Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / France / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2018-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Member State | France |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
| Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
| Report date | 2020-02-19 |
| Report access | ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml |
Manche mer du Nord (ANS-FR-MS-MMN)
GES component |
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
D3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Element |
Alopias spp |
Alopias spp |
Alopias spp |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Amblyraja radiata |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Ammodytes spp |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Anguilla anguilla |
Argentina silus |
Argentina silus |
Argentina silus |
Beryx spp |
Beryx spp |
Beryx spp |
Brosme brosme |
Brosme brosme |
Brosme brosme |
Buccinum undatum |
Buccinum undatum |
Buccinum undatum |
Centrophorus squamosus |
Centrophorus squamosus |
Centrophorus squamosus |
Centroscymnus coelolepis |
Centroscymnus coelolepis |
Centroscymnus coelolepis |
Chelidonichthys cuculus |
Chelidonichthys cuculus |
Chelidonichthys cuculus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Clupea harengus |
Coryphaenoides rupestris |
Coryphaenoides rupestris |
Coryphaenoides rupestris |
Dalatias licha |
Dalatias licha |
Dalatias licha |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dicentrarchus labrax |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Dipturus batis |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Eutrigla gurnardus |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Gadus morhua |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeorhinus galeus |
Galeus melastomus |
Galeus melastomus |
Galeus melastomus |
Glyptocephalus cynoglossus |
Glyptocephalus cynoglossus |
Glyptocephalus cynoglossus |
Hoplostethus atlanticus |
Hoplostethus atlanticus |
Hoplostethus atlanticus |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Lamna nasus |
Leucoraja fullonica |
Leucoraja fullonica |
Leucoraja fullonica |
Leucoraja naevus |
Leucoraja naevus |
Leucoraja naevus |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Limanda limanda |
Loligo forbesii |
Loligo forbesii |
Loligo forbesii |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Loligo vulgaris |
Macrourus berglax |
Macrourus berglax |
Macrourus berglax |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Melanogrammus aeglefinus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merlangius merlangus |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Merluccius merluccius |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Micromesistius poutassou |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Microstomus kitt |
Molva dypterygia |
Molva dypterygia |
Molva dypterygia |
Molva molva |
Molva molva |
Molva molva |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mullus surmuletus |
Mustelus spp |
Mustelus spp |
Mustelus spp |
Octopodidae |
Octopodidae |
Octopodidae |
Ommastrephidae |
Ommastrephidae |
Ommastrephidae |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pagellus bogaraveo |
Pecten maximus |
Pecten maximus |
Pecten maximus |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Phycis blennoides |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Platichthys flesus |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pleuronectes platessa |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius pollachius |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Pollachius virens |
Prionace glauca |
Prionace glauca |
Prionace glauca |
Raja brachyura |
Raja brachyura |
Raja brachyura |
Raja circularis |
Raja circularis |
Raja circularis |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja clavata |
Raja microocellata |
Raja microocellata |
Raja microocellata |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja montagui |
Raja undulata |
Raja undulata |
Raja undulata |
Rostroraja alba |
Rostroraja alba |
Rostroraja alba |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Sardina pilchardus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scomber scombrus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus maximus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scophthalmus rhombus |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus canicula |
Scyliorhinus stellaris |
Scyliorhinus stellaris |
Scyliorhinus stellaris |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Sepia officinalis |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Squalus acanthias |
Squatina squatina |
Squatina squatina |
Squatina squatina |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus alalunga |
Thunnus thynnus |
Thunnus thynnus |
Thunnus thynnus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Trachurus trachurus |
Xiphias gladius |
Xiphias gladius |
Xiphias gladius |
Element code |
105740 |
105740 |
105740 |
105865 |
105865 |
105865 |
125909 |
125909 |
125909 |
126281 |
126281 |
126281 |
126715 |
126715 |
126715 |
125700 |
125700 |
125700 |
126447 |
126447 |
126447 |
138878 |
138878 |
138878 |
105901 |
105901 |
105901 |
105907 |
105907 |
105907 |
127259 |
127259 |
127259 |
126417 |
126417 |
126417 |
158960 |
158960 |
158960 |
105910 |
105910 |
105910 |
126975 |
126975 |
126975 |
105869 |
105869 |
105869 |
150637 |
150637 |
150637 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
126436 |
105820 |
105820 |
105820 |
105812 |
105812 |
105812 |
127136 |
127136 |
127136 |
126402 |
126402 |
126402 |
105839 |
105839 |
105839 |
105841 |
105841 |
105841 |
105874 |
105874 |
105874 |
105876 |
105876 |
105876 |
127139 |
127139 |
127139 |
140270 |
140270 |
140270 |
140271 |
140271 |
140271 |
126472 |
126472 |
126472 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126437 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126438 |
126484 |
126484 |
126484 |
126439 |
126439 |
126439 |
127140 |
127140 |
127140 |
126459 |
126459 |
126459 |
126461 |
126461 |
126461 |
126986 |
126986 |
126986 |
105732 |
105732 |
105732 |
11782 |
11782 |
11782 |
11760 |
11760 |
11760 |
127059 |
127059 |
127059 |
140712 |
140712 |
140712 |
126501 |
126501 |
126501 |
127141 |
127141 |
127141 |
127143 |
127143 |
127143 |
126440 |
126440 |
126440 |
126441 |
126441 |
126441 |
105801 |
105801 |
105801 |
367297 |
367297 |
367297 |
105873 |
105873 |
105873 |
105883 |
105883 |
105883 |
105885 |
105885 |
105885 |
105887 |
105887 |
105887 |
105891 |
105891 |
105891 |
105896 |
105896 |
105896 |
126421 |
126421 |
126421 |
127023 |
127023 |
127023 |
127149 |
127149 |
127149 |
127150 |
127150 |
127150 |
105814 |
105814 |
105814 |
105815 |
105815 |
105815 |
141444 |
141444 |
141444 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
127160 |
105923 |
105923 |
105923 |
105928 |
105928 |
105928 |
127026 |
127026 |
127026 |
127029 |
127029 |
127029 |
126822 |
126822 |
126822 |
126822 |
126822 |
126822 |
127094 |
127094 |
127094 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
Thresher sharks (Alopias spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Thresher sharks (Alopias spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Thresher sharks (Alopias spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Starry ray (Amblyraja radiata) in subareas 2 and 4 and Division 3.a (Norwegian Sea North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Starry ray (Amblyraja radiata) in subareas 2 and 4 and Division 3.a (Norwegian Sea North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Starry ray (Amblyraja radiata) in subareas 2 and 4 and Division 3.a (Norwegian Sea North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Sandeel in the South Eastern North Sea (SA 2)
|
Sandeel in the South Eastern North Sea (SA 2)
|
Sandeel in the South Eastern North Sea (SA 2)
|
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range |
Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in subareas 1 2 and 4 and in Division 3.a (Northeast Arctic North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in subareas 1 2 and 4 and in Division 3.a (Northeast Arctic North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in subareas 1 2 and 4 and in Division 3.a (Northeast Arctic North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Alfonsinos/Golden eye perch (Beryx spp.) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Tusk (Brosme brosme) in subareas 4 and 7–9 and divisions 3.a 5.b 6.a and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
Tusk (Brosme brosme) in subareas 4 and 7–9 and divisions 3.a 5.b 6.a and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
Tusk (Brosme brosme) in subareas 4 and 7–9 and divisions 3.a 5.b 6.a and 12.b (Northeast Atlantic) |
West Cotentin
|
West Cotentin
|
West Cotentin
|
Leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d autumn spawners (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d autumn spawners (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d autumn spawners (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) in subareas 6-7 and divisions 5.b and 12.b (Celtic Seas and the English Channel Faroes grounds and western Hatton Bank) |
Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) in subareas 6-7 and divisions 5.b and 12.b (Celtic Seas and the English Channel Faroes grounds and western Hatton Bank) |
Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) in subareas 6-7 and divisions 5.b and 12.b (Celtic Seas and the English Channel Faroes grounds and western Hatton Bank) |
Kitefin shark (Dalatias licha) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Kitefin shark (Dalatias licha) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Kitefin shark (Dalatias licha) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c 7.a and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea Irish Sea English Channel Bristol Channel and Celtic Sea) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c 7.a and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea Irish Sea English Channel Bristol Channel and Celtic Sea) |
Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 4.b-c 7.a and 7.d-h (central and southern North Sea Irish Sea English Channel Bristol Channel and Celtic Sea) |
Common skate (Dipturus batis-complex) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Common skate (Dipturus batis-complex) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Common skate (Dipturus batis-complex) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 Division 7.d and Subdivision 20 (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 Division 7.d and Subdivision 20 (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 Division 7.d and Subdivision 20 (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e–k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e–k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas) |
Cod (Gadus morhua) in divisions 7.e–k (eastern English Channel and southern Celtic Seas) |
Tope (Galeorhinus galeus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Tope (Galeorhinus galeus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Tope (Galeorhinus galeus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Black-mouth dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Black-mouth dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Black-mouth dogfish (Galeus melastomus) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Witch (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Witch (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Witch (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in the Northeast Atlantic |
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
Shagreen ray (Leucoraja fullonica) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Shagreen ray (Leucoraja fullonica) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Shagreen ray (Leucoraja fullonica) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in subareas 6–7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and western English Channel Bay of Biscay) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in subareas 6–7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and western English Channel Bay of Biscay) |
Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in subareas 6–7 and divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas and western English Channel Bay of Biscay) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Dab (Limanda limanda) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat)
|
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Long-finned squids (Loliginidae) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4 Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea West of Scotland Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4 Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea West of Scotland Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Subarea 4 Division 6.a and Subdivision 20 (North Sea West of Scotland Skagerrak) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b-k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in Subarea 4 and Division 7.d (North Sea and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b –c and 7.e–k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b –c and 7.e–k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel) |
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b –c and 7.e–k (southern Celtic Seas and eastern English Channel) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Hake (Merluccius merluccius) in subareas 4 6 and 7 and divisions 3.a 8.a–b and 8.d Northern stock (Greater North Sea Celtic Seas and the northern Bay of Biscay) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in subareas 1–9 12 and 14 (Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Lemon sole (Microstomus kitt) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat eastern English Channel) |
Blue ling (Molva dypterygia) in subareas 6–7 and Division 5.b (Celtic Seas English Channel and Faroes grounds) |
Blue ling (Molva dypterygia) in subareas 6–7 and Division 5.b (Celtic Seas English Channel and Faroes grounds) |
Blue ling (Molva dypterygia) in subareas 6–7 and Division 5.b (Celtic Seas English Channel and Faroes grounds) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 6-9 12 and 14 and divisions 3.a and 4.a (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 6-9 12 and 14 and divisions 3.a and 4.a (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 6-9 12 and 14 and divisions 3.a and 4.a (Northeast Atlantic and Arctic Ocean) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea eastern English Channel Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus spp.) in subareas 1-10 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus spp.) in subareas 1-10 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Smooth-hound (Mustelus spp.) in subareas 1-10 12 and 14 (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Octopods (Octopodidae) in Subarea 7 (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel Bristol Channel Celtic Sea and Southwest of Ireland) |
Octopods (Octopodidae) in Subarea 7 (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel Bristol Channel Celtic Sea and Southwest of Ireland) |
Octopods (Octopodidae) in Subarea 7 (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel Bristol Channel Celtic Sea and Southwest of Ireland) |
Short-finned squids (Ommastrephidae) in divisions 7.a-e (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel) |
Short-finned squids (Ommastrephidae) in divisions 7.a-e (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel) |
Short-finned squids (Ommastrephidae) in divisions 7.a-e (Irish Sea West of Ireland Porcupine Bank English Channel) |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in subareas 6–8 (Celtic Seas the English Channel and Bay of Biscay) |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in subareas 6–8 (Celtic Seas the English Channel and Bay of Biscay) |
Blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) in subareas 6–8 (Celtic Seas the English Channel and Bay of Biscay) |
Bay of Seine and close surroundings
|
Bay of Seine and close surroundings
|
Bay of Seine and close surroundings
