Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D1-B / Finland / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2012-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Birds
Member State Finland
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Team of experts from: - several Finnish Institutes, - Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment - The Ministry of Enviroment
Report date 2012-11-09
Report access MSFD10TI_20130515_140728.xml

BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea

Feature [Target or Indicator code]
D1.1
1.1.1
1.1.3
1.2.1
1.3.1
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent]
D1-B
D1C4
D1C4
D1C2
D1C3
MarineUnitID
  • Baltic Sea (BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea)
  • Baltic Sea (BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea)
  • Baltic Sea (BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea)
  • Baltic Sea (BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea)
  • Baltic Sea (BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea)
Method used
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
Description [Targets]
The community structure of all habitats must match the ecosystems of the viable bottom;
Range of seal distribution
Distribution of breeding populations of aquatic birds (fish and shellfish)
Hibernation and waterbird abundance
Number of species at favourable conservation status under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive
Threshold value [TargetValue]
Reference point type
TargetReferencePoint
TargetReferencePoint
TargetReferencePoint
Baseline
current level
current level
current level
Proportion
Assessment method
Development status
operational by 2014
fully operational
operational by 2014
operational by 2014
fully operational
Type of target/indicator
State
State
State
State
State
Timescale
Interim or GES target
GES
GES
GES
GES
GES
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators
Physical/chemical features
Predominant habitats
  • SeabedHabitatsAll
  • HabitatsOther
Functional group
  • BirdsOffshorePelagic
  • MammalsSeals
  • BirdsOffshorePelagic
  • BirdsOffshorePelagic
Pressures
  • ExtractSpeciesOther