Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Germany / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
| Report date | 2020-02-17 |
| Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Nordsee (ANSDE_MS)
GES component |
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Element |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Anas acuta |
Anas acuta |
Anas acuta |
Anas acuta |
Anas clypeata |
Anas clypeata |
Anas clypeata |
Anas clypeata |
Anas penelope |
Anas penelope |
Anas penelope |
Anas penelope |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Branta bernicla |
Branta bernicla |
Branta bernicla |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Fratercula arctica |
Fratercula arctica |
Fratercula arctica |
Fratercula arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Morus bassanus |
Morus bassanus |
Morus bassanus |
Morus bassanus |
Morus bassanus |
Morus bassanus |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Fulmarus glacialis |
Hydrocoloeus minutus |
Hydrocoloeus minutus |
Hydrocoloeus minutus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus fuscus graellsii |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus melanocephalus |
Larus melanocephalus |
Larus melanocephalus |
Larus melanocephalus |
Larus ridibundus |
Larus ridibundus |
Larus ridibundus |
Larus ridibundus |
Larus ridibundus |
Larus ridibundus |
Rissa tridactyla |
Rissa tridactyla |
Rissa tridactyla |
Rissa tridactyla |
Rissa tridactyla |
Rissa tridactyla |
Stercorarius parasiticus |
Stercorarius parasiticus |
Stercorarius parasiticus |
Stercorarius pomarinus |
Stercorarius pomarinus |
Stercorarius pomarinus |
Stercorarius skua |
Stercorarius skua |
Stercorarius skua |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Arenaria interpres |
Arenaria interpres |
Arenaria interpres |
Arenaria interpres |
Calidris alba |
Calidris alba |
Calidris alba |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris canutus |
Calidris canutus |
Calidris canutus |
Calidris maritima |
Calidris maritima |
Calidris maritima |
Charadrius alexandrinus |
Charadrius alexandrinus |
Charadrius alexandrinus |
Charadrius alexandrinus |
Charadrius alexandrinus |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Limosa lapponica |
Limosa lapponica |
Limosa lapponica |
Limosa limosa |
Limosa limosa |
Limosa limosa |
Limosa limosa |
Limosa limosa |
Numenius arquata |
Numenius arquata |
Numenius arquata |
Numenius arquata |
Numenius arquata |
Numenius phaeopus |
Numenius phaeopus |
Numenius phaeopus |
Platalea leucorodia |
Platalea leucorodia |
Platalea leucorodia |
Platalea leucorodia |
Platalea leucorodia |
Pluvialis apricaria |
Pluvialis apricaria |
Pluvialis apricaria |
Pluvialis squatarola |
Pluvialis squatarola |
Pluvialis squatarola |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tringa erythropus |
Tringa erythropus |
Tringa erythropus |
Tringa nebularia |
Tringa nebularia |
Tringa nebularia |
Tringa totanus |
Tringa totanus |
Tringa totanus |
Tringa totanus |
Tringa totanus |
Vanellus vanellus |
Vanellus vanellus |
Vanellus vanellus |
Vanellus vanellus |
Vanellus vanellus |
Element code |
137073 |
137073 |
137073 |
137073 |
137073 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
158939 |
158939 |
158939 |
158939 |
158941 |
158941 |
158941 |
158941 |
159168 |
159168 |
159168 |
159168 |
148791 |
148791 |
148791 |
148791 |
159175 |
159175 |
159175 |
137128 |
137128 |
137128 |
137128 |
137128 |
137131 |
137131 |
137131 |
137131 |
137186 |
137186 |
137186 |
137186 |
137188 |
137188 |
137188 |
137188 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
148776 |
148776 |
148776 |
148776 |
148776 |
148776 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
137195 |
137195 |
137195 |
137195 |
137195 |
137195 |
567449 |
567449 |
567449 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
148796 |
148796 |
148796 |
148796 |
148796 |
148796 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137147 |
137147 |
137147 |
137147 |
137149 |
137149 |
137149 |
137149 |
137149 |
137149 |
137156 |
137156 |
137156 |
137156 |
137156 |
137156 |
137172 |
137172 |
137172 |
137173 |
137173 |
137173 |
137174 |
137174 |
137174 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
147431 |
147431 |
147431 |
147431 |
159084 |
159084 |
159084 |
159047 |
159047 |
159047 |
159047 |
147433 |
147433 |
147433 |
159052 |
159052 |
159052 |
212611 |
212611 |
212611 |
212611 |
212611 |
212619 |
212619 |
212619 |
212619 |
212619 |
147436 |
147436 |
147436 |
147436 |
147436 |
159034 |
159034 |
159034 |
159035 |
159035 |
159035 |
159035 |
159035 |
159037 |
159037 |
159037 |
159037 |
159037 |
159040 |
159040 |
159040 |
416678 |
416678 |
416678 |
416678 |
416678 |
159135 |
159135 |
159135 |
159137 |
159137 |
159137 |
212721 |
212721 |
212721 |
212721 |
212721 |
232042 |
232042 |
232042 |
232042 |
232042 |
159029 |
159029 |
159029 |
158968 |
158968 |
158968 |
158970 |
158970 |
158970 |
158970 |
158970 |
159142 |
159142 |
159142 |
159142 |
159142 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Annual collection rate
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Ratio of reproduction to adult mortality
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Ratio of reproduction to adult mortality
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Ratio of reproduction to adult mortality
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
3.0 |
0.8 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
3.0 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
No significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding failure, up to a maximum of 3 in 6 years.
|
no downward trend
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
no significantly decreasing trend
|
no significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding failure, up to a maximum of 3 in 6 years.
|
No significant decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding failure, up to a maximum of 3 in 6 years.
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
no significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
No significantly decreasing trend
|
Number of years with a large-scale breeding loss in a maximum of 3 out of 6 years.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
Reproduction is higher than the mortality of adults.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
Reproduction is higher than the mortality of adults.
|
Reproduction is higher than the mortality of adults.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
OSPAR Convention
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
National supplement for abundance assessment, breeding birds (TWSC data)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
8.971 |
14.1968 |
0.4847 |
2.0209 |
1.6036 |
0.7478 |
0.8996 |
0.8155 |
13.8279 |
0.0833 |
1.7538 |
118.8566 |
1.1512 |
1.4015 |
1.4296 |
1.1973 |
0.4124 |
0.5573 |
0.3688 |
1.0137 |
1.5239 |
1.0 |
8.2133 |
0.7122 |
152.4791 |
0.5067 |
0.9591 |
6.0 |
0.829 |
0.5339 |
6.0 |
0.4452 |
4.0 |
0.7446 |
5.0 |
0.8485 |
0.66 |
2.0555 |
0.8234 |
0.8637 |
0.0625 |
0.1047 |
0.2292 |
1.4666 |
1.1046 |
0.5408 |
1.1514 |
2.2148 |
1.0416 |
1.4201 |
20.3664 |
8.6196 |
1.3373 |
0.7603 |
0.4458 |
0.7773 |
1.1814 |
0.4343 |
0.9697 |
0.6683 |
0.7519 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season, offshore area |
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Convention for the abundance of breeding birds, OSPAR
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Winter age index (OSPAR)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
Data from TWSC monitoring were used for the evaluation.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/downloads/manual_breedingsuccess_version2011.pdf
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
Data from TWSC monitoring were used for the evaluation.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/downloads/manual_breedingsuccess_version2011.pdf
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
Data from TWSC monitoring were used for the evaluation.
http://www.waddensea-secretariat.org/sites/default/files/downloads/manual_breedingsuccess_version2011.pdf
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C2.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C2 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C2 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C2 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C2 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Data base not sufficient for the assessment of criterion D1C3 for this species.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators to assess the spread of species (criterion D1C4) and the condition of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
It is not possible to assess the species due to poor data.
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
It is not possible to assess the species due to poor data.
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
It is not possible to assess the species due to poor data.
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
It is not possible to assess the species due to poor data.
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Insufficient data basis for the assessment of this species.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Insufficient data basis for the assessment of this species.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Insufficient data basis for the assessment of this species.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
Not a sufficient basis for the assessment of this type of assessment.
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
GES extent threshold |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
GES extent achieved |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
86.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
25.00 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
52.38 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, OSPAR used indicators for ?abundance of sea and coastal birds? and ?sea and coastal bird hatching or failure? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other species of the Wadden Sea with data from TWSC monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|