Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Cyprus / Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State Cyprus
Region/subregion Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea
Reported by Department of Fisheries and Marine Research, Ministry of Agriculture Natural Resources and Environme
Report date 2020-08-12
Report access MSFD2018_Art8_GES_CY__5___2_.xml

MAL-CY-MS

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Boops boops
Boops boops
Boops boops
Dentex dentex
Dentex dentex
Dicentrarchus labrax
Diplodus sargus
Merluccius merluccius
Merluccius merluccius
Mullus barbatus
Mullus barbatus
Mullus surmuletus
Mullus surmuletus
Octopodidae
Octopus vulgaris
Octopus vulgaris
Pagellus acarne
Pagellus acarne
Pagellus erythrinus
Pagellus erythrinus
Pagrus pagrus
Pagrus pagrus
Sarda sarda
Sepia officinalis
Seriola dumerili
Seriola dumerili
Serranus cabrilla
Serranus cabrilla
Sparisoma cretense
Sparisoma cretense
Sparus aurata
Spicara maena
Spicara maena
Spicara smaris
Spicara smaris
Thunnus alalunga
Thunnus alalunga
Thunnus thynnus
Thunnus thynnus
Xiphias gladius
Xiphias gladius
Element code
127047
127047
127047
273962
273962
126975
127053
126484
126484
126985
126985
126986
126986
11782
140605
140605
127057
127057
127060
127060
127063
127063
127021
138477
126816
126816
127041
127041
231441
231441
151523
126828
126828
126830
126830
127026
127026
127029
127029
127094
127094
Element code source
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758)
Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758)
Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758)
Dentex dentex (Linnaeus, 1758)
Dentex dentex (Linnaeus, 1758)
Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus, 1758
Diplodus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758
Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758
Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758
Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758
Octopodoidea d'Orbigny, 1840
Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797
Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797
Pagellus acarne (Risso, 1827)
Pagellus acarne (Risso, 1827)
Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus, 1758)
RPG
RPG
Sarda sarda (Bloch, 1793)
Sepia officinalis officinalis Linnaeus, 1758
Seriola dumerili (Risso, 1810)
Seriola dumerili (Risso, 1810)
Serranus cabrilla (Linnaeus, 1758)
Serranus cabrilla (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sparisoma (Euscarus) cretense (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sparisoma (Euscarus) cretense (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758
Spicara maena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Spicara maena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Spicara maena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Spicara maena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Thunnus alalunga (Bonnaterre, 1788)
Thunnus alalunga (Bonnaterre, 1788)
Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758
Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758
Element 2 code
Bogue GSA 25
Bogue GSA 25
Bogue GSA 25
DEC
DEC
BSS
SWA
HKE
HKE
MUT GSA 25
MUT GSA 25
MUR GSA 25
MUR GSA 25
OCT
OCC
OCC
SBA
SBA
PAC GSA 25
PAC GSA 25
Pagrus pagrus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pagrus pagrus (Linnaeus, 1758)
BON
CTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
PRR
PRR
SBG
BPI
BPI
SPC
SPC
ALB
ALB
BFT
BFT
SWO
SWO
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Species (D3) http://www.fao.org/fishery/collection/asfis/en
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source
GFCM
GFCM
GFCM
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
GFCM
GFCM
GFCM
GFCM
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
GFCM
GFCM
National
National
Other
Other
Other
Other
National
National
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
D3C1
D3C2
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Size distribution
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
F0.1 and Fmsy Limit: Fmax
Stable or positive trend
Threshold value source
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
tonne
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
ratio
0
ratio
Ratio
ratio
ratio
ratio
ratio
ratio
ratio
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Improving
Improving
Stable
Improving
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Stable
Deteriorating
Improving
Improving
Deteriorating
Stable
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Improving
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Improving
Improving
Improving
Deteriorating
Deteriorating
Improving
Parameter achieved
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Description parameter
According to CMSY outputs, the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1
According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ratio B/BMSY below 1
Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in sustainable exploitation, with a current Fbar1-2 (0.26) lower than F0.1 (0.32; F/FMSY = 0.81)
.
The SSB show a stable trend
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Good
Good
Description criteria
Given the results from this analysis, the stock is in Low Over-exploitation (F0.1=0.29; Fcurrent=0.36; F/FMSYproxy = 1.24).
According to CMSY outputs, the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1
According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ratio B/BMSY below 1 (
Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in sustainable exploitation, with a current Fbar1-2 (0.26) lower than F0.1 (0.32; F/FMSY = 0.81;
Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in overfishing status (F>FMSY). The assessment has been endorsed as “Accepted with qualitative advice”.
The SSB show a stable trend
According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ration B/BMSY below 1
According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1
According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY close to 1 as well as the ratio B/BMSY
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Description element
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2017, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2016 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2016 (GFCM, 2017). Given the results from this analysis, the stock is in Low Over-exploitation (F0.1=0.29; Fcurrent=0.36; F/FMSYproxy = 1.24) with Intermediate Spawning Biomass showing a general decreasing trend. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2017, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2016 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2016 (GFCM, 2017). Given the results from this analysis, the stock is in Low Over-exploitation (F0.1=0.29; Fcurrent=0.36; F/FMSYproxy = 1.24) with Intermediate Spawning Biomass showing a general decreasing trend. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2017, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2016 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2016 (GFCM, 2017). Given the results from this analysis, the stock is in Low Over-exploitation (F0.1=0.29; Fcurrent=0.36; F/FMSYproxy = 1.24) with Intermediate Spawning Biomass showing a general decreasing trend. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
Common dentex was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessement using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study.
Common dentex was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessement using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study.
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2016, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2015 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2015 (GFCM, 2016). The assessment was carried out using as input data official landings and biological data collected under the Cyprus National Data Collection Programme, covering the period 2005-2015. Medits survey data for the years 2006-2015 were used for the tuning file. Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in sustainable exploitation, with a current Fbar1-2 (0.26) lower than F0.1 (0.32; F/FMSY = 0.81). The SSB show also a positive trend. Morever, the mean length trend observed during the Medits survey fluctuates without a showing a particular pattern.
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2016, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2015 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2015 (GFCM, 2016). The assessment was carried out using as input data official landings and biological data collected under the Cyprus National Data Collection Programme, covering the period 2005-2015. Medits survey data for the years 2006-2015 were used for the tuning file. Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in sustainable exploitation, with a current Fbar1-2 (0.26) lower than F0.1 (0.32; F/FMSY = 0.81). The SSB show also a positive trend. Morever, the mean length trend observed during the Medits survey fluctuates without a showing a particular pattern.
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2017, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2016 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2016 (GFCM, 2017). The assessment was carried out using as input data, official landings and biological data collected under the Cyprus National Data Programme, covering the period 2006-2016. Commercial CPUE from nets for the period 2009-2016 were used for the tuning file. Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in overfishing status (F>FMSY). The assessment has been endorsed as “Accepted with qualitative advice”. The SSB show a stable trend. Moreover, the mean length trend observed during the Medits survey fluctuates without a showing a particular pattern .
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2017, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2016 using Extended Survivor XSA on the cohorts present during 2005-2016 (GFCM, 2017). The assessment was carried out using as input data, official landings and biological data collected under the Cyprus National Data Programme, covering the period 2006-2016. Commercial CPUE from nets for the period 2009-2016 were used for the tuning file. Yield per recruit analysis was performed for the estimation of the reference point F0.1 as proxy of FMSY. The results of the assessment suggest that the stock is in overfishing status (F>FMSY). The assessment has been endorsed as “Accepted with qualitative advice”. The SSB show a stable trend. Moreover, the mean length trend observed during the Medits survey fluctuates without a showing a particular pattern .
Common octopus was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Due to the short time series of landing data was not possible to carry out a CMSY model, therefore a harvest rate and a trend of biomass index are presented for the period 2005-2016. According to the biomass index from trawl survey medits a decresing patter in observed while the harvest rate shows an increasing pattern. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a positive patter.
Common octopus was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Due to the short time series of landing data was not possible to carry out a CMSY model, therefore a harvest rate and a trend of biomass index are presented for the period 2005-2016. According to the biomass index from trawl survey medits a decresing patter in observed while the harvest rate shows an increasing pattern. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a positive patter.
