Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Spain |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
Reported by | Subdirección General para la protección del mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
Report date | 2020-02-03 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_MOD2020.xml |
Demarcación marina noratlántica (ABI-ES-SD-NOR)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
All trophic guilds |
|||
Element code |
TrophicGuildsAll |
|||
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
|||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
OSPAR |
|||
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
D4C4
|
Parameter |
Biomass
|
|||
Parameter other |
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
||||
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
Stable |
|||
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
|||
Description parameter |
||||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Some interesting results on trophic guild diversity indicators have been obtained which deserve to be developed in depth in the next 6-years cycle.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C1- trophic guild species diversity. |
The outcomes of the development and testing of FW4 indicator (Changes in mean trophic level of marine predators) in the area show a stable trend. However, there is no consensus within the OSPAR expert group on how to establish the Good Environmental Status of this indicator and this criterium.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C2-abundance across trophic guilds. |
No indicators have been developed within this criterium in the last 6 years in the area. FW3 -Size composition in fish communities has been developed in other OSPAR areas. It is expected to be developed in the area in the next 6-years cycle. |
At the moment, no indicators have been developed within this criterium in the last 6 years in the area. However, the Food Web expert group of OSPAR is working on the development of ENA indices and identified a list of 9 indices which should be developed and tested in the next years at regional (sub) regional level.
However, there is still no consensus on how to establish the Good Environmental Status within this criterium.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C2-abundance across trophic guilds. |
Element status |
Not assessed |
|||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Demarcación marina sudatlántica (ABI-ES-SD-SUD)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
||||
Element code |
||||
Element code source |
||||
Element 2 |
||||
Element 2 code |
||||
Element 2 code source |
||||
Element source |
||||
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
D4C4
|
Parameter |
||||
Parameter other |
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
||||
Threshold value source other |
||||
Value achieved upper |
||||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
||||
Value unit other |
||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend |
||||
Parameter achieved |
||||
Description parameter |
||||
Related indicator |
||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Some interesting results on trophic guild diversity indicators have been obtained which deserve to be developed in depth in the area in the next 6-years cycle.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C1- trophic guild species diversity. |
The development and testing of FW4 indicator (Changes in mean trophic level of marine predators) in other areas will be extended in this area in the next 6-years cycle.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C2-abundance across trophic guilds. |
No indicators have been developed within this criterium in the last 6 years in the area. FW3 -Size composition in fish communities has been developed in other OSPAR areas. It is expected to be developed in the area in the next 6-years cycle. |
No indicators have been developed within this criterium in the last 6 years in the area. However, the Food Web expert group of OSPAR is working on the development of ENA indices and identified a list of 9 indices which should be developed and tested in the next years at regional (sub) regional level.
However, there is still no consensus on how to establish the Good Environmental Status within this criterium.
More research is needed at european and regional level both i) to develop and testing robust indicators and ii) to be able to establish GES of D4C2-abundance across trophic guilds. |
Element status |
||||
Description element |
||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
||||
GES achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
||||
Assessments period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|