As part of EEA's ongoing security and identity management improvements, we are currently migrating the system to Entra ID authentication.
We kindly ask all users to start using Entra ID credentials when logging in to the system. 
Please note that LDAP authentication will be phased out and disabled in the upcoming months. We encourage you to verify that you can successfully access the system and that your account and permissions function as expected after Entra ID login. Should you encounter any issues or require assistance during this transition, please contact Laszlo Cseh at laszlo.cseh@eaudeweb.ro Thank you for your cooperation and support.
As part of EEA's ongoing security and identity management improvements, we are currently migrating the system to Entra ID authentication.
We kindly ask all users to start using Entra ID credentials when logging in to the system. 
Please note that LDAP authentication will be phased out and disabled in the upcoming months. We encourage you to verify that you can successfully access the system and that your account and permissions function as expected after Entra ID login. Should you encounter any issues or require assistance during this transition, please contact Laszlo Cseh at laszlo.cseh@eaudeweb.ro Thank you for your cooperation and support.

Member State report / Art9-2024 / 2024 / D4 / Estonia / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art9
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems
Member State Estonia
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Report date 2024-12-11 14:54:57

GES component
D4C1
D4C3
D4C1
D4C2
D4C3
D4C4
Marine reporting units
  • BAL-EE-AA-AA
  • BAL-EE-AA-AA
  • BAL-EE-AA-AA
  • BAL-EE-AA-AA
Features
  • Coastal ecosystem
  • Coastal ecosystem
  • Coastal ecosystem
  • Coastal ecosystem
  • Coastal ecosystem
  • Coastal ecosystem
GES description
Seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups: GES is achieved if seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups in assessment units are above threshold values (ratio): BAL-EE-AA-GR-Coastal: 0.68 BAL-EE-AA-GF-Opensea: 0.70 BAL-EE-AA-EGB-Opensea: 0.68 BAL-EE-AA-GR-Opensea: 0.68 BAL-EE-AA-EE_2;BAL-EE-AA-EE_3;BAL-EE-AA-EE_5;BAL-EE-AA-EE_6: 0.65 BAL-EE-AA-EE_1: 0.66 BAL-EE-AA-NBP-Opensea: 0.70
Zooplankton mean size and total stock (MSTS). The Zooplankton Mean Size and Total Stock (MSTS) indicator is comprised of two interrelated values. The environmental condition is considered good if both indicator values exceed the threshold levels for the respective assessment unit. The threshold values for each indicator component (mean size and total stock) are specific for each assessment unit (as described under D1P): Zooplankton mean size and total stock (MSTS) (mean size (µg wet weight ind-1) / total stock (mg m-3)): BAL-EE-AA-GR-Opensea: 4.7 / 253 BAL-EE-AA-EGB-Opensea: 14.1 / 104 BAL-EE-AA-NBP-Opensea: 9.8 / 123 BAL-EE-AA-GF-Opensea: 8.6 / 125
GES is determined via fish community trophic index. GES is achieved if the index value is >0,6.
GES is determined via two indicators: 1) abundance of coastal fish key functional groups: abundance of cyprinids in monitoring catches; 2) abundance of coastal fish key functional groups: abundance of piscivores in monitoring catches. GES is achieved if both of the indicator values are >0,6. In addition, GES is determined via balance of lower guilds. GES threshold value is two times of the long term standard deviation. If the indicator value differs more than two times the long term standard deviation the GES is not achieved. GES = > 0,3 ja < 0,7.
GES is determined via mean maximum length across all fish species found in monitoring catches (MMLI). GES is achieved if indicator value is >0,6. In addition, GES is determined via abundance index of large (TL>250 mm) perch (Perca fluviatilis) in monitoring catches. GES is achieved if index value is >0,6.
Determination date
201807
201807
201807
201807
201807
201807
Update type
DeterminationModified
DeterminationModified
DeterminationSame
DeterminationSame
DeterminationSame
DeterminationSame
Justification for non-use of criterion
Criterion D4C4 has not been used for determination of GES because there is not enough data. D4C4 is also secondary criterion and therefore not mandatory for GES determination
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements