Member State report / Art9 / 2012 / D1-M / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Belgium |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | FPS Health, Food Chain safety and Environment - Service Marine environment |
Report date | 2012-08-16 |
Report access | ANSBE_MSFD9GES_20130314.xml |
GES component |
D1
|
1.1 Species distribution |
1.1.1 Species distributional range |
1.1.2 Species distributional pattern |
1.1.3 Area covered by species |
1.2 Population size |
1.2.1 Population abundance |
1.3 Population condition |
1.3.1 Population demographic characteristics |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method used |
ANS-BE-MS-1: Conform the Directive, GES and the environmental targets for the Belgian marine waters are defined on the basis of the eleven qualitative descriptors listed in Annex I of the Directive. The definition of GES is expressed in a qualitative description of what GES would look like when achieved for each of the descriptors. This is then underpinned by a set of more detailed quantitative environmental targets based on established environmental thresholds/limits for state, pressure or impact (Art. 10). Where quantitative environmental thresholds could not be set, trend-based or qualitative thresholds were used. The complete package of GES and environmental targets needs to give a complete and balanced overview. |
ANS-BE-MS-1: Conform the Directive, GES and the environmental targets for the Belgian marine waters are defined on the basis of the eleven qualitative descriptors listed in Annex I of the Directive. The definition of GES is expressed in a qualitative description of what GES would look like when achieved for each of the descriptors. This is then underpinned by a set of more detailed quantitative environmental targets based on established environmental thresholds/limits for state, pressure or impact (Art. 10). Where quantitative environmental thresholds could not be set, trend-based or qualitative thresholds were used. The complete package of GES and environmental targets needs to give a complete and balanced overview. |
ANS-BE-MS-1: Conform the Directive, GES and the environmental targets for the Belgian marine waters are defined on the basis of the eleven qualitative descriptors listed in Annex I of the Directive. The definition of GES is expressed in a qualitative description of what GES would look like when achieved for each of the descriptors. This is then underpinned by a set of more detailed quantitative environmental targets based on established environmental thresholds/limits for state, pressure or impact (Art. 10). Where quantitative environmental thresholds could not be set, trend-based or qualitative thresholds were used. The complete package of GES and environmental targets needs to give a complete and balanced overview. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine reporting units |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feature |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criterion/indicator |
D1 |
1.1 |
1.1.1 |
1.1.2 |
1.1.3 |
1.2 |
1.2.1 |
1.3 |
1.3.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
GES description |
Biological diversity is maintained. The quality and occurrence of habitats and the distribution and abundance of
species are in line with prevailing physiographic, geographic and climatic conditions. |
1) Good conditions according to the Water Framework Directive (i.e. good ecological status), Habitats and Birds Directives (i.e. favourable conservation status) and OSPAR (i.e. ecological quality objectives) are attained. Rare and threatened habitat types and species, included in existing legislation and conventions, are protected to the level envisaged by that legislation or convention. 2) The habitat types and constituting species’ populations extent, distribution and condition minimally reflect the conditions described in the Initial Assessment of Belgian waters (2012). 3) Diversity within the different ecosystem components (i.e. plankton, benthos, fish, seabirds and marine mammals) is maintained. |
1) Good conditions according to the Water Framework Directive (i.e. good ecological status), Habitats and Birds Directives (i.e. favourable conservation status) and OSPAR (i.e. ecological quality objectives) are attained. Rare and threatened habitat types and species, included in existing legislation and conventions, are protected to the level envisaged by that legislation or convention. 2) The habitat types and constituting species’ populations extent, distribution and condition minimally reflect the conditions described in the Initial Assessment of Belgian waters (2012). 3) The habitat types are structurally and functionally diverse and productive. 4) Diversity within the different ecosystem components (i.e. plankton, benthos, fish, seabirds and marine mammals) is maintained. |
1) Good conditions according to the Water Framework Directive (i.e. good ecological status), Habitats and Birds Directives (i.e. favourable conservation status) and OSPAR (i.e. ecological quality objectives) are attained. Rare and threatened habitat types and species, included in existing legislation and conventions, are protected to the level envisaged by that legislation or convention. 2) The habitat types and constituting species’ populations extent, distribution and condition minimally reflect the conditions described in the Initial Assessment of Belgian waters (2012). 3) Diversity within the different ecosystem components (i.e. plankton, benthos, fish, seabirds and marine mammals) is maintained. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold values |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion of area to achieve threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference point type |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline |
Initial Assessment 2012, Good environmental status (MSFD), Good ecological status (WFD) and Favourable conservation status (Birds and Habitat Directive) |
Initial Assessment 2012, Good environmental status (MSFD), Good ecological status (WFD) and Favourable conservation status (Birds and Habitat Directive) |
Initial Assessment 2012, Good environmental status (MSFD), Good ecological status (WFD) and Favourable conservation status (Birds and Habitat Directive) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment method |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development status |