Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D10 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D10 Litter
Member State Belgium
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report date 2026-01-13 14:08:15

Belgian Part of the North Sea (ANS-BE-MS-1)

Regional assessment area
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
plastic-in-fulmar-qsr23-ospar-South-Eastern North Sea
Component MRUs
GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Bags
Bottles
Cloth/textile
Fishing
Glass/ceramics
Glass/ceramics
Glass/ceramics
Macrolitter (all)
Macrolitter (all)
Metal
Metal
Natural
Other materials
Other materials
Paper/cardboard
Processed/worked wood
Undefined
Undefined
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Element extent
Trend element
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Deteriorating
Element 2
Fulmarus glacialis
Element source
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
OSPAR
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C2
D10C3
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on coastline
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on coastline
Amount on coastline
Amount on coastline
Concentration in sediment
Concentration in water
AMO-B
Threshold value upper
20.0
0.1
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Not applicable
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
211.0
69.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
246.0
75.0
14.0
6.0
54.0
9.0
8.0
8.0
10.0
331.0
57.0
Value achieved lower
17.0
64.0
2.0
21.0
69.0
4.0
6.0
17.0
Value unit
items/100m
percentage
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
percentage
items/100m
percentage
items/100m
percentage
items/100m
percentage
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
items/100l
g/stomach
Proportion threshold value
10.0
Proportion value achieved
55.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% of samples achieving threshold value
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Deteriorating
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
No
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
No
Description parameter
Kunstmatige polymeermaterialen on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Gemiddelde (jaarlijkse min-max) kans dat de sleep afval bevat.
Doek/textiel on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Glas/Keramiek on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Keramiek/aardewerk on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Gemiddelde (jaarlijkse min-max) kans dat de sleep afval bevat. Cat D.
Macrolitter (alle) on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Gemiddelde (jaarlijkse min-max) kans dat de sleep afval bevat.
Metaal on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Gemiddelde (jaarlijkse min-max) kans dat de sleep afval bevat. Cat B.
Other materials: Rubber on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Other materials: Rubber. Gemiddelde (jaarlijkse min-max) kans dat de sleep afval bevat. Cat C.
Papier/karton on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Hout Bewerkt on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Medisch afval on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Sanitair afval on coastline (Belgian beaches)
Microafvaldeeltjes tussen 100 µm en 5 mm worden sinds 2020 geanalyseerd in zeebodemsediment en in zeewater in het Belgische deel van de Noordzee (D10C2). Aangezien zeebodemsediment beschouwd wordt als afzetplaats voor microplastics in het milieu, zijn metingen in sediment het meest geschikt voor langetermijn-monitoring van microplasticvervuiling. Microplastics blijken alomtegenwoordig te zijn met ongeveer 9 keer hogere aantallen dicht bij de kust (102-331 deeltjes/kg dw) vergeleken met offshore waarden rond de detectiegrens (17-25 deeltjes/kg dw). De kleinste groottecategorie (100-299 µm) kwam het meest voor en fragmenten waren het meest vertegenwoordigde type deeltje.
De resultaten voor microplasticsdeeltjes in oppervlaktewaterstalen van 2020-2021 laten een vergelijkbaar verschil zien tussen kust en offshore, met meer vezels dan fragmenten. Er werd een grote variatie waargenomen bij het kuststation, wat typisch is voor microplastics in water. Ze zijn zeer mobiel en worden bijgevolg sterk beïnvloed door meteorologische en hydrodynamische omstandigheden. Met de voortzetting van de gegevensverzameling in het BNZ, geïntegreerd in een multidisciplinair monitoringaanpak, zal meer kennis worden vergaard over zowel de evolutie als de dynamiek in ons gebied.
Fulmar Threshold Value = [ThresholdValueUpper] + [ProportionThresholdValue]
Related indicator
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-BLITTER-2024
  • ANS-BE-ML-SED-2024
  • ANS-BE-ML-WAT-2024
  • ANS-BE-PLASTIC-FUL-STMCH-2024;plastic-in-fulmar-qsr23-ospar
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Description criteria
microlitter in sediment and water
microlitter in sediment and water
In the South-eastern North Sea to which Belgium belongs, 50% of the fulmar stomachs contained > 0.1 g plastics and here on average 21 particles and 0.27 g per bird were found (see Kühn et al. 2022 for more details and standard errors). During the 2014 to 2018 period only 12 birds were found in Belgium (see Figure 2), which does not allow a further breakdown to national levels.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Description element
Kunstmatige polymeermaterialen (beach and seafloor)
Kunstmatige polymeermaterialen (beach and seafloor)
Composition and spatial distribution of litter on the seafloor: seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
Composition and spatial distribution of litter on the seafloor: seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
Doek/textiel (beach and seafloor)
Composition and spatial distribution of litter on the seafloor: seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
Keramiek/aardewerk (beach and seafloor)
Keramiek/aardewerk (beach and seafloor)
Keramiek/aardewerk (beach and seafloor)
Macrolitter (alle) (beach and seafloor)
Macrolitter (alle) (beach and seafloor)
Metaal (beach and seafloor)
Metaal (beach and seafloor)
Composition and spatial distribution of litter on the seafloor: seafloor-litter-qsr23-ospar-Greater North Sea
Rubber (beach and seafloor)
Rubber (beach and seafloor)
Papier/karton (beach and seafloor)
Hout Bewerkt (beach and seafloor)
Medisch and Sanitair afval (beach and seafloor)
Medisch and Sanitair afval (beach and seafloor)
Microafvaldeeltjes tussen 100 µm en 5 mm worden sinds 2020 geanalyseerd in zeebodemsediment en in zeewater in het Belgische deel van de Noordzee (D10C2). Aangezien zeebodemsediment beschouwd wordt als afzetplaats voor microplastics in het milieu, zijn metingen in sediment het meest geschikt voor langetermijn-monitoring van microplasticvervuiling. Microplastics blijken alomtegenwoordig te zijn met ongeveer 9 keer hogere aantallen dicht bij de kust (102-331 deeltjes/kg dw) vergeleken met offshore waarden rond de detectiegrens (17-25 deeltjes/kg dw). De kleinste groottecategorie (100-299 µm) kwam het meest voor en fragmenten waren het meest vertegenwoordigde type deeltje. De resultaten voor microplasticsdeeltjes in oppervlaktewaterstalen van 2020-2021 laten een vergelijkbaar verschil zien tussen kust en offshore, met meer vezels dan fragmenten. Er werd een grote variatie waargenomen bij het kuststation, wat typisch is voor microplastics in water. Ze zijn zeer mobiel en worden bijgevolg sterk beïnvloed door meteorologische en hydrodynamische omstandigheden. Met de voortzetting van de gegevensverzameling in het BNZ, geïntegreerd in een multidisciplinair monitoringaanpak, zal meer kennis worden vergaard over zowel de evolutie als de dynamiek in ons gebied.
Microafvaldeeltjes tussen 100 µm en 5 mm worden sinds 2020 geanalyseerd in zeebodemsediment en in zeewater in het Belgische deel van de Noordzee (D10C2). Aangezien zeebodemsediment beschouwd wordt als afzetplaats voor microplastics in het milieu, zijn metingen in sediment het meest geschikt voor langetermijn-monitoring van microplasticvervuiling. Microplastics blijken alomtegenwoordig te zijn met ongeveer 9 keer hogere aantallen dicht bij de kust (102-331 deeltjes/kg dw) vergeleken met offshore waarden rond de detectiegrens (17-25 deeltjes/kg dw). De kleinste groottecategorie (100-299 µm) kwam het meest voor en fragmenten waren het meest vertegenwoordigde type deeltje. De resultaten voor microplasticsdeeltjes in oppervlaktewaterstalen van 2020-2021 laten een vergelijkbaar verschil zien tussen kust en offshore, met meer vezels dan fragmenten. Er werd een grote variatie waargenomen bij het kuststation, wat typisch is voor microplastics in water. Ze zijn zeer mobiel en worden bijgevolg sterk beïnvloed door meteorologische en hydrodynamische omstandigheden. Met de voortzetting van de gegevensverzameling in het BNZ, geïntegreerd in een multidisciplinair monitoringaanpak, zal meer kennis worden vergaard over zowel de evolutie als de dynamiek in ons gebied.
In the South-eastern North Sea to which Belgium belongs, 50% of the fulmar stomachs contained > 0.1 g plastics and here on average 21 particles and 0.27 g per bird were found (see Kühn et al. 2022 for more details and standard errors). During the 2014 to 2018 period only 12 birds were found in Belgium (see Figure 2), which does not allow a further breakdown to national levels. (plastic-in-fulmar-qsr23-ospar-South-Eastern North Sea)
Source assessment feature
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • OSPAR
  • National
  • National
  • OSPAR
Reporting method feature
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type D
Type D
Type A
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Unknown
Unknown
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
Because of frequent beach clean-ups, the amount of litter on the Belgian coast is an indication of the cleanliness of the beach, rather than a representative figure on the amount of beached litter items. Nevertheless, the results always exceed the threshold of 20 items/100 m. Plastic (84%) is the most common material encountered. At OSPAR level, beach litter levels remain high with plastic items predominating. Over the last six years, significant decreases in litter and plastic abundance have been observed in the Greater North Sea. To substantially reduce marine litter, it is necessary to continue current efforts and take additional measures. Seafloor litter is widespread across the assessed area. Fisheries-related items and plastic materials predominate. In the North Sea, the chance of finding litter has increased. High variability in seafloor litter distribution can be noted in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Litter linked to fisheries accounts for 31 to 52% of all collected seafloor litter items. More litter items were observed at dredged spoil disposal site Zeebrugge-Oost which should be further investigated.
About 9 times more microliter particles in the seabed sediments at the coastal station compared to offshore were found. The smallest particles (100-299µm) are the most abundant and fragments are the most represented particle shape. A positive correlation with organic matter and amount of silt was observed. Complementary, near the coast 8 times more microlitter particles were found in seawater compared to offshore, with the big majority being fibres. The number of microplastic particles in the water column is low ant varies a lot at the same station. Since microplastics tend to accumulate in sediment, seabed sediment appears to be the priority matrix for long-term monitoring.
About 9 times more microliter particles in the seabed sediments at the coastal station compared to offshore were found. The smallest particles (100-299µm) are the most abundant and fragments are the most represented particle shape. A positive correlation with organic matter and amount of silt was observed. Complementary, near the coast 8 times more microlitter particles were found in seawater compared to offshore, with the big majority being fibres. The number of microplastic particles in the water column is low ant varies a lot at the same station. Since microplastics tend to accumulate in sediment, seabed sediment appears to be the priority matrix for long-term monitoring.
Currently 51% of beached North Sea Fulmars have more than 0,1g of plastics in their stomachs, exceeding the Fulmar Threshold Value (Fulmar-TV) of 10%. This reflects the abundance of floating litter and provides an indication of harm. The amounts of ingested plastics have decreased significantly in the period 2009 to 2018. At OSPAR level, over the past ten years, a slight reduction in the mass of plastic in Northern Fulmar stomachs was observed in the North Sea, but the threshold value of less than 10% of Fulmars exceeding 0.1 g of plastic in their stomachs was far from being achieved.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2020
2020
2014-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
Related targets
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
  • D10.1
  • D10.2
  • D10.3
  • D10.4
  • D10.5
  • D10.6
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Test results
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False