Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Cyprus / Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Cyprus |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Aegean-Levantine Sea |
| Report date | 2026-03-17 12:57:16 |
MAL-CY-AA-001
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) |
Perfluorononanoate (PFNA) |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
|
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Element 2 |
Xiphias gladius
|
Boops boops
|
Myliobatoidei
|
Parapenaeus longirostris
|
Spicara smaris
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Boops boops
|
Myliobatoidei
|
Parapenaeus longirostris
|
Spicara smaris
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Xiphias gladius
|
Boops boops
|
Myliobatoidei
|
Parapenaeus longirostris
|
Spicara smaris
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Xiphias gladius
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Thunnus spp.
|
|
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
|
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
0.25 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
6.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
75.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
|
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.044 |
0.013 |
0.016 |
0.0012 |
0.0012 |
0.026 |
0.04 |
1.98 |
0.044 |
0.043 |
0.009 |
0.014 |
0.0022 |
0.028 |
0.048 |
0.4 |
0.01 |
0.041 |
0.74 |
1.5 |
1.15 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.27 |
1.45 |
0.11 |
Value achieved lower |
0.0033 |
0.0072 |
0.0012 |
0.0012 |
0.016 |
0.0025 |
0.19 |
0.007 |
0.0044 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
0.0022 |
0.0044 |
0.026 |
0.4 |
0.01 |
0.035 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.17 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.38 |
0.01 |
|
Value unit |
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
ng/g ww
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
picogram per gram of wet weight
|
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
75.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
1/4 samples above threshold.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
See DescriptionOverallStatus of the OverallStatus sheet and MSFD Text Report for additional information |
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Description element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
Τhe total GES is assessed, based on the Proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥90 % of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. |
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
GES achieved by 2024 |
Description overall status |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
The Republic of Cyprus (Ministry of Health and Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment) monitors the contaminants in seafood harvested in the sea of Cyprus, based on Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 and its amendments. Fish specimens are collected from the local market and directly from local fishermen. These specimens are analysed by the State General Laboratory of the Ministry of Health, which is accredited for this kind of analyses. The PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS analyses are performed in the National Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece. The contaminants measured according to the Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 are the following:
• Lead, Cadmium and Mercury in tissues of Boops boops, Xiphias gladius, Thunnus spp., Spicara smaris, Parapenaeus longirostris and Myliobatoidei.
• Sum of dioxins, Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, Non-dioxin like PCBs, PFOS, PFOA, PFNA and PFHxS in tissues of Thunnus spp.
For the assessment of D9C1, the values of each sample, for each parameter, are compared to the maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, Annex I of the Regulation. Furthermore, a proportion threshold of ≥90% of samples achieving TV is applied. This means that more than 90% of samples analysed for one contaminant must be above the relevant threshold defined in the Regulation.
Finally, the total GES is assessed, based on the proportion (%) of substances in Good Status. The threshold set in this case is “≥ 90% of substances to be in good status in order to achieve GES”. This means that more than 90% of substances assessed must be in Good Status. See MSFD CY-Text Report for additional information |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |