Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Finland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Finland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Report date | 2025-01-30 09:01:21 |
BAL-FI-AA-AS
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
|||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
|||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-FI-AA-BB
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
|||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
|||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-FI-AA-BS
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
|||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
|||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-FI-AA-GF
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
|||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
|||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-FI-AA-NB
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
||||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
||||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
BAL-FI-AA-QK
Regional assessment area |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
PFOA |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Element 2 |
||||||
Element source |
||||||
Criterion |
||||||
Parameter |
||||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||
Threshold value operator |
||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||
Value unit |
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||
Trend parameter |
||||||
Parameter achieved |
||||||
Description parameter |
||||||
Related indicator |
||||||
Criteria status |
||||||
Description criteria |
||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description element |
||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
NHIE_WEI
|
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
GES achieved by 2018 |
Description overall status |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
No threshold at feature level is set; but the feature state is obviously good as 100% of elements have good status. |
Assessments period |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
2017-2022 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |