Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D10 / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | Team of experts from: - several Finnish Institutes, - Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment - The Ministry of Enviroment |
| Report date | 2012-11-09 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20130515_140728.xml |
BAL-FI-RG-Baltic_Sea
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D10 |
10.1.1 |
10.1.2 |
10.1.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D10
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
Method used |
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Good status is defined qualitatively for each of the evaluation criteria and qualitative targets are also set for each criterion. A good status limit (s), which can be either quantitative or qualitative, is set for hot indicators, unless quantitative values can be scientifically set.
|
Description [Targets] |
The quantity and quality of marine litter, as well as their impact, will be investigated and the ultimate aim is the reduction of the amount of marine litter
|
Number and quality of visible debris on beaches
|
Amount of litter collected
|
Quantity and quality of visible litter at the bottom of the sea
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
||||
Reference point type |
||||
Baseline |
||||
Proportion |
||||
Assessment method |
||||
Development status |
operational by 2014 |
operational by 2014 |
operational by 2014 |
operational by 2014 |
Type of target/indicator |
State |
State |
State |
State |
Timescale |
||||
Interim or GES target |
||||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
||||
Physical/chemical features |
||||
Predominant habitats |
||||
Functional group |
||||
Pressures |
|
|
|
|