Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Spain / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
| Report date | 2026-03-24 07:53:11 |
ABI-ES-SD-FAO27
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
|
Element extent |
|||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
|||||
Element 2 |
Ensis directus
|
Ensis directus
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Ensis directus
|
Ensis directus
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
Mytilus galloprovincialis
|
|
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
|||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
||||
Parameter |
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
|||||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
|||||
Value achieved upper |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.22 |
0.18 |
|||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
|||||
Proportion threshold value |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
90.0 |
|||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
|||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
|||||
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|||||
Description parameter |
|||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
||||||||
Description criteria |
|||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|||||
Description element |
|||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
Como valor umbral se propone utilizar el valor umbral del 10%, es decir, para cumplir el BEA es necesario que el 90% de las muestras se encuentre por debajo de la CMP (concentración máxima permitida)
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
we cannot say as we do not have data for all compounds family, neither we have a trend feature for comparison |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |