Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D1-F / Spain / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
Member State | Spain |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Macaronesia |
Reported by | Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar. D.G. Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar. Minister |
Report date | 2020-02-03 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART10.XML |
Target code |
00 |
A. C.13 |
A. C.14 |
A.1.1 |
A.1.10 |
A.1.12 |
A.1.2 |
A.1.3 |
A.1.4 |
A.1.5 |
A.1.9 |
A.3.1 |
A.C.1 |
A.C.10 |
A.C.11 |
A.C.2 |
A.C.3. |
A.C.4 |
A.C.5 |
A.C.6 |
A.C.7 |
A.C.8 |
A.C.9 |
B.C.13 |
B.C.14 |
C.1.3 |
C.1.4 |
C.1.5 |
C.1.6 |
C.3.1 |
C.3.4 |
C.3.7 |
C.C.10 |
C.C.11 |
C.C.12 |
C.C.13 |
C.C.14 |
C.C.16 |
C.C.17 |
C.C.19 |
C.C.2 |
C.C.20 |
C.C.21 |
C.C.22 |
C.C.8 |
C.C.9 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target description |
Achieve or maintain the values and characteristics defined as GES for all descriptors of the good environmental status in the Canary Islands
|
Ensuring regulatory compliance.
* Surveying of surveillance in hours
* Infringements identified vs sanctions imposed
* Human resources available for surveillance and available materials.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.12
|
Increase awareness of food webs, with a view to developing new indicators to assess and define Good Environmental Status.
⢠Existence of appropriate indicators to assess food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.8
|
And avoiding adverse effects of the exploitation of marine non-renewable resources on biogenic or protected habitats.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.1.Reduce pressure intensity and area
significant anthropogenic habitats on benthic habitats, with special reference ...
|
Establish a national system for the coordination of programmes for the monitoring of incidental catches of seabirds, reptiles and marine mammals, reptiles and mammals and cabbage birds.
In the second cycle, this objective has been divided into two:
A.C.7. Improve national coordination and stand...
|
Ensuring proper surveillance of the marine environment through remote or on-site systems
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.13. Ensuring regulatory compliance
This modified objective will be produced as a new objective, as the code and indicators have changed.
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-indigenous species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation (avoid leakages in aquaculture or aquarium installations, avoid transport and release into the medium of species associ...
|
Eradicate or decrease, preferably in the initial stages of the invasive processes, the abundance of invasive species to ease pressure on the habitat, in cases where the economic or biodiversity loss is significant, and provided that it is technically feasible and there is no collateral damage
|
Reduce the main causes of mortality and decrease of the populations of non-commercial species groups at the top of the trophic chain (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds, pelagic and demersal species), such as accidental catches, collisions with boats, ingestion of marine litter, land predators, p...
|
To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species
In the second cycle, the objective has been maintained, although changing the code and indicators
C.C.9. Preventing the impacts on food webs of culture from
ma...
|
Develop regulation to prevent commercial exploitation and by-catches of elasmobranchs included in the annexes of national legislation, European Directives or applicable international conventions.
|
Maintain viable populations of key species and apical predators (marine mammals, reptiles, seabirds and fish) and for commercially exploited species, keep them within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
A.C.3. To maintain or restore the natural balan...
|
Ensuring the conservation and restoration of marine biodiversity through effective tools and measures.
* Percentage of marine species/habitats not found or threatened, subject to conservation, restoration and restoration plans or national strategies.
* Percentage of the demarcation included in Ma...
|
To reduce or prevent the increase of populations of species or functional groups whose proliferation indicates a clear alteration or threat of local food webs (e.g. Diadea aff antillarum, species released from marine crops, etc.)
⢠Implementation of control programmes for these species
⢠Allo...
|
Monitor and reduce the impacts of the included predator populations (e.g. cats and rats) in seabird colonies.
⢠Number of predators eradication actions in affected colonies
⢠Trends in the impacts by predators on the main islands in 10 years, and in 25 % of mean sea bird colonies on ave...
|
Achieve a complete, ecologically representative, coherent and well-managed network of marine protected areas in the Canary Islands area.
* Approval of the Master Plan for RAMPE.
* Percentage of MPAs included in the Spanish network of Marine Protected Areas
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.2.1
|
Maintain or restore the natural balance of populations of key species for the ecosystem
* Trends in populations of the species used as evaluation elements, corresponding to various trophic levels.
* Indicators used for the assessment of food webs.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.3.4
|
To maintain positive or stable trends in the range of habitats protected or of natural interest and specific habitats.
* Trends in habitat distribution area.
Objective 2012: A3.5
|
Promoting the consideration of marine species in the regional, national and international asset lists of threatened species, as well as their study
* No. of marine species which are listed/delisted on lists and catalogues of threatened species, or change category.
* No. of target species.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.1
|
Improve international coordination of species monitoring programmes, especially for geographically wide species (e.g. fish, cetaceans and reptiles).
⢠Number of international initiatives and working groups involved.
⢠Establishment of an international group in Macaronesia for coordinating monitoring programmes for marine birds, marine mammals and sea turtles.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.2
|
Improve national coordination and standardisation of habitat and species monitoring programmes
⢠Development of methodologies/common protocols/guidelines.
⢠No of meetings for updating the monitoring programmes.
⢠Development of common access database for the different operators of monitoring programmes.
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.7
|
Improve the coordination of monitoring and response to accidental catches and bereavement events, including the monitoring of the incidental catch of turtles, mammals and seabirds on fishing vessels.
⢠Adoption and implementation of coordination systems at national level (protocols, common data...
|
Manage processes for invasions of alien species in an integrated manner, including the development of early warning networks and their coordination at national level.
* The area covered by networks of detection and quantification of non-native species.
* Existence of action protocols for IAS scre...
|
Encourage scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment, in response to knowledge gaps identified in the Initial Assessment and in the successive phases of Marine Strategies.
* Awareness building on impac...
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through studies, initiatives and scientific projects on the impacts of the introduction of substances, litter and energy in the marine environment.
* Criteria for evaluating and monitoring the r...
|
Ensure social participation in the marine strategy of the Canary Islands area by means of dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
In the second cycle, this objective has remained the same, with the exception o...
|
Ensure proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Canary Islands, which carry out work relating to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.12. Ensure ...
|
Develop management plans for marine recreational activities, or the use thereof, such as boat anchoring, diving, recreational fishing, marine sports, cetacean watching, etc., for each area of the Canary Islands, where these activities are relevant.
In the second cycle, this objective has been am...
|
Ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.14. To encourage fish stocks to be properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to thos...
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information.
In the second cycle, this objective has been amended to:
C.C.19. ...
|
Increase the quality of information obtained from professional fishing and shellfish trade (volume of fishing, fishing effort or shellfish fishing, harvested species, fishing or shellfishing areas, etc.) so that the state and evolution of those working groups of commercial interest can be properly assessed.
|
Have information to assess the current status with regard to BEB on the basis of a larger number of commercially important stocks, within which the following specific objectives are identified:
⢠Monitoring and obtaining basic information for species that have not been included in the monitorin...
|
Reduce the main anthropogenic causes of mortality of elasmobranchs, in particular from commercial exploitation and by-catch.
⢠No. of catch
⢠Number of measures taken to prevent impacts
OBJECTIVE 2012: A.1.4
|
Ensuring social participation in the marine strategy of the Strait and Alboran area through initiatives for dissemination, awareness-raising, voluntary environmental education and involvement of stakeholders in the marine environment.
* Number of initiatives for social participation and evaluation of their results
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.3
|
Ensuring proper coordination of public administrations, institutions and sectors in the Strait and Alboran area who carry out work related to the marine environment, in such a way as to avoid duplication and to exploit synergies.
* Number of initiatives, projects and coordination meetings
* Thematic areas in which coordination initiatives are taken
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.1.4
|
To guarantee, through the Maritime Spatial Plan of the Canary Islands area and/or other development tools, that human activities take place in a sustainable manner and do not jeopardise the achievement of the Good Environmental Status.
* Number of human activities covered by the management plan
OBJECTIVE 2012: C1.5
|
To ensure that fish stocks are properly managed so that they remain within safe biological limits, paying particular attention to those whose status is unknown and to those who do not reach BEA according to the initial assessment of D3 in the sea demarcation of the Canary Islands
⢠No and perce...
|
To promote that the biological and permanent physical alterations caused by human activities do not threaten the persistence and operation of protected habitats or natural interests and do not jeopardise the achievement or maintenance of the GES for these habitats.
* Percentage of compatibility r...
|
Measures on stretches of coastline where permanent physical alterations caused by human activities have caused a significant impact so as to be compatible with the good environmental status of the seabed and hydrographical conditions.
⢠No of measures taken in respect of each activity causing significant impact
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.2.3
|
Improving access to available marine information, in particular with regard to the descriptors of good environmental status, pressures and impacts, and socio-economic aspects, as well as ensuring the quality of this information for both administrations and institutions related to the sea, and for...
|
To minimise the potential for introduction or secondary expansion of non-native species, directly taking into account the anthropogenic pathways and vectors of translocation.
* Number of policy/control measures on pathways and vectors for introduction and translocation
* Number of introduction an...
|
Encourage scientific studies and projects to address knowledge gaps identified in the initial assessment of the impact of human activities on marine and coastal ecosystems.
* No. of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with these subjects.
* Knowledge-based studies and scientific projects.
OBJECTIVE 2012: C.3.5
|
Improving knowledge on the effects of climate change on marine and coastal ecosystems, with a view to mainstreaming climate change variable into all phases of Marine Strategies
* Number of studies and scientific projects promoted by public administrations dealing with this issue
* Number of monit...
|
Integrate into decision-making and management of the marine environment results and knowledge acquired through scientific studies, initiatives and projects on the impact of human activities on habitats, species, populations and communities
* Criteria for evaluation and monitoring of the results o...
|
Reducing the disturbance to fauna caused by tourist and recreational activities
* Number of individuals of the species potentially affected (for turtles and birds)
* Number of established protection measures/initiatives to reduce pressure on these populations
|
. To prevent impacts on trophic webs of the cultivation of marine species, with a focus on the cultivation of non-native and rare species.
⢠Existence of preventive measures within the control programmes.
OBJECTIVES 2012: A.1.5
|
||
Feature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GES components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Timescale |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202012 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
202412 |
||
Update date |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201211 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
201907 |
||
Update type |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Modified from 2012 definition |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Modified from 2012 definition |
Target no longer needed |
Target no longer needed |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
New target |
||
Marine reporting unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Element |
superficie del fondo marino |
Especies alóctonas invasoras |
Aves marinas |
Mamíferos marinos |
Reptiles marinos |
elasmobranquios |
Mamíferos, aves, tortugas |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter |
Other
|
Extent
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter - other |
All parameters
|
Existence of coordination system
|
Existence of surveillance systems
|
measures on vectors for introduction
|
Number of species to be tested
|
existence of control programmes
|
Social participation initiatives
|
Coordination actions
|
Existence of management plans
|
Parameters used in the evaluation of D3
|
Degree of access
|
Fishing activity data
|
Number of stocks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - upper |
98.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved - lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
square kilometre
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit - other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target status |
Target achieved |
Target not yet achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
Target achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment period |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
2012-2018 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target assessment description |
(SEE 9 GES reporting for the different arbitrators)
objective 0 is considered unnecessary since it coincides with the main aim of the Directive: Achieve BEA in all descriptors
|
The minimum surface area of the seabed
of the Demarcación Canaria que ha
if you have suffered some sort of disturbance
during the current period of
evaluation is 98 million m².
representing 0.02Â % of the area
demarcation.
