Art8-2024

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-B / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Birds
Member State	Germany
Region/subregion	Baltic Sea
Report date	2024-10-15 10:22:35

BAL-DE-MS-001

Simplified table

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B
Feature	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Grazing birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds	Wading birds
Element	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya ferina	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya fuligula	Aythya marila	Aythya marila	Aythya marila	Aythya marila	Aythya marila	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Bucephala clangula	Clangula hyemalis	Clangula hyemalis	Clangula hyemalis	Clangula hyemalis	Clangula hyemalis	Clangula hyemalis	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta fusca	Melanitta nigra	Melanitta nigra	Melanitta nigra	Melanitta nigra	Melanitta nigra	Melanitta nigra	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Somateria mollissima	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas acuta	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anas platyrhynchos	Anser anser	Anser anser	Anser anser	Anser anser	Anser anser	Cygnus bewickii	Cygnus bewickii	Cygnus bewickii	Cygnus bewickii	Cygnus bewickii	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus cygnus	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Cygnus olor	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Fulica atra	Mareca penelope	Mareca penelope	Mareca penelope	Mareca penelope	Mareca penelope	Alca torda	Alca torda	Alca torda	Alca torda	Alca torda	Cepphus grylle	Cepphus grylle	Cepphus grylle	Cepphus grylle	Cepphus grylle	Gavia arctica	Gavia arctica	Gavia arctica	Gavia arctica	Gavia arctica	Gavia arctica	Gavia stellata	Gavia stellata	Gavia stellata	Gavia stellata	Gavia stellata	Gavia stellata	Mergellus albellus	Mergellus albellus	Mergellus albellus	Mergellus albellus	Mergellus albellus	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus merganser	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Mergus serrator	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Phalacrocorax carbo	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps auritus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps cristatus	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Podiceps grisegena	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Hydrocoloeus minutus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus argentatus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus canus	Larus fuscus	Larus fuscus	Larus fuscus	Larus fuscus	Larus fuscus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus marinus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Larus ridibundus	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna paradisaea	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sterna sandvicensis	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Anas crecca	Calidris alpina	Calidris alpina	Calidris alpina	Calidris alpina	Calidris alpina	Charadrius hiaticula	Charadrius hiaticula	Charadrius hiaticula	Charadrius hiaticula	Charadrius hiaticula	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Haematopus ostralegus	Philomachus pugnax	Philomachus pugnax	Philomachus pugnax	Philomachus pugnax	Philomachus pugnax	Recurvirostra avosetta	Recurvirostra avosetta	Recurvirostra avosetta	Recurvirostra avosetta	Recurvirostra avosetta	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna	Tadorna tadorna
Element extent
Trend element	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Improving	Improving	Improving	Improving	Improving	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Improving	Improving	Improving	Improving	Improving	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable
Element 2	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	non-breeding	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking	breaking
Element source	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU	EU
Criterion	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5
Parameter	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	BR	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Stranding	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	ABU-Breeding	Breeding success	Unknown	Unknown
Threshold value upper		0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7	0.7						0.7						0.7					0.7						0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7																0.7						0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7						0.7					0.7						0.7						0.7					0.7						0.7						0.7															0.7										0.7										0.7					0.7						0.7					0.7										0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7					0.7
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator		>=					>=					>=				<=	>=					>=				<=	>=	>=				<=	>=	>=				<=	>=	>=					>=				<=	>=	>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=				<=	>=				<=	>=	>=				<=	>=	>=					>=					>=					>=					>=				<=	>=	>=					>=					>=	>=				<=	>=	>=					>=					>=	>=				<=	>=	>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=	>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=					>=
Threshold qualitative																No by-catch										No by-catch						No by-catch	No significantly decreasing trend.					No by-catch	No significant negative stock trend										No by-catch	No significant negative stock trend																																																			No significantly decreasing trend.				No by-catch	No significantly decreasing trend.				No by-catch	No significantly decreasing trend.					No by-catch	No significantly decreasing trend.																									No by-catch	No significant negative stock trend											No significant negative stock trend					No by-catch	No significant negative stock trend											No significant negative stock trend					No by-catch	No significant negative stock trend						No significantly decreasing trend.					No significant negative stock trend										No significant negative stock trend										No significant negative stock trend															No significant negative stock trend											No significant negative stock trend
Threshold value source		Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention				Helsinki Convention	Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention				Helsinki Convention	Helsinki Convention	Helsinki Convention				Helsinki Convention	National	Helsinki Convention				Helsinki Convention	National	Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					National	Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention																Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention															Helsinki Convention										Helsinki Convention										Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention						Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention										Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention					Helsinki Convention
Value achieved upper		0.50705277723545					0.24328220087408					0.72184671131143					0.89211023272507					0.90567145153162					0.321	0.62050204466049						0.73029221214907						1.7800310458353					1.5661342445955						0.7644638281742					4.043049					0.981918					2.438866					0.64273					1.365894					0.616873					1.29432					1.101209					2.611967																0.54327626952487						3.2396533592758					1.9501134176086					1.875					1.8203599553507					0.49413091172569						0.90538247478936					1.3417704474281						1.7814965704916						2.6114546647707					1.0151334565028						1.6464319563023						0.86397840064234															0.787437										0.46653934325119										9.781163					2.3987						0.53905															0.541746					0.378962					0.343661					1.060986					2.016545					0.034931					0.835092					0.65421										0.888089					1.063212
Value achieved lower
Value unit		index					index					index				no unit	index					index				no unit	index	index				no unit	no unit	index				no unit	no unit	index					index				no unit	no unit	index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					no unit				no unit	no unit				no unit	no unit	index				no unit	no unit	index					index					index					index					index				no unit	no unit	index					index					no unit	index				no unit	no unit	index					index					no unit	index				no unit	no unit	index					no unit					no unit					index					no unit					index					no unit					index					index					no unit	index					index					no unit					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index					index
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend parameter	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Improving	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Improving	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Improving	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Not assessed	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	No	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	No	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description parameter																Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.										Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Valuation based on offshore censuses. The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Assessment based on coastal censuses. The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.									Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.																																																		Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses. In the context of the MSFD 2018 reporting, the element was not assessed with this indicator, so no trend is reported.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses. In the context of the MSFD 2018 reporting, the element was not assessed with this indicator, so no trend is reported.					Assessment based on coastal censuses.										Assessment based on coastal censuses.									Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses.										Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses. In the context of the MSFD 2018 reporting, the element was not assessed with this indicator, so no trend is reported.										Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring. In the context of the MSFD 2018 reporting, the element was not assessed with this indicator, so no trend is reported.	Assessment based on coastal censuses.				Due to the time-spatial overlap between the presence of the species and fishing activities causing by-catches of this species (gillnet fishing), it can be assumed that by-catches are taking place (assessment method 3 of the HELCOM indicator ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds in fishing gear’). The criterion was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated.	Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses. In the context of the MSFD 2018 reporting, the element was not assessed with this indicator, so no trend is reported.					Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.					The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.										Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.																									Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.	Assessment based on coastal censuses.										The parameter was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Stock trend in the offshore area due to seabird monitoring.
Related indicator	HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi				HELC_BIOD_DrMaWb	Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)					Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)	HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					Trend der Artpopulation (Daten aus nationalem Monitoring und Literaturquellen)					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbWi					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr					HELC_BIOD_AbWbBr
Criteria status	Not assessed	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Good	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown		Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not relevant	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Not relevant	Good	Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown
Description criteria	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.		There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.			There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	Operational indicators to assess breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species distribution (criterion D1C4) and habitat status (criterion D1C5) do not yet exist				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).					There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).		Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C2.	There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).				There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).		Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C2.	There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).			There is insufficient data to assess criterion D1C3.	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).	There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good
Description element	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here. In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here. In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here. In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here. In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here. In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here	Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	In the context of the 2018 MSFD report, breeding and resting birds were assessed together, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	Insufficient data basis for the assessment for this species. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Insufficient data basis for the assessment for this species. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Insufficient data basis for the assessment for this species. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Insufficient data basis for the assessment for this species. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	Insufficient data basis for the assessment for this species. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The element was not assessed in the 2018 MSFD reporting, so no trend is indicated. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The species is co-assessed in the group of waders because, like them, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The species is co-assessed in the group of waders because, like them, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The species is co-assessed in the group of waders because, like them, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The species is co-assessed in the group of waders because, like them, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The species is co-assessed in the group of waders because, like them, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	An assessment of the species is not possible due to a lack of data. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	An assessment of the species is not possible due to a lack of data. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	An assessment of the species is not possible due to a lack of data. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	An assessment of the species is not possible due to a lack of data. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	An assessment of the species is not possible due to a lack of data. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.	The species is co-assessed in the wading birds group because, like the wafer, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The species is co-assessed in the wading birds group because, like the wafer, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The species is co-assessed in the wading birds group because, like the wafer, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The species is co-assessed in the wading birds group because, like the wafer, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.	The species is co-assessed in the wading birds group because, like the wafer, it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. Primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area under consideration here.
Source assessment feature	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM
Reporting method feature	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C	Type C
Trend feature	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable
Integration rule type parameter	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE
Integration rule description parameter	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.	Where regional and national parameter assessments are available for a criterion, the regional assessment shall be taken into account as a priority, but the national assessment shall also be reported.
Integration rule type criteria	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE	TREE
Integration rule description criteria	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.	The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition when all criteria meet the respective thresholds (the envisaged decision tree is equivalent to OOAO per element based on criteria evaluated only 1-2). At the level of species groups, the criteria are then no longer taken into account in a differentiated manner.
GES extent threshold	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00	75.00
GES extent achieved	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	30.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	78.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	50.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	54.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00	67.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group
GES achieved	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES achieved by 2018	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Number of drowned mammals and Waterbirds’, ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used, partly supplemented by trend data for other types of open Baltic Sea with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.	For the assessment of the species groups, the HELCOM indicators ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the breeding season’ and ‘Abundance of Waterbirds in the wintering season’ and the associated threshold values were used. If 75 % of the bird species in a functional group reach good status, the group is assessed as ‘good’. Breeding and resting occurrences of a species are assessed independently as separate elements in accordance with Article 8 MSFD Assessment Guidance.
Assessments period	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2 UZO3.4 UZO4.3 UZO4.5 UZO4.6 UZO5	UZO2 UZO3.1 UZO3.2