Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D7 / Belgium / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D7 Hydrographical changes |
Member State | Belgium |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | RBINS - Scientific Service MUMM |
Report date | 2020-01-14 |
Report access | ART8_GES_BE_20200110.xml |
Belgian Part of the North Sea (ANS-BE-MS-1)
GES component |
D7
|
D7
|
D7
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Hydrographical changes
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Element |
Circalittoral sand |
Offshore circalittoral sand |
|
Element code |
HabBenCircalitSand |
HabBenOffshSand |
|
Element code source |
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
|
|
Element 2 |
|||
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
|
Criterion |
D7C1
|
D7C2
|
D7C2
|
Parameter |
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Area negatively impacted
|
Area negatively impacted
|
|
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
Physical loss and change in classification of substrate type, biological zone, energy class (waves and currents) |
Physical loss and change in classification of substrate type, biological zone, energy class (waves and currents) |
|
Threshold value source |
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
15.47 |
1.9 |
4.04 |
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
Value unit other |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
99.81 |
99.7 |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
% area of habitat achieving threshold value |
|
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Area physically lost, disturbed or hydrographically altered |
||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description element |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Description overall status |
In the period 2011-2016, the cumulative extent of permanent and significant hydrographic changes was expanded from 15.57 km2 to 23.69 km2. This increase is only due to the construction of offshore wind farms. Although it has long been assumed that the presence of an offshore wind farm does not cause permanent and significant hydrographic changes, recent studies based on satellite observations, in situ observations and numerical simulations have shown that wind turbines can locally disrupt erosion and sedimentation patterns. Numerical studies show that the soil stress changes significantly over an area of approximately 0.066 km2 around each wind turbine. All 233 offshore wind turbines installed in the FDNZ at the end of 2016 would, according to this realistic estimate, be responsible for significant hydrographic changes over a cumulated area of 15.47 km2.
|
Offshore wind farms are the only infrastructure projects that were carried out in the 2011-2016 period. Outside the erosion zone at the foot of each wind turbine (a zone with a radius of 5 to 15m around the foundation of the wind turbine that is considered to be a physical loss), there is to date no evidence that the permanent hydrodynamic changes due to the presence wind turbines have an adverse effect on benthic habitats.
|
Offshore wind farms are the only infrastructure projects that were carried out in the 2011-2016 period. Outside the erosion zone at the foot of each wind turbine (a zone with a radius of 5 to 15m around the foundation of the wind turbine that is considered to be a physical loss), there is to date no evidence that the permanent hydrodynamic changes due to the presence wind turbines have an adverse effect on benthic habitats.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|