Because it could not be taken into account
trawling, one
very relev...
|
Progress was noted. Is necessary
continue along this line
The wording of this objective is
it corresponds better to a measure.
Edit wording to bring it into line with
an objective, and the indicator to
measure achievement can be measured
of the
Further divide the target into two:
one aiming at t...
|
Progress was noted.
There are active surveillance systems in place in
on the spot, however, it is envisaged to complete the
monitoring of Marine Spaces
Protected (PME).
Surveillance systems also exist
remote, such as buoys, satellites,
geolocalisation of vessels, by
radio (AIS) and satellite (VMS...
|
In process. Despite the fact that it is
have implemented a number of
actions on introduction pathways, and
that the outcome of the evaluation of the
Descriptor 2 proved to be
Good Environmental Conditionâ, is considered to be
that no key vectors have been addressed
for introduction and transloc...
|
Objective achieved.
In accordance with Initial Assessment of D2
in the case of the Canary Islands, non-indigenous species
they have not increased.
decreased and do not pose a threat
marine habitats
It is proposed to change the target.
as the eradication of
is very poor invasive species
complex an...
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Birds: In general, there is not enough
data to assess the target in
seabird species
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Mammals: For most of the
assessed species, no data
sufficient to assess this objective.
However, the sperm whale seems not to be
achieve BEA for Criterion D1C1, a
collisions with ships caused by collisions with vessels
|
Results MISTIC SECAS II
Turtles: There is not enough data for
evaluate the target in species of
Sea turtles.
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information on the indicator.
There are measures such as: in RN2000, non-native species cannot be grown
It is proposed that the aim be maintained, on the proposal of the experts and by the foreseeable rise of aquaculture. The indicator will be changed to "prevention measu...
|
Cannot be evaluated. No information
on the indicator.
It is proposed to delete as it is
more than an objective.
The substance of the objective is retained
through amendment of A.1.4.
|
Depending on the species.
See initial evaluation of D1 of the
DMCAN (Macaronesia Roof Report)
It is proposed to change the target for
better reflecting the balance of all
the ecosystem as a whole, not only
the populations of certain
species
|
Objective achieved:
Expert PdS workshops: 14 (Workshops and meetings with administrations and survey)
Expert workshop for the design of the MIP: 21
⢠Dissemination: 1 workshop (by DM),
⢠1 Dissemination campaign (dissemination materials)
⢠2 CONAMAS
⢠Education and participation projects:...
|
Target achieved
⢠ICES meetings: 6
⢠meetings meetings of the CAN Monitoring Committee: 6
⢠Autonomous Community meetings on marine biodiversity: 7
⢠Generating DMCAN data flow
⢠Working groups:
WG Biodiversity: 1
Marine cartography: 10
Descriptor 9 GT: 1
WG Seat-Data: 2
WG Technical W...
|
Progress is being made, although not all recreational marine activities are regulated
Pocket management plans: 24
It is proposed to change the target and indicator to cover all activities and uses, in line with the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue along this line
See initial evaluation of D3 in the DMCAN.
It is proposed that the aim should be maintained, by improving the wording and focusing on all stocks that fall outside the scope of the BEA.
|
Target achieved
All Member State documents are publicly available on MITECOâs website.
However, it can be improved.
For the second cycle, it is proposed to specify and extend the target audience, so as to improve access to information on the marine environment available to all maritime administrations and institutions, as well as to the general public.
|
Progress detected
There are data that provide information on the professional fishing activity provided by the SGP, which could not be analysed in depth.
There are also data on recreational fishing and shellfishing activities (licences, et).
It is proposed to delete the target, as this information is collected, through the monitoring programmes.
|
Progress was noted. It is necessary to continue this line.
It is proposed to remove the objective since it overlaps with the implementation of commercial species monitoring programmes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|