Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State Germany
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date 2020-02-17
Report access DE_ART8_GES.xml

Kuestengewaesser Arkona Becken (BALDE_CW_AB)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Abramis brama
Abramis brama
Abramis brama
Esox lucius
Esox lucius
Esox lucius
Perca fluviatilis
Perca fluviatilis
Perca fluviatilis
Rutilus rutilus
Rutilus rutilus
Rutilus rutilus
Sander lucioperca
Sander lucioperca
Sander lucioperca
Element code
154281
154281
154281
154210
154210
154210
151353
151353
151353
154333
154333
154333
151308
151308
151308
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4

Kuestengewaesser Bornholm Becken (BALDE_CW_BB)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Abramis brama
Abramis brama
Abramis brama
Esox lucius
Esox lucius
Esox lucius
Perca fluviatilis
Perca fluviatilis
Perca fluviatilis
Rutilus rutilus
Rutilus rutilus
Rutilus rutilus
Sander lucioperca
Sander lucioperca
Sander lucioperca
Element code
154281
154281
154281
154210
154210
154210
151353
151353
151353
154333
154333
154333
151308
151308
151308
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4

BALDE_CW_D5_GB_B3

GES component
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Mytilus edulis
Mytilus edulis
Mytilus edulis
Element code
140480
140480
140480
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4

Fischgewaesser 3c22 (BALDE_FA_3c22)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Platichthys flesus
Platichthys flesus
Platichthys flesus
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Element code
127141
127141
127141
127143
127143
127143
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound)
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound)
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound)
Element 2 code
fle.27.2223
fle.27.2223
fle.27.2223
ple.27.21-23
ple.27.21-23
ple.27.21-23
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Description parameter
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Description element
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4

Fischgewaesser 3d24 (BALDE_FA_3d24)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Platichthys flesus
Platichthys flesus
Platichthys flesus
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectes platessa
Element code
126436
126436
126436
127141
127141
127141
127143
127143
127143
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea)
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic)
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic)
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas)
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas)
Element 2 code
cod.27.24-32
cod.27.24-32
cod.27.24-32
fle.27.2425
fle.27.2425
fle.27.2425
ple.27.24-32
ple.27.24-32
ple.27.24-32
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
No
Yes
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description parameter
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
Related indicator
  • cod.27.25-32
  • cod.27.25-32
Criteria status
Not good
Good
Not assessed
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4

Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)

GES component
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
D3
Feature
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element
Anguilla anguilla
Anguilla anguilla
Anguilla anguilla
Belone belone
Belone belone
Belone belone
Clupea harengus
Clupea harengus
Clupea harengus
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Gadus morhua
Limanda limanda
Limanda limanda
Limanda limanda
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus)
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Sprattus sprattus
Element code
126281
126281
126281
126375
126375
126375
126417
126417
126417
126436
126436
126436
127139
127139
127139
154473
154473
154473
126425
126425
126425
Element code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range
N/A
N/A
N/A
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic)
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic)
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea)
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea)
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea)
Element 2 code
ele.2737.nea
ele.2737.nea
ele.2737.nea
her.27.20-24
her.27.20-24
her.27.20-24
cod.27.22-24
cod.27.22-24
cod.27.22-24
dab.27.22-32
dab.27.22-32
dab.27.22-32
tur.27.22–32
tur.27.22–32
tur.27.22–32
spr.27.22-32
spr.27.22-32
spr.27.22-32
Element 2 code source
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element source
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
ICES
Criterion
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
D3C1
D3C2
D3C3
Parameter
Other
BIOM-SSB
Other
Other
Other
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
BIOM-SSB
Other
Parameter other
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
No
No
Not assessed
No
No
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Yes
Yes
Not assessed
Description parameter
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
The trend has not been assessed.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good
Good
Good
Description element
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases. Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach. The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
Assessments period
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
Related targets
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4
  • UZO4.1
  • UZO4.2
  • UZO4.4