Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / Denmark / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
Member State | Denmark |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Danish Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2019-08-30 |
Report access | DK_ART8_GES_Merge_20190829.xml |
BAL-DK1-CW
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Phytoplankton |
Angiosperms |
Benthic invertebrates |
Element code |
QE1-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-3 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|||
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C2
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
As in WFD
|
As in WFD
|
As in WFD
|
Threshold value source |
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Value unit other |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
13.4707 |
0.1791 |
3.3167 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
As assessed in WFD
|
As assessed in WFD
|
As assessed in WFD
|
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
Related pressures |
|||
Related targets |
BAL-DK2-CW
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Phytoplankton |
Angiosperms |
Benthic invertebrates |
Element code |
QE1-1 |
QE1-2-2 |
QE1-3 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|||
Element 2 code |
|||
Element 2 code source |
|||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C2
|
D5C7
|
D5C8
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
Threshold value upper |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||
Threshold qualitative |
As in WFD
|
As in WFD
|
As in WFD
|
Threshold value source |
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||
Value achieved upper |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||
Value unit |
|||
Value unit other |
|||
Proportion threshold value |
|||
Proportion value achieved |
79.2028 |
7.6469 |
49.5358 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
As assessed in WFD
|
As assessed in WFD
|
As assessed in WFD
|
Related indicator |
|||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
As used in WFD
|
GES extent threshold |
|||
GES extent achieved |
|||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
2010-2016 |
Related pressures |
|||
Related targets |
BAL-DK3-CW
GES component |
D5
|
---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Element |
Phytoplankton |
Element code |
QE1-1 |
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5)(EQRs) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedPropertyBiologyEQR/view
|
Element 2 |
|
Element 2 code |
|
Element 2 code source |
|
Element source |
EU |
Criterion |
D5C2
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Parameter other |
As used in WFD
|
Threshold value upper |
|
Threshold value lower |
|
Threshold qualitative |
As in WFD
|
Threshold value source |
|
Threshold value source other |
|
Value achieved upper |
|
Value achieved lower |
|
Value unit |
|
Value unit other |
|
Proportion threshold value |
|
Proportion value achieved |
|
Proportion threshold value unit |
% area of MRU achieving threshold value |
Trend |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
As assessed in WFD
|
Related indicator |
|
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Description element |
|
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
As used in WFD
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
As used in WFD
|
GES extent threshold |
|
GES extent achieved |
|
GES extent unit |
Proportion of area in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The assessment of the condition of the Danish fjords and coastal waters reflects national assessments under the Water Framework Directive. That is, in relation to eutrophication in coastal waters (within 1 nautical mile from the baseline), good environmental status corresponding to good ecological status is determined based on a number of quality elements according to the Water Framework Directive. In the Danish watershed plans, 119 coastal water areas (within 1 nautical mile) have been defined in four water districts. Overall, the state of the water areas is assessed on the basis of the indicators (quality elements) chlorophyll, eelgrass and bottom fauna. The indicators are monitored in the national monitoring program. When the watershed plans were published in 2016, two coastal watersheds had target fulfillment. Implementation of efforts under the Danish watershed plans is expected to have a positive impact on the condition in all open Danish marine areas.
|
Assessments period |
2010-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
Related targets |
Danish part of HELCOM Kattegat (SEA_001) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_001-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.49 |
17.4 |
0.64 |
1.5 |
7.6 |
|
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
5.9 |
0.54 |
15.6 |
0.7 |
0.94 |
9.4 |
|
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
||||
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Storebælt (SEA_002) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_002-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.59 |
21.0 |
0.95 |
1.7 |
8.5 |
|
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
6.45 |
0.65 |
15.7 |
0.76 |
2.0 |
7.6 |
|
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
milligram per litre
|
|
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Øresund (SEA_003) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_003-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
3.3 |
0.64 |
17.3 |
0.68 |
1.2 |
8.2 |
|
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
6.0 |
0.42 |
17.8 |
0.79 |
1.26 |
8.26 |
|
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
milligram per litre
|
|
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Kiel Bugt (SEA_004) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_004-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.5 |
0.57 |
2.0 |
7.4 |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
5.9 |
0.64 |
2.16 |
6.9 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
milligram per litre
|
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Mecklenburg Bugt (SEA_005) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_005-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
4.3 |
0.49 |
1.8 |
7.1 |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
6.3 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
5.3 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
milligram per litre
|
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Arkona Bassinet (SEA_006) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_006-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Parameter other |
|||||||
Threshold value upper |
2.9 |
0.36 |
1.8 |
7.2 |
|||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
4.0 |
0.62 |
2.6 |
5.5 |
|||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
micromole per litre
|
microgram per litre
|
metre
|
milligram per litre
|
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danish part of HELCOM Bornholmerbassinet (SEA_007) from 1 mile zone to EEZ (BAL-DK-SEA_007-WO_coast)
GES component |
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
D5
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Element |
DIN |
DIP |
TN |
TP |
Chlorophyll-a |
Photic limit |
Dissolved oxygen |
Element code |
TDIN |
PHOS |
NTOT |
PTOT |
EEA_3164-01-0 |
EEA_3111-01-1 |
EEA_3132-01-2 |
Element code source |
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Element 2 |
|||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
Criterion |
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C1
|
D5C2
|
D5C4
|
D5C5
|
Parameter |
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in water
|
Transparency in water
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Oxygen dept
|
||||||
Threshold value upper |
2.5 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
7.1 |
6.37 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
9.3 |
0.66 |
4.1 |
5.2 |
8.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||
Value unit |
milligram per litre
|
||||||
Value unit other |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||
Criteria status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||||||
Element status |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
Each assessment unit shows the result for the criteria group furthest away from good status. |
GES extent threshold |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
HELCOM's overall assessment shows that the Danish maritime areas in the Kattegat, the Great Belt and the Baltic are in poor condition.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|