Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / Finland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | Finland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Finnish Environment Institute |
Report date | 2019-04-10 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8_GES_8Jan2019update_24_.xml |
National part of Åland Sea (BAL-FI-AS)
GES component |
D3
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
||||||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sprattus sprattus |
||||
Element code |
126417 |
126436 |
151353 |
151308 |
126425 |
||||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
||||
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
x
|
.
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
||||
Element 2 code |
her.27.25-2932
|
cod.27.24-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
||||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
||||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
HELCOM |
||||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Spawning stock biomass
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement
|
Expert judgement
|
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.66 |
1.66 |
2.0 |
0.6 |
0.49 |
1.25 |
1.51 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
F/F-MSY ratio
|
positive slope of trend
|
biomass
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The indicator combines fishing catch and stock size. |
The catch of pikeperch has declined since past 20 years from 0.4 kg per gillnet equivalent per day to 0.3. The stock assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). |
The pikeperch size has decreased in the area.
The assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Related indicator |
|||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (ICES SD 24-32). |
||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
||||
Description element |
|||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
||||||||
GES extent achieved |
40.00 |
||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
||||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
||||||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
||||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
||||||||
Related pressures |
|
||||||||
Related targets |
|
National part of Bothnian Bay (BAL-FI-BB)
GES component |
D3
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
|||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Coregonus lavaretus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Salmo salar |
Sander lucioperca |
|
Element code |
126417 |
127180 |
151353 |
127186 |
151308 |
|
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivision 31 (Bothnian Bay) |
.
|
.
|
Salmon (Salmo salar) in subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea, excluding the Gulf of Finland) |
.
|
|
Element 2 code |
her.27.31
|
sal.27.22-31
|
||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
National |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
|
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Size distribution
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.07 |
2500.0 |
||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Spawning fish size increases
|
Expert judgement
|
||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.93 |
1.9 |
0.15 |
2800.0 |
||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
biomass
|
biomass
|
||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The ratio is the mean of the annual SSB/B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS ii / Thematic Assessment of Biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Assessment based on size distribution of spawning females. No quantitative threshold has been set, but the assessment is based on expert judgement of good size distribution. |
The indicator is a combination of fishing catch and stock size. |
The assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE).
The fishing catch is combined with the stock size assessment under D3C2. |
|
Related indicator |
|
|||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
Assessment based on abundance of spawning females and their success in river spawning. |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
80.00 |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
|||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
|||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|
National part of Bothnian Sea (BAL-FI-BS)
GES component |
D3
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
|||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sprattus sprattus |
||
Element code |
126417 |
151353 |
151308 |
126425 |
||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
||
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivision 30 (Bothnian Sea) |
.
|
.
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
||
Element 2 code |
her.27.30
|
spr.27.22-32
|
||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
HELCOM |
||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Spawning stock biomass
|
||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.18 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement
|
|||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.93 |
1.9 |
0.27 |
1.25 |
1.51 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
biomass
|
biomass
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSM /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The indicato is a combination of fishing catch and stock size. |
The assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). It is a combination of fishing catch and stock size. |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (ICES SD 24-32). |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
75.00 |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
|||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
|||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|
National part of Gulf of Finland (BAL-FI-GF)
GES component |
D3
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
|||||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sprattus sprattus |
|||
Element code |
126417 |
126436 |
151353 |
151308 |
126425 |
|||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
x
|
.
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
|||
Element 2 code |
her.27.25-2932
|
cod.27.24-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
|||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
|||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
HELCOM |
|||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Spawning stock biomass
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Threshold value lower |
||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement
|
|||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.66 |
1.66 |
2.0 |
0.6 |
0.625 |
1.25 |
1.51 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
|
Other
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
F/F-MSY ratio
|
biomass
|
ratio
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The assessment is a combination of stock size and fishing catch. |
The assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE).
The assessment is a combination of fishing catch and stock size. |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (ICES SD 24-32). |
|||||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
|||
Description element |
||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
|||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
60.00 |
|||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
|||||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
|||||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||||
Related targets |
|
National part of Northern Baltic Proper (BAL-FI-NB)
GES component |
D3
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
|||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Gadus morhua |
Sprattus sprattus |
|||
Element code |
126417 |
126436 |
126425 |
|||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|||
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25-29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24-32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) |
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea) |
|||
Element 2 code |
her.27.25-2932
|
cod.27.24-32
|
spr.27.22-32
|
|||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
|||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
|||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Spawning stock biomass
|
|||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.66 |
1.66 |
2.0 |
0.6 |
1.25 |
1.51 |
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Other
|
ratio
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
F/F-MSY ratio
|
ratio
|
|||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (ICES SD 24-32). |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
|||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
33.00 |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
|||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
|||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|
National part of The Quark (BAL-FI-QK)
GES component |
D3
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
|||||
Element |
Clupea harengus |
Perca fluviatilis |
Sander lucioperca |
Sprattus sprattus |
||
Element code |
126417 |
151353 |
151308 |
126425 |
||
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
||
Element 2 |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subdivisions 30 and 31 (Gulf of Bothnia) |
x
|
.
|
Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in Subdivisions 22-32 (Baltic Sea)
|
||
Element 2 code |
her.27.3031
|
spr.27.22-32
|
||||
Element 2 code source |
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
|
||||
Element source |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
National |
HELCOM |
||
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C2
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Spawning stock biomass
|
Biomass
|
Biomass
|
Spawning stock biomass
|
||
Threshold value upper |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Expert judgement
|
|||||
Threshold value source |
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
0.93 |
1.9 |
0.625 |
1.2 |
1.51 |
|
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
ratio
|
ratio
|
biomass
|
biomass
|
ratio
|
ratio
|
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The result is the mean of the annual SSB /B-MSY trigger ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
The fishing catch is combined with the stock size assessment under D3C2. |
The assessment was based on expert judgement by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). The fishing catch is combined with the stock size assessment under D3C2. |
The result is the mean of the annual F /F-MSY ratios during 2011-2016. Source: HELCOM HOLAS II / Thematic assessment of biodiversity (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf). |
|
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
The assessment applies to the entire Baltic Sea (ICES SD 24-32). |
|||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
||
Description element |
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
|||||
Integration rule description criteria |
OOAO between the fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass:
http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
75.00 |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
|||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
|||||
Description overall status |
No integration was made for the level of D3.
|
|||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
|||||
Related pressures |
|
|||||
Related targets |
|