Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Germany / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)
GES component |
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Element |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Phocoena phocoena |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Phoca vitulina |
Element code |
137117 |
137117 |
137117 |
137117 |
137117 |
137080 |
137080 |
137080 |
137080 |
137080 |
137084 |
137084 |
137084 |
137084 |
137084 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Age distribution
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Age distribution
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Age distribution
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Parameter other |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
14441.53 |
12569.39 |
14651.62 |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
1.0 |
||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
|||
Threshold value source |
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
1906.0 |
14441.53 |
12569.39 |
14651.62 |
|||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit |
(number of) individuals
|
square kilometre
|
(number of) individuals
|
square kilometre
|
(number of) individuals
|
square kilometre
|
|||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
|
A threshold for abundance in terms of favourable conservation status has not yet been established. However, it is known that there would be a much higher rate than the current one.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
|
A threshold for abundance has not been defined so far in terms of favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator does not currently have a threshold and the data base is not sufficient. In the future, these gaps need to be filled.
|
A threshold for abundance has not been defined so far in terms of favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Data are missing for reliable assessment.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
|
Criterion D1C3 is classified as not good as the population is not in good condition after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
|
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
|
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Criterion D1C3 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
|
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
|
Criterion D1C1 cannot be assessed on the basis of current data. Monitoring should be established in the future and thresholds for the HELCOM indicator should be defined.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Criterion D1C3 is classified as unknown as the population could not be assessed after the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive. There is a lack of data.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
|
Criterion D1C5 is assessed as not good, since the habitat for the species does not reach the favourable conservation status according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive
|
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
The species group is assessed as good when all species are in good condition.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|