Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D6 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State Belgium
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report date 2026-01-13 14:08:15

Belgian Part of the North Sea (ANS-BE-MS-1)

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral sand
Infralittoral sand
Infralittoral sand
Littoral sediment
Littoral sediment
Littoral sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Offshore circalittoral sand
Element extent
0.5
0.5
0.5
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.2
27.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.6
3.6
3.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
51.1
51.1
51.1
51.1
51.1
51.1
Trend element
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Element 2
Element source
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C3
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C5
D6C5
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Abundance
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Abundance
DIV
HAB-CON index BQI
HAB-CON index BQI
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Abundance
DIV
HAB-CON index BQI
HAB-CON index BQI
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Abundance
DIV
Size - mean
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical disturbance
Extent of physical loss
Abundance
DIV
HAB-CON index BQI
Extent
Extent
Threshold value upper
25.0
2.0
0.8
25.0
2.0
0.8
0.6
0.6
25.0
25.0
2.0
0.8
0.6
0.6
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
2.0
25.0
25.0
2.0
0.8
0.6
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative
Increasing trend
Increasing trend
Increasing trend
Increasing trend
Increasing trend
Increasing trend
Threshold value source
EU
EU
OSPAR Convention
EU
EU
OSPAR Convention
EU
EU
EU
OSPAR Convention
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
39.3
71.0
0.49
0.2
49.5
0.49
46.4
17.5
13.5
82.8
52.3
0.2
41.4
3397.0
1.4
Value achieved lower
3184.0
Value unit
percentage
percentage
index - relative Margalef diversity
percentage
percentage
index - relative Margalef diversity
Ratio-EQR
Ratio-EQR
percentage
percentage
percentage
index - relative Margalef diversity
Ratio-EQR
Ratio-EQR
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
index - relative Margalef diversity
Ratio-EQR
square kilometre
square kilometre
Proportion threshold value
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Proportion value achieved
0.1
0.5
0.4
Proportion threshold value unit
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
% area of habitat adversely affected
Trend parameter
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Deteriorating
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Deteriorating
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Yes
No
Unknown
Yes
No
No
No
No
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
No
No
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Yes
No
No
No
Unknown
Yes
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Description parameter
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 6.9 (39,3) - km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 217 (71,0) ↓ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions.
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV.
Ind2: Bioturbation potential for Abra alba habitat (soft sediment): BPc using BEQI tool
Ind7: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive sand extraction (Ind7): 2,1 (0,2%) ↓ km2 (%)
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 471 (49,5) ↓ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions.
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV.
Ind2: Bioturbation potential for Abra alba habitat (soft sediment): BPc using BEQI tool
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 4,4 (46,4) ↓ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 22 (17,5) ↓ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 3,4 (13,5) - km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 211 (82,8) ↑ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions.
Ind3: The ecological status of subtidal natural hard substrate biotopes in Belgian waters: Median body size and relative occurrence of the selected indicator species.
Ind4: Median body size and relative occurrence of the selected indicator species
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 9,9 (52,3) ↓ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind7: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive sand extraction (Ind7): 3,2 (0,2 %) ↑ km2 (%)
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 739 (41,4) ↑ km2 (%)
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made.
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions.
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV.
Physical disturbance has been calculated per activity. Fishery affects approximately the whole area based on the current grid data (OSPAR). Other human activities account for a disturbed area of 2.5 à 3% per year with as two most important activities sand extraction ranging from 1.93 to 2.69% and dredging& dumping from 0.29 to 0.73. (link doc lars) fishery: ospar indicator)
Physical loss has been calculated per activity, for windmills and energy cables the surface doubled with an insignificant increase of 0.12 km2 during the period 2012 till 2016.
Related indicator
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTH-COND-2024
  • condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BPc-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-KSP-2024
  • condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BPc-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024;ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-KSP-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTH-COND-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTH-COND-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-DIST-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-H-S-2024; ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-KSP-2024
  • condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar
  • ANS-BE-BENTS-BEQI-F-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
  • ANS-BE-BENT-PHYS-2024
Criteria status
Not good
Good
Not relevant
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Not relevant
Unknown
Good
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Not relevant
Not good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description criteria
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
Area < 20km2
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
Area < 20km2
Fysical disturbance unknown (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
Fysical disturbance < 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
Area < 20km2
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction)
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent.
Element status
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description element
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%.
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%.
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%.
Source assessment feature
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev).
Since 1992, physical disturbance, mainly by bottom trawling fisheries, exceeded 90 % for all habitat types (excluding littoral sediment) with a small decrease offshore due to exclusion of fisheries in wind farms.
Since 1992, physical loss of each habitat type remained below 2 % of its natural extent.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
  • D1.10
  • D1.11
  • D1.12
  • D1.13
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Test results
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
False
False
False
False