Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Estonia / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D9 Contaminants in seafood
Member State Estonia
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Report date 2024-12-11 14:54:57

BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-1

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
Feature
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Element
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Element extent
Trend element
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Element 2
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sander lucioperca
Element source
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Criterion
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
Parameter
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
Threshold value upper
0.05
0.3
0.5
3.5
6.5
75.0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
1.0
8.0
1.0
8.0
7.0
35.0
7.0
35.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Value achieved upper
0.029
0.004
0.01
0.007
0.15
0.1
0.21
0.15
0.04
0.28
0.06
0.18
8.0
4.0
14.0
5.0
0.39
0.39
0.45
0.45
1.095
1.05
1.47
0.99
2.0
1.4
2.7
1.4
1.1
0.5
1.3
0.5
Value achieved lower
0.00575
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.0075
0.06
0.02
0.03
4.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.31
0.34
0.15
0.15
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.2
Value unit
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
ng/g ww
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Related indicator
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
Source assessment feature
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
Related targets
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False

BAL-EE-AA-ICES_28-2

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
Feature
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Element
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Element extent
Trend element
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Element 2
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Element source
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Criterion
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
Parameter
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
Threshold value upper
0.05
0.3
0.5
3.5
6.5
75.0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
1.0
8.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
35.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Value achieved upper
0.007
0.009
0.16
0.18
0.07
0.09
3.0
9.0
0.6
0.42
0.6
0.39
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.5
Value achieved lower
0.003
0.003
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.0
3.0
0.2
0.13
0.2
0.13
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.2
Value unit
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
ng/g ww
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Description parameter
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Related indicator
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Description criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
Element status
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Description element
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
Source assessment feature
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
Related targets
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
NA
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct
Correct
False
False
Correct

BAL-EE-AA-ICES_29

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
Feature
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Element
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Element extent
Trend element
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Element 2
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Element source
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Criterion
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
Parameter
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
Threshold value upper
0.05
0.3
0.5
3.5
6.5
75.0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
1.0
8.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
35.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Value achieved upper
0.029
0.007
0.009
0.029
0.1575
0.16
0.19
0.15
0.03
0.2
0.1
0.03
7.0
4.0
9.0
18.0
11.25
0.45
0.39
0.45
1.215
8.25
0.39
18.0
2.3
1.0
1.4
3.3
1.4
0.4
0.5
1.7
Value achieved lower
0.00575
0.001
0.002
0.006
0.04
0.03
0.003
0.03
0.005
0.05
0.03
0.01
5.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.285
0.22
0.13
0.13
1.0
0.3
0.7
1.0
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.5
Value unit
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
ng/g ww
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
75.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Related indicator
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
50% of the analyzed batch samples individually did not exceed the threshold value established for the element however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
75% of the analyzed batch samples individually did not exceed the threshold value established for the element however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
Source assessment feature
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
Related targets
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
False

BAL-EE-AA-ICES_32

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
D9
Feature
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Contaminants - in seafood
Element
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Cadmium and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Lead and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Mercury and its compounds
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180)
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
PFOA
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ)
Element extent
Trend element
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Element 2
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Clupea harengus
Perca fluviatilis
Platichthys flesus
Sprattus sprattus
Element source
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Foodstuffs
Criterion
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
D9C1
Parameter
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
CONC-B-Muscle
Threshold value upper
0.05
0.3
0.5
3.5
6.5
75.0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
1.0
8.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
35.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
<=
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
Value achieved upper
0.02
0.01
0.043
0.09
0.18
0.1
0.04
0.09
0.03
8.0
9.0
12.0
0.39
0.39
0.39
1.17
1.35
4.2
2.1
2.3
3.4
1.2
1.4
1.9
Value achieved lower
0.006
0.003
0.006
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
3.0
3.0
6.0
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.31
0.16
0.38
1.0
0.8
1.4
0.5
0.3
0.7
Value unit
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
ng/g ww
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
ng/g ww
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
pg TEQ/g ww
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
Trend parameter
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Stable
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Improving
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole_ the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS_ however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analysed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequency of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for cadmium, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for lead, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for mercury, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of non dioxin-like PCBs (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOA, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for PFOS, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for concentration of the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs (WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the maximum level applies to the whole fish. Proportion indicates the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulations 1881/2006 and 2023/915 (Foodstuffs). None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for Concentration of the sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/FTEQ), however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the parameter.
Related indicator
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.8
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
  • BALEED9C1.7
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES which would allow to assess the status of the criteria
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
There are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the criteria.
Element status
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
None of the analyzed batch samples individually exceeded the threshold value established for the element, however there are no minimum number and frequecy of the sampling set for the species to be sampled in different MRUs and no threshold values for proportion of batches to be GES wich would allow us to assess the status of the element.
Source assessment feature
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
  • EU
  • Foodstuffs
Reporting method feature
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Type D
Trend feature
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Integration rule type parameter
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
There is no integration and the results are presented individually for each species and contaminant as the share of batches that achieved GES according to the threshold values set by regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
For D9 and criterion D9C1, no aggregated assessment is made above the indicator level. Therefore, results are presented for each assessment unit by fish species and contaminant or contaminant groups (indicator) as proportion of catch batches that achieved good environmental status (GES) during the assessment period.
Assessments period
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
2016-2021
Related pressures
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
Related targets
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
  • BALEE-T23-2024
  • BALEE-T33
  • BALEE-T37
  • BALEE-T38
  • BALEE-T39
  • BALEE-T43
  • BALEE-T48
  • BALEE-T50
  • BALEE-T51
Test TV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
Yes
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False
False
Correct
False
False