Member State report / Art13 / 2022 / D1-R / Estonia / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 13 Programme of measures (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2022-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Reptiles |
Member State | Estonia |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Estonian Environmental Research Centre |
Report date | 2023-03-01 |
Report access | 363 |
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RegionSubregion |
Baltic Sea |
Baltic Sea |
Baltic Sea |
Baltic Sea |
|||
Measure code |
BALEE-M017 |
BALEE-M021 |
BALEE-M026 |
BALEE-M035 |
BALEE-M020 |
BALEE-M076 |
BALEE-M036 |
Measure old code |
|||||||
Measure name |
Improving the effectiveness of the existing network of marine protected areas |
Applying technologies to reduce and prevent bycatch for the protection of Baltic Sea species |
Reducing fishing efforts to GES level and development and implementation of the corresponding concept |
Preparing and implementing minimum requirements for EIA and impact monitoring of blue economy development projects |
Improving the condition of fish spawning areas and migration routes, stimulating populations and updating protection measures |
Changing hydromorphological conditions for local improvement of environmental status |
Construction of the openings of the dam in Väike Väin to improve water exchange and to open the strait as a fish migration route |
Measure description |
Assessing the effectiveness and coherence of the existing network of marine protected areas and developing measures to improve their coherence; developing and implementing a monitoring programme for marine protected areas.
Making changes in the network of marine protected areas in order to increase coherence and efficiency (changing the boundaries of protected areas, introducing changes to the conservation management plans of protected areas according to the results of the efficiency analysis).
Determining which measures other than the conservation management plans of marine protected areas contribute to the protection of species by evaluating the use of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECM) in the Estonian sea area. Participating in the development of HELCOM MPA management guidelines and evaluating the effectiveness of Estonian measures according to developed methodology by 2025 and publicizing the results, including providing the necessary input to HELCOM.
Prepare a compliance assessment of Estonian marine protected areas according to the updated HELCOM instructions, including assessing:
1. national and regional coherence of Estonian marine protected areas, management efficiency and representation of protection regimes;
2. sufficiency of marine protection management plans or other area-based conservation measures for the protection of HELCOM Red Book species and their habitats;
3. sufficiency of conservation management plans or other area-based conservation measures for the protection of threatened and declining species;
4. sufficiency of conservation management plans of marine protected areas or other area-based conservation measures related to fishing intensity;
5. the need to establish conservation measures for areas important for biodiversity and ecosystem resilience that are not directly rare or endangered [by 2025] Development of protection measures based on the compliance assessment of Estonian marine protected areas, including forwarding of national input to HELCOM [by 2027] |
1) Support testing and applying new techniques to reduce bycatch (i.e. catching non-target fish species, birds and mammals).
2) Developing and implementing financial support measures to reduce bycatch. One of the sub-activities is to support the introduction of seal deterrents to reduce marine mammal bycatch in commercial fishing gear.
3) Identify problems related to bird bycatch, plan possible voluntary and regulatory measures, especially for important bird areas, to prevent bird bycatch [by 2027]. |
The main factor affecting biodiversity and abundance of fish populations, the status of industrial fish stocks and the structure of food webs is fishing. The studies so far have indicated that the large number of fishing gear potentially in use and for which licences have been issued to fishermen in Estonian maritime areas is one of the main reasons that prevents achieving GES. Thus, it is necessary to reduce the number of fishing gear potentially in use, but at the same time, it is necessary to develop a concept of how to implement the change in a way to reduce the possible negative socio-economic impact. The concept must propose various solutions to achieve the target. |
The aim of the measure is to prevent or reduce possible negative environmental impacts to marine ecosystems caused by offshore infrastructure developments; including fish farms (e.g. non-indigenous species; ecological and genetical impacts to local fish communities; introduction of antibiotics; other pharmaceuticals and hazardous substances; implementing HELCOM recommendation 37/3). As for the blue economy development projects, there are no minimum EIA requirements and there is also no standard for monitoring during operational phase. As these are mostly maritime areas for which the existing information is extremely patchy, it is not possible to rely only on the existing information.
Within the measure, EIA minimum requirements for development projects (description of the necessary information to conduct an EIA) and an EIA-SAE ex-post assessment system will be prepared.
Preparing guidance document (standard) for monitoring during the operational phase of blue economy projects. |
As a result of straightening and damming of the rivers, and vegetal overgrowth in small bays and shallow sea areas, the quantity and quality of accessible spawning grounds for many fish populations (e. g. pike, ide, dace, roach, burbot, sea trout, Atlantic salmon, whitefish, eel) have decreased.
In order to achieve the good environmental status of biodiversity, distribution of fish in the coastal sea areas, the status of commercial fish populations and food webs, it is necessary to improve the respective degraded wetlands (e.g. river estuaries, coastal lagoons, shallow sea areas) and migration routes (e. g. straits between coastal lagoons and the sea) to ensure migration routes for fish to their spawning grounds, stimulate populations and update protection measures (e. g. updating the regionally coordinated eel management plan) and develop and implement new measures to improve the status of the population (e. g. stocking juvenile fish into the coastal sea, introducing additional catch limits or regulating the number of traps used). |
Removing hydrological factors, reducing nutrient/organic accumulation and improving environmental conditions in local areas, including, if necessary, removal of nutrient-rich sediments or decomposing algae. The local areas are the coastal area along Pirita road in Tallinn Bay and Haapsalu Tagalaht bay.
Proposing technical solutions, preparing and implementing of technical projects for improving local conditions. One of the technical solution is to improve the water exchange and eliminate areas with stagnant water. |
As a result of the construction of the road dam of Väike Väin (Väike Strait), the exchange of water between different parts of the strait has been disturbed, which has caused the water quality to deteriorate, and many fish species (e.g. Baltic herring, whitefish, ide, perch, pike, etc.) cannot pass through this natural migration route. Therefore, it is necessary to construct the largest possible passageways into the road dam of Väike Väin (Väike Strait) to ensure the free passage of fish between their spawning grounds and feeding areas. |
Update type |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure new in 2021 PoM |
Measure category |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.a |
Category 2.b |
Category 2.b |
Policy conventions |
|||||||
Policy national |
|||||||
Responsible competent authority |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;Ministry of Rural Affairs of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;Ministry of Rural Affairs of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Responsible organisation |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;local municipalities |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;Ministry of Rural Affairs of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;Ministry of Rural Affairs of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;Estonian Environmental Board |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia |
Ministry of the Environment of Estonia;local municipalities |
Estonian Transport Administrations |
Coordination level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
CEA reference |
|||||||
CBA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
CBA reference |
|||||||
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure purpose |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns);Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity) |
Directly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by managing the source activity);Indirectly prevent further inputs of a pressure (e.g. by governance mechanisms, financial incentives, awareness campaigns);Establish monitoring programmes (of relevant activities, pressures or impacts);Assess effectiveness of the measures (through assessing changes in state/impact/pressure in the marine environment) |
Directly restores a species or habitat(s) |
Directly reduce existing levels of the pressure in the marine environment (e.g. removal of litter or oil spill clean-up) |
Directly reduce existing levels of the pressure in the marine environment (e.g. removal of litter or oil spill clean-up) |
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant KTMs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GEScomponent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
|||||||
Temporal scope |
2023-2030 |
2023-2027 |
2023-2026 |
2023-2026 |
2023-2027 |
2023-2027 |
2023-2027 |
Implementation status |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation not started |
Implementation delay |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation reason |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
No obstacles to implementation |
Progress description |
|||||||
Reason description |