Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-F / Germany / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)
GES component |
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
D1-F
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Element |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Acipenser oxyrinchus |
Acipenser oxyrinchus |
Acipenser oxyrinchus |
Acipenser oxyrinchus |
Acipenser oxyrinchus |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Coregonus maraena |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Lampetra fluviatilis |
Leuciscus aspius |
Leuciscus aspius |
Leuciscus aspius |
Leuciscus aspius |
Leuciscus aspius |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Vimba vimba |
Vimba vimba |
Vimba vimba |
Vimba vimba |
Vimba vimba |
Enchelyopus cimbrius |
Enchelyopus cimbrius |
Enchelyopus cimbrius |
Enchelyopus cimbrius |
Enchelyopus cimbrius |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Petromyzon marinus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Trachinus draco |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Alosa fallax |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Cyclopterus lumpus |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Element code |
154281 |
154281 |
154281 |
154281 |
154281 |
151802 |
151802 |
151802 |
151802 |
151802 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
712453 |
154210 |
154210 |
154210 |
154210 |
154210 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
101172 |
1015724 |
1015724 |
1015724 |
1015724 |
1015724 |
151308 |
151308 |
151308 |
151308 |
151308 |
283150 |
283150 |
283150 |
283150 |
283150 |
126450 |
126450 |
126450 |
126450 |
126450 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
154675 |
154675 |
154675 |
154675 |
154675 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
101174 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
127082 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
126415 |
126375 |
126375 |
126375 |
126375 |
126375 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
127214 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
127186 |
223866 |
223866 |
223866 |
223866 |
223866 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Habitat condition
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Recruitment of glass and gel scales as an index of the stock size
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Spawning Stock Biomass
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
Specific parameters to be defined in relation to D1C3
|
Specific parameters related to distribution to be defined
|
Specific parameters related to habitat characteristics are still to be defined.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
6725.18 |
260.0 |
52874.73 |
64037.51 |
20536.65 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
Favourable conservation status of the population following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of distribution following national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
Favourable conservation status of the habitat under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
According to national red list, not at risk.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
ICES
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
Petromyzontidae).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
2.0 |
13007.29 |
36.0 |
6725.18 |
287.0 |
52874.73 |
520.0 |
64037.51 |
144.0 |
35894.84 |
145.0 |
20536.65 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
Presence in the T25-quadrant
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes, based on low risk |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Für die Art ist derzeit unklar wo der Schwellenwert für den günstigen Erhaltungszustand der Population gemäß FFH-Bewertung anzusetzen ist. Die Angaben zur aktuellen Populationsgröße basiert auf Schätzung durch Experten.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Schwellenwert bisher nur deskriptiv: "Viel größer als aktueller Wert".
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Bewertung über Experteneinschätzung, es konnte bisher kein quantitativer Wert für die erforderliche Mindestgröße der Fläche in guter Habitatqualität festgelegt werden. Das aktuelle Habitat wird auf 120.028 Hektar geschätzt. Welche Habitatfläche potentiell geeignet ist, ist unbekannt. Die Habitatqualität wird insgesamt als nicht gut eingestuft.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Gemäß aktuellem ICES-Advice von 2017 befindet sich die Rekrutierung von Glasaalen sowie Gelbaalen (hier als Index für die Bestandsgröße) unterhalb möglicher Referenzwerte.
Der Trend wurde nicht bewertet.
|
Für die Art ist derzeit unklar wo der Schwellenwert für den günstigen Erhaltungszustand der Population gemäß FFH-Bewertung anzusetzen ist. Die Angaben zur aktuellen Populationsgröße basiert auf Schätzung durch Experten. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Es konnte bisher kein quantitativer Wert für die erforderliche Mindestgröße der Fläche in guter Habitatqualität festgelegt werden. Das aktuell geeignete und genutzte Habitat wird auf 100.564 Hektar geschätzt.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Die Angaben zur aktuellen Populationsgröße basiert auf Schätzung durch Experten.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Bewertung über Experteneinschätzung, es konnte bisher kein quantitativer Wert für die erforderliche Mindestgröße der Fläche in guter Habitatqualität festgelegt werden. Das aktuelle Habitat wird auf 1.703.100 Hektar geschätzt. Welche Habitatfläche potentiell geeignet ist, ist unbekannt. Die Habitatqualität wird insgesamt als nicht gut eingestuft.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Schwellenwert bisher nur deskriptiv: "größer als aktueller Wert".Die Angaben zur Populationsgröße basiert auf Schätzung durch Experten.
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Bewertung über Experteneinschätzung, es konnte bisher kein quantitativer Wert für die erforderliche Mindestgröße der Fläche in guter Habitatqualität festgelegt werden. Das aktuelle Habitat wird auf 1.709.588 Hektar geschätzt. Welche Habitatfläche potentiell geeignet ist, ist unbekannt. Die Habitatqualität wird insgesamt als nicht gut eingestuft.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The indicator is used for the first time in the reporting exercise for 2018, with the result that no trend is reported.
|
Für die Art ist derzeit unklar wo der Schwellenwert für den günstigen Erhaltungszustand der Population gemäß FFH-Bewertung anzusetzen ist.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Schwellenwert bisher nur deskriptiv: "Viel größer als aktueller Wert".
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Bewertung über Experteneinschätzung, es konnte bisher kein quantitativer Wert für die erforderliche Mindestgröße der Fläche in guter Habitatqualität festgelegt werden. Das aktuelle Habitat wird auf 1.278.136 Hektar geschätzt. Welche Habitatfläche potentiell geeignet ist, ist unbekannt. Die Habitatqualität wird insgesamt als nicht gut eingestuft.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
Schwellenwert bisher nur deskriptiv: "Viel größer als aktueller Wert".
Bewertung wurde über Experteneinschätzung vorgenommen.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Es fehlen Daten für die Einschätzung der Habitatqualität und der genutzen Habitatfläche.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
The indicator is used for the first time under the 2018 MSFD report, so no trend is reported.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Für eine Bewertung im Rahmen der FFH-RL liegen zu wenige Informationen vor.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is considered not to be good, since dissemination under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is considered not to be good, since the habitat for the species according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Bestandsgröße nach ICES-Advice 2017.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Das Kriterium kann derzeit aufgrund einer mangelhaften Datenlage im Rahmen der FFH-RL nicht beurteilt werden.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national evaluation under the Habitats Directive reaches favourable conservation status. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Das Kriterium D1C5 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da das Habitat für die Art nach nationaler FFH-Bewertung nicht den günstigen Erhaltungszustand erreicht.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Datensituation unzureichend für eine Bewertung der Population im Rahmen der FFH-RL. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Criterion D1C5 is considered not to be good, since the habitat for the species according to the national assessment under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Das Kriterium D1C5 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da das Habitat für die Art nach nationaler FFH-Bewertung nicht den günstigen Erhaltungszustand erreicht.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Das Kriterium D1C2 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da die Indikatorart nach nationaler Roter Liste ungefährdet ist.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
For stocks/species that are assessed under Descriptor 1 and Descriptor 3, descriptor 3 shall be used for descriptor 1. Therefore, the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) will also be used for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
For the species, it is currently unclear where the threshold for the favourable conservation status of the population is to be determined according to the assessment under the Habitats Directive.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Das Kriterium D1C4 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da die Verbreitung nach nationaler FFH-Bewertung nicht den guten Erhaltungszustand erreicht.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Das Kriterium D1C5 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da die Teilbewertung für die Habitatqualität nach nationaler FFH-Bewertung nicht den günstingen Erhaltungszustand erreicht. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Spawning stock biomass according ICES assessment.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Laicherbestandsbiomasse nach ICES Bewertung.
Es liegen nicht genug Informationen für eine Bewertung vor.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk. It is currently on the alert list.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good as the population after a national evaluation under the Habitats Directive does not reach the favourable conservation status.
Https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Criterion D1C4 is classified as good, since dissemination under the national assessment under the Habitats Directive achieves the favourable conservation status.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Das Kriterium D1C5 wird als nicht gut eingestuft, da das Habitat für die Art nach nationaler FFH-Bewertung nicht den günstigen Erhaltungszustand erreicht.
https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/berichte-monitoring/nationaler-ffh-bericht.html
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
The criterion cannot currently be assessed due to a lack of data.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as not good, as the type of indicator according to national red list is in danger of extinction.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Insufficient data are available for the assessment of criterion D1C1.
|
Criterion D1C2 is classified as good as the type of indicator according to national red list is not at risk.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
The criterion cannot be assessed at this stage due to lack of assessment procedures and poor data situation.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
There is currently insufficient information available for the assessment of the species.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
For the assessment of current status, individual fish species assessments are presented in each species group (coastal fish, demersal shelf, pelagic shelf). For the national overall assessment of fish, there are as yet no aggregation rules and no finalised evaluation scheme. These will have to be developed in the future. The overall assessment is currently based on individual results and on the basis of expert judgement.
All species groups do not achieve good status for fish.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|