Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D1-P / Finland / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art8
Report due 2024-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Pelagic habitats
Member State Finland
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Report date 2025-01-30 09:01:21

BAL-FI-AA-NB

Regional assessment area
Component MRUs
GES component
D1P
D1P
D1P
D1P
D1P
D1P
D1P
Feature
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Pelagic broad habitats
Element
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Shelf pelagic habitat
Element extent
Trend element
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Element 2
Element source
Criterion
D1C6
D1C6
D1C6
D1C6
D1C6
D1C6
D1C6
Parameter
Abundance
CONC-W-Summer
Cyanobacterial bloom
Seasonal succession
Size distribution
SPP-C
Transparency in water
Threshold value upper
123.0
1.65
0.82
0.7
9.8
7.1
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator
>
<
>
>
>
>
>
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
National
Helsinki Convention
Value achieved upper
244.0
3.78
0.27
0.57
6.3
5.1
Value achieved lower
Value unit
mg/m3 ww
microgram per litre
Ratio-EQR
ratio
ug/individual ww
metre
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend parameter
Stable
Stable
Deteriorating
Stable
Deteriorating
Stable
Deteriorating
Parameter achieved
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Description parameter
Phytoplankton community composition -food web indicator.
Related indicator
  • HELC_BIOD_ZoMsTs
  • HELC_EUTR_ChLa
  • HELC_EUTR_CyBlIn
  • HELC_BIOD_PhyGr
  • HELC_BIOD_ZoMsTs
  • BAL-FI-IND-PHYTOPLANKTON-COMMUNITY-COMPOSITION
  • HELC_EUTR_WaCl
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description criteria
Element status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Description element
Source assessment feature
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
  • National
Reporting method feature
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Type C
Trend feature
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Integration rule type parameter
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
OOAO
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Not relevant
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
GES achieved
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported
Description overall status
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
FI uses extra phytoplankton indicators as well as state of bathing waters; and hence deviate from the HELCOM assessment. Two habitats were assessed.
Assessments period
2017-2022
2017-2022
2017-2022
2017-2022
2017-2022
2017-2022
2017-2022
Related pressures
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
Related targets
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV1-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV2-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV3-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV4-2030
  • BAL-FI-RAV5-2030
Test TV
Yes
No
No
No
No
NA
No
Test results
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
Correct
False
Correct