Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D3 / Germany / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2024-10-15 10:22:35 |
BAL-DE-MS-001
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Ammodytes spp. |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Palaemon elegans |
Palaemon elegans |
Palaemon elegans |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys solemdali |
Platichthys solemdali |
Platichthys solemdali |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo salar |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Salmo trutta trutta |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Element 2 |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20-24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22-24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in 21-23
|
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in 21-23
|
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in 21-23
|
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in 21-23
|
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in subdivisions 24-32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in subdivisions 22–32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subdivisions 20 and 24 (Skagerrak and Kattegat, western Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus) in subdivisions 22–32 |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus) in subdivisions 22–32 |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus) in subdivisions 22–32 |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus balticus) in subdivisions 22–32 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB-relative
|
Unknown
|
BIOM-SSB-relative
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB-relative
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
BIOM-SSB-relative
|
Unknown
|
Unknown
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Unknown
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
R
|
Ratio SSB/R
|
|
Threshold value upper |
0.31 |
150000.0 |
3776242.0 |
0.039 |
0.26 |
23492.0 |
79211.0 |
0.543 |
120637.0 |
2500530.0 |
0.035 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.31 |
4730.0 |
36603.0 |
0.166 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.26 |
2600.0 |
3691.0 |
0.364 |
0.31 |
570000.0 |
50530055.0 |
0.016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
<= |
>= |
>= |
>= |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
ICES
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
ICES
|
National
|
National
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.356 |
64048.0 |
761782.0 |
0.086 |
0.92 |
9956.0 |
15093.0 |
2.317 |
81038.0 |
1862287.0 |
0.049 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
65.79 |
149.0 |
0.42 |
9835.0 |
80163.0 |
0.178 |
0.266 |
1.744 |
0.211 |
2513.0 |
2214.0 |
1.317 |
0.381 |
976167.0 |
76717333.0 |
0.013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
Proportion
|
Proportion
|
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
Rate/y
|
tonne
|
individuals
|
Proportion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not relevant |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
Description parameter |
The trend has not been assessed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
Neue Bewertung anhand Rekrutierung (R) und SSB/R, siehe Probst, W. N. 2023. An approach to assess exploited fish stocks compliant to the requirements of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) including criterion D3C3. Ecological Indicators, 146. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
This refers to Baltic flounder Platichthys solemdali. |
This refers to Baltic flounder Platichthys solemdali. |
This refers to Baltic flounder Platichthys solemdali. |
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
Expert assessment based on ICES Advice 2022
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No evaluation results are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
No valuations are available for this element.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
OOAO_HIE
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
For the MSFD status assessment, the indicator values of fishing mortality (criterion D3C1), spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) and age structure (criterion D3C3) are averaged over the period 2016-2021 and compared against the reference values. The individual assessments of the three criteria will be integrated in a two-step process. Criteria D3C1 and D3C2 are first integrated according to the ‘one out – all out’ principle. Criterion D3C3 cannot improve the integrated assessment of D3C1 and D3C2, but only confirm or downgrade. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
One stock has good environmental status, eight stocks do not have good environmental status and 16 stocks could not be assessed due to a lack of indicators or assessment limits.
|
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |