Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D6 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Report date | 2026-01-13 14:08:15 |
Belgian Part of the North Sea (ANS-BE-MS-1)
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
D6
|
Feature |
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Element |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral coarse sediment |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral mud |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Circalittoral sand |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral mud |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
Infralittoral sand |
Littoral sediment |
Littoral sediment |
Littoral sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral mud |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
||
Element extent |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
51.1 |
51.1 |
51.1 |
51.1 |
51.1 |
51.1 |
||
Trend element |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C3
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C5
|
D6C2
|
D6C1
|
Parameter |
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Abundance
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Abundance
|
DIV
|
HAB-CON index BQI
|
HAB-CON index BQI
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Abundance
|
DIV
|
HAB-CON index BQI
|
HAB-CON index BQI
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Abundance
|
DIV
|
Size - mean
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical disturbance
|
Extent of physical loss
|
Abundance
|
DIV
|
HAB-CON index BQI
|
Extent
|
Extent
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
25.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
2.0 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Increasing trend
|
Increasing trend
|
Increasing trend
|
Increasing trend
|
Increasing trend
|
Increasing trend
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
EU
|
EU
|
OSPAR Convention
|
EU
|
EU
|
OSPAR Convention
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
OSPAR Convention
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
EU
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
39.3 |
71.0 |
0.49 |
0.2 |
49.5 |
0.49 |
46.4 |
17.5 |
13.5 |
82.8 |
52.3 |
0.2 |
41.4 |
3397.0 |
1.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
3184.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
percentage
|
percentage
|
index - relative Margalef diversity
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
index - relative Margalef diversity
|
Ratio-EQR
|
Ratio-EQR
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
index - relative Margalef diversity
|
Ratio-EQR
|
Ratio-EQR
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
index - relative Margalef diversity
|
Ratio-EQR
|
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
% area of habitat adversely affected |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
||||
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
||||
Description parameter |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 6.9 (39,3) - km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 217 (71,0) ↓ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions. |
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea |
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV. |
Ind2: Bioturbation potential for Abra alba habitat (soft sediment): BPc using BEQI tool |
Ind7: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive sand extraction (Ind7): 2,1 (0,2%) ↓ km2 (%) |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 471 (49,5) ↓ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions. |
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea |
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV. |
Ind2: Bioturbation potential for Abra alba habitat (soft sediment): BPc using BEQI tool |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 4,4 (46,4) ↓ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 22 (17,5) ↓ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 3,4 (13,5) - km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 211 (82,8) ↑ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions. |
Ind3: The ecological status of subtidal natural hard substrate biotopes in Belgian waters: Median body size and relative occurrence of the selected indicator species. |
Ind4: Median body size and relative occurrence of the selected indicator species |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 9,9 (52,3) ↓ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind7: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive sand extraction (Ind7): 3,2 (0,2 %) ↑ km2 (%) |
Ind6: Extent of physical disturbance due to intensive fishery (Ind6): 739 (41,4) ↑ km2 (%) |
Extent of direct habitat loss. Only pilot assessments wrt indirect loss could be made. |
Ind5: No increasing trend in the occurrence or densities of one of the selected key species was observed. Within the BPNS, 5 distinct macrobenthic communities (Breine et al., 2018) were distinguished, but for analytical purposes of this indicator, they are grouped in the following habitat types: (a) mud (Macoma balthica), (b) fine to medium sand (Abra alba) and (c) medium to coarse sand (Nephtys cirrosa – Ophelia borealis). However, the epi-benthic communities are divided into two distinct spatial zones: (1) coastal and (2) offshore, which are composed of distinct epibenthic species compositions. |
Ind8: condition-benthic-hab-margalef-qsr23-ospar-Southern North Sea |
Ind1: Bentic Ecology Quality Index (BEQI), Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) at species level (EU). Value exceeds the TV. |
Physical disturbance has been calculated per activity. Fishery affects approximately the whole area based on the current grid data (OSPAR). Other human activities account for a disturbed area of 2.5 à 3% per year with as two most important activities sand extraction ranging from 1.93 to 2.69% and dredging& dumping from 0.29 to 0.73. (link doc lars) fishery: ospar indicator) |
Physical loss has been calculated per activity, for windmills and energy cables the surface doubled with an insignificant increase of 0.12 km2 during the period 2012 till 2016. |
||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Good |
Not relevant |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not relevant |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description criteria |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
Area < 20km2
|
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
Area < 20km2
|
Fysical disturbance unknown (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
Fysical disturbance < 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
Area < 20km2
|
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Fysical disturbance > 25% (based on intensive fishery and sand extraction) |
Direct loss < 2%. Knowledge gaps remain to assess indirect loss. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
The actual extent of habitat in a status 'Not good' is not know since the biological indicators are based on point data. The result is asigned to the whole habitat extent. |
||||
Element status |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 39% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 18km2 or 0,5%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) takes plase in 71 % of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 30,5km2 or 8,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 50% of the area. Fishery disturbance decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 950km2 or 27,2%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 46.4% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 9,5km2 or 0,3%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 17.5% of the area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 125km2 or 3,6%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%. |
No assessment of benthic communities. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 26km2 or 0,7%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in nearly 83% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 255km2 or 7,3%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%. |
Area too small for full assessment. Intensive fishery (SAR>3) in 52% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 19km2 or 0,5%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
Benthic communities are not in a good status, the areal extent is unknown since benthic communities cannot be mapped exactly to benthic broad habitats and the benthic assessments are based on point data. Intensive fishery takes plase in 41% of the area. Fisheries in general decreased due to the expansion of wind farm area. Sealed physical loss remained below 2% of its natural extent since 1992. Indirect loss due to intensive and/or frequent human activities and cumulative effects are not yet included. Only pilot assessments have been made and knowledge gaps remain. Element Extent 1785km2 or 51,1%. |
||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
All benthic habitats are currently degraded, with markedly lower quality in intensively and chronically disturbed areas. Bottom fishing in particular has a major impact on seabed integrity, as continuous disturbance prevents habitats from fully recovering. Although the overall richness of life forms remains stable in gravel beds, more than 85% of which are exposed to bottom trawling, several typical species are observed less frequently, have disappeared completely, or are still only rarely found in their adult stage. On soft sediment, fishing is also the main disturbing activity for biological communities. Although on soft sediment these are evaluated as in a moderate general condition, this contribution leads to an overall decline of benthic communities at the scale of the whole Belgian part of the North Sea. Disturbance levels fluctuated around the same values since 2010, although the space for fishing decreased due to the implantation of wind farms and associated infrastructure. The assessment is partly based on OSPAR approach applied at more detailed level and indicator (Margalev). |
Since 1992, physical disturbance, mainly by bottom trawling fisheries, exceeded 90 % for all habitat types (excluding littoral sediment) with a small decrease offshore due to exclusion of fisheries in wind farms. |
Since 1992, physical loss of each habitat type remained below 2 % of its natural extent. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |