Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-R / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Reptiles |
Member State | Belgium |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Reporter not found |
Report date | Date not found; 2020-10-29 |
Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name | MP_D1_4_6_Birds |
MP_D1_4_6_Birds |
MP_D1_4_6_Fish |
MP_D1_4_6_Mammals |
MP_D1_4_6_SeabedHabitats |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme | |||||
Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID | |||||
Q4e - Programme ID | ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds |
ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds |
ANSBE-D1, 4 Fish/Cephalopods |
ANSBE-D1, 4 Mammals/Reptiles |
ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed habitats |
|
Q4f - Programme description | The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity – Birds’ aims at assessing the following ETs:
• ET1 : Changes in breeding seabird abundance remain within target limits for 75% of the species monitored;
• ET2: The 5 year running mean species density is not below the long-term mean annual population size for 5 consecutive years for minimally half of the non-scavenging seabird species;
• ET3: The 5 year running mean species density is not above the long-term mean annual population size for 5 consecutive years for minimally two of the scavenging seabird species;
• ET4: For each of the scavenging seabirds species, are the mean densities over 5 consecutive years not below the minimum defined by the Birds Directive favourable conservation status
Two sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds-SP1 (delivering data to assess ET1), targeting the number of nesting gulls and terns in the port of Zeebrugge and other coastal breeding sites;
• ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds-SP2 (delivering data to assess ET2 to 4), targeting ship-based seabird counts
covering the Eastern part of the Belgian North Sea with at least 1 count per month |
The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity – Birds’ aims at assessing the following ETs:
• ET1 : Changes in breeding seabird abundance remain within target limits for 75% of the species monitored;
• ET2: The 5 year running mean species density is not below the long-term mean annual population size for 5 consecutive years for minimally half of the non-scavenging seabird species;
• ET3: The 5 year running mean species density is not above the long-term mean annual population size for 5 consecutive years for minimally two of the scavenging seabird species;
• ET4: For each of the scavenging seabirds species, are the mean densities over 5 consecutive years not below the minimum defined by the Birds Directive favourable conservation status
Two sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds-SP1 (delivering data to assess ET1), targeting the number of nesting gulls and terns in the port of Zeebrugge and other coastal breeding sites;
• ANSBE-D1, 4 Birds-SP2 (delivering data to assess ET2 to 4), targeting ship-based seabird counts
covering the Eastern part of the Belgian North Sea with at least 1 count per month |
The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity - Fish and cephalopods’ aims at assessing the following ET:
• ET 6: Positive trend in the number of individuals of thornback ray Raja clavata
One sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE- D1,4 Fish-SP3 (delivering data to assess ET6), targeting the quantification of the number of thornback rays through the BTS and the DYFS surveys |
The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity - mammals and reptiles’ aims at assessing the following ET:
• ET 5: The yearly number of incidentally bycaught harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena is less than 1,7 % of the best estimate of the population size
One sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE-D1, 4 Mammals-SP4 (delivering data to assess ET5), targeting different data sources to estimate the rate of incidentally caught harbour porpoises in Belgium vs. the average population size in Belgian waters. |
The Belgian MSFD monitoring programme ‘Biodiversity - seabed habitats’ aims at assessing the following ETs:
• ET7 : The spatial extent and distribution of the EUNIS level 3 habitats (sandy mud to mud, muddy sands to sands and coarse grained sediments), as well as that of gravel beds fluctuate - relative to the reference state as described in Initial Assessment - within a margin limited to the accuracy of the current distribution maps
• ET10: The Ecological Quality Ratio as determined by BEQI, indicative for benthic ecosystem structure and quality, has a minimum value of 0,60 in each of the habitat types
• ET11: Positive trend in median adult density (or frequency of occurrence) of at least one species within the long-lived and/or slowly reproducing and key engineering benthic species groups in both mud to muddy sands and pure fine to coarse sands
• ET12: Spring median benthic bioturbation potential (BPc) in the Abra alba habitat type is higher than 100
• ET13: Positive trend in median colony/body size of the sessile, long-lived and/or larger benthic species Buccinum undatum, Mytilus edulis, Flustra foliacea, Haliclona oculata and Alcyonium digitatum
• ET14 – Positive trend in frequency of occurrence and median adult density of at least half of the key and long-lived species Ostrea edulis, Sabellaria spinulosa, Mytilus edulis, Buccinum undatum, Haliclona oculata, Alcyonium digitatum and Alcyonidium spp
• ET15 – No loss or positive trend in species richness within all key hard substrate taxa, i.e. Porifera, Cnidaria, Bryozoa, Polychaeta, Malacostraca, Maxillopoda, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Echinodermata and Ascidiacea
• ET16 – Decreasing relative frequency of occurrence of damaged Asterias rubens (2+ cm arm length) and tube clusters of Pomatoceros triqueter, indicative for physical disturbance of the bottom (= pressure indicator), as to enhance natural development of the gravel bed ecosystem (= desired state)
• ET17: For each of the scavenging seabirds species, are the mean densities over 5 consecutive years not below the minimum defined by the Birds Directive favourable conservation status
Six sub-programmes can be discerned:
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP5 (delivering data to assess ET7), targeting a full-coverage seabed and transect seabed mapping of selected areas at EUNIS level 3;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP6 (delivering data to assess ET10), targeting the quantification of a composite index based on density, biomass, species richness and species composition of the macrobenthos at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP7 (delivering data to assess ET11), targeting the quantification of long-lived and key engineering benthic species density at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP8 (delivering data to assess ET12), targeting the quantification of the macrobenthic community bioturbation potential at selected stations in the BPNS;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP9 (delivering data to assess ET13 to 16), targeting body/colony size of characteristic hard substrate species, frequency of occurrence and densities in a non-bottom fisheries-impacted, a low impacted and regular fisheries-impacted area;
• ANSBE-D1, 4, 6 Seabed-SP10 (delivering data to assess ET17), targeting multibeam bathymetry and backscatter measurements in combination with visual observations and seabed sampling in a gravel bed in the Hinder Banks region and a gravel bed in the Flemish Banks region |
|
Q5e - Natural variability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods | Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | ||||||
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
|
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment |
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
The link between bycatch rate in stranded porpoises and porpoises at sea will be investigated through national scientific projects. |
A research proposal has been submitted to the Belgian Science Policy Office to strengthen capacity to develop improved methods and strategies for the acoustic mapping of seabed/habitat types in a monitoring context, hence emphasising on quantifying uncertainties in the mapping process needed for accurate change detection |
|
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target | Target 1 Target 2 Target 3 Target 4 |
Target 1 Target 2 Target 3 Target 4 |
Target 6 |
Target 5 |
Target 7 Target 10 Target 11 Target 12 Target 13 Target 14 Target 15 Target 16 Target 17 |
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator | Target 1 Target 2 Target 3 Target 4 |
Target 1 Target 2 Target 3 Target 4 |
Target 6 |
Target 5 |
Target 7 Target 10 Target 11 Target 12 Target 13 Target 14 Target 15 Target 16 Target 17 |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods | Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity | Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
Q6c - Target updating | N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment |
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
|
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2018 |
By2018 |
|
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment |
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
N.A.
|
The link between bycatch rate in stranded porpoises and porpoises at sea will be investigated through national scientific projects |
A research proposal has been submitted to the Belgian Science Policy Office to strengthen capacity to develop improved methods and strategies for the acoustic mapping of seabed/habitat types in a monitoring context, hence emphasising on quantifying uncertainties in the mapping process needed for accurate change detection |
|
Q7a - Relevant activities | ||||||
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | ||||||
Q7c - Relevant measures | ||||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data | |||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods | |||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES | |||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity | |||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures | |||||
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures | |||||
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | ||||||
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
By2014 |
|
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID | |||||
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Seabed habitats - distribution and extent |
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID | |||||
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name | Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Seabed habitats - distribution and extent |
Q4k - Monitoring purpose | ||||||
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | ||||||
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats | |||||
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
|
|
|
|
|
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
|
||||
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
|
||||
Q9a - Elements | ||||||
Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output | |||||
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity | |||||
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other | |||||
Q41 Spatial scope | ||||||
Q4j - Description of spatial scope | ||||||
Marine Unit IDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date | - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | ||||||
Q9c - Monitoring method | ||||||
Q9d - Description of alteration to method | ||||||
Q9e - Quality assurance | ||||||
Q9f - Quality control | ||||||
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % | |||||
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples | |||||
Q9i - Description of sample representivity | ||||||
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | ||||||
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | ||||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type | |||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism | |||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights | |||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard | |||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available | |||||
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency | |||||
Q10d - Description of data access | ||||||
Descriptor |
|
---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
|
Coverage of GES criteria |
|
Gaps and plans |
|
Related targets |
|
Coverage of targets |
|
Related measures |
|
Coverage of measures |
|
Related monitoring programmes |
|
Programme code |
|
Programme name |
|
Update type |
|
Old programme codes |
|
Programme description |
|
Monitoring purpose |
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|
Monitoring details |
|
Features |
|
Elements |
|
GES criteria |
|
Parameters |
|
Parameter Other |
|
Spatial scope |
|
Marine reporting units |
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
|
Monitoring frequency |
|
Monitoring type |
|
Monitoring method |
|
Monitoring method other |
|
Quality control |
|
Data management |
|
Data access |
|
Related indicator/name |
|
Contact |
|
References |