Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Denmark / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Denmark |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Danish Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2019-08-30 |
Report access | DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml |
Danish part of Baltic Sea from coastline to EEZ (BAL-DK-TOTAL)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
Primary producers |
Secondary producers |
Apex predators |
Planktivores |
Primary producers |
Secondary producers |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsPrimProd |
TrophicGuildsSecProd |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPlankt |
TrophicGuildsPrimProd |
TrophicGuildsSecProd |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Parameter other |
Diversity of primary producers see report in D1 pelagic habitats |
Diversity of secondary producers see report in D1 pelagic habitats |
Biomass as reported under D1 pelagic habitats
|
Biomass of zooplankton see report under D1 pelagic habitats. |
|||
Threshold value upper |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
The diversity (species composition and their relative density) of the individual trophic levels is not negatively affected by man-made pressures.
|
The diversity (species composition and their relative density) of the individual trophic levels is not negatively affected by man-made pressures.
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
|
||
Threshold value source |
|||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
800.0 |
70.0 |
|||||
Value achieved lower |
800.0 |
45.0 |
|||||
Value unit |
tonne
|
Other
|
|||||
Value unit other |
mg C per cubic meter
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
The distribution of phytoplankton shows large year-to-date fluctuations (see D1C6) but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the Baltic Sea scale. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
For the species diversity in the Baltic, the data series is based on sampling from one or two stations sampled during the summer. This does not give a true and fair view of the area. The number of species varied without a clear trend from 1979-2009, after which no data are available. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
The above assessment addresses the total biomass for the three species (gray seal, spotted seal and harbour porpoise) from 2016. Of this, the biomass of harbour porpoise represents 82-89%. The assessment of improvement is in relation to an assessment of 1994. It is estimated that the population of harbour porpoises, spotted seals and gray seals is progressing. The population of harbour porpoises in the inner Baltic is very small and the trend is unknown. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
The biomass of small pelagic fish around Denmark has increased slightly in the period from 2010 to 2016, for the Baltic Sea region increases have been seen in Baltic sprat. The food supply for predators on these species has thus been steady in recent years. Especially sprat is eaten by many birds and fish species. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Upper and lower values show the higher and lower annual mean values observed during the assessment period. Overall biomass of primary producers have been decreasing in the North Sea and Kattegat for the period 1978-2016, a slight increase has been observed since 2012. |
There is insufficient data for an assessment of the zooplankton biomass in the region.
|
There is no significant change in the biomass of large fish-eating fish in the Baltic from 2010-2016. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
Phytoplankton species diversity exhibits large year-on-year fluctuations, but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the Baltic Sea scale, and no temporal trends are still seen here. Overall, the species diversity of phytoplankton cannot be stated as being in good environmental condition, as the data base is currently too insubstantial to be able to assess this.
|
The data series for the species diversity of zooplankton in the Baltic Sea is based on sampling from one to two stations in the summer. This is not comprehensive for the MRU and does not necessarily give a true and fair view of the species diversity in the area. The number of species varies without a clear trend from 1979 to 2009, after which no data are available.
|
The total marine mammal biomass is stable or increased from 1994 to 2016. The biomass in 2005 was lower than in 1994 (Figure 23.6). Harbour porpoises make up 82-89% of the biomass all year, and the total figures for marine mammals are therefore mainly controlled by the biomass of harbour porpoises. The spotted seal has increased in number from 1994 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2016 in both areas. Gray seal was virtually absent in 1994 and 2005, but in 2016 the number has increased significantly in the MRU. Furthermore, according to the GES decision, good environmental status for seals and porpoises is considered to correspond to favorable conservation status under the Habitats Directive. The condition of marine mammals in the Danish marine areas was assessed in 2013 under Article 17. It was considered that the condition of the spotted seal in the Baltic Sea and the Great Belt was favorable, while the condition of harbour porpoises and gray seals was unfavorable. Based on that, it is not possible to make an overall assessment of the state of the trophic level.
|
The overall plankton biomass has been steadily declining in the Baltic Sea and the Great Belt from 1978 to 2016. A slight increase is seen after 2012.
|
|||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
In a national inventory of marine mammals, three species are evaluated - harbour porpoise, spotted seal and gray seal. The condition of the marine mammals can often be seen as a good indicator of the overall state of the food chain, as the condition of this group of species is dependent on the condition of the underlying trophic levels.
|
The guild covers populations of Baltic Sea cod
|
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration has not been applied.
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration has not been applied
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of Baltic Sea from coastline to EEZ. Data covers DK-TOTAL. (DK-TOTAL-part-BAL)
GES component |
D4
|
---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
Sub-apex pelagic predators |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexPel |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
|
Element 2 code |
|
Element 2 code source |
|
Element source |
EU |
Criterion |
D4C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Parameter other |
As reported under D1C2 for birds
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold qualitative |
|
Threshold value source |
|
Threshold value source other |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Value unit other |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
|
Trend |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
For birds, good environmental status corresponds to the assessment under Article 12 of the Birds Protection Directive. Data from the recent report (2013) of breeding birds shows that, in general, certain species groups are stable or progressive, such as herbivores and birds foraging in the water column. For groups such as waders and birds foraging in the surface, less than 75% of the species are stable or in progress. For wintering birds, most of the species groups are stable, progressive or fluctuating, but not birds that seek food on the seabed.
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
This description deals with birds that also cross other trophic levels. In 2013, Denmark reported development trends for a number of Danish birds to the EU under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive. The assessment covered the entire Danish marine area. Inventory development varies between species. The number of gulls and alfalfa is, for example. overall, with the exception of the splits, the terns are in decline. For wintering birds, it is difficult to describe a uniform trend.
|
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Integration has not been applied
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Integration has not been applied
|
GES extent threshold |
|
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
|
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
|