Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Estonia / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Estonia |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2024-12-11 14:54:57 |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-1
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sander lucioperca
|
||||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
75.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
35.0 |
7.0 |
35.0 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.029 |
0.004 |
0.01 |
0.007 |
0.15 |
0.1 |
0.21 |
0.15 |
0.04 |
0.28 |
0.06 |
0.18 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
14.0 |
5.0 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
1.095 |
1.05 |
1.47 |
0.99 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
2.7 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.00575 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.0075 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.31 |
0.34 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
||||||||
Value unit |
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Description element |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-2
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
||||||||
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
||||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
75.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.0 |
35.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.007 |
0.009 |
0.16 |
0.18 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
3.0 |
9.0 |
0.6 |
0.42 |
0.6 |
0.39 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.13 |
0.2 |
0.13 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
||||||||
Description element |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_29
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
||||||||
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
||||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
75.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.0 |
35.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.029 |
0.007 |
0.009 |
0.029 |
0.1575 |
0.16 |
0.19 |
0.15 |
0.03 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.03 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
9.0 |
18.0 |
11.25 |
0.45 |
0.39 |
0.45 |
1.215 |
8.25 |
0.39 |
18.0 |
2.3 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
3.3 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
1.7 |
||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.00575 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.006 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.005 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
5.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.285 |
0.22 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
||||||||
Value unit |
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
75.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Description element |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
50% of the analyzed batch samples individually did not exceed the threshold value established for the element however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
75% of the analyzed batch samples individually did not exceed the threshold value established for the element however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-EE-AA-ICES_32
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
||||||||
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Perca fluviatilis
|
Platichthys flesus
|
Sprattus sprattus
|
||||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
Threshold value upper |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
75.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
7.0 |
35.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Value achieved upper |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.043 |
0.09 |
0.18 |
0.1 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
0.03 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
12.0 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
1.17 |
1.35 |
4.2 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
3.4 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.006 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
6.0 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.31 |
0.16 |
0.38 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
ng/g ww
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description parameter |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish.
Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter. |
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria. |
||||||||
Element status |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Unknown |
Unknown |
||||||||
Description element |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element. |
||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs |
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |