Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D10 / France / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | France |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
| Report date | 2026-01-19 09:44:27 |
SRM GdG (ABI-FR-MS-GDG)
Regional assessment area |
OSPAR-IV |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
Feature |
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Litter and micro-litter in species
|
Species
|
Element |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Chemicals |
Chemicals |
Chemicals |
Cloth/textile |
Cloth/textile |
Cloth/textile |
Food waste |
Food waste |
Food waste |
Glass/ceramics |
Glass/ceramics |
Glass/ceramics |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Paper/cardboard |
Paper/cardboard |
Paper/cardboard |
Processed/worked wood |
Processed/worked wood |
Processed/worked wood |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Undefined |
Undefined |
Undefined |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Microlitter |
Microlitter |
Microlitter |
Artificial polymer materials |
|
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Element 2 |
Fishing gear
|
Fishing gear
|
Fishing gear
|
Single-use plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
|
Criterion |
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C3
|
|
Parameter |
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Unknown
|
|
Threshold value upper |
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
MSFD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
393.0 |
219.88 |
0.37 |
130.0 |
69.28 |
0.02 |
71.0 |
70.6 |
3.0 |
6.03 |
8.0 |
24.22 |
480.0 |
281.73 |
0.46 |
4.0 |
9.08 |
2.0 |
0.16 |
9.0 |
8.18 |
0.02 |
2.0 |
12.26 |
1.91 |
0.06 |
33272.46 |
33272.46 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
|
Description parameter |
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 393 unités/100 m, representing 93.7 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a significant upward trend in the average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a significant upward trend in the average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 130 unités/100 m, representing 29.3 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a significant upward trend in the average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a non-significant upward trend in average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 71 unités/100 m, representing 16 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a non-significant upward trend in average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a non-significant upward trend in average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. No such waste has been found on beaches. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 3 unités/100 m, representing 0.8 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. No such waste has been found on beaches. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 8 unités/100 m, representing 1.8 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The parameter ‘Quantity on the coast’ represents a median abundance of waste, for all categories, per 100 metre of beach, bringing together all monitoring at SRM level over the period from 2018 to 2020. This median abundance of waste is 480 unités/100m. A high level of pollution is observed, however, with a heterogeneous distribution of this pollution. The median abundance of waste at site level is between 128 unités/100 m and 1 132 unités/100 m, and the median abundance of sites is 466 unités/100 m.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density across all waste categories. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. In addition, a significant upward trend in the average density of total waste over the assessment period has been identified. Therefore, according to the qualitative threshold, the parameter is not reached.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density across all waste categories. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. In addition, a significant upward trend in the average density of total waste over the assessment period has been identified. Therefore, according to the qualitative threshold, the parameter is not reached.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 4 unités/100 m, representing 1 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 2 unités/100 m, representing 0.4 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 9 unités/100 m, representing 2 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. The median abundance of this category of waste at site level is 2 unités/100 m, representing 0.4 % of total pollution. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
At SRM GdG level, 152 follow-ups were carried out at 14 monitoring sites. The ‘coastal quantity’ parameter represents a median abundance of waste, for the category in question, per 100 metre of beach, integrated into the SRM scale. The reported value is therefore the median abundance of median abundances of each monitoring site over the period 2018 to 2020. No such waste has been found on beaches. In the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The indicator ‘micro-litter buried in coastal sediments’ does not appear to be relevant because the levels of pollution detected are very low and do not reflect the levels of pollution generally observed on the coast. It therefore appears necessary to develop the protocol in order to better quantify and characterise the pollution of the coastline by microplastics.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing microplastics in the seabed, the achievement of the parameter was not assessed for this cycle.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating microplastics via Manta nets on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average density of microplastics. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. Over this period, a significant upward trend is observed, so the parameter is not met.
|
The indicator ‘micro-litter buried in coastal sediments’ does not appear to be relevant because the levels of pollution detected are very low and do not reflect the levels of pollution generally observed on the coast. It therefore appears necessary to develop the protocol in order to better quantify and characterise pollution of the coastline by micro-litter.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing micro-litter in the seabed, the achievement of the parameter was not assessed for this cycle.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating micro-litter using Manta nets on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the mean density of micro-litter. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. Over this period, a significant upward trend is observed, so the parameter is not met.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing biota waste, no parameters were assessed for this cycle.
|
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description criteria |
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method, the status of criterion D10C3, relating to ingested waste and micro-waste, was not assessed in cycle 3.
|
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description element |
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing marine animal ingested litter and micro-litter, this element was not assessed in Round 3.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing the adverse effects of litter and micro-litter on marine species and habitats, no evidence was assessed in the 3 cycle.
|
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type C |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of a consensual assessment method, the macro- and micro-litter ingested by marine animals could not be assessed for this cycle.
|
In the absence of a consensual assessment method, the adverse effects of waste on species could not be assessed for this cycle. Furthermore, the assessment of the achievement of good environmental status is not required at the level of this attribute (Decision (EU) 2017/848). Thus, no integration is carried out.
|
Assessments period |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |