Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Germany / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Germany |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit |
Report date | 2020-02-17 |
Report access | DE_ART8_GES.xml |
Kuestengewaesser Arkona Becken (BALDE_CW_AB)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Element code |
154281 |
154281 |
154281 |
154210 |
154210 |
154210 |
151353 |
151353 |
151353 |
154333 |
154333 |
154333 |
151308 |
151308 |
151308 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuestengewaesser Bornholm Becken (BALDE_CW_BB)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Abramis brama |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Esox lucius |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Perca fluviatilis |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Rutilus rutilus |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Sander lucioperca |
Element code |
154281 |
154281 |
154281 |
154210 |
154210 |
154210 |
151353 |
151353 |
151353 |
154333 |
154333 |
154333 |
151308 |
151308 |
151308 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment per stock, the evaluation results for the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated according to the "one out -all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALDE_CW_D5_GB_B3
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Mytilus edulis |
Element code |
140480 |
140480 |
140480 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
|||
Threshold value source |
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Value unit other |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
|||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
|||
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
|||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
|||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
Fischgewaesser 3c22 (BALDE_FA_3c22)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Element code |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 22 and 23 (Belts and Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 21, 23 (Kattegat, Belt Seas, and the Sound) |
Element 2 code |
fle.27.2223
|
fle.27.2223
|
fle.27.2223
|
ple.27.21-23
|
ple.27.21-23
|
ple.27.21-23
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Value unit other |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
|||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Flounder was managed as on stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks in the Baltic (since 2014), two of which are in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
|
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
|
At the time of the initial assessment (based on: ICES evaluation 2011), Plaice was managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks in the Baltic (since 2012).
|
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fischgewaesser 3d24 (BALDE_FA_3d24)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Element code |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subdivisions 24 - 25 (west of Bornholm and southwestern central Baltic) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Subdivisions 24 - 32 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Sound and Belt Seas) |
Element 2 code |
cod.27.24-32
|
cod.27.24-32
|
cod.27.24-32
|
fle.27.2425
|
fle.27.2425
|
fle.27.2425
|
ple.27.24-32
|
ple.27.24-32
|
ple.27.24-32
|
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
|||
Related indicator |
|
|
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
|||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
Flounder was at the time of the MSFD initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into four stocks of flounder (since 2014), two of which are also in German Baltic Sea waters.
|
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
|
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
|
Plaice was at the time of the initial assessment in 2012 (based on: ICES evaluation 2011) managed as one stock in the Baltic. It is now divided into two plaice stocks (since 2012).
|
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Ostsee (BALDE_MS)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Belone belone |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Sprattus sprattus |
Element code |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126375 |
126375 |
126375 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
127139 |
127139 |
127139 |
154473 |
154473 |
154473 |
126425 |
126425 |
126425 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 20 - 24, spring spawners (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and western Baltic) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivisions 22–24, western Baltic stock (western Baltic Sea) |
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
DAB (Limanda limanda) in Divisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22 - 32 (Baltic Sea) |
Element 2 code |
ele.2737.nea
|
ele.2737.nea
|
ele.2737.nea
|
her.27.20-24
|
her.27.20-24
|
her.27.20-24
|
cod.27.22-24
|
cod.27.22-24
|
cod.27.22-24
|
dab.27.22-32
|
dab.27.22-32
|
dab.27.22-32
|
tur.27.22–32
|
tur.27.22–32
|
tur.27.22–32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
|||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
|||
Element source |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
ICES |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
Not specified
|
|||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
No |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
The trend has not been assessed.
|
||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
An assessment of the age and size structure (criterion D3C3) has not been carried out because so far no agreed and validated indicators and assessment limits exist between the EU Member States (ICES 2016a). ICES is responsible for providing scientific support for the development of appropriate assessment procedures, including thresholds, in the framework of the EU's common MSFD implementation strategy. The thresholds are then to be coordinated by regional or sub-regional cooperation.
|
||||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
|
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
|
According to the latest ICES advice from 2017, the recruitment of glass eels and yellow eels (here as a stock size index) is below possible reference values.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
Stocks could not be assessed due to the lack of data, indicators or assessment thresholds.
|
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
|
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
|
For one criterion (D3C2), there are no assessments in accordance with MSFD procedures available.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
There are no assessments available in accordance with MSFD assessment procedures.
|
|||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
For the status assessment, evaluation results for fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) are integrated per stock according to the "one out - all out" principle. An assessment of the overall state of fish stocks can currently not be carried out.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
An overall assessment of the state of fish stocks cannot be carried out at this time. The progressive implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy can be expected to improve the condition of many commercial stocks. New assessment methods are being developed in order to improve future assessment bases.
Evaluation results for the most recent quantitative ICES stock assessments have been used for the assessment of the fishing mortality (criterion D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (criterion D3C2) (as at 2017). These are carried out in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach.
The selection of stocks to be evaluated is based on the specifications of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 and the EU Evaluation Guide (test version 2017). Accordingly, the selection of assessment elements takes into account the stocks managed under the CFP, with a focus on the region's most commercially important stocks. This is calculated on the basis of landings between 2010 and 2015. In principle, only stocks which yield more than 0.1 % on average per year of the total landings in these areas are taken into account. Commercial catches of species outside their core distribution area have been excluded from the evaluation.
|
Assessments period |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|