Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-B / Germany / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Birds |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
| Report date | 2020-02-17 |
| Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)
GES component |
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
D1-B
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Wading birds
|
Element |
Aythya ferina |
Aythya ferina |
Aythya ferina |
Aythya ferina |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya fuligula |
Aythya marila |
Aythya marila |
Aythya marila |
Aythya marila |
Bucephala clangula |
Bucephala clangula |
Bucephala clangula |
Bucephala clangula |
Clangula hyemalis |
Clangula hyemalis |
Clangula hyemalis |
Clangula hyemalis |
Melanitta fusca |
Melanitta fusca |
Melanitta fusca |
Melanitta fusca |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Melanitta nigra |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Somateria mollissima |
Anas acuta |
Anas acuta |
Anas acuta |
Anas penelope |
Anas penelope |
Anas penelope |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anas platyrhynchos |
Anser anser |
Anser anser |
Anser anser |
Anser anser |
Cygnus bewickii |
Cygnus bewickii |
Cygnus bewickii |
Cygnus cygnus |
Cygnus cygnus |
Cygnus cygnus |
Cygnus olor |
Cygnus olor |
Cygnus olor |
Cygnus olor |
Cygnus olor |
Fulica atra |
Fulica atra |
Fulica atra |
Fulica atra |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Alca torda |
Cepphus grylle |
Cepphus grylle |
Cepphus grylle |
Cepphus grylle |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia arctica |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Gavia stellata |
Mergellus albellus |
Mergellus albellus |
Mergellus albellus |
Mergellus albellus |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus merganser |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Mergus serrator |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Phalacrocorax carbo |
Podiceps auritus |
Podiceps auritus |
Podiceps auritus |
Podiceps auritus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps cristatus |
Podiceps grisegena |
Podiceps grisegena |
Podiceps grisegena |
Podiceps grisegena |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Uria aalge |
Hydroprogne caspia |
Hydroprogne caspia |
Hydroprogne caspia |
Hydroprogne caspia |
Hydroprogne caspia |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus argentatus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus canus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus fuscus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Larus marinus |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna hirundo |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna paradisaea |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sterna sandvicensis |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Sternula albifrons |
Anas crecca |
Anas crecca |
Anas crecca |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Calidris alpina |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Charadrius hiaticula |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Haematopus ostralegus |
Philomachus pugnax |
Philomachus pugnax |
Philomachus pugnax |
Philomachus pugnax |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Recurvirostra avosetta |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Tadorna tadorna |
Element code |
232037 |
232037 |
232037 |
232037 |
159164 |
159164 |
159164 |
159164 |
159164 |
159164 |
159172 |
159172 |
159172 |
159172 |
159197 |
159197 |
159197 |
159197 |
137071 |
137071 |
137071 |
137071 |
137072 |
137072 |
137072 |
137072 |
137073 |
137073 |
137073 |
137073 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
137074 |
158939 |
158939 |
158939 |
159168 |
159168 |
159168 |
148791 |
148791 |
148791 |
148791 |
416682 |
416682 |
416682 |
416682 |
1037309 |
1037309 |
1037309 |
159089 |
159089 |
159089 |
159090 |
159090 |
159090 |
159090 |
159090 |
232054 |
232054 |
232054 |
232054 |
137128 |
137128 |
137128 |
137128 |
137130 |
137130 |
137130 |
137130 |
137186 |
137186 |
137186 |
137186 |
137188 |
137188 |
137188 |
137188 |
232039 |
232039 |
232039 |
232039 |
159097 |
159097 |
159097 |
159097 |
159097 |
159097 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
159098 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137179 |
137181 |
137181 |
137181 |
137181 |
137182 |
137182 |
137182 |
137182 |
137182 |
137182 |
137183 |
137183 |
137183 |
137183 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
137133 |
567825 |
567825 |
567825 |
567825 |
567825 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137138 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137141 |
137142 |
137142 |
137142 |
137142 |
137142 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137146 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137162 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137165 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
137166 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
567480 |
158943 |
158943 |
158943 |
159047 |
159047 |
159047 |
159047 |
212619 |
212619 |
212619 |
212619 |
147436 |
147436 |
147436 |
147436 |
159046 |
159046 |
159046 |
159046 |
212721 |
212721 |
212721 |
212721 |
232042 |
232042 |
232042 |
232042 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – breeding
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – trend
|
Abundance (number of individuals) – wintering
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Breeding success / failure Brut
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
No significantly decreasing trend.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Other (specify)
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
National supplement for abundance assessment resting birds offshore.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.519 |
0.598 |
1.05 |
0.837 |
1.064 |
1.442 |
1.103 |
1.61 |
1.131 |
2.1 |
0.537 |
1.112 |
0.749 |
1.178 |
0.825 |
1.747 |
1.875 |
0.804 |
0.522 |
0.914 |
1.154 |
1.431 |
1.791 |
1.165 |
0.124 |
1.097 |
0.423 |
4.401 |
1.669 |
0.781 |
0.69 |
0.307 |
0.486 |
0.878 |
1.296 |
0.092 |
0.699 |
0.719 |
0.677 |
1.033 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of Waterbird in the bregrading sason
|
Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising sason
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season offshore area |
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Winter abundance index, HELCOM
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
Breeding bird abundance index, HELCOM.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Deteriorating |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C2.
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
There are as yet no operational indicators for assessing breeding success (criterion D1C3) and species (criterion D1C4) and the status of habitats (criterion D1C5).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C3 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton wool group as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton wool group as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton wool group as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat. The primary criteria D1C1 and D1C3 are not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The assessment of the species is not possible due to lack of data. the primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The assessment of the species is not possible due to lack of data. the primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The assessment of the species is not possible due to lack of data. the primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The assessment of the species is not possible due to lack of data. the primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton group, as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat.
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton group, as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat.
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton group, as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat.
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
The species is assessed in the cotton group, as it uses the shallow water as a food habitat.
The primary criterion D1C1 is not relevant for the assessment of this species in the marine area considered here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
So far, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed. Where possible and appropriate, the resting and breeding flocks shall be considered. These are used as parameters in the evaluation and will be integrated into On Out All Out.
|
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
To date, only criterion D1C2 has been assessed and for the other criteria indicators and/or monitoring have to be further developed.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
The criteria were assessed at the level of individual species. A species is in good condition if all criteria meet the relevant thresholds. At the level of the groups of species, the criteria are no longer taken into account.
|
GES extent threshold |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
75.00 |
GES extent achieved |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
91.70 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
22.20 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
62.50 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring. If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
For the assessment of the species groups, HELCOM uses indicators ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the breaking season? and ?Abundance of Waterbirds in the winterising season? and the related thresholds, partly supplemented by trend data for other open Baltic Sea species with data from national monitoring.
If 75 % of the birds of a functional group reach a good status, the group is rated as ?good?.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|