Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D2 / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D2 Non-indigenous species |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2026-04-17 08:55:18 |
BAL-FI-MS-ALL
Regional assessment area |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||
GES component |
D2
|
D2
|
D2
|
D2
|
D2
|
Feature |
Newly-introduced non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Established non-indigenous species
|
Element |
No new non-indigenous species reported |
Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities |
Carassius gibelio |
Neogobius melanostomus |
Rhithropanopeus harrisii |
Element extent |
|||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Element 2 |
|||||
Element source |
|||||
Criterion |
D2C1
|
D2C2
|
D2C2
|
D2C2
|
D2C2
|
Parameter |
Presence
|
ABU-REL
|
Abundance
|
Distribution (range)
|
Distribution (range)
|
Threshold value upper |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
> |
< |
< |
< |
Threshold qualitative |
|||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
||||
Value achieved upper |
95.0 |
200.0 |
10.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
SpeciesNew/6yr
|
percentage
|
% change
|
% change
|
% change
|
Proportion threshold value |
|||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Unknown |
Deteriorating |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
No |
No |
Description parameter |
No new species came as a primary introduction.
|
Proportion of established NIS of the whole community |
|||
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Unknown |
Description criteria |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
The HELCOM indicator counts new NIS to the whole area. Secondary invasions are not counted; i.e. the species had arrived already to the area is spreading by natural means to new MRUs. The three NIS new to FI were all secondary invasions. |
Assessement counts the proportion of NIS polychaeta species of all polychaetes int he MRU. |
The invasive species continues its spreading
|
The invasive species continues its spreading
|
The invasive species continues its spreading
|
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type B2 |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Number of newly-introduced species |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
GES later than 2024, Art14ExceptionNotReported |
Description overall status |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
Two established species were assessed and both continue invasion and increase in abundance. |
|
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |