Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Mammals
Member State Germany
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date 2020-02-17
Report access DE_ART8_GES.xml

Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)

GES component
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
D1-M
Feature
Small toothed cetaceans
Small toothed cetaceans
Small toothed cetaceans
Small toothed cetaceans
Small toothed cetaceans
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Seals
Element
Phocoena phocoena
Phocoena phocoena
Phocoena phocoena
Phocoena phocoena
Phocoena phocoena
Halichoerus grypus
Halichoerus grypus
Halichoerus grypus
Halichoerus grypus
Halichoerus grypus
Phoca vitulina
Phoca vitulina
Phoca vitulina
Phoca vitulina
Phoca vitulina
Element code
137117
137117
137117
137117
137117
137080
137080
137080
137080
137080
137084
137084
137084
137084
137084
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C4
D1C5
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C4
D1C5
D1C1
D1C2
D1C3
D1C4
D1C5
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Age distribution
Distribution (spatial)
Habitat condition
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Age distribution
Distribution (spatial)
Habitat condition
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
Abundance
Age distribution
Distribution (spatial)
Habitat condition
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
14441.53
12569.39
14651.62
Threshold value lower
1.0
Threshold qualitative
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Threshold value source
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
1906.0
14441.53
12569.39
14651.62
Value achieved lower
Value unit
(number of) individuals
square kilometre
(number of) individuals
square kilometre
(number of) individuals
square kilometre
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Improving
Improving
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
No
No
Yes
No
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Yes
No
Description parameter
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
A threshold for abundance in terms of favourable conservation status has not yet been established. However, it is known that there would be a much higher rate than the current one. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
A threshold for abundance has not been defined so far in terms of favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
A threshold for abundance has not been defined so far in terms of favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
Data are missing for reliable assessment. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Good
Not good
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Not good
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Good
Not good
Description criteria
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Criterion D1C3 is classified as not good as the population is not in good condition after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
Criterion D1C2 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Criterion D1C3 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
Criterion D1C2 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
Criterion D1C3 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive. There is a lack of data.
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
GES extent threshold
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
Proportion of species in good status within species group
GES achieved
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported
Description overall status
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
Assessments period
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • All pressures related to inputs of substances, litter and energy
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6
  • UZO2
  • UZO3.1
  • UZO3.2
  • UZO3.4
  • UZO4.3
  • UZO5
  • UZO6