Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D6 / Spain / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea |
| Reported by | Subdirección General para la Protección del Mar de la D.G. de la Costa y el Mar |
| Report date | 2021-04-14 |
| Report access |
Descriptor |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
D6/D1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
The Benthic Habitats (HB) monitoring strategy would provide the necessary parameters for:
⢠Assessment of the environmental status of HBs in the area of application of the MSFD: Descriptor 1-Biodiversity-HB and Descriptor 6. In relation to HB, a total of 9 indicators are proposed, plus the existing indicators derived from the WFD that are constructed with a limited number of parameters, which represents an advantage in optimising PdS. these parameters in a simplified way relate to (1) habitat distribution (area), (2) Composition and quantification of species associated with the habitat, and (3) Morphology, Quantification of status or condition of the structuring species, forming the habitat, and should respond to the different criteria set by the European Commission Decision 2017/848: D6C1, D6C2, D6C3, D6C4 and D6C5, as well as D7C2, which are mainly related to the effect of human activities on HB.
The conformation of the programmes is based on the ecological domains (bathymetric, biological) which are used in both the EUNIS (European Nature Information System) and the Spanish Reference Register (LPRE) classification. The reason why a PdS has been established for each stratum or domain is due to the fact that the methodologies to be applied in each case vary depending on the accessibility of that habitat (e.g. the need for oceanographic vessels, the option of prospecting it with autonomous scafander, etc.) and also the type of substrate (sedimentary substrates allow sampling of sediment, which is not applicable to rocky bottoms). In addition to one PdS for ecological domain, it has specific PdS for marine phanerogams, protected species and human activity.
⢠Evaluation of compliance with the environmental objectives and programme of measures related to Descriptor 1-HB and Descriptor 6. Furthermore, according to Annex I to Law 41/2010 on the Protection of the Marine Environment, the aim is to obtain the necessary information to assess the main impacts and pressures in relation to HB.
The HB Monitoring Strategy comprises 8 Monitoring Programmes: Infralittoral rocky background habitats (HB-1), Infralittoral sedimentary and intertidal seabed habitats (HB-2_7), circalittoral seabed habitats and rocky bathland habitats (HB-3), circalittoral and sedimentary bathland habitats
|
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Gaps and plans |
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Criteria D6C1 and D6C2 (primary): The programmes to monitor seabed loss pressures and bottom physical disturbance collect the data necessary to estimate the extent of the natural background affected.
Criterion D6C3 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the spatial extent of each habitat type adversely affected by physical disturbances by altering its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The indicators set out in the various programmes (HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6) are designed to respond specifically to these issues (area of habitats significantly affected by human activities (HB-AreaAfec), area of extent of physical damage to habitats (OSPAR BH3), by collecting information on the structure and functioning of the habitats (typical species composition, diversity, structural species, bathymetric range, etc.). The overlap of the results of these programmes with those of the physical disturbance programme will allow the estimation of the extent required by this criterion.
Criterion D6C4 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of loss for each habitat type and could therefore be addressed by overlapping habitat type mapping and results of the seabed physical loss monitoring programme.
Criterion D6C5 (primary): This criterion requires estimating the extent of the adverse effects of anthropogenic pressures on the condition of the habitat type, including the alteration of its biotic and abiotic structure and functions. The HB8 monitoring programme aims to assess the effects of interactions between human activities and their derived pressures and marine habitats, including those relating to eutrophication, pollution, marine litter, etc., added to the physical disturbances analysed in the above criteria, and indicators calculated using PdS HB1, HB2/7, HB3, HB4, HB5 and HB6.
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
ES-A-03_DefensaCostera |
ES-A-04_InfrMarAdentro |
ES-A-05_ReestructuracFondoMarino |
ES-A-06_ExtraccMinerales |
ES-A-07_Hidrocarburos |
ES-A-12_Cables |
ES-A-13_PescaMaritima |
ES-A-13_PescaMaritima |
ES-A-15_RecoleccPlantMarinas |
ES-A-16_CazaRecoleccOtrosFines |
ES-A-21_Puertos |
ES-A-29_ActividadesTurismoOcio |
ES-BM-3_BasuraFondoMarino |
ES-BM-5_MicroplásticosFondo |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-CONT-4_ContaminacionAccidental |
ES-CONT-4_ContaminacionAccidental |
ES-EUT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-EUT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-EUT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-EUT-1_AguasCosteras |
ES-EUT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-EUT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-EUT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-EUT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-EUT-2_AguasAbiertas |
ES-EUT-3_DatosAdicionales |
ES-EUT-3_DatosAdicionales |
ES-EUT-3_DatosAdicionales |
ES-EUT-3_DatosAdicionales |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-2-7_InfralitSedim_Intermareal |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-3_CircaBatRocoso |
ES-HB-4_CircaBatSedim |
ES-HB-4_CircaBatSedim |
ES-HB-4_CircaBatSedim |
ES-HB-5_Angiospermas |
ES-HB-5_Angiospermas |
ES-HB-5_Angiospermas |
ES-HB-5_Angiospermas |
ES-HB-6-BEN_Especies BentProteg |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-HB-8_InteraccionActHum |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-OA-C |
ES-PF-01_PerturbacFisicasFondo |
ES-PF-02_PerdidasFisicas |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
HB-1_InfralitRocoso |
Programme name |
Defensa costera y protección contra las inundaciones |
Infraestructuras mar adentro (excepto las destinadas a explotación de petróleo, gas o energías renovables) |
Dragados portuarios operacionales y vertidos de material dragado |
Extracción de minerales |
Extracción de petróleo y gas |
Tendido de cables de electricidad y comunicaciones |
Pesca y marisqueo (profesional, recreativa) |
Pesca y marisqueo (profesional, recreativa) |
Recolección de plantas marinas |
Caza y recolección para otros fines |
Infraestructuras portuarias |
Actividades de turismo y ocio |
Basura en el fondo marino |
Microplásticos en el fondo marino |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento contaminacion química en aguas costeras |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Seguimiento de la contaminación química marina en aguas abiertas |
Contaminación accidental |
Contaminación accidental |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua no costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua no costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua no costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua no costeras |
Nutrientes, oxígeno y fitoplancton en masas de agua no costeras |
Datos adicionales |
Datos adicionales |
Datos adicionales |
Datos adicionales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales sedimentarios e intermareales |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales sedimentarios |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales sedimentarios |
Hábitats de fondos circalitorales y batiales sedimentarios |
Hábitats infralitorales e intermareales de angiospermas marinas |
Hábitats infralitorales e intermareales de angiospermas marinas |
Hábitats infralitorales e intermareales de angiospermas marinas |
Hábitats infralitorales e intermareales de angiospermas marinas |
Especies bentónicas protegidas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Interacción con actividades humanas |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Perturbaciones físicas del fondo marino |
Pérdidas físicas |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Hábitats de fondos infralitorales rocosos |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
An assessment is made of the existing coastal defence infrastructures (longitudinal defences â escorts, walls, screens and linings â free of charge) on the coast line and the coastal defence activities carried out by the Directorate-General for the Coast and the Sea (DGCM) according to their number and typology. In the case of artificial beach feeding, considered a soft coastal defence action, the volume of sediments used for this purpose is assessed.
|
Newly built offshore infrastructure is identified according to its number and typology, as well as the occupation of the seabed where possible. The infrastructure considered includes pipelines, artificial reefs, submarine wineries, research platforms, etc.
|
The dredging activity of seabed sediments is assessed to increase or maintain the draught of ports and their subsequent destination, mainly the reservoir in the marine environment.
|
The intensity of sediment extraction from the seabed for beach regeneration and port filling is assessed, on the understanding that maintenance dredges or first establishment dredges are not intended for the extraction of the material but respond to a need to maintain or improve port navigability or operability. Where the origin of the material is a port dredging, the monitoring programme Operational port dredges and spills of dredged material (ES-A-05) is applicable.
|
The extraction of oil and gas from the seabed is assessed, as well as the infrastructure needed both for the extraction, temporary storage of gas and for transport to land in order to assess the occupation of the seabed. Account is also taken of the various permits that may exist for exploration or exploitation, as well as seismic surveys and prospecting surveys carried out during the exploration phase.
|
The location and length of power lines or in order to improve telecommunications, mainly fibre-optic cables, are assessed.
|
The objective of this programme is to obtain a spatial distribution and time series of the fishing effort carried out by métier, both by professional and recreational activities throughout Spain, without taking into account inland and transitional waters.
The methods of assessment of effort, both in terms of units and methods, shall be adaptive according to the metier and the habitats with which it interacts, in order to describe the pressure exerted in the most appropriate way. The units to be used, for example, will use the technical characteristics of the vessels (GRT, CV, length, etc.), the number of crew/persons, the number of gear (number of nets, poles, hooks, etc.), fuel consumption, etc. In terms of methods, both nominal and standardised measurements of effort shall be used, using in the latter case the statistical techniques used.
The sampling or census technique to obtain the fishing effort is conditioned by the type of activity. The following activities have been considered on the basis of the information available and the type of economic activity: 1. Professional activities
⢠With VMS (VMS).
⢠Without VMS (fishing from boat/boat or fishing/shellfish on foot): With other non-VMS vessel monitoring systems (SSB)
|
The objective of this programme is to obtain a spatial distribution and time series of the fishing effort carried out by métier, both by professional and recreational activities throughout Spain, without taking into account inland and transitional waters.
The methods of assessment of effort, both in terms of units and methods, shall be adaptive according to the metier and the habitats with which it interacts, in order to describe the pressure exerted in the most appropriate way. The units to be used, for example, will use the technical characteristics of the vessels (GRT, CV, length, etc.), the number of crew/persons, the number of gear (number of nets, poles, hooks, etc.), fuel consumption, etc. In terms of methods, both nominal and standardised measurements of effort shall be used, using in the latter case the statistical techniques used.
The sampling or census technique to obtain the fishing effort is conditioned by the type of activity. The following activities have been considered on the basis of the information available and the type of economic activity: 1. Professional activities
⢠With VMS (VMS).
⢠Without VMS (fishing from boat/boat or fishing/shellfish on foot): With other non-VMS vessel monitoring systems (SSB)
|
The intensity of collection of marine macroalgae, mainly brown algae and red algae, is assessed for different purposes such as human food, agricultural, medical and pharmacological uses, cosmetics, etc.
|
The number of current licences for harvesting red coral and, as far as possible, the quantities harvested are assessed.
|
An analysis is carried out of the main characteristics of ports with freight or passenger traffic as the main transport infrastructure with a direct link to the marine environment, both those managed by the State, through the port authorities, and those managed by the Autonomous Communities. The changes are identified and the gain or loss on land at sea is quantified.
|
The programme describes the intensity of leisure and leisure activities that generate pressures/impacts on the marine environment, such as nights spent in coastal accommodation, cruise ships, nautical sports (sailing, surfing, diving, water skiing, etc.) and sighting cetaceans.
|
The programme aims to monitor litter accumulated on the seabed, including its abundance, composition and origin.
Seabed areas can be areas of accumulation of marine litter depending on bottom accidents, platform currents, discharge of rivers, close to navigation routes, ports or population centres or tourists (Galgani et al., 2000).
Macrolitter on the bed bed is determined by means of the IEO demersal trawl surveys called DEMERSALES (North Atlantic and South Atlantic RBDs) and MEDITS (Estrecho and Alboran and Alboran RBDs). These campaigns are aimed at assessing the state of the demersal and benthic ecosystem by bottom trawling and, in addition, take marine litter data in accordance with internationally agreed protocols.
In shallow depths (less than 40 metres) the abundance of marine litter is generally greater than in shelf areas, especially in areas where currents are weak, as litter tends to accumulate in the bottom in the absence of hydrodynamism. The proximity to urban areas, tourist centres and river mouths, which channel riparian litter, increases the amount of litter in submerged areas close to the coast. In addition, maritime activity on commercial routes and areas with increased fishing pressure can be considered as an additional source of pollution.
The collection of data on marine litter in shadows is carried out through citizen science and is therefore included in the BM-7 programme.
In addition, in the five marine districts there are littered fishing initiatives where fishermen store and land unintentionally âfishedâ marine litter in port during their fishing activity. This is often accompanied by a collection of data on collected litter.
Examples of these initiatives are ECOPUERTOS, MARVIVA, Upcycling the Oceans, CleanAtlantic, REPESCAPLAS or Circular Seas. Currently, the MITERD, as part of the INTEMARES project, will develop national guidelines on fishing for litter, which will include a standardised data collection protocol, as well as a database at national level to collect the information obtained from existing and future initiatives.
|
This programme, which aims to monitor microparticles in the seabed, is under development, not only in Spain, but also at European level. The lack of standardised means to study this aspect is a weakness in the implementation of marine strategies. Spain is working to address this problem, in cooperation with other countries, in the framework of the Technical Group for Marine Waste set up by the European Commission (TG-ML). The data taken in the IEO campaigns where it is feasible and feasible to include a work plan in this area will be note.One of the potential campaigns for data collection and monitoring of this sub-programme is the IBERIANMULLUS campaign, the main objective of which is the collection of samples of red mullet on the Mediterranean coast of the Peninsula, in order to assess the temporary trends of priority pollutants, and where, in addition, specific samples are obtained from the EMAN project (e.g. by means of a platform).
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-1 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects in the coastal marine area (up to 1 mile from the baseline). This area is the area most exposed to direct or diffuse pollution of terrestrial origin and therefore the most vulnerable.
The data generated through the Water Framework Directive and the Regional Conventions for the Protection of the Marine Environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in this programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of pollutants in water, sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms in the coastal zone. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
The CONT-2 programme focuses on monitoring pollution and its potential biological effects on the deepest marine area (beyond the first mile from the baseline). This area is the least exposed area to direct pollution and is spatially complementary to the CONT-1 programme.
The data generated through the regional conventions for the protection of the marine environment OSPAR and Barcelona are integrated and harmonised in the CONT-2 programme.
The programme consists of spatial and temporal monitoring of the concentration of contaminants in sediment and biota and their effects on bioindicator organisms. This will provide integrated information on both pollution levels and the environmental impact of such pollution.
|
Accidental pollution may come from sources as diverse as incidents/accidents on ships, oil exploration and exploitation activities, port activities primarily loading and discharging oil or other polluting substances) or industrial activities carried out near the coast. Given the serious consequences they may have on the coastal and marine environment, the monitoring of these discharges
it is particularly relevant in the context of marine strategies. The aim of this programme is to analyse both accidental spills from ships and platforms registered by the Directorate-General for Merchant Shipping, and acute pollution events, which trigger contingency plans against accidental pollution.
In addition, in the event of an acute pollution event, the programme will monitor the adverse effects of these events on species through a protocol for action on petroleated fauna.
|
Accidental pollution may come from sources as diverse as incidents/accidents on ships, oil exploration and exploitation activities, port activities primarily loading and discharging oil or other polluting substances) or industrial activities carried out near the coast. Given the serious consequences they may have on the coastal and marine environment, the monitoring of these discharges
it is particularly relevant in the context of marine strategies. The aim of this programme is to analyse both accidental spills from ships and platforms registered by the Directorate-General for Merchant Shipping, and acute pollution events, which trigger contingency plans against accidental pollution.
In addition, in the event of an acute pollution event, the programme will monitor the adverse effects of these events on species through a protocol for action on petroleated fauna.
|
The programme aims at obtaining data from eutrophication indicators in the water column in coastal water bodies assessed under the Water Framework Directive. This programme will make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out in compliance with the WFD, as well as sampling at coastal stations as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radials (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Oceanography Institute.
The Eutrophication monitoring programmes, like the rest of the programmes, are designed to monitor the state of the marine environment throughout its gradient pressures. However, particular efforts will be made to monitor areas that may be under pressure at any given time that could threaten the resilience of ecosystems, so that appropriate action can be taken as soon as possible. This is the case for Mar Menor, which is indeed a specific evaluation area for this programme (MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVMM (D5).
|
The programme aims at obtaining data from eutrophication indicators in the water column in coastal water bodies assessed under the Water Framework Directive. This programme will make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out in compliance with the WFD, as well as sampling at coastal stations as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radials (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Oceanography Institute.
The Eutrophication monitoring programmes, like the rest of the programmes, are designed to monitor the state of the marine environment throughout its gradient pressures. However, particular efforts will be made to monitor areas that may be under pressure at any given time that could threaten the resilience of ecosystems, so that appropriate action can be taken as soon as possible. This is the case for Mar Menor, which is indeed a specific evaluation area for this programme (MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVMM (D5).
|
The programme aims at obtaining data from eutrophication indicators in the water column in coastal water bodies assessed under the Water Framework Directive. This programme will make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out in compliance with the WFD, as well as sampling at coastal stations as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radials (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Oceanography Institute.
The Eutrophication monitoring programmes, like the rest of the programmes, are designed to monitor the state of the marine environment throughout its gradient pressures. However, particular efforts will be made to monitor areas that may be under pressure at any given time that could threaten the resilience of ecosystems, so that appropriate action can be taken as soon as possible. This is the case for Mar Menor, which is indeed a specific evaluation area for this programme (MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVMM (D5).
|
The programme aims at obtaining data from eutrophication indicators in the water column in coastal water bodies assessed under the Water Framework Directive. This programme will make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out in compliance with the WFD, as well as sampling at coastal stations as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radials (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Oceanography Institute.
The Eutrophication monitoring programmes, like the rest of the programmes, are designed to monitor the state of the marine environment throughout its gradient pressures. However, particular efforts will be made to monitor areas that may be under pressure at any given time that could threaten the resilience of ecosystems, so that appropriate action can be taken as soon as possible. This is the case for Mar Menor, which is indeed a specific evaluation area for this programme (MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVMM (D5).
|
The programme aims at obtaining data on eutrophication indicators in demarcated areas beyond coastal waters as assessed by the Water Framework Directive. The programme shall make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radial (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Institute.
Oceanography.
|
The programme aims at obtaining data on eutrophication indicators in demarcated areas beyond coastal waters as assessed by the Water Framework Directive. The programme shall make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radial (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Institute.
Oceanography.
|
The programme aims at obtaining data on eutrophication indicators in demarcated areas beyond coastal waters as assessed by the Water Framework Directive. The programme shall make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radial (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Institute.
Oceanography.
|
The programme aims at obtaining data on eutrophication indicators in demarcated areas beyond coastal waters as assessed by the Water Framework Directive. The programme shall make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radial (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Institute.
Oceanography.
|
The programme aims at obtaining data on eutrophication indicators in demarcated areas beyond coastal waters as assessed by the Water Framework Directive. The programme shall make it possible to assess the BEA against the primary criteria (D5C1, D5C2 and D5C5) as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/848, as well as for criterion D5C4, the assessment of which requires information from the water column. The programme includes the sampling of physico-chemical (temperature, salinity, nutrients, transparency and oxygen) and biological (phytoplankton) quality elements carried out as part of the eutrophication monitoring programmes (ESMARES) and radial (RADMED, RAPROCAN, STOCA and North radials) carried out by the Spanish Institute.
Oceanography.
|
The objective of this programme is to collect and analyse data on secondary criteria, which will complement the information obtained from the EUT-1 and EUT-2 programmes on a spatial and temporary basis. Information will be collected from three data sources:
⢠Satellite chlorophyll a data that will complement the sampling information related to criteria D5C2 and D5C4.
⢠Data on the presence of toxic phytoplankton and toxins in water generated by the monitoring programme for the quality of shellfish waters. The data are publicly available on a weekly basis. The information collected will allow the evaluation of the ROJAS indicator (criterion D5C3).
⢠For the Calculation Demarcations of the Balearic Islands and the Strait and Alboran, data on organic matter collected in the MEDPOL programme will be generated and obtained since 2010. The information collected will allow the MOR indicator to be evaluated and will complement the information generated from sampling for the NUTRI indicator (criterion D5C1).
|
The objective of this programme is to collect and analyse data on secondary criteria, which will complement the information obtained from the EUT-1 and EUT-2 programmes on a spatial and temporary basis. Information will be collected from three data sources:
⢠Satellite chlorophyll a data that will complement the sampling information related to criteria D5C2 and D5C4.
⢠Data on the presence of toxic phytoplankton and toxins in water generated by the monitoring programme for the quality of shellfish waters. The data are publicly available on a weekly basis. The information collected will allow the evaluation of the ROJAS indicator (criterion D5C3).
⢠For the Calculation Demarcations of the Balearic Islands and the Strait and Alboran, data on organic matter collected in the MEDPOL programme will be generated and obtained since 2010. The information collected will allow the MOR indicator to be evaluated and will complement the information generated from sampling for the NUTRI indicator (criterion D5C1).
|
The objective of this programme is to collect and analyse data on secondary criteria, which will complement the information obtained from the EUT-1 and EUT-2 programmes on a spatial and temporary basis. Information will be collected from three data sources:
⢠Satellite chlorophyll a data that will complement the sampling information related to criteria D5C2 and D5C4.
⢠Data on the presence of toxic phytoplankton and toxins in water generated by the monitoring programme for the quality of shellfish waters. The data are publicly available on a weekly basis. The information collected will allow the evaluation of the ROJAS indicator (criterion D5C3).
⢠For the Calculation Demarcations of the Balearic Islands and the Strait and Alboran, data on organic matter collected in the MEDPOL programme will be generated and obtained since 2010. The information collected will allow the MOR indicator to be evaluated and will complement the information generated from sampling for the NUTRI indicator (criterion D5C1).
|
The objective of this programme is to collect and analyse data on secondary criteria, which will complement the information obtained from the EUT-1 and EUT-2 programmes on a spatial and temporary basis. Information will be collected from three data sources:
⢠Satellite chlorophyll a data that will complement the sampling information related to criteria D5C2 and D5C4.
⢠Data on the presence of toxic phytoplankton and toxins in water generated by the monitoring programme for the quality of shellfish waters. The data are publicly available on a weekly basis. The information collected will allow the evaluation of the ROJAS indicator (criterion D5C3).
⢠For the Calculation Demarcations of the Balearic Islands and the Strait and Alboran, data on organic matter collected in the MEDPOL programme will be generated and obtained since 2010. The information collected will allow the MOR indicator to be evaluated and will complement the information generated from sampling for the NUTRI indicator (criterion D5C1).
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will analyse the information available from the Autonomous Communities and research projects of partial scope, for an assessment of the status of intertidal (sedimentary and rock) and infralittoral sedimentary habitats.
The monitoring of intertidal and infralittoral invertebrates and macroalgae derived from the WFD, carried out by the Autonomous Communities, provides considerable spatial coverage, as stations are presented along the entire coastline of the RBDs. Based on this monitoring, a set of status indicators is built within the WFD
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will carry out a study of the circalittoral and batial rock domain, with the aim of gathering information to assess the status of habitats present in the five RBDs. This programme provides for the estimation of marine biodiversity and the distribution of habitats, by means of filming using photogrammetrical trench and ROV (video/photo sampling) from the different bottoms, including geohabitats to be mapped with multibeam echo sounding and dredger sampling. Existing programmes (funded by MITERD) to monitor rock habitats in Marine Protected Areas (under the Habitats Directive), such as the âEl Cachuchoâ SAC, will also be included in this programme. If there are new Protected Marine Areas (EMPS), monitoring will gradually be extended to other areas. Spatial integration between PME and non-PME areas shall be carried out by establishing a number of monitoring points outside protected areas, using the same methodology as that used in the SSMSs.
|
This programme will consist of a study of circalittoral and batial sedimentary domains. Marine biodiversity and habitat distribution will be monitored through the use of visual methods (epibentos) and extractive methods including trawlers (epibentos) and dredges (endoobent and sedimentary characteristics). Sampling shall be carried out in a network of monitoring stations along the demarcated area, together with sampling in marine protected areas (Habitats Directive). This monitoring will be complemented by sampling of higher spatial coverage, from existing programmes, such as the ICES-IBTS bottom trawl assessment campaigns âDEMERSALESâ (North Atlantic), âARSAâ (sudatltica) and âMEDITSâ (Estrecho and Alborán y Caltino-balear), co-financed by the Data Collection Framework of the European Commission. The programme includes experimental trawling campaigns in the Canary Islands to obtain information, as there are no monitoring programmes.
The programme shall be implemented, at least in part, by the same means as the PC-4 programme. Sampling schemes which cannot be matched with such campaigns (e.g. ROV, beam-trawl) shall be the subject of an extension of these or additional campaigns.
|
This programme will consist of a study of circalittoral and batial sedimentary domains. Marine biodiversity and habitat distribution will be monitored through the use of visual methods (epibentos) and extractive methods including trawlers (epibentos) and dredges (endoobent and sedimentary characteristics). Sampling shall be carried out in a network of monitoring stations along the demarcated area, together with sampling in marine protected areas (Habitats Directive). This monitoring will be complemented by sampling of higher spatial coverage, from existing programmes, such as the ICES-IBTS bottom trawl assessment campaigns âDEMERSALESâ (North Atlantic), âARSAâ (sudatltica) and âMEDITSâ (Estrecho and Alborán y Caltino-balear), co-financed by the Data Collection Framework of the European Commission. The programme includes experimental trawling campaigns in the Canary Islands to obtain information, as there are no monitoring programmes.
The programme shall be implemented, at least in part, by the same means as the PC-4 programme. Sampling schemes which cannot be matched with such campaigns (e.g. ROV, beam-trawl) shall be the subject of an extension of these or additional campaigns.
|
This programme will consist of a study of circalittoral and batial sedimentary domains. Marine biodiversity and habitat distribution will be monitored through the use of visual methods (epibentos) and extractive methods including trawlers (epibentos) and dredges (endoobent and sedimentary characteristics). Sampling shall be carried out in a network of monitoring stations along the demarcated area, together with sampling in marine protected areas (Habitats Directive). This monitoring will be complemented by sampling of higher spatial coverage, from existing programmes, such as the ICES-IBTS bottom trawl assessment campaigns âDEMERSALESâ (North Atlantic), âARSAâ (sudatltica) and âMEDITSâ (Estrecho and Alborán y Caltino-balear), co-financed by the Data Collection Framework of the European Commission. The programme includes experimental trawling campaigns in the Canary Islands to obtain information, as there are no monitoring programmes.
The programme shall be implemented, at least in part, by the same means as the PC-4 programme. Sampling schemes which cannot be matched with such campaigns (e.g. ROV, beam-trawl) shall be the subject of an extension of these or additional campaigns.
|
The general objective of this programme is to collect the information needed to assess the status of marine angiosperms grassland in relation to the BEA at marine demarcation level, in the supdatantic, upland and Balearic, Estrecho and Alboran and Canary Islands, in accordance with the criteria of Decision 2017/848, the indicators selected for this habitat (Indicators Document) and the available information.
To this end, a status/impact monitoring programme has been developed, i.e. based on the measurement of a set of parameters (or criteria) corresponding to aspects or properties of marine angiosperms that are characteristic of the different levels of organisation at which the components and functions of these habitats (and their associated community) are structured, and which respond to the impact of anthropic pressures.
The main elements to be monitored are:
⢠The meadows of Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera noltii and Zostera marina (Estrecho and Alboran RBDs)
⢠Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii (Sudatltica and Canaria RBDs), distributed in the intertidal and infralittoral areas of these RBDs.
In the case of P. oceanica meadows, the available information mostly covers shallow funds up to 15 metres deep, so that the monitoring programme will focus on obtaining basic information on the state of the deepest grasslands, which are precisely more vulnerable to anthropic pressures. Particular emphasis will be placed on pressures likely to cause direct or indirect reductions in light availability, such as nutrient and organic matter discharges through underwater outfalls and aquaculture facilities.
Moreover, the available information does not provide data to address indicators related to the distribution and extent of habitats. To this end, the programme envisages, as an approximation to these criteria, a precise study of the position of the shallow and deep boundaries of habitats by combining traditional direct methods of border-marking (installation of marks or tell-tales in situ) with indirect methods using underwater camcorder, ROV or drones. The development of the specific protocol to carry out this study is one of the objectives of the HB-5 programme in this cycle.
In the case of C. meadows
|
The general objective of this programme is to collect the information needed to assess the status of marine angiosperms grassland in relation to the BEA at marine demarcation level, in the supdatantic, upland and Balearic, Estrecho and Alboran and Canary Islands, in accordance with the criteria of Decision 2017/848, the indicators selected for this habitat (Indicators Document) and the available information.
To this end, a status/impact monitoring programme has been developed, i.e. based on the measurement of a set of parameters (or criteria) corresponding to aspects or properties of marine angiosperms that are characteristic of the different levels of organisation at which the components and functions of these habitats (and their associated community) are structured, and which respond to the impact of anthropic pressures.
The main elements to be monitored are:
⢠The meadows of Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera noltii and Zostera marina (Estrecho and Alboran RBDs)
⢠Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii (Sudatltica and Canaria RBDs), distributed in the intertidal and infralittoral areas of these RBDs.
In the case of P. oceanica meadows, the available information mostly covers shallow funds up to 15 metres deep, so that the monitoring programme will focus on obtaining basic information on the state of the deepest grasslands, which are precisely more vulnerable to anthropic pressures. Particular emphasis will be placed on pressures likely to cause direct or indirect reductions in light availability, such as nutrient and organic matter discharges through underwater outfalls and aquaculture facilities.
Moreover, the available information does not provide data to address indicators related to the distribution and extent of habitats. To this end, the programme envisages, as an approximation to these criteria, a precise study of the position of the shallow and deep boundaries of habitats by combining traditional direct methods of border-marking (installation of marks or tell-tales in situ) with indirect methods using underwater camcorder, ROV or drones. The development of the specific protocol to carry out this study is one of the objectives of the HB-5 programme in this cycle.
In the case of C. meadows
|
The general objective of this programme is to collect the information needed to assess the status of marine angiosperms grassland in relation to the BEA at marine demarcation level, in the supdatantic, upland and Balearic, Estrecho and Alboran and Canary Islands, in accordance with the criteria of Decision 2017/848, the indicators selected for this habitat (Indicators Document) and the available information.
To this end, a status/impact monitoring programme has been developed, i.e. based on the measurement of a set of parameters (or criteria) corresponding to aspects or properties of marine angiosperms that are characteristic of the different levels of organisation at which the components and functions of these habitats (and their associated community) are structured, and which respond to the impact of anthropic pressures.
The main elements to be monitored are:
⢠The meadows of Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera noltii and Zostera marina (Estrecho and Alboran RBDs)
⢠Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii (Sudatltica and Canaria RBDs), distributed in the intertidal and infralittoral areas of these RBDs.
In the case of P. oceanica meadows, the available information mostly covers shallow funds up to 15 metres deep, so that the monitoring programme will focus on obtaining basic information on the state of the deepest grasslands, which are precisely more vulnerable to anthropic pressures. Particular emphasis will be placed on pressures likely to cause direct or indirect reductions in light availability, such as nutrient and organic matter discharges through underwater outfalls and aquaculture facilities.
Moreover, the available information does not provide data to address indicators related to the distribution and extent of habitats. To this end, the programme envisages, as an approximation to these criteria, a precise study of the position of the shallow and deep boundaries of habitats by combining traditional direct methods of border-marking (installation of marks or tell-tales in situ) with indirect methods using underwater camcorder, ROV or drones. The development of the specific protocol to carry out this study is one of the objectives of the HB-5 programme in this cycle.
In the case of C. meadows
|
The general objective of this programme is to collect the information needed to assess the status of marine angiosperms grassland in relation to the BEA at marine demarcation level, in the supdatantic, upland and Balearic, Estrecho and Alboran and Canary Islands, in accordance with the criteria of Decision 2017/848, the indicators selected for this habitat (Indicators Document) and the available information.
