As part of EEA's ongoing security and identity management improvements, we are currently migrating the system to Entra ID authentication.
We kindly ask all users to start using Entra ID credentials when logging in to the system. 

Please note that LDAP authentication will be phased out and disabled by the end of August 2026. We encourage you to verify that you can successfully access the system and that your account and permissions function as expected after Entra ID login. Should you encounter any issues or require assistance during this transition, please contact Laszlo Cseh at laszlo.cseh@eaudeweb.ro Thank you for your cooperation and support.
As part of EEA's ongoing security and identity management improvements, we are currently migrating the system to Entra ID authentication.
We kindly ask all users to start using Entra ID credentials when logging in to the system. 

Please note that LDAP authentication will be phased out and disabled by the end of August 2026. We encourage you to verify that you can successfully access the system and that your account and permissions function as expected after Entra ID login. Should you encounter any issues or require assistance during this transition, please contact Laszlo Cseh at laszlo.cseh@eaudeweb.ro Thank you for your cooperation and support.

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D7 / Germany / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D7 Hydrographical changes
Member State Germany
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Report date 2024-10-15 10:22:35

BAL-DE-AA-CW

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D7
D7
D7
D7
Feature
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Element
Changes in seabed substrate
Salinity
Temperature
Changes in seabed substrate
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D7C1
D7C1
D7C1
D7C2
Parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Für die Küstengewässer ist der einzige hydrografische Parameter im Sinne der MSRL, der unmittelbar auf Veränderungen reagiert, die Strömung, z.B. beim Bau größerer Anlagen im Küstenvorfeld, beim Bau von Dämmen (z.B. im Jasmunder Bodden) oder bei Fahrrinnenvertiefungen. Diese Veränderungen wären in Bezug auf die gesamte deutsche Ostsee aber meist nur kleinräumig, beim Bau großer Anlagen und Dämme höchstens mesoskalig. Hier sind im Umfeld von Küstenschutzbauwerken die hydrografischen Bedingungen auf ungefähr 0,3 % der Fläche ([lt] 1 sm) dauerhaft verändert. Zusätzlich ist eine Fläche von rund 5,7 km² von Meeresbodenverlust betroffen, wobei hier Küstenschutzbauwerke und Häfen den größten Anteil ausmachen (5,5 km²). Insgesamt beträgt der Flächenverlust 0,13 % in den Küstengewässern. Aktuell wird lediglich das Fehlen von Hartsubstraten in den schleswig-holsteinischen Küstengewässern als erhebliche Belastung eingestuft. Ursache hierfür ist die bis in die Mitte der 1970er Jahre betriebene Steinfischerei, die zu erheblichen Verlusten an geeigneten Siedlungssubstraten für Makrophyten geführt hat (Bock et al., 2003). Der gegenwärtige Bau des Fehmarnbelt-Tunnels begann auf deutscher Seite erst im November 2021 und ist für die vorliegende Berichtsperiode nicht relevant. Die Auswirkungen auf die hydrografischen Bedingungen wurden im Rahmen der UVS untersucht und werden im Rahmen des baubegleitendenden Monitorings überwacht. english version: For coastal waters, the only hydrographic parameter that is relevant for the MSFD and that directly reacts to changes is the current, e.g. during the construction of larger facilities in the coastal foreland, during the construction of dams (e.g. in the Jasmund Bodden) or during channel deepening. In relation to the entire German Baltic Sea, however, these changes usually would only take place on a small-scale, or at most on a meso-scale in the case of the construction of large facilities and dams. In the case of the latter, the hydrographic conditions in the vicinity of coastal protection structures are permanently altered for approximately 0.3 % of the area ([lt] 1 nm). In addition, an area of around 5.7 km² is affected by the loss of seabed, with coastal protection structures and harbors accounting for the largest share (5.5 km²). Overall, the area lost in coastal waters amounts to 0.13 %. Currently, only the lack of hard substrates in coastal waters of the federal state of Schleswig-Holstein is classified as a significant impact. This is due to rock fishing, which was carried out until the mid-1970s and led to considerable losses of suitable substrates for macrophytes (Bock et al., 2003). The current construction of the Fehmarnbelt tunnel on the German side did not start until November 2021 and is therefore not relevant for this reporting period. The effects on the hydrographic conditions were investigated as part of the EIA and are monitored during the construction works. References: Bock, G., Thiermann, F., Rumohr, H., Karez, R. (2003): Ausmaß der Steinfischerei an der schleswig-holsteinischen Ostseeküste. - Jahresbericht Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, 2003, S. 111-6 116.
Not assessed.
Not assessed.
Weit weniger als 0,2 % der deutschen Ostseegewässer (ca. 17 km²) sind von dauerhaften hydrografischen Veränderungen betroffen. Diese beziehen sich primär auf dauerhafte Veränderungen des Meeresbodens durch menschliche Aktivitäten. Physischer Verlust an Meeresboden ergibt einen Anteil von 0,04 % (physischer Verlust aus Kriterium D6C1). Grundlage dieser Abschätzung sind neben Datenmeldungen zum HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment (HOLAS 3) vorwiegend Daten des Continental Shelf Information System (CONTIS) des BSH für die AWZ sowie Daten der Länder für das Küstenmeer. Im Umfeld von Küstenschutzbauwerken sind die hydrografischen Bedingungen auf ungefähr 0,3 % der Fläche ([lt] 1 sm) dauerhaft verändert. Zusätzlich ist eine Fläche von rund 5,7 km² von Meeresbodenverlust betroffen, wobei hier Küstenschutzbauwerke und Häfen den größten Anteil ausmachen (5,5 km²). Insgesamt beträgt der Flächenverlust 0,13 % in den Küstengewässern. english version: Far less than 0.2 % of German Baltic Sea waters (approx. 17 km²) are affected by permanent hydrographic changes. These relate primarily to permanent changes of the seabed caused by human activities. Physical loss of the seabed results in a share of 0.04 % (physical loss related to criterion D6C1). In addition to data reports for the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment (HOLAS 3), this estimate is based primarily on data from the BSH's Continental Shelf Information System (CONTIS) for the EEZ and data from the federal states for their territorial area of the coastal sea. In the vicinity of coastal protection structures, the hydrographic conditions are permanently altered for approximately 0.3 % of the area ([lt] 1 nm). In addition, an area of around 5.7 km² is affected by seabed loss, with coastal protection structures and ports accounting for the largest share (5.5 km²). Overall, the area lost in coastal waters amounts to 0.13 %.
Element status
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Systemische Auswirkungen auf die Biologie und Ökologie infolge hydrografischer Veränderungen sind erst zu erwarten, wenn die natürliche Variabilität der limitierenden Umweltfaktoren wie Temperatur und Salzgehalt dauerhaft überschritten wird. Generell zeigen Oberflächentemperatur und -salzgehalt eine hohe Korrelation mit dem NAO-Index. Vergleicht man die Winterwerte (Dezember, Januar, Feb-8 ruar) von Jahren mit einem hohen positiven NAO-Index mit Jahren mit niedrigem negativen NAO-Index, so ergeben sich Unterschiede in der Oberflächentemperatur von bis zu 3 °C und im Oberflächensalzgehalt von bis zu 3 psu. Diese natürliche Variabilität ist deutlich höher als die bis zum Ende des Jahrhunderts prognostizierten klimabedingten Veränderungen; beide Prozesse überlagern sich jedoch und müssen in ihrer Gesamtheit berücksichtigt werden. english version: Systemic effects on biology and ecology as a result of hydrographic changes are only to be expected if the natural variability of limiting environmental factors such as temperature and salinity is permanently exceeded. In general, surface temperature and salinity show a high correlation with the NAO index. If the winter values (December, January, February) of years with a high positive NAO index are compared with years with a low negative NAO index, differences in surface temperature of up to 3 °C and in surface salinity of up to 3 psu can be observed. This natural variability is significantly higher than the climate-induced changes predicted for the end of the century; however, both processes overlap and must be considered in their entity.
For the Baltic Sea, the monitoring data from recent years, which dissolve the seasonal season, show that all basic hydrographic parameters of the water column monitored in practice are strongly influenced by natural variability. The most striking feature here is the strong seasonal variability in the surface layer, which manifests up to the depth of the halokline. The sea surface temperature, averaged over the area of Baltic Sea waters and based on corresponding datasets issued by the BSH (‘ST data’), shows large interannual variations during the assessment period. This behaviour is overshadowed by a sustained increase in temperature, which is indicative of global ocean warming. However, SST fluctuations within a year are very large. The range is from 2 °C in climatological February and March to 18 °C in climatological August. It thus represents the largest fluctuations in temperature. During the 2016-2021 assessment period, the monthly surface temperatures for the German EEZ were within the range of ± 2 standard deviations. However, the months of June and July of 2021 were warmer. The annual mean of the near-surface water temperature at the Kiel lighthouse, as presented in the 2018 status assessment, has remained at an elevated level compared to the long-term average since the late 1980s, after a short-term collapse in the years 2010-2013. They reached their (previous) maximum in 2020 at 11.50 °C. The time trend in this series is 0.040 °C ± 0.024 °C per year. Unlike the surface layer, the deep waters of the Baltic Sea below the Halokline are not determined by seasonality, but by the Baltic single-flow events (MBI’s – Major Baltic Inflows). These are variable in time and can take place at different times of the year. The existing MARNET stations in the German Baltic Sea can capture these events, but do not allow a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the MBIs. For the assessment of the intensity of these single flow events, the MARNET station “Darßer Schwelle” is of paramount importance, as approximately 70 % of the water exchange takes place over this strait. The temporary observation of temperature changes in the ground waters at the MARNET stations must therefore always be seen in the context of the time of single flow events. No major inflow has taken place since 2017 (e.g. Mohrholz 2018). Several smaller, short-term events have an impact on the dynamics in the western Baltic Sea, generating increased variability there (IOW 2022). To date, climate change has had no obvious impact on single flow events (Mohrholz 2018). Systemic effects on biology and ecology as a result of hydrographic changes can only be expected once the natural variability of the limiting environmental factors, such as temperature and salinity, is persistently exceeded. In general, surface temperature and salinity show a high correlation with the NAO index. Comparing winter values (December, January, Feb-8 ruar) of years with a high positive NAO index with years with a low negative NAO index gives differences in surface temperature up to 3 °C and surface salt content up to 3 psu. This natural variability is significantly higher than the projected climate-related changes up to the end of the century; however, both processes overlap and need to be considered in their entirety. IOW 2022: Barotropic saltwater intrusions into the Baltic Sea (SBI) 1887 – 2021. https://www.io-warnemuende.de/major-baltic-inflow-statistics.html Mohrholz, V. (2018): Major Baltic inflow statistics-revised. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 384, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00384.
Source assessment feature
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct

BAL-DE-AA-OFFSHORE

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D7
D7
D7
D7
Feature
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Hydrographical changes
Element
Changes in seabed substrate
Salinity
Temperature
Changes in seabed substrate
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D7C1
D7C1
D7C1
D7C2
Parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Während die Veränderungen der hydrografischen Bedingungen der Wassersäule im Nah- und Fernfeld von Offshore-Windparks in der Ostsee noch nicht bekannt sind, können die von Verlust betroffenen Flächen am Meeresboden quantifiziert werden. Im aktuellen Bewertungszeitraum 2016–2021 beträgt die durch Offshore-Windparks von Meeresbodenverlust geprägte Fläche in den tieferen Meeresgewässern ([gt] 1 sm) weniger als 0,07 km² bzw. rund 0,005 Promille der deutschen Ostsee. Der Flächenverbrauch ist demnach sehr gering, hat sich während des Bewertungszeitraum im Vergleich zum letzten Bericht jedoch verdoppelt. Zusätzlich gingen bis 2021 0,46 km² an Meeresboden durch Pipelines verloren. In der Summe sind hiermit rund 0,05 Promille der tieferen Gewässer der deutschen Ostsee ([gt] 1 sm) von einem Meeresbodenverlust betroffen. english version: While the changes in hydrographic conditions of the water column in the near and far field of offshore wind farms in the Baltic Sea are not yet known, the areas affected by seabed loss can be quantified. Within the current assessment period of 2016-2021, the area affected by seabed loss due to offshore wind farms in the deeper marine waters ([gt] 1 nm) is less than 0.07 km² or about 0.005 per thousand of the German Baltic Sea area. Area consumption is therefore very low, but it has doubled during the assessment period compared to the last report. In addition, 0.46 km² of seabed was lost by 2021 due to the construction of pipelines. In total, this means that around 0.05 per thousand of the deeper water area of the German Baltic Sea ([gt] 1 nm) are affected by seabed loss.
Not assessed.
Not assessed.
Weit weniger als 0,2 % der deutschen Ostseegewässer (ca. 17 km²) sind von dauerhaften hydrografischen Veränderungen betroffen. Diese beziehen sich primär auf dauerhafte Veränderungen des Meeresbodens durch menschliche Aktivitäten. Physischer Verlust an Meeresboden ergibt einen Anteil von 0,04 % (physischer Verlust aus Kriterium D6C1). Grundlage dieser Abschätzung sind neben Datenmeldungen zum HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment (HOLAS 3) vorwiegend Daten des Continental Shelf Information System (CONTIS) des BSH für die AWZ sowie Daten der Länder für das Küstenmeer. Im aktuellen Bewertungszeitraum 2016–2021 beträgt die durch Offshore-Windparks von Meeresbodenverlust geprägte Fläche in den tieferen Meeresgewässern ([gt] 1 sm) weniger als 0,07 km². Der Flächenverbrauch ist demnach sehr gering, hat sich während des Bewertungszeitraum im Vergleich zum letzten Bericht jedoch verdoppelt. Zusätzlich gingen bis 2021 0,46 km² an Meeresboden durch Pipelines verloren. In der Summe sind hiermit rund 0,05 Promille der tieferen Gewässer der deutschen Ostsee ([gt] 1 sm) von einem Meeresbodenverlust betroffen. english version: Far less than 0.2 % of German Baltic Sea waters (approx. 17 km²) are affected by permanent hydrographic changes. These relate primarily to permanent changes of the seabed caused by human activities. Physical loss of the seabed results in a share of 0.04 % (physical loss related to criterion D6C1). In addition to data reports for the HELCOM Third Holistic Assessment (HOLAS 3), this estimate is based primarily on data from the BSH's Continental Shelf Information System (CONTIS) for the EEZ and data from the federal states for their territorial area of the coastal sea. In the current assessment period of 2016-2021, the area affected by loss of seabed due to offshore wind farms in the deeper marine waters ([gt] 1 nm) is less than 0.07 km². Area consumption is therefore very low, but has doubled during the assessment period compared to the last report. In addition, 0.46 km² of seabed was lost to pipelines by 2021. In total, this means that around 0.05 per thousand of the deeper waters of the German Baltic Sea ([gt] 1 nm) are affected by seabed loss.
Element status
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description element
Systemic effects on biology and ecology as a result of hydrographic changes can only be expected once the natural variability of the limiting environmental factors, such as temperature and salinity, is persistently exceeded. In general, surface temperature and salinity show a high correlation with the NAO index. Comparing winter values (December, January, Feb-ruar) of years with a high positive NAO index with years with a low negative NAO index gives differences in surface temperature up to 3 °C and surface salt content up to 3 psu. This natural variability is significantly higher than the projected climate-related changes up to the end of the century; however, both processes overlap and need to be considered in their entirety.
For the Baltic Sea, the monitoring data from recent years, which dissolve the seasonal season, show that all basic hydrographic parameters of the water column monitored in practice are strongly influenced by natural variability. The most striking feature here is the strong seasonal variability in the surface layer, which manifests up to the depth of the halokline. The sea surface temperature, averaged over the area of Baltic Sea waters and based on corresponding datasets issued by the BSH (‘ST data’), shows large interannual variations during the assessment period. This behaviour is overshadowed by a sustained increase in temperature, which is indicative of global ocean warming. However, SST fluctuations within a year are very large. The range is from 2 °C in climatological February and March to 18 °C in climatological August. It thus represents the largest fluctuations in temperature. During the 2016-2021 assessment period, the monthly surface temperatures for the German EEZ were within the range of ± 2 standard deviations. However, the months of June and July of 2021 were warmer. The annual mean of the near-surface water temperature at the Kiel lighthouse, as presented in the 2018 status assessment, has remained at an elevated level compared to the long-term average since the late 1980s, after a short-term collapse in the years 2010-2013. They reached their (previous) maximum in 2020 at 11.50 °C. The time trend in this series is 0.040 °C ± 0.024 °C per year. Unlike the surface layer, the deep waters of the Baltic Sea below the Halokline are not determined by seasonality, but by the Baltic single-flow events (MBI’s – Major Baltic Inflows). These are variable in time and can take place at different times of the year. The existing MARNET stations in the German Baltic Sea can capture these events, but do not allow a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the MBIs. For the assessment of the intensity of these single flow events, the MARNET station “Darßer Schwelle” is of paramount importance, as approximately 70 % of the water exchange takes place over this strait. The temporary observation of temperature changes in the ground waters at the MARNET stations must therefore always be seen in the context of the time of single flow events. No major inflow has taken place since 2017 (e.g. Mohrholz 2018). Several smaller, short-term events have an impact on the dynamics in the western Baltic Sea, generating increased variability there (IOW 2022). To date, climate change has had no obvious impact on single flow events (Mohrholz 2018). Systemic effects on biology and ecology as a result of hydrographic changes can only be expected once the natural variability of the limiting environmental factors, such as temperature and salinity, is persistently exceeded. In general, surface temperature and salinity show a high correlation with the NAO index. Comparing winter values (December, January, February) of years with a high positive NAO index with years with a low negative NAO index gives differences in surface temperature up to 3 °C and surface salt content up to 3 psu. This natural variability is significantly higher than the projected climate-related changes up to the end of the century; however, both processes overlap and need to be considered in their entirety. IOW 2022: Barotropic saltwater intrusions into the Baltic Sea (SBI) 1887 – 2021. https://www.io-warnemuende.de/major-baltic-inflow-statistics.html Mohrholz, V. (2018): Major Baltic inflow statistics-revised. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 384, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00384.
Source assessment feature
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Description overall status
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct