Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Denmark / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems
Member State Denmark
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Danish Environmental Protection Agency
Report date 2019-08-30
Report access DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml

Danish part of Baltic Sea from coastline to EEZ (BAL-DK-TOTAL)

GES component
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
Feature
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Shelf ecosystem
Element
Primary producers
Secondary producers
Apex predators
Planktivores
Primary producers
Secondary producers
Sub-apex demersal predators
Element code
TrophicGuildsPrimProd
TrophicGuildsSecProd
TrophicGuildsPredApex
TrophicGuildsPlankt
TrophicGuildsPrimProd
TrophicGuildsSecProd
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
National
National
National
National
National
National
National
Criterion
D4C1
D4C1
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
Parameter
Other
Other
Biomass
Biomass
Other
Other
Biomass
Parameter other
Diversity of primary producers see report in D1 pelagic habitats
Diversity of secondary producers see report in D1 pelagic habitats
Biomass as reported under D1 pelagic habitats
Biomass of zooplankton see report under D1 pelagic habitats.
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
The diversity (species composition and their relative density) of the individual trophic levels is not negatively affected by man-made pressures.
The diversity (species composition and their relative density) of the individual trophic levels is not negatively affected by man-made pressures.
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
The balance between the trophic levels (biomass or number of individuals).
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
800.0
70.0
Value achieved lower
800.0
45.0
Value unit
tonne
Other
Value unit other
mg C per cubic meter
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The distribution of phytoplankton shows large year-to-date fluctuations (see D1C6) but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the Baltic Sea scale. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
For the species diversity in the Baltic, the data series is based on sampling from one or two stations sampled during the summer. This does not give a true and fair view of the area. The number of species varied without a clear trend from 1979-2009, after which no data are available. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
The above assessment addresses the total biomass for the three species (gray seal, spotted seal and harbour porpoise) from 2016. Of this, the biomass of harbour porpoise represents 82-89%. The assessment of improvement is in relation to an assessment of 1994. It is estimated that the population of harbour porpoises, spotted seals and gray seals is progressing. The population of harbour porpoises in the inner Baltic is very small and the trend is unknown. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
The biomass of small pelagic fish around Denmark has increased slightly in the period from 2010 to 2016, for the Baltic Sea region increases have been seen in Baltic sprat. The food supply for predators on these species has thus been steady in recent years. Especially sprat is eaten by many birds and fish species. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
Upper and lower values show the higher and lower annual mean values observed during the assessment period. Overall biomass of primary producers have been decreasing in the North Sea and Kattegat for the period 1978-2016, a slight increase has been observed since 2012.
There is insufficient data for an assessment of the zooplankton biomass in the region.
There is no significant change in the biomass of large fish-eating fish in the Baltic from 2010-2016. For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Phytoplankton species diversity exhibits large year-on-year fluctuations, but no trend over time. However, the number of species varies relatively little when calculated on the Baltic Sea scale, and no temporal trends are still seen here. Overall, the species diversity of phytoplankton cannot be stated as being in good environmental condition, as the data base is currently too insubstantial to be able to assess this.
The data series for the species diversity of zooplankton in the Baltic Sea is based on sampling from one to two stations in the summer. This is not comprehensive for the MRU and does not necessarily give a true and fair view of the species diversity in the area. The number of species varies without a clear trend from 1979 to 2009, after which no data are available.
The total marine mammal biomass is stable or increased from 1994 to 2016. The biomass in 2005 was lower than in 1994 (Figure 23.6). Harbour porpoises make up 82-89% of the biomass all year, and the total figures for marine mammals are therefore mainly controlled by the biomass of harbour porpoises. The spotted seal has increased in number from 1994 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2016 in both areas. Gray seal was virtually absent in 1994 and 2005, but in 2016 the number has increased significantly in the MRU. Furthermore, according to the GES decision, good environmental status for seals and porpoises is considered to correspond to favorable conservation status under the Habitats Directive. The condition of marine mammals in the Danish marine areas was assessed in 2013 under Article 17. It was considered that the condition of the spotted seal in the Baltic Sea and the Great Belt was favorable, while the condition of harbour porpoises and gray seals was unfavorable. Based on that, it is not possible to make an overall assessment of the state of the trophic level.
The overall plankton biomass has been steadily declining in the Baltic Sea and the Great Belt from 1978 to 2016. A slight increase is seen after 2012.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
In a national inventory of marine mammals, three species are evaluated - harbour porpoise, spotted seal and gray seal. The condition of the marine mammals can often be seen as a good indicator of the overall state of the food chain, as the condition of this group of species is dependent on the condition of the underlying trophic levels.
The guild covers populations of Baltic Sea cod
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration has not been applied.
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
Integration has not been applied
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
Assessments period
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
Related targets
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3

Danish part of Baltic Sea from coastline to EEZ. Data covers DK-TOTAL. (DK-TOTAL-part-BAL)

GES component
D4
Feature
Shelf ecosystem
Element
Sub-apex pelagic predators
Element code
TrophicGuildsPredSApexPel
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
Criterion
D4C2
Parameter
Other
Parameter other
As reported under D1C2 for birds
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Description parameter
For several of the trophic levels, the state of the individual species within the trophic level is known, but there is insufficient knowledge of the balance across and between the trophic levels. Therefore, regionally coordinated thresholds for the criteria under descriptor 4 are not currently set.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Description criteria
For birds, good environmental status corresponds to the assessment under Article 12 of the Birds Protection Directive. Data from the recent report (2013) of breeding birds shows that, in general, certain species groups are stable or progressive, such as herbivores and birds foraging in the water column. For groups such as waders and birds foraging in the surface, less than 75% of the species are stable or in progress. For wintering birds, most of the species groups are stable, progressive or fluctuating, but not birds that seek food on the seabed.
Element status
Unknown
Description element
This description deals with birds that also cross other trophic levels. In 2013, Denmark reported development trends for a number of Danish birds to the EU under Article 12 of the Bird Protection Directive. The assessment covered the entire Danish marine area. Inventory development varies between species. The number of gulls and alfalfa is, for example. overall, with the exception of the splits, the terns are in decline. For wintering birds, it is difficult to describe a uniform trend.
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration has not been applied
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
Integration has not been applied
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Description overall status
The sea food network is dependent on the state of the different species groups, and since threshold values for the food criteria have not yet been set, reference is sometimes made to the assessments for the individual species groups under descriptor 1. Whether good environmental condition is achieved for descriptor 4 on the food depends on whether the individual elements of the food network achieve good environmental status. Despite assessments of individual sub-elements of the food network, it is currently not possible to assess whether the food network as a whole will be in good environmental condition by 2020. However, the balance of the sea food is expected to improve as the environmental targets for pressure factors and condition under the other descriptors is obtained. Going forward, therefore, work remains in the regional conventions with the development of relevant indicators and the setting of relevant thresholds. For this, it must be ensured that there is sufficiently good data.
Assessments period
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Changes to hydrological conditions
Related targets
  • DK-T4.1
  • DK-T4.2
  • DK-T4.3