MS/Art8-2024/2024/D1-B/Spain/NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-B / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Birds
Member State	Spain
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Report date	2026-03-24 07:53:11

Demarcación marina noratlántica (ABI-ES-SD-NOR)

Simplified table

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B
Feature	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Benthic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds
Element	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Gulosus aristotelis aristotelis	Calonectris borealis	Calonectris borealis	Calonectris borealis	Calonectris borealis	Calonectris borealis	Calonectris borealis	Gulosus aristotelis	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Hydrobates pelagicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Sterna hirundo	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Uria aalge	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Rissa tridactyla	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo	Sterna hirundo
Element extent
Trend element	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable							Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable
Element 2
Element source	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS							WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS
Criterion	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5		D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5		D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5		D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5
Parameter	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed						Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed
Threshold value upper	5.0	1440.0	1.2	0.82				46.0	0.4	0.9	3.0					0.4	0.85			17.0		0.4	0.9					106.0	1.2	0.82	2.0				1937.0	0.4	0.9	9.0							23.0	0.99	0.99	0.85
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=	>=	>=	>=	>=		<=	>=	>=	>=	>=			<=	>=	>=	>=	>=		<=	>=	>=	>=	>=			<=	>=	>=	>=	>=			<=	>=	>=	>=	>=							<=	>=	>=	>=	>=
Threshold qualitative											Of all known colonies, no one is known to have disappeared									Evidence of significant bycatch exists, although no detailed data is available
Threshold value source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National		National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National		National	National	National	National	National	National		National	National	National	National	National	National						National	National	National	National	National	National
Value achieved upper	9.0	881.0	1.22					57.0	0.71		3.0																																			33.0	1.13		1.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit	individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies		individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies			individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies		individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies			individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies			individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies							individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0					100.0	100.0				100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0				100.0
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value		% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value		% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value		% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value						% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value
Trend parameter	Stable	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed		Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed		Unknown	Deteriorating	Not assessed	Not assessed	Deteriorating	Not assessed		Unknown	Stable	Not assessed	Not assessed	Stable	Not assessed						Unknown	Stable	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed
Parameter achieved	No	No	Yes	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Yes	Unknown	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed		Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed		Unknown	No	Not assessed	Not assessed	No	Not assessed		No	No	Not assessed	Not assessed	No	Not assessed						Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Not assessed
Description parameter	There are several data gaps, but there is widespread evidence of regular bycatch in small-scale fisheries, mainly by set-nets. Only with the birds reported by a few collabotrative fishermen in Galicia, the average number per year is above the threshold, although the real figure must be substantially higher.	Historical data allowing comparisons is only available for the National Park of Islas Atlánticas (PNIA), to which the figures provided correspond. Other areas have been monitored more sporadically, with increasing effort during this cycle, or historical data has not been available.	The best monitores colonies are those of West Galicia, which correspond to the bulk of the species in the region, and which shows the lowest values of breeding success. These have been averaged with values from other colonies, in apparently better condition, resulting 1.22. This value is just two hundredths above the reproductive success threshold established for the species (1.20); this, combined with the fact that the PNMTIAG colonies (which concentrate more than half of the DMNOR breeding population) show values well below the threshold, has led to the conclusion that the criterion does not meet the BEA for the subspecies.	There is no information available to assess D1C3 for survival rate	Not assessed. The species tends to breed scattered across long coastal stetches, making particularly difficult to define colonies and hence to use the number and distribution of colonies to assess D1C4.	Not assessed	There is some evidence of bycatch, but the evidence is too sparse as to make a proper assessment. On the other hand, the reference value would change substantially if only the breeding population is considered, or foraging/migrating birds visiting from other areas are also taken into account (the local breeding population is relatively new and small, but the species is common at sea).	The species colonised the region within the last two decades, and has shown an increasing trend, with abundance during this period above the threshold in the three breeding colonies/areas known.	Data available is limited, but shows values above the threshold (2 colonies monitored)	No data available on adult survival	Only three colonies known in the region (on of them with different sub-colonies), all of them occupied during the current cycle.	Not assessed		No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a problem, at least on a regular basis	No data available for the current period of evaluation. Prospections starting in 2021 will provide better information for future evaluations.	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	No proper monitoring across the region to properly evaluate this criterion, although there is no evidence of any colony disappearing in recent times	Not assessed	Despite the lack of official data in Spain, the species is known to be prone to bycatch, largely in small-scale fisheries, which are not covered by observer programmes. Data from the neighbouring countries (France and Portugal) points to significant bycatch, hence supporting this evaluation. Reference values have been taken considering the global population, although it is likely that these numbers should be lower, adapted to the population visiting the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assess trends in abundance at sea.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assessdistribution range changes at sea.	Not assessed		The species is prone to fisheries bycatch, so it merits attention, although no data were available for the evaluation period. Since this may be due to the scarcity of data, the result is left as unknown.	The species has bred for the last time in the region in 2017, and is now considered extinct, so the evaluation is not good. The status in 2nd cycle was already """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""not good"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""", but the trend is """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""deteriorating"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""", as the nesting pairs have dissapeared.	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	At the beginning of the evaluation period there was only one colony left out of 2, and this also disappeared after 2017, so the species became locally extinct during the current cycle. The status in 2ndcycle was already """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""not good"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""", but the trend is """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""deteriorating"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""", as the nesting pairs have dissapeared.			Despite the lack of official data in Spain, the species is known to be prone to bycatch, largely in set nets, being one of the most reported species across it's range. Particular attention merits the small-scale fisheries, which are not covered by observer programmes. Data from the neighbouring countries (France and Portugal) points to significant bycatch of this species, hence supporting this evaluation. Reference values, on the other hand, require a proper assessment of the wintering population in the region, now that there is no breeding population anymore.	The species has bred for the last time in the region in 2015, and is now considered extinct, so the evaluation is not good.	No breeding population within the current evaluation period	No breeding population within the current evaluation period	No colonies left, out of 9 known historically.							No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a relevant problem, although there might be occasional captures, most probably with recreational fisheries, and the issue deserves attention in the future.	The unique colony of the species in the region is small but increasing	Breeding success values above the threshold	There is no information available to assess D1C3 for survival rate	Very nomadic species. However, for the region there is only one colony hand has remained stable.
Related indicator	MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR		MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR			MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR		MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR			MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR			MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR							MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not assessed		Not assessed	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed									Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Not good	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not assessed
Description criteria	There are several data gaps, but there is widespread evidence of regular bycatch in small-scale fisheries, mainly by set-nets. Only with the birds reported by a few collabotrative fishermen in Galicia, the average number per year is above the threshold, although the real figure must be substantially higher.	Historical data allowing comparisons is only available for the National Park of Islas Atlánticas (PNIA), to which the figures provided correspond. Other areas have been monitored more sporadically, with increasing effort during this cycle, or historical data has not been available.	The best monitores colonies are those of West Galicia, which correspond to the bulk of the species in the region, and which shows the lowest values of breeding success. These have been averaged with values from other colonies, in apparently better condition, resulting 1.22. This value is just two hundredths above the reproductive success threshold established for the species (1.20); this, combined with the fact that the PNMTIAG colonies (which concentrate more than half of the DMNOR breeding population) show values well below the threshold, has led to the conclusion that the criterion does not meet the BEA for the subspecies. Adult survival data are not available to evaluate this indicator.	The best monitores colonies are those of West Galicia, which correspond to the bulk of the species in the region, and which shows the lowest values of breeding success. These have been averaged with values from other colonies, in apparently better condition, resulting 1.22. This value is just two hundredths above the reproductive success threshold established for the species (1.20); this, combined with the fact that the PNMTIAG colonies (which concentrate more than half of the DMNOR breeding population) show values well below the threshold, has led to the conclusion that the criterion does not meet the BEA for the subspecies. Adult survival data are not available to evaluate this indicator.	Not assessed. The species tends to breed scattered across long coastal stetches, making particularly difficult to define colonies and hence to use the number and distribution of colonies to assess D1C4.	Not assessed	There is some evidence of bycatch, but the evidence is too sparse as to make a proper assessment. On the other hand, the reference value would change substantially if only the breeding population is considered, or foraging/migrating birds visiting from other areas are also taken into account (the local breeding population is relatively new and small, but the species is common at sea).	The species colonised the region within the last two decades, and has shown an increasing trend, with abundance during this period above the threshold in the three breeding colonies/areas known.	See Sheet 6	See Sheet 6	Only three colonies known in the region (on of them with different sub-colonies), all of them occupied during the current cycle.	Not assessed		No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a problem, at least on a regular basis	No data available for the current period of evaluation. Prospections starting in 2021 will provide better information for future evaluations.	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	No proper monitoring across the region to properly evaluate this criterion, although there is no evidence of any colony disappearing in recent times	Not assessed	Despite the lack of official data in Spain, the species is known to be prone to bycatch, largely in small-scale fisheries, which are not covered by observer programmes. Data from the neighbouring countries (France and Portugal) points to significant bycatch, hence supporting this evaluation. Reference values have been taken considering the global population, although it is likely that these numbers should be lower, adapted to the population visiting the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assess trends in abundance at sea.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assessdistribution range changes at sea.	Not assessed									Despite the lack of official data in Spain, the species is known to be prone to bycatch, largely in set nets, being one of the most reported species across it's range. Particular attention merits the small-scale fisheries, which are not covered by observer programmes. Data from the neighbouring countries (France and Portugal) points to significant bycatch of this species, hence supporting this evaluation. Reference values, on the other hand, require a proper assessment of the wintering population in the region, now that there is no breeding population anymore.	The species has bred for the last time in the region in 2015, and is now considered extinct, so the evaluation is not good.	No breeding population within the current evaluation period	No breeding population within the current evaluation period	No colonies left, out of 9 known historically.	Not assessed	The species is prone to fisheries bycatch, so it merits attention, although no data were available for the evaluation period. Since this may be due to the scarcity of data, the result is left as unknown.	The species has bred for the last time in the region in 2017, and is now considered extinct, so the evaluation is not good.	No demographic information available for this evaluation period	At the beginning of the evaluation period there was only one colony left out of 2, and this also disappeared after 2017, so the species became locally extinct during the current cycle	Not assessed	No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a relevant problem, although there might be occasional captures, most probably with recreational fisheries, and the issue deserves attention in the future.	The unique colony of the species in the region is small but increasing	Breeding success values above the threshold. No information on survival rate.	Breeding success values above the threshold. No information on survival rate.	Very nomadic species. However, for the region there is only one colony hand has remained stable.	Not assessed
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good							Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good
Description element
Source assessment feature							National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Reporting method feature							Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D
Trend feature							Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Integration rule type parameter							Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria							OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE
Integration rule description criteria							Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.
GES extent threshold							80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00
GES extent achieved							29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00	29.00
GES extent unit							Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group
GES achieved							GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status							In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.
Assessments period							2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021
Related pressures							Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets							A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5
Test TV	No	No	Yes	NA	NA	NA	NA	Yes	Yes	NA	Yes	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	No	NA	NA	No	NA	NA	NA	No	NA	NA	No	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	Yes	Yes	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct

Demarcación marina sudatlántica (ABI-ES-SD-SUD)

Simplified table

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B	D1B
Feature	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Pelagic-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds	Surface-feeding birds
Element	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Puffinus mauretanicus	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons	Sternula albifrons
Element extent
Trend element	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable	Stable
Element 2
Element source	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS	WoRMS
Criterion	D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5		D1C1	D1C2	D1C3	D1C3	D1C4	D1C5
Parameter	Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	ABU-BreedingPairs	Breeding success	Rate survival	DIST-NR	Not assessed
Threshold value upper	17.0		0.4	0.9					2100.0	1.4	0.8
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=	>=	>=	>=	>=			<=	>=	>=	>=	>=
Threshold qualitative	Evidence of significant bycatch exists, although no detailed data is available
Threshold value source	National	National	National	National	National	National		National	National	National	National	National	National
Value achieved upper									1045.0	0.3
Value achieved lower
Value unit	individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies			individuals	Breeding pairs	Chicks/pr	percentage	Breeding colonies
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value		% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value	% of species achieving threshold value
Trend parameter	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed		Not assessed	Stable	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed		Not assessed	No	No	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description parameter	No data available for the region, although the species is prone to bycatch, and captures have been reported in ICES area 27.9.a, that includes all DMSUD. For now it has been left as unknown, but future efforts should be directed to assess bycatch of this and other seabird species in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assess trends in abundance at sea.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assessdistribution range changes at sea.	Not assessed		No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a relevant problem, although there might be occasional captures.	Severe decrease of the speciesin the last 15 years, with declining trend also across the current evaluation period.	Very low values of productivity in the two monitored colonies	No information on survival rates available for this evaluation period	Very nomadic species, criterion not assessed
Related indicator	MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR			MB_BYC	MB_ABU_BPP	MB_DEM_BRS	MB_DEM_ASR	MB_DIST_NR
Criteria status	Unknown	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed		Not assessed	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed
Description criteria	No data available for the region, although the species is prone to bycatch, and captures have been reported in ICES area 27.9.a, that includes all DMSUD. For now it has been left as unknown, but future efforts should be directed to assess bycatch of this and other seabird species in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assess trends in abundance at sea.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region.	No breeding population in the region. For now there has been no attempts to assessdistribution range changes at sea.	Not assessed		No evidence of bycatch. Given the ecology of the species, it is not expected to be a relevant problem, although there might be occasional captures.	Severe decrease of the speciesin the last 15 years, with declining trend also across the current evaluation period.	Very low values of productivity in the two monitored colonies. No information for survival rate in this cycle.	Very low values of productivity in the two monitored colonies. No information for survival rate in this cycle.	Very nomadic species, criterion not assessed	Not assessed
Element status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element
Source assessment feature	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Reporting method feature	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D	Type D
Trend feature	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE	OOAO_HIE
Integration rule description criteria	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.	Criteria to species->If D1C1 and D1C2 not assessed or unknown, species status cannot be consider in good status.
GES extent threshold	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00	80.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group	Proportion of species in good status within species group
GES achieved	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported	GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.	In the 2º cycle, this descriptor was not assessed by features as they did not reflect the ecology of the bird species in Spain. Although the situation is the same, it has been decided to follow the requirements of the COM for coherence and comparability amongst MS.
Assessments period	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021	2016-2021
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input or spread of non-indigenous species
Related targets	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5	A.1 A.10 A.12 A.13 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 A.7 A.8 A.9 B.22 B.23 C.11 C.12 C.14 C.15 C.16 C.17 C.18 C.19 C.3 C.5
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	No	No	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	False	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct	Correct