To this end, a status/impact monitoring programme has been developed, i.e. based on the measurement of a set of parameters (or criteria) corresponding to aspects or properties of marine angiosperms that are characteristic of the different levels of organisation at which the components and functions of these habitats (and their associated community) are structured, and which respond to the impact of anthropic pressures.
The main elements to be monitored are:
⢠The meadows of Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera noltii and Zostera marina (Estrecho and Alboran RBDs)
⢠Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii (Sudatltica and Canaria RBDs), distributed in the intertidal and infralittoral areas of these RBDs.
In the case of P. oceanica meadows, the available information mostly covers shallow funds up to 15 metres deep, so that the monitoring programme will focus on obtaining basic information on the state of the deepest grasslands, which are precisely more vulnerable to anthropic pressures. Particular emphasis will be placed on pressures likely to cause direct or indirect reductions in light availability, such as nutrient and organic matter discharges through underwater outfalls and aquaculture facilities.
Moreover, the available information does not provide data to address indicators related to the distribution and extent of habitats. To this end, the programme envisages, as an approximation to these criteria, a precise study of the position of the shallow and deep boundaries of habitats by combining traditional direct methods of border-marking (installation of marks or tell-tales in situ) with indirect methods using underwater camcorder, ROV or drones. The development of the specific protocol to carry out this study is one of the objectives of the HB-5 programme in this cycle.
In the case of C. meadows
|
The monitoring programme for protected benthic species will focus on monitoring indicators for benthic species (invertebrates, macroalgae and marine angiosperms) in all the RBDs that are included in the lists or annexes of the Barcelona Convention, the Habitats Directive, the OSPAR Convention, the Berne Convention, the Spanish Catalogue of Threatened Species or the catalogues of endangered species of coastal ACs.
Habitat monitoring programmes, especially those involving community studies associated with such habitats, may provide some information on some of these benthic species. However, the information gathered may not be sufficient and representative at demarcation level for some of these species, and monitoring is necessary for the species itself and not for the habitat. As a result, this monitoring programme is being launched to ascertain the presence of the catalogued species in the various districts and always in the area of the rock infralittoral area.
In addition, special attention will be paid to the nacra (Pinna nobilis), which, due to its current vulnerable situation and the mass mortality event experienced since autumn 2016, is the subject of joint action coordinated by various groups of specialists from the territory and different research organisations.
All species of marine angiosperms are included in different conventions and directives and will be dealt with in the HB-5 programme, as they are the species forming those habitats.
The species to be monitored are listed in the HB6 published at https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/costas/temas/proteccion-medio-marino/estrategias-marinas/eemm_2dociclo_fase4.aspx
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
The objective of this monitoring programme is to collect the necessary data to address the criteria associated with Descriptor 6, Seabed Integrity, which will be used to assess the BEA of the five marine RBDs. The good environmental status of Descriptor 6 implies that the structure and functions of benthic ecosystems are safeguarded and are not adversely affected by human activities. This programme should assess the status of habitats by using indicators on the basis of the following criteria:
⢠D6C1, extension of the pressure on the seabed resulting in a permanent loss, defined as permanent loss, when that change lasts for more than 12 years.
⢠D6C2, extent of physical disturbance on the seabed.
⢠D6C3, extent of habitat affected by each physical disturbance.
⢠D6C4, extent of permanent habitat loss, closely related to criterion D6C1.
⢠D6C5, extent of adverse effects on the condition of the habitat, taking into account here the state of the habitat for all pressures, physical, pollution, etc.
Through this programme, the extensions indicated in these criteria, the adverse effects on the condition of each habitat type, should be calculated. For the assessment of these criteria, the definition of the BEA in Descriptor 6 should set the maximum extent of adverse effects on habitats as a proportion of the total natural extent of each habitat type.
The HB-8 programme has a direct link with the programmes associated with the spatial distribution of human activities (ES-A monitoring programmes), with the programmes monitoring physical pressures ES-PF-01 (background physical disturbance) and ES-PF-02 (physical losses), as well as with the programmes of descriptors providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats, mainly: Descriptor 2 (non-indigenous species), descriptor 5 (eutrophication), Descriptor 7 (hydrographic conditions), Descriptor 8 (contaminants) and Descriptor 10 (marine litter). The HB-8 programme is directly related to all programmes associated with the spatial distribution of physical ACT pressures (1-7) and the descriptorsâ programmes providing information on the spatial distribution of other pressures on benthic habitats
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the thematic monitoring programmes addressing the different descriptors, pressures and activities. In addition, in some cases, state or pressure targets are based on qualitative (e.g. âexistence of protocolsâ, âexistence of methodologies or guidesâ, etc.) or quantitative indicators, but mostly of a non-scientific or technical nature (e.g. ânumber of meetingsâ, ânumber of people trainedâ, etc.).
Both indicators associated with the operational objectives, as well as state and pressure indicators of a non-scientific or technical nature, will be addressed through specific monitoring programmes such as the present one. They are intended to assess the achievement of environmental objectives in a comprehensive manner and to cover aspects not covered by the thematic monitoring programmes of descriptors, pressures and activities.
For this reason, three monitoring programmes for environmental objectives have been defined, based on the three objectives pursued by drawing up marine strategies in accordance with Article 1 (3) of Law 41/2010:
a. protecting and preserving the marine environment, including its biodiversity, preventing its deterioration and restoring marine ecosystems in areas that have been adversely affected
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
The intensity and temporal variation of this pressure on the marine environment is assessed considering the following aspects in order to estimate the marine area affected by each of them:
⢠Landfill of dredged material from port dredging
⢠beach regeneration
⢠Cables
⢠Trawling
⢠Marine aquaculture facilities
⢠commercial boat anchorages
⢠Recreational navigation anchoring areas
|
The intensity and spatial/temporal variation of this pressure on the marine environment is assessed considering the following aspects in order to estimate the marine area affected by each of them:
⢠Enlargements and demolitions carried out in ports of general interest and in regional ports.
⢠The construction and removal of exempted spigons and dykes.
⢠Artificial reefs installed.
⢠Offshore infrastructure.
⢠sediments extracted from the seabed for beach regeneration.
⢠Port dredging.
⢠The creation of artificial beaches.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
In the first stage, an exploratory study will be carried out of those stretches of the coastline where the information is insufficient to identify and locate the different habitats present according to the classification of the Spanish Inventory of Marine Habitats. In this way and in conjunction with other well-known areas, the different points to be monitored will be identified. In a second step, a number of parameters would be monitored at the selected points. Sampling of communities and their facilities will make it possible to work both at habitat level and with multimetric indices and species composition. In the case of special habitats (e.g. biogenic, reef, caves), more intensive, more accurate sampling shall be carried out and attention shall be paid to micromapping of control areas. The latter sampling will make it possible to work on macroscopic parameters to be analysed using GIS, which will provide information on the spatial evolution (extent, volume, coordinates) of the habitat to be studied when the habitat is significantly present in the survey area.
|
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Observations on litter deposited on the seabed are obtained during campaigns in charge of assessing benthic and demersal resources. These campaigns generally take place during the autumn winter transition between September and October. Fishing hauls are carried out during the day using âBakaâ 44/60 "net with 20Â mm mesh in the codend. The trawlers last about 30 minutes and are carried out at a constant speed of 3 knots. The sampling design follows stratified random sampling covering depths of 70 to 500Â m.
After each haul the waste waste is sorted (plastics, metals, glass, etc.). These values are counted and weighed by obtaining these values for the haul as a whole and for one of the classes sampled in accordance with the international protocols agreed for the area being studied (Atlantic or Mediterranean).
|
The sampling strategy was designed taking into account the highly heterogeneous distribution of microplastics in sediments (Wang et al., 2018) together with the aims of different working groups to analyse, inter alia: PAH, PCB, OCP, PBDE or trace metals. Sediment was sampled using a stainless steel sacatum (0.17 m à 0.10 m) where only surface sediment layers were collected (approx. 1.5 cm depth) using a clean stainless steel spatula. Several replicates were performed at each sampling point to achieve a representative sample (Wang et al., 2018), specifically four trawlers were combined at each sampling point. The pooled sediment sample was subsequently homogenised in a stainless steel vessel so that between 3 and 5 kg of sediment were obtained per sampling point.Finally, the homogenised sediment was distributed in clean aluminium containers and stored until analysis at -20 °C.
After in the laboratory, aluminium trays with sediment samples were thawed at room temperature. To determine the water content, 3 g of sediment was weighed in triplicate in aluminium cups and dried at 70 °C for 24 h. the sediment sample (100 g) was introduced into a 2 L beaker
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
⢠and annually for mussel pollution. 24
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
The sampling frequency will depend on the type of indicator to be analysed:
⢠annually or every two years for fish contamination
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
⢠four months in the upright/Balearic area.
⢠six-monthly in the district of the Canary Islands.
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authorities will follow the methods laid down in the guides and protocols to the regional conventions set out below.
|
The sampling frequency shall differ according to the type of monitoring and the elements monitored:
⢠daily for satellite images
|
The sampling frequency shall differ according to the type of monitoring and the elements monitored:
⢠daily for satellite images
|
The sampling frequency shall differ according to the type of monitoring and the elements monitored:
⢠daily for satellite images
|
The sampling frequency shall differ according to the type of monitoring and the elements monitored:
⢠daily for satellite images
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Acute pollution events
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Deep-sea cephalopods
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Oceanic/deep-sea ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal fish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Deep-sea fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Input or spread of non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Turtles
|
Agriculture
|
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure
|
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)
|
Fish and shellfish processing
|
Hunting and collecting for other purposes
|
Marine plant harvesting
|
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)
|
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure
|
Extraction of salt
|
Extraction of water
|
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables)
|
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure
|
Research, survey and educational activities
|
Coastal defence and flood protection
|
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables)
|
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials
|
Tourism and leisure activities
|
Tourism and leisure infrastructure
|
Transport infrastructure
|
Transport – shipping
|
Waste treatment and disposal
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Coastal/shelf cephalopods
|
Deep-sea cephalopods
|
Coastal fish
|
Deep-sea fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Input or spread of non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
|
Turtles
|
Physical disturbance to seabed
|
Physical loss of the seabed
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Benthic broad habitats
|
Other benthic habitats
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES criteria |
D10C1 |
D10C2 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C2 |
D8C2 |
D8C2 |
D8C2 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C2 |
D8C2 |
D8C3 |
D8C4 |
D5C1 |
D5C2 |
D5C4 |
D5C5 |
D5C1 |
D5C2 |
D5C4 |
D5C5 |
NotRelevan |
D5C1 |
D5C2 |
D5C3 |
D5C4 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D2C1 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
D6C2 |
D6C1 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C3 |
D6C4 |
D6C4 |
D6C5 |
D6C5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter Other |
Patrón de distribución, Distribución espacial, Ran |
• Concentración en sedimento (CONT-S) • Patrón de |
EROD enzymatic activity, AchE enzymatic activity, |
AchE enzymatic activity, metallothionein protein c |
Imposex |
Growth larvae (Length) |
EROD enzymatic activity, AchE enzymatic activity, |
Growth larvae (Length) |
Volume if possible |
Abundancia individuos especies |
Abundancia (número de individuos) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2020-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2020-9999 |
2020-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2007-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2013-9999 |
2013-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1995-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2016-9999 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
2020-9999 |
2020-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
6-yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
As needed |
As needed |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
As needed |
As needed |
As needed |
As needed |
As needed |
As needed |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
3-yearly |
3-yearly |
3-yearly |
3-yearly |
2-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Para el indicador A-03-01 se utiliza la relación de actuaciones en la costa de las aguas marinas españolas suministrada por el Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico y que contiene, para cada actuación ejecutada por la DGCM, entre otros campos, la provincia, el municipio, el estado (terminada, en ejecución y programada), la localización geográfica, la ruta en la web para obtención de información adicional y la fecha de finalización.
Los volúmenes de sedimentos empleados en la alimentación de playas a los que hace referencia el indicador A-03-02 se caracterizan a partir del Inventario de Extracciones de Arena en España facilitado por el Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Este inventario incluye información proporcionada por las diferentes Demarcaciones o Servicios de Costas referente al tipo de extracción (yacimiento submarino, reacomodación de arenas, uso de material dragado portuario, arena de cantera terrestre y otros), al volumen extraído y al lugar de depósito de las arenas.
La información sobre infraestructuras de defensa costera (indicador A-03-03) se elabora por el CEDEX mediante una actualización de la línea de costa artificial del Instituto Hidrográfico de la Marina utilizando la ortofotografía más reciente del Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía Aérea. |
Se solicitará a las autoridades competentes información sobre la localización, superficie sellada y tipología de las nuevas infraestructuras mar adentro construidas durante el periodo de interés. |
Se analiza la información procedente de las siguientes fuentes utilizando herramientas GIS:
• El Inventario Anual de Dragados en los Puertos Españoles, que incluye datos desde 1975 de los puertos de interés general. Este inventario recoge, entre otros campos, el puerto donde se realiza el dragado, el volumen del mismo y el destino de dicho material.
• Información de las comunidades autónomas referente a los dragados de los puertos autonómicos.
Los datos de vertido de material dragado notificados a los convenios internacionales de protección del medio marino y que incluye los datos de los puertos autonómicos. Los datos recopilados son: puerto donde se realiza el dragado, código del punto de vertido y volumen de sedimento vertido. |
La información de extracción de arenas para alimentación de playas procede del Inventario de Extracciones de Áridos para aporte en Playas en España facilitado por el Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Este inventario incluye información sobre los proyectos ejecutados por las diferentes Demarcaciones o Servicios de Costas referente al tipo de extracción (yacimiento submarino, reacomodación arenas, uso material dragado, arena de cantera terrestre y otros), al volumen extraído y al lugar de depósito de las arenas. Solamente se consideran en este programa las extracciones de arenas de yacimientos submarinos.
La caracterización de la extracción de sedimentos para rellenos portuarios se realiza a partir del Inventario Anual de Dragados en los Puertos Españoles (CEDEX, varios años), que incluye datos desde 1975 de los puertos de interés general. Este inventario recoge, entre otros campos, el puerto donde se realiza el dragado, su objeto (obtención de material, aumento de calado o mantenimiento), el volumen del mismo y el destino de dicho material. En el caso de los puertos autonómicos se utiliza la información remitida por las comunidades autónomas.
Los datos se analizan utilizando herramientas GIS. |
Se recopila y analiza la información publicada sobre las cantidades de hidrocarburos extraídos o inyectados, controladas en el marco de la política energética nacional y puesta a disposición del público a través de diferentes páginas web (www.cores.es, www.enagas.es). |
Se analiza la información procedente de la Cartografía Náutica producida por el Instituto Hidrográfico de la Marina (IHM) y la suministrada por las compañías eléctricas utilizando herramientas GIS. |
Actividad Pesquera con VMS (MAPA/MITERD/IEO)
En este caso se utilizará el programa de seguimiento existente de Sistemas de Seguimiento de Buques VMS, junto con el resto de programas de seguimiento que nos permiten obtener las variables asociadas a la captura y el esfuerzo. Además, se complementará con el programa de seguimiento de navegación Marítima (Automatic Identification System, AIS) que proporcionará una mejora importante en cuanto a frecuencia de señales (1').
Actividad pesquera sin VMS (CCAA/MAPA/MITERD/IEO)
En algunas demarcaciones destacan varias iniciativas autonómicas de seguimiento de embarcaciones menores de 15 metros. Estos seguimientos se realizan principalmente de dos formas: bien a través de SSB diseñados al efecto (por ejemplo, cajas verdes de Andalucía) o sistemas de seguimiento con observadores a bordo, como es el caso de Galicia. En todos estos casos se establecerá un marco de cooperación para el suministro y análisis conjunto de la información. En el caso de la demarcación canaria, dado que casi no existe flota con VMS, se pondrá en marcha el programa “Plan Especial de Seguimiento de la flota de la Demarcación Canaria (PESCA)“, en el que se hará un seguimiento de la flota con GPS a bordo.
En el taller de expertos de seguimiento de pesquerías artesanales se acordó la siguiente propuesta de una metodología estandarizada para el seguimiento de estas embarcaciones, consistente en la implantación en todas las unidades pesqueras de un Sistema de Localización de Unidades Pesquera (SLUP). Para la implantación este sistema se han identificado tres fases:
• Fase 1. Elección del sistema de seguimiento óptimo (frecuencia: una vez).• Fase 2. Instalación en todas las unidades de pesca tanto embarcaciones como actividades a pie de los sistemas de localización/seguimiento (frecuencia: una vez).
• Fase 3. Validación, ajuste y calibrado de los datos (frecuencia: cada 3 años; muestreo con observadores a bordo; intensidad de muestreo: 4 réplicas por métier).
El análisis de todos los parámetros asociados a la pesca deportiva se realiza mediante el procesado de datos de licencias de pesca recreativa facilitados por las comunidades autónomas. Asimismo, se utiliza la información de producción de moluscos de comunidades autónomas y se cuantifica la superficie potencialmente explotable a partir de la información de las zonas designadas para la protección de especies acuáticas significativas desde un punto de vista económico, integradas en el registro de zonas |
Actividad Pesquera con VMS (MAPA/MITERD/IEO)
En este caso se utilizará el programa de seguimiento existente de Sistemas de Seguimiento de Buques VMS, junto con el resto de programas de seguimiento que nos permiten obtener las variables asociadas a la captura y el esfuerzo. Además, se complementará con el programa de seguimiento de navegación Marítima (Automatic Identification System, AIS) que proporcionará una mejora importante en cuanto a frecuencia de señales (1').
Actividad pesquera sin VMS (CCAA/MAPA/MITERD/IEO)
En algunas demarcaciones destacan varias iniciativas autonómicas de seguimiento de embarcaciones menores de 15 metros. Estos seguimientos se realizan principalmente de dos formas: bien a través de SSB diseñados al efecto (por ejemplo, cajas verdes de Andalucía) o sistemas de seguimiento con observadores a bordo, como es el caso de Galicia. En todos estos casos se establecerá un marco de cooperación para el suministro y análisis conjunto de la información. En el caso de la demarcación canaria, dado que casi no existe flota con VMS, se pondrá en marcha el programa “Plan Especial de Seguimiento de la flota de la Demarcación Canaria (PESCA)“, en el que se hará un seguimiento de la flota con GPS a bordo.
En el taller de expertos de seguimiento de pesquerías artesanales se acordó la siguiente propuesta de una metodología estandarizada para el seguimiento de estas embarcaciones, consistente en la implantación en todas las unidades pesqueras de un Sistema de Localización de Unidades Pesquera (SLUP). Para la implantación este sistema se han identificado tres fases:
• Fase 1. Elección del sistema de seguimiento óptimo (frecuencia: una vez).• Fase 2. Instalación en todas las unidades de pesca tanto embarcaciones como actividades a pie de los sistemas de localización/seguimiento (frecuencia: una vez).
• Fase 3. Validación, ajuste y calibrado de los datos (frecuencia: cada 3 años; muestreo con observadores a bordo; intensidad de muestreo: 4 réplicas por métier).
El análisis de todos los parámetros asociados a la pesca deportiva se realiza mediante el procesado de datos de licencias de pesca recreativa facilitados por las comunidades autónomas. Asimismo, se utiliza la información de producción de moluscos de comunidades autónomas y se cuantifica la superficie potencialmente explotable a partir de la información de las zonas designadas para la protección de especies acuáticas significativas desde un punto de vista económico, integradas en el registro de zonas |
Los datos de recolección de plantas marinas se recaban del Plan Estadístico Nacional (PEN), que incluye la Estadística de Capturas y Desembarcos de Pesca Marítima elaborada por el Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Estos datos incluyen el peso vivo en kilogramos de recolección de plantas marinas llevada a cabo por barcos españoles en cada una de las áreas de pesca de la FAO. |
La información sobre el número de licencias para la pesca de coral rojo en aguas exteriores la facilita el Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (MAPA) a través de la Secretaría General de Pesca. Asimismo, se consideran los datos de recolección de coral rojo que figuran en el Plan Estadístico Nacional (PEN), que incluye la Estadística de Capturas y Desembarcos de Pesca Marítima elaborada por el MAPA. Estos datos incluyen el peso vivo en kilogramos de recolección de diferentes organismos llevada a cabo por barcos españoles en cada una de las áreas de pesca de la FAO. |
Se analiza la información generada por las distintas autoridades responsables en el marco de sus competencias, esto es: Puertos del Estado y las autoridades portuarias facilitan información relativa a las modificaciones de los puertos que conlleven la creación/modificación de infraestructuras portuarias o que den lugar a nuevas áreas del fondo marino selladas. En cuanto a las modificaciones de puertos autonómicos, estas se identifican haciendo uso de la comparativa de fotografías aéreas en distintos años procedentes del Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía Aérea. Para realizar este análisis se utilizan herramientas GIS. |
Se realiza la recopilación de información bien mediante la consulta de estadísticas publicadas bien mediante su petición a los organismos responsables. Así, la ocupación en establecimientos turísticos se obtiene del Instituto Nacional de Estadística y de los institutos de estadística de las comunidades autónomas; los deportes náuticos procede de la Estadística de Deporte Federado del Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte; los datos de cruceros procede de Puertos del Estado y de los puertos autonómicos; las actividades practicadas en las playas procede de la Guía de playas del MITECO y los datos sobre avistamientos de cetáceos los suministra la Dirección General de la Costa y el Mar, órgano que otorga las licencias para el desarrollo de esta actividad (Datos AROC sobre la actividad recreativa de observación de cetáceos). Se lleva a cabo un análisis espacial y temporal de la evolución de los citados parámetros cuando su nivel de desagregación lo permita utilizando herramientas GIS. |
En cuanto a la recogida de datos de iniciativas de pesca de basura, actualmente el MITERD, en el marco del
proyecto INTEMARES, va a desarrollar unas directrices nacionales sobre pesca de basura, que incluirá un
protocolo estandarizado de toma de datos, así como una base de datos a nivel nacional para recoger la
información obtenida por las iniciativas existentes y las que surjan en el futuro. |
Las muestras de sedimentos marinos superficiales se obtienen mediante el uso de una draga Box Corer. De la muestra se lleva a cabo una caracterización visual del sedimento, incluyendo los parámetros de color, olor, textura, presencia/ausencia de organismos macrobentónicos o restos vegetales. Posteriormente, se lleva a cabo un análisis de granulometría, y otras variables como contenido en materia orgánica y concentración de metales traza, compuestos orgánicos persistentes e hidrocarburos aromáticos policíclicos en la fracción total (< 2 mm) del sedimento. Dentro de este marco, sería factible que se llevara a cabo también la caracterización física de los microplásticos (cantidad, forma, tamaño, volumen, color y estado) siguiendo los protocolos desarrollados en el seno del BASEMAN project (JPI Oceans). |
Salvamento Marítimo (SASEMAR, Dirección General de la Marina Mercante) registra información de las incidencias relativas a posibles episodios de contaminación en el mar, a través de su programa de vigilancia aérea y satelital y su sistema de información de emergencias, que alimenta la base de datos de la Agencia Europea de Seguridad Marítima (EMSA). Desde 2019, SASEMAR también alimenta el informe
anual de Vigilancia Aérea que publica el Acuerdo de Bonn, suministrando las contaminaciones registradas en la Zona del Golfo de Vizcaya incluida en el acuerdo.
En el marco de este programa de seguimiento se llevará a cabo un análisis de la información facilitada por Salvamento Marítimo, que previsiblemente incluirá la fecha y coordenadas geográficas del punto del accidente, el origen del vertido, así como su extensión y volumen.
De la base de datos de los posibles incidentes de contaminación en el medio marino, se seleccionarán aquellos episodios que hayan dado lugar a manchas contaminantes con una superficie mayor de 1 km2
y con origen conocido.
Esto permitirá descartar su acumulación o reiteración en determinadas zonas. En caso de que durante la vigencia de este programa de seguimiento se alcanzara algún consenso a nivel regional o europeo sobre la definición de evento significativo de contaminación aguda, este programa se adaptaría y se comenzarían a aplicar los términos
acordados.
Para los casos en que se produzca un episodio de contaminación aguda, el MITERD tiene previsto publicar una Guía de actuación ante fauna petroleada, en coordinación con las CCAA, en la cual se basará el seguimiento de los efectos adversos de estos episodios sobre especies marinas. |
Salvamento Marítimo (SASEMAR, Dirección General de la Marina Mercante) registra información de las incidencias relativas a posibles episodios de contaminación en el mar, a través de su programa de vigilancia aérea y satelital y su sistema de información de emergencias, que alimenta la base de datos de la Agencia Europea de Seguridad Marítima (EMSA). Desde 2019, SASEMAR también alimenta el informe
anual de Vigilancia Aérea que publica el Acuerdo de Bonn, suministrando las contaminaciones registradas en la Zona del Golfo de Vizcaya incluida en el acuerdo.
En el marco de este programa de seguimiento se llevará a cabo un análisis de la información facilitada por Salvamento Marítimo, que previsiblemente incluirá la fecha y coordenadas geográficas del punto del accidente, el origen del vertido, así como su extensión y volumen.
De la base de datos de los posibles incidentes de contaminación en el medio marino, se seleccionarán aquellos episodios que hayan dado lugar a manchas contaminantes con una superficie mayor de 1 km2
y con origen conocido.
Esto permitirá descartar su acumulación o reiteración en determinadas zonas. En caso de que durante la vigencia de este programa de seguimiento se alcanzara algún consenso a nivel regional o europeo sobre la definición de evento significativo de contaminación aguda, este programa se adaptaría y se comenzarían a aplicar los términos
acordados.
Para los casos en que se produzca un episodio de contaminación aguda, el MITERD tiene previsto publicar una Guía de actuación ante fauna petroleada, en coordinación con las CCAA, en la cual se basará el seguimiento de los efectos adversos de estos episodios sobre especies marinas. |
Obtención de imágenes Level 2 de los sensores MODIS y VIIRS. Análisis estadístico de los pixeles mediante técnicas multivariantes. Adicionalmente, se evaluará el uso de los productos ofrecidos por el programa COPERNICUS de la ESA.
La metodología para análisis de fitoplancton tóxico es la usada por la autoridad competente en el programa de vigilancia correspondiente
La materia orgánica se determinará mediante análisis de la composición elemental del material particulado procedente de la filtración de una muestra de agua a través de filtros de 0,7 micras de fibra de vidrio. Las muestras de agua serán recogidas dentro de las campañas oceanográficas realizadas para el programa EUT2. El carbono orgánico total se determina en la muestra de agua debidamente preservada mediante analizador TOC. |
Obtención de imágenes Level 2 de los sensores MODIS y VIIRS. Análisis estadístico de los pixeles mediante técnicas multivariantes. Adicionalmente, se evaluará el uso de los productos ofrecidos por el programa COPERNICUS de la ESA.
La metodología para análisis de fitoplancton tóxico es la usada por la autoridad competente en el programa de vigilancia correspondiente
La materia orgánica se determinará mediante análisis de la composición elemental del material particulado procedente de la filtración de una muestra de agua a través de filtros de 0,7 micras de fibra de vidrio. Las muestras de agua serán recogidas dentro de las campañas oceanográficas realizadas para el programa EUT2. El carbono orgánico total se determina en la muestra de agua debidamente preservada mediante analizador TOC. |
Obtención de imágenes Level 2 de los sensores MODIS y VIIRS. Análisis estadístico de los pixeles mediante técnicas multivariantes. Adicionalmente, se evaluará el uso de los productos ofrecidos por el programa COPERNICUS de la ESA.
La metodología para análisis de fitoplancton tóxico es la usada por la autoridad competente en el programa de vigilancia correspondiente
La materia orgánica se determinará mediante análisis de la composición elemental del material particulado procedente de la filtración de una muestra de agua a través de filtros de 0,7 micras de fibra de vidrio. Las muestras de agua serán recogidas dentro de las campañas oceanográficas realizadas para el programa EUT2. El carbono orgánico total se determina en la muestra de agua debidamente preservada mediante analizador TOC. |
Obtención de imágenes Level 2 de los sensores MODIS y VIIRS. Análisis estadístico de los pixeles mediante técnicas multivariantes. Adicionalmente, se evaluará el uso de los productos ofrecidos por el programa COPERNICUS de la ESA.
La metodología para análisis de fitoplancton tóxico es la usada por la autoridad competente en el programa de vigilancia correspondiente
La materia orgánica se determinará mediante análisis de la composición elemental del material particulado procedente de la filtración de una muestra de agua a través de filtros de 0,7 micras de fibra de vidrio. Las muestras de agua serán recogidas dentro de las campañas oceanográficas realizadas para el programa EUT2. El carbono orgánico total se determina en la muestra de agua debidamente preservada mediante analizador TOC. |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
La metodología de seguimiento de la DMA varía en función del indicador utilizado en cada demarcación marina, y puede consultarse en el Documento Técnico del segundo ejercicio de intercalibración (“Technical Report” ).
En el caso de la demarcación sudatlántica, las campañas de seguimiento del IEO incluyen algunos de sus lances en profundidades del infralitoral sedimentario (menos de 30 metros, frente a la desembocadura del río Guadalquivir). |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
El seguimiento se realizará al menos en los EMPs de la Red Natura que presentan este tipo de hábitat y en puntos control fuera de estos EMPs. Se combinarán diferentes metodologías:
a. Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas, mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
b. Estimación de la densidad y distribución espacial de las comunidades epibentónicas de los hábitats rocosos. Sólo en el caso de que, por la configuración del sustrato rocoso y la ausencia de hábitats sensibles y/o especies incluidas en Convenios o Directivas de conservación, sea posible tomar muestras del fondo y la fauna marina, se realizarán muestreos con métodos directos como dragas de arrastre o beam-trawl.
Este seguimiento se realizará en dos fases:
• Fase 1: estudio previo de reconocimiento geomorfológico de la demarcación, basado en técnicas acústicas (sonda multihaz y sónar de barrido lateral). Se localizarán aquellas áreas más idóneas en las que se realizará el muestreo. En la actualidad hay programas de seguimiento que están empleando alguna de estas metodologías (por ejemplo, ZEE, ESPACE), los cuales también serán usados para este fin. Si fuese necesario, se intentará cubrir paulatinamente las deficiencias espaciales que no queden cubiertas por los programas de seguimiento existentes.
• Fase 2: seguimiento de esas zonas control, con la misma metodología desarrollada para las zonas incluidas en la Red Natura 2000. |
Además de en los protocolos CFP, la metodología detallada del seguimiento en las campañas de evaluación con arte de arrastre de fondo puede verse en la ficha del programa PC4. En cuanto al seguimiento adicional propuesto, se contemplará:
• Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
• Estimación de la abundancia, biomasa y distribución espacial de las comunidades endobentónicas (draga Box corer), epibentónicas (beam-trawl) y demersales (artes de arrastre) de los hábitats sedimentarios.
Con estos métodos se podrán obtener los indicadores propuestos. |
Además de en los protocolos CFP, la metodología detallada del seguimiento en las campañas de evaluación con arte de arrastre de fondo puede verse en la ficha del programa PC4. En cuanto al seguimiento adicional propuesto, se contemplará:
• Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
• Estimación de la abundancia, biomasa y distribución espacial de las comunidades endobentónicas (draga Box corer), epibentónicas (beam-trawl) y demersales (artes de arrastre) de los hábitats sedimentarios.
Con estos métodos se podrán obtener los indicadores propuestos. |
Además de en los protocolos CFP, la metodología detallada del seguimiento en las campañas de evaluación con arte de arrastre de fondo puede verse en la ficha del programa PC4. En cuanto al seguimiento adicional propuesto, se contemplará:
• Identificación visual directa de hábitats y comunidades bentónicas mediante fotogrametría y vídeo (trineos fotogramétricos, ROV, lander).
• Estimación de la abundancia, biomasa y distribución espacial de las comunidades endobentónicas (draga Box corer), epibentónicas (beam-trawl) y demersales (artes de arrastre) de los hábitats sedimentarios.
Con estos métodos se podrán obtener los indicadores propuestos. |
En cada demarcación se llevará a cabo un seguimiento específico de praderas profundas (en el caso de P. oceánica) e indicadores de distribución y extensión (para todas las especies). Para cada especie se han seleccionado una serie de praderas control (hipotéticamente en buen estado ambiental), a partir de las cuales se establecerá la variabilidad natural espacio‐temporal equivalente a los valores y umbrales del BEA; por otro lado, el cumplimiento del BEA se evaluará en una serie de casos de impacto significativo sobre las praderas de las diferentes especies. La selección de casos (tanto de zonas impactadas como de zona control o de referencia) se ha realizado en coordinación con las CCAA y la información disponible, buscando la sinergia y complementariedad.
Cada estación del programa será muestreada idealmente dos veces por ciclo mediante métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos estándar, basados en buceo autónomo, video arrastrado desde embarcación, imágenes aéreas y satélite, posicionamiento GPS y análisis de muestras en laboratorio. A lo largo de este ciclo se desarrollará, aplicará, calibrará y refinará el método de integración de los indicadores para el cálculo del BEA a las diferentes escalas espaciales de cada demarcación. Esta tarea se realizará a través del grupo español de expertos en seguimiento de hábitats de angiospermas marinas formado para el diseño del programa y en coordinación con representantes de las CCAA.
Dada la inviabilidad y dificultad de emplear aproximaciones basadas en métodos cartográficos, para la obtención de los indicadores de extensión y distribución se empleará como aproximación (proy o sustituto) el marcaje y posicionamiento muy preciso de límites inferiores (profundos) y superiores (someros) de las praderas en localidades concretas seleccionadas para el programa de seguimiento, de acuerdo con el planteamiento explicado anteriormente. Para ello se aplicará una combinación de marcaje in situ de los límites inferiores mediante buceo autónomo y técnicas de videocámara submarina para las praderas infralitorales, o a pie y con imágenes de satélite para las praderas intermareales. En el caso de las praderas profundas y sus límites máximos de distribución se aplicarán otros métodos acústicos (Side Scan Sonar y multibeam) y de imagen (ROV) con el objetivo de evaluar protocolos eficaces y precisos para el seguimiento a largo plazo de estos hábitats (...) |
En cada demarcación se llevará a cabo un seguimiento específico de praderas profundas (en el caso de P. oceánica) e indicadores de distribución y extensión (para todas las especies). Para cada especie se han seleccionado una serie de praderas control (hipotéticamente en buen estado ambiental), a partir de las cuales se establecerá la variabilidad natural espacio‐temporal equivalente a los valores y umbrales del BEA; por otro lado, el cumplimiento del BEA se evaluará en una serie de casos de impacto significativo sobre las praderas de las diferentes especies. La selección de casos (tanto de zonas impactadas como de zona control o de referencia) se ha realizado en coordinación con las CCAA y la información disponible, buscando la sinergia y complementariedad.
Cada estación del programa será muestreada idealmente dos veces por ciclo mediante métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos estándar, basados en buceo autónomo, video arrastrado desde embarcación, imágenes aéreas y satélite, posicionamiento GPS y análisis de muestras en laboratorio. A lo largo de este ciclo se desarrollará, aplicará, calibrará y refinará el método de integración de los indicadores para el cálculo del BEA a las diferentes escalas espaciales de cada demarcación. Esta tarea se realizará a través del grupo español de expertos en seguimiento de hábitats de angiospermas marinas formado para el diseño del programa y en coordinación con representantes de las CCAA.
Dada la inviabilidad y dificultad de emplear aproximaciones basadas en métodos cartográficos, para la obtención de los indicadores de extensión y distribución se empleará como aproximación (proy o sustituto) el marcaje y posicionamiento muy preciso de límites inferiores (profundos) y superiores (someros) de las praderas en localidades concretas seleccionadas para el programa de seguimiento, de acuerdo con el planteamiento explicado anteriormente. Para ello se aplicará una combinación de marcaje in situ de los límites inferiores mediante buceo autónomo y técnicas de videocámara submarina para las praderas infralitorales, o a pie y con imágenes de satélite para las praderas intermareales. En el caso de las praderas profundas y sus límites máximos de distribución se aplicarán otros métodos acústicos (Side Scan Sonar y multibeam) y de imagen (ROV) con el objetivo de evaluar protocolos eficaces y precisos para el seguimiento a largo plazo de estos hábitats (...) |
En cada demarcación se llevará a cabo un seguimiento específico de praderas profundas (en el caso de P. oceánica) e indicadores de distribución y extensión (para todas las especies). Para cada especie se han seleccionado una serie de praderas control (hipotéticamente en buen estado ambiental), a partir de las cuales se establecerá la variabilidad natural espacio‐temporal equivalente a los valores y umbrales del BEA; por otro lado, el cumplimiento del BEA se evaluará en una serie de casos de impacto significativo sobre las praderas de las diferentes especies. La selección de casos (tanto de zonas impactadas como de zona control o de referencia) se ha realizado en coordinación con las CCAA y la información disponible, buscando la sinergia y complementariedad.
Cada estación del programa será muestreada idealmente dos veces por ciclo mediante métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos estándar, basados en buceo autónomo, video arrastrado desde embarcación, imágenes aéreas y satélite, posicionamiento GPS y análisis de muestras en laboratorio. A lo largo de este ciclo se desarrollará, aplicará, calibrará y refinará el método de integración de los indicadores para el cálculo del BEA a las diferentes escalas espaciales de cada demarcación. Esta tarea se realizará a través del grupo español de expertos en seguimiento de hábitats de angiospermas marinas formado para el diseño del programa y en coordinación con representantes de las CCAA.
Dada la inviabilidad y dificultad de emplear aproximaciones basadas en métodos cartográficos, para la obtención de los indicadores de extensión y distribución se empleará como aproximación (proy o sustituto) el marcaje y posicionamiento muy preciso de límites inferiores (profundos) y superiores (someros) de las praderas en localidades concretas seleccionadas para el programa de seguimiento, de acuerdo con el planteamiento explicado anteriormente. Para ello se aplicará una combinación de marcaje in situ de los límites inferiores mediante buceo autónomo y técnicas de videocámara submarina para las praderas infralitorales, o a pie y con imágenes de satélite para las praderas intermareales. En el caso de las praderas profundas y sus límites máximos de distribución se aplicarán otros métodos acústicos (Side Scan Sonar y multibeam) y de imagen (ROV) con el objetivo de evaluar protocolos eficaces y precisos para el seguimiento a largo plazo de estos hábitats (...) |
En cada demarcación se llevará a cabo un seguimiento específico de praderas profundas (en el caso de P. oceánica) e indicadores de distribución y extensión (para todas las especies). Para cada especie se han seleccionado una serie de praderas control (hipotéticamente en buen estado ambiental), a partir de las cuales se establecerá la variabilidad natural espacio‐temporal equivalente a los valores y umbrales del BEA; por otro lado, el cumplimiento del BEA se evaluará en una serie de casos de impacto significativo sobre las praderas de las diferentes especies. La selección de casos (tanto de zonas impactadas como de zona control o de referencia) se ha realizado en coordinación con las CCAA y la información disponible, buscando la sinergia y complementariedad.
Cada estación del programa será muestreada idealmente dos veces por ciclo mediante métodos cuantitativos y cualitativos estándar, basados en buceo autónomo, video arrastrado desde embarcación, imágenes aéreas y satélite, posicionamiento GPS y análisis de muestras en laboratorio. A lo largo de este ciclo se desarrollará, aplicará, calibrará y refinará el método de integración de los indicadores para el cálculo del BEA a las diferentes escalas espaciales de cada demarcación. Esta tarea se realizará a través del grupo español de expertos en seguimiento de hábitats de angiospermas marinas formado para el diseño del programa y en coordinación con representantes de las CCAA.
Dada la inviabilidad y dificultad de emplear aproximaciones basadas en métodos cartográficos, para la obtención de los indicadores de extensión y distribución se empleará como aproximación (proy o sustituto) el marcaje y posicionamiento muy preciso de límites inferiores (profundos) y superiores (someros) de las praderas en localidades concretas seleccionadas para el programa de seguimiento, de acuerdo con el planteamiento explicado anteriormente. Para ello se aplicará una combinación de marcaje in situ de los límites inferiores mediante buceo autónomo y técnicas de videocámara submarina para las praderas infralitorales, o a pie y con imágenes de satélite para las praderas intermareales. En el caso de las praderas profundas y sus límites máximos de distribución se aplicarán otros métodos acústicos (Side Scan Sonar y multibeam) y de imagen (ROV) con el objetivo de evaluar protocolos eficaces y precisos para el seguimiento a largo plazo de estos hábitats (...) |
Para la elección de las especies objetivo de seguimiento se realizará un estudio exploratorio (de campo y bibliográfico) de los diferentes hábitats y zonas dentro de cada demarcación marina que contengan especies bentónicas protegidas, seleccionando aquellas con probabilidad de presencia al muestreo seleccionado, tanto en los hábitats muestreados como por los rangos de profundidad que se muestrearán.
Los muestreos se realizarán en diferentes hábitats y zonas, pero incluyendo replicación espacial, con el objetivo de cubrir el gradiente ambiental para cada una de las demarcaciones y, por tanto, obtener datos representativos de toda la demarcación.
En este caso, si la especie catalogada resulta positiva en los censos realizados, se anotará cualquier otra información típica de la especie, como pudiera ser el estado de madurez, presencia de agregaciones, morfología atípica, librea singular, entre otras características.
Con posterioridad a los primeros años de muestreo, si se detecta la presencia de una especie catalogada que sea de interés para su seguimiento, se evaluará la instalación de parcelas permanentes de monitorización, o censos visuales adaptados a la presencia de la especie que abarquen una superficie conocida y que sea similar dentro cada especie a monitorizar. Los individuos serán marcados (siempre que sea posible), medidos y cartografiados, en la medida que lo permita su presencia y abundancia. Los parámetros demográficos requieren seguimientos a largo plazo para obtener datos de reclutamiento y mortalidad.
El primer año se obtendrá el estado cero de los individuos/colonias marcados y cartografiados y posteriormente se realizará el seguimiento anual. El número de parcelas por demarcación se establecerá tras dicha fase exploratoria. En cada visita se realizará un mantenimiento de las parcelas (revisión marcas, etiquetas, piquetas delimitadoras del polígono, etc.), así como el muestreo demográfico. Para el muestreo demográfico se cuenta con la cartografía de los individuos/frondes/colonias presentes en cada parcela, de manera que se procederá al revisado de los individuos marcados inicialmente, para confirmar su supervivencia o mortalidad. También se prospectarán individuos no marcados que se correspondan con reclutas, los cuales serán cartografiados y marcados para su posterior seguimiento.
Se monitorizarán en la medida de lo posible todas las especies catalogadas en los listados autonómicos y sus actualizaciones
(...) |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recolectarán los resultados de los indicadores de los distintos programas de seguimiento mencionados para dar respuesta a los criterios del descriptor 6 en cuanto a la extensión de área de cada tipo de hábitat afectada por las presiones producidas por actividades humanas. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
La procedencia de la información de los vertidos de material dragado (superficie afectada por los vertidos y volúmenes vertidos de material dragado) se indica en el programa ES-A-05 Dragados portuarios operacionales y vertidos de material dragado. Para las regeneraciones de playas la información se obtendrá del Inventario de extracciones de áridos para aporte a playas.
La información disponible sobre los cables submarinos, según se indica en el programa ES-A-12 Tendido de cables de electricidad y comunicaciones, hace referencia a su longitud por lo que la superficie ocupada por los mismos se estima en base a unas características medias y considerando que se perturba el fondo marino tanto tras el tendido de estos por cubrimiento de la zanja como por su posado sobre el fondo por el efecto barrera que suponen sobre la fauna bentónica. En este sentido, el International Cable Protection Committee indica que los cables se entierran dentro de un corredor de 1 m de ancho (aprox.) y que la zanja se realiza mediante agua a presión o utilizando un arado.
Los datos de la superficie del fondo marino afectada por la pesca de arrastre proceden del programa de seguimiento ES-A-13.Pesca y marisqueo.
La información disponible de las instalaciones de acuicultura instaladas procede del Acuivisor del Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación.
Para la definición de los fondeaderos de embarcaciones comerciales se realiza un análisis de la densidad de embarcaciones en las zonas II o exteriores de las aguas portuarias utilizando datos AIS facilitados por SASEMAR, considerando todos los buques presentes y que circulan por ellas con una velocidad inferior a 1 nudo. Se considera como umbral mínimo para su consideración como zona de fondeo una densidad de buques superior a 0,01 buques/km2. Se selecciona el mes de enero porque la actividad pesquera no es muy elevada, no interfiriendo así los buques pesqueros que están faenando a baja velocidad con los buques que están fondeados. En este sentido, se eliminan los datos alejados de costa, situados en la plataforma y que están relacionados con la actividad pesquera o con la actividad de extracción de hidrocarburos.
La superficie de fondo potencialmente perturbada por fondeo recreativo se estimará también a partir de datos AIS facilitados por SASEMAR, tanto de clase A como de clase B, siguiendo la metodología propuesta por Deter et al (2017).
Los datos se analizan utilizando programas de producción propia y herramientas GIS. |
La procedencia de la información de los diferentes aspectos tratados en el programa se detalla a continuación:
• Ampliaciones y demoliciones realizadas en los puertos de interés general y en los puertos autonómicos: se indica en el programa ES-A-21 Infraestructuras portuarias.
• Construcción y retirada de espigones y diques exentos: se indica en el programa ES-A-03 Defensa costera y protección contra las inundaciones. En el cálculo de la superficie afectada por los espigones se han considerado estos en toda su longitud y únicamente su parte emergida.
• Arrecifes artificiales instalados: se indica en el programa ES-A-04 Infraestructuras mar adentro (excepto las destinadas a explotación de petróleo, gas o energías renovables). La superficie considera el polígono arrecifal y no la superficie ocupada por cada módulo instalado por lo que este dato se considera como superficie máxima sellada por el arrecife artificial.
• Infraestructuras instaladas mar adentro: se indica en los programas ES-A-04 Infraestructuras mar adentro (excepto las destinadas a explotación de petróleo, gas o energías renovables) y ES-A-07 Extracción de petróleo y gas.
• Sedimentos extraídos del fondo marino para regeneración de playas: se indica en el programa ES-A-06 Extracción de minerales.
• Dragados portuarios: se indica en el programa ES-A-05 Dragados portuarios operacionales y vertidos de material dragado. Además, se tratará de estimar la superficie realmente afectada por esta actividad en base a datos AIS, facilitados por SASEMAR.
• Creación de playas artificiales: cálculo de la superficie perdida utilizando ortofotografías.
Los datos se analizan utilizando herramientas GIS. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
En este programa las campañas de muestreo estarán basadas mayoritariamente en buceo con escafandra autónoma, técnica mediante la cual se llevarán a cabo inventarios y censos de las comunidades consideradas. En una primera fase se propone obtener una información de los hábitats presentes en cada demarcación (a partir de cartografías publicadas, fotografía aérea, cartas náuticas), y de las zonas cubiertas por la DMA. En los casos en los que la información existente no fuera suficiente se llevará a cabo una primera fase de prospección.
• Fase de prospección: en esta fase exploratoria se realizarán transectos perpendiculares a costa en costas rocosas con diferente grado de exposición al oleaje con el fin de disponer de perfiles bionómicos con listados y caracterizaciones de los hábitats presentes en cada tipo de costa y a lo largo de toda la demarcación.
• Fase de seguimiento: durante esta fase se realizará el seguimiento de los hábitats infralitorales rocosos que se consideren representativos de la demarcación y que serán establecidos como resultado de la fase de prospección. A continuación, se desarrollará toda la metodología de muestreo en escafandra autónoma descrita por distintos especialistas y homogeneizada en la medida de lo posible para todas las demarcaciones.
La variación espacial quedará bien abordada con una correcta replicación a lo largo de cada una de las unidades de evaluación. Por lo que respecta a la variación temporal, se aconseja el muestreo de las comunidades bentónicas en la época de mayor desarrollo (primavera-verano) y una replicación bianual posterior.
• Seguimiento de hábitats: para la caracterización de comunidades de algas fotófilas se propone la metodología utilizada por Cebrian et al. (2000) y Sala et al. (2012). Se muestreará una profundidad estándar fija entre los 5 y 35 metros de profundidad, dependiendo de la demarcación, para eliminar la variabilidad batimétrica. La unidad de muestreo será un transecto de 50 m a profundidad constante. Se realizarán los siguientes muestreos:
o Censo de algas
o Censo de invertebrados
o Perfil vertical entre 5 y 35 m: uno por estación, anotando hábitats presentes.
o Se anotarán las especies incluidas en directivas o listados de protección.
o En el mismo transecto se realiza el muestreo del programa PC1 (peces del infralitoral rocoso).
• Seguimiento de especies invasoras: se cuantificará la presencia de especies invasoras. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Quality control |
That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity or by the executing authority during the analysis of the data.
|
Other quality checks: That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
Other standards: In the case of professional fishing, at least every six year cycle, observer embarkation shall be carried out for the validation and calibration of the systems. For recreational fishing and shellfishing, that established by the competent authority.
|
Other standards: In the case of professional fishing, at least every six year cycle, observer embarkation shall be carried out for the validation and calibration of the systems. For recreational fishing and shellfishing, that established by the competent authority.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity or by the executing authority during the analysis of the data.
|
Other standards (please specify): That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity or by the executing authority during the analysis of the data.
|
Other quality checks: That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
|
That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity
|
Other quality checks: That applied by the competent authorities in the execution of the activity.
Data are monitored by IEO research staff.
|
Data are monitored by IEO researchers.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
⢠QUASIME-Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe
⢠BEQUALM Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
⢠IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency intercomparison exercises
⢠UNEP/MED POL Biological Effects intercomparison exercises
Other quality checks: Use of validated methods that produce analytical data with the precision appropriate to the objectives pursued, using certified or generated reference materials for those methods for which they are not available, performing targets and participating in intercomparison exercises.
|
That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity
|
That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity
|
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authority will follow. For the rest of the sampling and analysis, actual validation will be carried out.
|
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authority will follow. For the rest of the sampling and analysis, actual validation will be carried out.
|
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authority will follow. For the rest of the sampling and analysis, actual validation will be carried out.
|
For the sampling carried out as part of the WFD monitoring programme, the competent authority will follow. For the rest of the sampling and analysis, actual validation will be carried out.
|
Actual validation will be carried out.
|
Actual validation will be carried out.
|
Actual validation will be carried out.
|
Actual validation will be carried out.
|
Actual validation will be carried out.
|
⢠for organic carbon a real validation is carried out.
|
⢠for organic carbon a real validation is carried out.
|
⢠for organic carbon a real validation is carried out.
|
⢠for organic carbon a real validation is carried out.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
Other standards: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
Other quality checks: That applied by the responsible authority in the implementation of the programme.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
These are standardised methodologies in the European working groups (OSPAR, CORMON) where quality controls are ensured.
Other quality checks: The metadata associated with environmental information define the quality of that information: Campaign data, modelling, literature.
|
Other standards: Proven experience of the scientific team implementing the monitoring programme
|
Other standards: Proven experience of the scientific team implementing the monitoring programme
|
Other standards: Proven experience of the scientific team implementing the monitoring programme
|
Other standards: Proven experience of the scientific team implementing the monitoring programme
|
BEQUALM â Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes
Other quality checks: Methodology published in international scientific journals under independent review (peer review).
The acquisition of information through citizen science shall be verified by specialists of each taxa to be evaluated and shall have complementary information, both images and associated data.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Statistical techniques to be used.
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Other quality checks: That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity.
|
Other quality checks: That applied by the competent authority in the execution of the activity.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
BEQUALM/Community analysis by NMBAQC in UK.
|
Data management |
Data are monitored by IEO research staff.
These data are uploaded in applications such as ICES or other applications used internally by the IEO.
|
The data processed are uploaded to the IEO Geographical Information System (GIS).
They are pre-loaded in other applications such as EMODNET or ICES Dome.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
Data are aggregated at WFD coastal water level, as well as at river basin district and marine district level.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be at demarcation level. Processed data shall be made public.
|
The aggregation scale shall be per demarcation and the data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
The aggregation scale shall be per demarcation and the data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
The aggregation scale shall be per demarcation and the data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
Aggregation by marine demarcation. The data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
Aggregation by marine demarcation. The data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
Aggregation by marine demarcation. The data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
Aggregation by marine demarcation. The data shall be made public in a processed form.
|
The data shall be aggregated at marine demarcation level, sub-region or region and made public in a processed form.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregated data per marine demarcation. Processed data shall be made public.
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
Aggregation scale: Marine demarcation
Nature: Processed data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References |