Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D5 / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D5 Eutrophication
Member State Germany
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Report date 2020-02-17
Report access DE_ART9_GES.xml

GES component
D5
D5C1
D5C2
D5C3
D5C4
D5C5
D5C6
D5C7
D5C8
5.1.2
5.2
5.3
Marine reporting units
  • BALDE_CW
  • BALDE_CW_D5_AB_B2
  • BALDE_CW_D5_AB_B3
  • BALDE_CW_D5_BB_B2
  • BALDE_CW_D5_BB_B3
  • BALDE_CW_D5_GB_B3
  • BALDE_CW_D5_KB_B2
  • BALDE_CW_D5_KB_B3
  • BALDE_CW_D5_MB_B2
  • BALDE_CW_D5_MB_B3
  • BALDE_OFFSHORE_AB
  • BALDE_OFFSHORE_BB
  • BALDE_OFFSHORE_KB
  • BALDE_OFFSHORE_MB
Features
  • Eutrophication
GES description
Good environmental status (GES) in relation to eutrophication is achieved when "the good environmental status is achieved in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and when the eutrophication status is at least good in accordance with the integrated HELCOM eutrophication assessment". For the assessment of good environmental status of coastal waters < 1 nautical mile related to D5, the following criteria are used in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848: D5C1, D5C2, D5C4, D5C5, D5C6, D5C7, D5C8. For the assessment of good environmental status of the open Baltic Sea > 1 nm, the following criteria will be taken into account in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848: D5C1, D5C2, D5C4 and D5C5. Criterion D5C3 has been taken into account in some coastal waters as part of the assessment of the biological quality element phytoplankton (biovolume of cyanobacteria). Secondary criterion D5C8 is under development. Explanation: Germany does not update the general description of good environmental status (GES) from 2012 at descriptor level in this reporting exercise. During the reporting period, Germany has worked with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the EU's CIS process and HELCOM to develop methodological standards (indicators, evaluation procedures). Specific aspects of criteria and indicators that contribute to a quantitative assessment of good environmental status are reported in the reporting scheme Art. 8_GES. For the assessment of the criteria set out in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848, the relevant assessments under other EU directives shall be taken into account under Article 8_GES, and, as far as possible, the regional assessments that have been coordinated so far and will be, on a case-by-case basis, supplemented by national assessments.
Determination date
201810
Update type
Same as last reported determination
Justification for non-use of criterion
In the Kieler Bucht, criterion D5C3 is not applied, as blue algal blooms only rarely occur in these areas. Where relevant in coastal water bodies, the biovolume of cyanobacteria feeds into the WFD assessment of the biological quality component phytoplankton. In the open Baltic Sea > 1 nm, criteria D5C6 and D5C7 do not apply, since there are only occasional macrophyte stocks due to depth.
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements
During the reporting period, regional cooperation focused on the development of methodological standards to assess the various aspects of stress and resilience on the basis of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU. The indicators vary in their level of maturity and require further development or testing. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 gives, for the first time, an explicit obligation on the part of the EU Member States to agree on evaluation elements, thresholds and integration rules in the framework of the EU MSFD CIS process and through regional or subregional cooperation. Germany is actively working with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the ongoing work programmes of the EU MSFD and the HELCOM bodies to establish where a coordinated definition is still missing.