Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-M / Estonia / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
| Member State | Estonia |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2024-12-11 14:54:57 |
BAL-EE-AA-AA
Regional assessment area |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
HELCOML1_SEA000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES component |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
D1M |
Feature |
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Element |
Halichoerus grypus |
Pusa hispida |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||
Trend element |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
||||||||
Element 2 |
||||||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
|||||||||
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
D1C4
|
D1C4
|
D1C4
|
D1C5
|
||
Parameter |
Not assessed
|
Abundance
|
Not assessed
|
Distribution (pattern)
|
Distribution (pattern)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Not assessed
|
||
Threshold value upper |
10000.0 |
36260.0 |
36260.0 |
|||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
>= |
>= |
>= |
|||||||
Threshold qualitative |
The distributional pattern of grey seal is continuous in whole Estonian marine area |
The distributional pattern of ringed seals is continuous in whole Estonian marine area |
||||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
|||||||
Value achieved upper |
40000.0 |
13900.0 |
36260.0 |
|||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||
Value unit |
individuals
|
Other
|
Other
|
square kilometre
|
square kilometre
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Not assessed |
Improving |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Not assessed |
||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Not assessed |
||
Description parameter |
There is no national indicator, and the bycatch data is insufficient. Therefore, Estonia does not provide a separate assessment for D1C1 for its marine area. The D1C1 assessment is conducted on a regional scale: https://indicators.helcom.fi/indicator/bycatch/ |
Distribution of the population is uniform. Grey seals are inhabiting entire Estonian sea area.
Value unit: continuous/fragmented |
Distribution pattern of ringed seals in Estonian sea area is fregmented.The main population inhabiting the Estonian sea area is located in the Gulf of Riga, and contact with the seals in other sea areas or in nearby countries has not been proven by research.
Value unit: continuous/fragmented |
|||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
||
Description criteria |
There is no national indicator, and the bycatch data is insufficient. Therefore, Estonia does not provide a separate assessment for D1C1 for its marine area. The D1C1 assessment is conducted on a regional scale, HELCOM’s core indicator results for bycatch https://indicators.helcom.fi/indicator/bycatch/ |
There is no national indicator, and the bycatch data is insufficient. Therefore, Estonia does not provide a separate assessment for D1C1 for its marine area. The D1C1 assessment is conducted on a regional scale, HELCOM’s core indicator results for bycatch https://indicators.helcom.fi/indicator/bycatch/ |
There is no national indicator, and the bycatch data is insufficient. Therefore, Estonia does not provide a separate assessment for D1C1 for its marine area. The D1C1 assessment is conducted on a regional scale, HELCOM’s core indicator results for bycatch https://indicators.helcom.fi/indicator/bycatch/ |
|||||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
||||||||
Description element |
The status of the grey seal population is good, its abundance is increasing and GES is achieved. |
The status of the ringed seal population is poor, and its breeding success - and consequently the population's growth rate - is hindered by the reduction in ice cover caused by climate change. The ringed seal population also faces threats from fisheries bycatch, as the loss of each individual negatively impacts the already depleted population. |
||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Type C |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
NHIE_NWEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Non-hierarchical, non-weighted averaging
|
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
one-out-all-out
|
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent achieved |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
Proportion of species in good status within species group |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionReported |
Description overall status |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
The grey seal population is in a favourable condition, GES is achieved with regard to abundance and spatial distribution, while the ringed seal population is not favourable, GES has not been achieved yet. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |