Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Finland / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems
Member State Finland
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Reported by Finnish Environment Institute
Report date 2019-04-10
Report access msfd2018-ART8_GES_8Jan2019update_24_.xml

National part of Baltic Sea (BAL-FI)

GES component
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
D4
Feature
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Coastal ecosystem
Element
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
All trophic guilds
Element code
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
TrophicGuildsAll
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
HELCOM
Criterion
D4C1
D4C1
D4C1
D4C1
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C2
D4C3
D4C4
Parameter
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
Benthic species community (BQI) in offshore
Benthic species richness (beta diversity) in offshore
Coastal benthic species community
Phytoplankton assmeblage
Abundance of breeding waterbirds
Abundance of coastal cyprinid fish
Abundance of coastal piscivore fish
Abundance of grey seals
Abundance of ringed seals
Abundance of wintering waterbirds
Cod spawning stock biomass
Herring spawning stock biomass
Sprat spawning stock biomass
Zooplankton mean size and total abundance
Zooplankton mean size and total abundance
Blubber thickness of grey seal (nutritional status)
Threshold value upper
75.0
10000.0
10000.0
75.0
1.0
40.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Sub-basin specific thresholds
Sub-basin specific thresholds
Inner coastal waters 0,57/0,55 (0-10 m / >10 m); Outer coastal waters 0,56/0,55 (0-10 m / >10 m);
The community has species indicating a well-balanced food web and species indicative of eutrophication are not dominating.
Area specific thresholds
Area specific thresholds
Stock specific thresholds.
Sub-basin specific thresholds for mean size and total abundance
Sub-basin specific thresholds
Sub-basin specific thresholds
Threshold value source
Helsinki Convention
National
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
83.0
30000.0
20000.0
81.0
1.51
42.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit
percentage
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
Catch-Per-Unit-Effort
(number of) individuals
(number of) individuals
percentage
tonne
ratio
millimetre
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
50.0
Proportion value achieved
26.0
Proportion threshold value unit
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trend
Unknown
Improving
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Stable
Improving
Stable
Improving
Improving
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
Offshore benthic communities are in good status (HELCOM indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/Core%20Indicators/State%20of%20the%20soft-bottom%20macrofauna%20community%20HELCOM%20core%20indicator%202018.pdf). The HELCOM assessment was made under D5 for benthic macrofauna, but here the indicator is used for the entire Finnish sea area.
The indicator has sub-basin specific thresholds but here the indicator is used for the entire Finnish marine area.Offshore benthic communities are in good status in terms of regional species richness (beta diversity).
Coastal water benthic communities are not in good state: only 25% of inner and 30% of outer coastal waters are in GES.
All the four phytoplankton indicators were used to support the assessment. They gave similar results: phytoplankton species composition has changed and diversity declined.
HELCOM indicator gives the status for the Baltic Sea and its sub-regions and the national indicator gives some extra information abut the species trends in the Finnish marine area.
The indicator for the coastal cyprinid fish meets the area-specific thresholds in 1 of 8 assessment areas in Finland. See HELCOM indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-coastal-fish-key-functional-groups/
The indicator for the coastal piscivore fish meets the area-specific thresholds in 8 of 8 assessment areas in Finland. See HELCOM indicator: http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/abundance-of-coastal-fish-key-functional-groups/
HELCOM indicator gives the Baltic wide result and the national indicator gives additional results and trends over the Finnish marine area.
HELCOM indicator gives the assessment result for the region. The national indicator gives additional information from the Finnish marine area.
HELCOM indicator gives the status for the Baltic Sea and its sub-regions and the national indicator gives some extra information abut the species trends in the Finnish marine area.
Cod SSB is in good status in the eastern stock area (ICES SD 25-32). See HELCOM assessment: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/biodiversity-and-its-status/fish/#commercial-fish-species-in-the-open-sea. The indicator refers to the ICES stock assessment but is calculated as annual ratios with the threshold over the assessment period following the HELCOM biodiversity assessment (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf).
Herring SSB is in GES in the Gulf of Bothnia stock (ICES SD 30-31) and the Baltic Proper Stock (ICES SD 25-29, 32) both indicate good status (see D3C2 outcomes in these assessment areas). The indicator is calculated from the ICES stock assessments as annual ratios with the stock thresold and then averaged following the HELCOM assessment: http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/biodiversity-and-its-status/fish/#commercial-fish-species-in-the-open-sea.
Sprat SSB is in good status in the stock area (entire Baltic Sea). The indicator refers to the ICES stock assessment but is calculated as annual ratios with the threshold over the assessment period following the HELCOM biodiversity assessment (http://stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/HELCOM_Thematic-assessment-of-biodiversity-2011-2016_pre-publication.pdf).
The HELCOM indicator has threshold values ofr each sub-basin. For food webs it is used for the entire Finnish Marine area.
The HELCOM indicator gives subbasin specific results but these are looked under this criterion for the entire Finnish marine area.
The risk is indicated as the HELCOM core indicator has high variability for unknown reasons. This assessment results is based on the HELCOM data but assessed by the Finnish indicator which calculated through a model and thus it differs sligthly from the HELCOM result.
Related indicator
  • BAL-FI-IND-SOFT_BOTTOM
  • BAL-FI-IND-BENTHIC_FAUNA
  • BAL-FI-IND-BENTHIC_FAUNA
  • HELCOM-ABU_CF_FG
  • HELCOM-ABU_CF_FG
  • BAL-FI-IND-HERRING
  • BAL-FI-IND-SPRAT-SSB
Criteria status
Not good
Not good
Not good
Not good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good, based on low risk
Description criteria
The zooplankton indicator includes the size distribution variable which is used to assess this criterion).
Element status
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description parameter
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used.
Integration rule type criteria
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Integration rule description criteria
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
No integration rule agreed. Expert judgement is used among 13 indicators.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
The Finnish marine area is entirely considered as 'coastal ecosystem'.
Assessments period
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
2011-2016
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
Related targets
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen
  • LUVA1
  • LUVAyleinen