Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D2 / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D2 Non-indigenous species |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2025-01-30 09:01:21 |
BAL-FI-MS-ALL
Regional assessment area |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||
GES component |
D2
|
D2
|
D2
|
D2
|
Feature |
Established non-indigenous species
|
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Element |
Rhithropanopeus harrisii |
No new non-indigenous species reported |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Element extent |
||||
Trend element |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Element 2 |
||||
Element source |
||||
Criterion |
D2C1
|
D2C2
|
D2C2
|
|
Parameter |
Presence
|
ABU-REL
|
Distribution (range)
|
|
Threshold value upper |
||||
Threshold value lower |
||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
> |
< |
|
Threshold qualitative |
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
|||
Value achieved upper |
95.0 |
200.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||
Value unit |
SpeciesNew/6yr
|
percentage
|
% change
|
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
Description parameter |
No new species came as a primary introduction.
|
Proportion of established NIS of the whole community |
||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
|
Description criteria |
||||
Element status |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
The invasive species continues its spreading
|
The HELCOM indicator counts new NIS to the whole area. Secondary invasions are not counted; i.e. the species had arrived already to the area is spreading by natural means to new MRUs. The three NIS new to FI were all secondary invasions. |
Assessement counts the proportion of NIS polychaeta species of all polychaetes int he MRU. |
The invasive species continues its spreading
|
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type B2 |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||
GES extent threshold |
||||
GES extent achieved |
||||
GES extent unit |
Not relevant |
Number of newly-introduced species |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
|
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |