Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D6 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2020-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State Spain
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Reported by Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar de la D.G. de la Costa y el Mar
Report date 2021-04-14
Report access

Descriptor
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
D6/D1
Monitoring strategy description
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for: • Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB. The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity. • Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB. The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
Coverage of GES criteria
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020
Gaps and plans
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected. Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion. Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme. Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
Related targets
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1
  • C.L.10
  • C.L.11
  • C.L.12
  • C.L.17
  • C.L.4
  • C.N.1
  • C.N.10
  • C.N.11
  • C.N.12
  • C.N.17
  • C.N.4
  • C.S.1
  • C.S.10
  • C.S.11
  • C.S.12
  • C.S.17
  • C.S.4
  • A. C.15
  • A. E.12
  • A. L.12
  • A. N.12
  • A. S.12
  • A.C.1
  • A.C.10
  • A.C.2
  • A.C.4
  • A.C.7
  • A.E.1
  • A.E.2
  • A.E.4
  • A.E.7
  • A.E.9
  • A.L.1
  • A.L.2
  • A.L.4
  • A.L.7
  • A.L.9
  • A.N.1
  • A.N.2
  • A.N.4
  • A.N.7
  • A.N.9
  • A.S.1
  • A.S.2
  • A.S.4
  • A.S.7
  • A.S.9
  • C.C.1
  • C.C.15
  • C.C.16
  • C.C.17
  • C.C.21
  • C.C.8
  • C.E.1
  • C.E.10
  • C.E.11
  • C.E.12
  • C.E.17
  • C.E.4
  • C.L.1