Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D3 / Greece / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Greece |
Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
Reported by | APC S.A. |
Report date | 2012-10-15 |
Report access | MADGR_MSFD10TI_20130430.xml |
MAD-EL-MS-AD, MIC-EL-MS-IO
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D3 |
3.1 |
3.1.1 |
3.2 |
3.2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D3
|
D3C1
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
GES determination and target setting were approached both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative description was made but at the same time environmental indicators were used according to environmental quality criteria and guidelines. As a result target setting follows the same pattern where possible. Targets to achieve or maintain GES are defined according to the desired state of the environment as set by GES descriptors. State-based, pressure- based and impact-based targets are provided. |
GES determination and target setting were approached both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative description was made but at the same time environmental indicators were used according to environmental quality criteria and guidelines. As a result target setting follows the same pattern where possible. Targets to achieve or maintain GES are defined according to the desired state of the environment as set by GES descriptors. State-based, pressure- based and impact-based targets are provided. |
GES determination and target setting were approached both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative description was made but at the same time environmental indicators were used according to environmental quality criteria and guidelines. As a result target setting follows the same pattern where possible. Targets to achieve or maintain GES are defined according to the desired state of the environment as set by GES descriptors. State-based, pressure- based and impact-based targets are provided. |
GES determination and target setting were approached both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative description was made but at the same time environmental indicators were used according to environmental quality criteria and guidelines. As a result target setting follows the same pattern where possible. Targets to achieve or maintain GES are defined according to the desired state of the environment as set by GES descriptors. State-based, pressure- based and impact-based targets are provided. |
GES determination and target setting were approached both qualitatively and quantitatively. A qualitative description was made but at the same time environmental indicators were used according to environmental quality criteria and guidelines. As a result target setting follows the same pattern where possible. Targets to achieve or maintain GES are defined according to the desired state of the environment as set by GES descriptors. State-based, pressure- based and impact-based targets are provided. |
Description [Targets] |
Monitoring of fishing mortality ratio F/Fmsy and B/Bmsy ratio (the current adult biomass relative to the adult biomass that would provide the maximum sustainable yield) of main target demersal species. |
GES evaluation is based on the fishing mortality indexes that have been calculated for certain species that are main targets or are frequently caught in the bottom trawl fishery and purse-seine fishery.
Estimates of F/Fmsy ratios for the main target species of the bottom trawl fishery have been considered as fishing mortality proxies and consequently as indicators of the level of fishing pressure. Also, Estimates of fishing over total mortality (exploitation rate, E) for the main target species of the purse-seine fishery have been considered as fishing mortality proxies and consequently as indicators of the level of fishing pressure. |
GES evaluation is based on biomass indicators that have been calculated for certain species that are main targets or are frequently caught in the bottom trawl fishery. As SSB estimates are not available the ratio of total biomass over Bmsy has been used as proxy for SSB trends.
SSB estimates have been obtained for a series of years through the analysis of fisheries data but not thresholds have been set due to lack of a stock-recruitment relationship. |
||
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||
Reference point type |
|||||
Baseline |
|||||
Proportion |
|||||
Assessment method |
Regular monitoring |
Regular monitoring |
Regular monitoring |
Regular monitoring |
Regular monitoring |
Development status |
fully operational |
fully operational |
fully operational |
fully operational |
fully operational |
Type of target/indicator |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Timescale |
12-2020 |
12-2020 |
12-2020 |
12-2020 |
12-2020 |
Interim or GES target |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
|||||
Physical/chemical features |
|
|
|
|
|
Predominant habitats |
|||||
Functional group |
|
|
|
|
|
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|