Axillary seabream was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ration B/BMSY below 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a decreasing pattern
Axillary seabream was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ration B/BMSY below 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a decreasing pattern
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2018, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2017 (GFCM, 2018). The stock is exploited from all fleet segments and by recreational fishery too. The lack of data from the last segment is one of the major reasons of postponing the assessment of this species. In 2017 a pilot study on recreational fishery (RF) provided the first preliminary quantities of catches derived from this activity. Data from Cyprus official statistics were compiled into a surplus production model in continuous time (SPiCT) under the R language environment. Abundance index derived from effort of Trawl fleet which is believed to be more consistent and reliable than other fishery dependent information. Results show that the stock is in sustainable exploitation with biomass above optimum levels. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a decreasing pattern
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2018, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2017 (GFCM, 2018). The stock is exploited from all fleet segments and by recreational fishery too. The lack of data from the last segment is one of the major reasons of postponing the assessment of this species. In 2017 a pilot study on recreational fishery (RF) provided the first preliminary quantities of catches derived from this activity. Data from Cyprus official statistics were compiled into a surplus production model in continuous time (SPiCT) under the R language environment. Abundance index derived from effort of Trawl fleet which is believed to be more consistent and reliable than other fishery dependent information. Results show that the stock is in sustainable exploitation with biomass above optimum levels. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a decreasing pattern
Red porgy was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ration B/BMSY below 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
Red porgy was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ration B/BMSY below 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
Comber was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ratio B/BMSY around 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear patter.
Comber was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY higher than 1 and a ratio B/BMSY around 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear patter.
The parrotfish was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY close to 1 as well as the ratio B/BMSY. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
The parrotfish was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY close to 1 as well as the ratio B/BMSY. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear pattern.
The blotched picarel was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY below 1 and a ratio B/BMSY above 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear patter
The blotched picarel was not object of a stock assessment in the framework of the relevant RFMO. Therefore, an independent assessment using CMSY (Froese et al., 2016a; 2016b) has been carried out in the framework of the present study. According to CMSY outputs the stock shows a ratio of F/FMSY below 1 and a ratio B/BMSY above 1. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating without showing a clear patter
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2016, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2015 (GFCM, 2016). The status of the species was assessed using an integrated approach (SS3 environment) where all available historical data since 1965 have been analyzed. Given the results from this analysis, the stock is sustainably exploited (F0.1=0.36; Fcurrent=0.05; F/FMSY = 0.14). The abundance indices are in agreement with the stock assessment results, indicating an increase both in recruitment and in SSB and the subsequent increase in recent catch. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a positive pattern
The last assessment of this species in GSA 25 has been performed in 2016, during the GFCM Working Group stock of Stock Assessment on Demersal Species with a reference year of 2015 (GFCM, 2016). The status of the species was assessed using an integrated approach (SS3 environment) where all available historical data since 1965 have been analyzed. Given the results from this analysis, the stock is sustainably exploited (F0.1=0.36; Fcurrent=0.05; F/FMSY = 0.14). The abundance indices are in agreement with the stock assessment results, indicating an increase both in recruitment and in SSB and the subsequent increase in recent catch. The mean length observed in research trawl survey (MEDITS) was fluctuating showing a positive pattern
The status of the resource is assessed with a production model (CMSY model, ICCAT, 2017a) combining the fishing statistics of the entire Mediterranean basin, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area and is considered a single stock. During the last evaluation, which took place in 2017, the historical series of catches available in the ICCAT database has been revised. In 2016, the total Mediterranean landings reported were 3,519 tonnes, similar to those of the last decade. Most of the catches came from longline fishing and Italy is the main producer, with around 57% of landings in the last 10 years. In 2016 Italian capture remained similar to the average of the last five years. Otherwise, 2015 was an unusual year with landing data very different from that of previous years, probably this change is related to the anticipation of management measures related to swordfish that changed the fishing strategy in 2015. Therefore, relative abundance estimates for the 2015 CPUE indices were not used in the evaluation. Since this estimate seems highly influential and perhaps suspect, the production model took into account catch data up to 2015 and relative abundance data (CPUE) until 2014. However, it is important to consider that alternative solutions that include 2015 CPUE are not biologically plausible. The results of the 2017 evaluation, based on the limited information available, show that the state of the stock is extremely uncertain both in terms of fishing mortality and biomass. Despite the high uncertainty, the results would seem to indicate that the biomass is at a level similar to BMSY, and the fishing mortality is lower than FMSY (Figure 43). However, the ICCAT working group noted the lack of CPUE in 2015 and given the recent downward trend of the series available, reiterates that it is very important to confirm, in the coming years, whether this trend continues or not. The ICCAT also reiterates that the ability to monitor stock trends is limited and that current abundance indices (CPUE from commercial fishing) may be influenced by the management measures undertaken for the swordfish recovery plan.
The status of the resource is assessed with a production model (CMSY model, ICCAT, 2017a) combining the fishing statistics of the entire Mediterranean basin, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area and is considered a single stock. During the last evaluation, which took place in 2017, the historical series of catches available in the ICCAT database has been revised. In 2016, the total Mediterranean landings reported were 3,519 tonnes, similar to those of the last decade. Most of the catches came from longline fishing and Italy is the main producer, with around 57% of landings in the last 10 years. In 2016 Italian capture remained similar to the average of the last five years. Otherwise, 2015 was an unusual year with landing data very different from that of previous years, probably this change is related to the anticipation of management measures related to swordfish that changed the fishing strategy in 2015. Therefore, relative abundance estimates for the 2015 CPUE indices were not used in the evaluation. Since this estimate seems highly influential and perhaps suspect, the production model took into account catch data up to 2015 and relative abundance data (CPUE) until 2014. However, it is important to consider that alternative solutions that include 2015 CPUE are not biologically plausible. The results of the 2017 evaluation, based on the limited information available, show that the state of the stock is extremely uncertain both in terms of fishing mortality and biomass. Despite the high uncertainty, the results would seem to indicate that the biomass is at a level similar to BMSY, and the fishing mortality is lower than FMSY (Figure 43). However, the ICCAT working group noted the lack of CPUE in 2015 and given the recent downward trend of the series available, reiterates that it is very important to confirm, in the coming years, whether this trend continues or not. The ICCAT also reiterates that the ability to monitor stock trends is limited and that current abundance indices (CPUE from commercial fishing) may be influenced by the management measures undertaken for the swordfish recovery plan.
The status of the resource is assessed with an analytical model (VPA, ICCAT, 2017b) combining the fishing statistics of the whole Mediterranean basin and the Eastern Atlantic, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area and is considered as a single stock. The trend of fishing mortality (F) for young specimens (2-5 years) has shown a continuous increase up to the last years. Since 2008, fishing mortality of bluefin tuna 2 and 5 years has dropped dramatically to reach historically lower values. For the most adult fish (aged 10 years and over), fishing mortality showed a negative trend until 1980 and then increased in the following years until 2010. From 2010 onwards, a clear reduction in fishing mortality is observed. Spawning stock biomass has clearly increased in recent years while recruitment has shown a reverse trend. These recent trends are consistent with those obtained during the 2012 stock evaluation (ICCAT, 2017b).
The status of the resource is assessed with an analytical model (VPA, ICCAT, 2017b) combining the fishing statistics of the whole Mediterranean basin and the Eastern Atlantic, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area and is considered as a single stock. The trend of fishing mortality (F) for young specimens (2-5 years) has shown a continuous increase up to the last years. Since 2008, fishing mortality of bluefin tuna 2 and 5 years has dropped dramatically to reach historically lower values. For the most adult fish (aged 10 years and over), fishing mortality showed a negative trend until 1980 and then increased in the following years until 2010. From 2010 onwards, a clear reduction in fishing mortality is observed. Spawning stock biomass has clearly increased in recent years while recruitment has shown a reverse trend. These recent trends are consistent with those obtained during the 2012 stock evaluation (ICCAT, 2017b).
The status of the resource is assessed with an analytical model (XSA, ICCAT, 2016) combining the fishing statistics of the entire Mediterranean basin, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area as a single stock. It is important to note that the evaluation results and projections presented in the 2016 ICCAT report are based on the 2016 evaluation results, including data up to 2015 that were available at the time of the evaluation. Based on several hypotheses on natural death rates and landed levels of undersized fish, the analysis (XSA) indicated that current levels of spawning biomass (SSB) are much lower than those of the 1980s. The results also indicate that recruitment shows a negative trend in the last decade. In terms of fishing mortality, a recent decline has been observed in recent years. The current biomass is lower than BMSY, while fishing mortality F is almost double FMSY. The results therefore indicate that the stock is both overfished in an over-exploitation state.
The status of the resource is assessed with an analytical model (XSA, ICCAT, 2016) combining the fishing statistics of the entire Mediterranean basin, considering that this species is distributed throughout the area as a single stock. It is important to note that the evaluation results and projections presented in the 2016 ICCAT report are based on the 2016 evaluation results, including data up to 2015 that were available at the time of the evaluation. Based on several hypotheses on natural death rates and landed levels of undersized fish, the analysis (XSA) indicated that current levels of spawning biomass (SSB) are much lower than those of the 1980s. The results also indicate that recruitment shows a negative trend in the last decade. In terms of fishing mortality, a recent decline has been observed in recent years. The current biomass is lower than BMSY, while fishing mortality F is almost double FMSY. The results therefore indicate that the stock is both overfished in an over-exploitation state.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GES extent unit
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
Proportion of populations in good status
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
Assessments period
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014
  • Targets established initial impl. 2014