Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D1-P / Finland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Pelagic habitats |
Member State | Finland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finnish Environment Institute, Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment from South Ostrobothnia, North Ostrobothnia, Southwest Finland, Southeast Finland and Lapland, Finland’s environmental administration, Finnish Environment Institute, Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Finnish Environment Institute, Metsähallitus, Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment from North Ostrobothnia, Uusimaa, Southeast Finland and Southwest Finland |
Report date | 2012-11-07 |
Report access | MSFD8aFeatures_20130515_140529.xml |
Archipelago Sea
Bay of Bothnia
Bothnian Sea
Gulf of Finland
Northern Baltic Proper
Quark
Sea of Aland
Baltic Sea
Topic |
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatExtent
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatCondition
|
HabitatCondition
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reporting Feature |
Hydrolittoral philamentous algal communities |
Hydrolittoral philamentous algal communities |
Seagrass beds |
Bladderwrack communities |
Bladderwrack communities |
Other submerged macrophyte
meadows |
Other submerged macrophyte
meadows |
Charophyte communites |
Charophyte communites |
Blue mussel communities |
Bryophyte communities |
Sublittoral philamentous algal communities |
Indicator |
1.6.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.4.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.5.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
1.6.1 |
Threshold Value |
||||||||||||
Threshold Unit |
||||||||||||
Threshold Proportion |
||||||||||||
Baseline |
||||||||||||
Status |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
NotAssessed |
Status Description |
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Lack of established methods
|
Status Trend |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Unknown_NotAssessed |
Status Confidence |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |
NotRelevant |