Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D1-P / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Team of experts from: - several Finnish Institutes, - Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment - The Ministry of Enviroment |
| Report date | 2012-09-11 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20130515_140728.xml |
BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D1.6 |
1.5.2 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D1-P
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
D1C6
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
Method used |
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Description [Targets] |
The community structure of all habitats must match the ecosystems of the viable bottom;
|
Merellisten suojelualueiden pinta-ala (yksittäisten suojelualueiden ja suojelualueiden kokonaispinta-alatavoite merialuekohtaisesti kansainvälisten sopimusten (HELCOM, CBD) mukaan), huomioiden arvioinnissa myös suojeluun käytettävät keinot (lainsäädäntö, hoidon ja käytön suunnitelmat).
|
Status of species and communities typical of habitats
|
Occurrence and abundance of juvenile whitefish and flounder on shallow sandy bottoms
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
||||
Reference point type |
TargetReferencePoint |
|||
Baseline |
current level
|
|||
Proportion |
||||
Assessment method |
||||
Development status |
operational by 2014 |
operational by 2014 |
operational by 2018 |
operational by 2018 |
Type of target/indicator |
State |
State |
||
Timescale |
||||
Interim or GES target |
GES |
|||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
||||
Physical/chemical features |
||||
Predominant habitats |
|
|
|
|
Functional group |
||||
Pressures |