|
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Flounder (Platichthys flesus) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in Subarea 4 and Division 3.a (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea Rockall and West of Scotland Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea Rockall and West of Scotland Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 6 and Division 3.a (North Sea Rockall and West of Scotland Skagerrak and Kattegat) |
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
North East Atlantic
|
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Blonde ray (Raja brachyura) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Sandy ray (Leucoraja circularis) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Sandy ray (Leucoraja circularis) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Sandy ray (Leucoraja circularis) in subareas 6–7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Seas English Channel) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Thornback ray (Raja clavata) in Division 7.e (western English Channel) |
Small-eyed ray (Raja microocellata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Small-eyed ray (Raja microocellata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Small-eyed ray (Raja microocellata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak Kattegat and eastern English Channel) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak Kattegat and eastern English Channel) |
Spotted ray (Raja montagui) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d (North Sea Skagerrak Kattegat and eastern English Channel) |
Undulate ray (Raja undulata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Undulate ray (Raja undulata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
Undulate ray (Raja undulata) in divisions 7.d and 7.e (English Channel) |
White skate (Rostroraja alba) in the Northeast Atlantic |
White skate (Rostroraja alba) in the Northeast Atlantic |
White skate (Rostroraja alba) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.a–b and 8.d and Subarea 7 (Bay of Biscay southern Celtic Seas and the English Channel) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.a–b and 8.d and Subarea 7 (Bay of Biscay southern Celtic Seas and the English Channel) |
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.a–b and 8.d and Subarea 7 (Bay of Biscay southern Celtic Seas and the English Channel) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1-8 and 14 and Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) |
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d–e (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat English Channel) |
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d–e (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat English Channel) |
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d–e (North Sea Skagerrak and Kattegat English Channel) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.a–c and 7.e–j (West of Scotland Irish Sea southern Celtic Seas) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.a–c and 7.e–j (West of Scotland Irish Sea southern Celtic Seas) |
Lesser-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in Subarea 6 and divisions 7.a–c and 7.e–j (West of Scotland Irish Sea southern Celtic Seas) |
Greater-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus stellaris) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Sea and the English Channel) |
Greater-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus stellaris) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Sea and the English Channel) |
Greater-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus stellaris) in subareas 6 and 7 (West of Scotland southern Celtic Sea and the English Channel) |
Cuttlefishes (Sepiida) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Cuttlefishes (Sepiida) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Cuttlefishes (Sepiida) in divisions 7.d-e (English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Division 7.d (eastern English Channel) |
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Sole (Solea solea) in Subarea 4 (North Sea)
|
Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Angel shark (Squatina squatina) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Angel shark (Squatina squatina) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Angel shark (Squatina squatina) in the Northeast Atlantic |
Thunnus alalunga
|
Thunnus alalunga
|
Thunnus alalunga
|
Thunnus thynnus
|
Thunnus thynnus
|
Thunnus thynnus
|
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in Subarea 8 and divisions 2.a 4.a 5.b 6.a 7.a–c e–k (the Northeast Atlantic) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a 4.b–c and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat southern and central North Sea eastern English Channel) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a 4.b–c and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat southern and central North Sea eastern English Channel) |
Horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in divisions 3.a 4.b–c and 7.d (Skagerrak and Kattegat southern and central North Sea eastern English Channel) |
Xiphias gladius
|
Xiphias gladius
|
Xiphias gladius
|
Element 2 code |
thr-nea
|
thr-nea
|
thr-nea
|
rjr.27.23a4
|
rjr.27.23a4
|
rjr.27.23a4
|
san-ns2
|
san-ns2
|
san-ns2
|
ele.2737.nea
|
ele.2737.nea
|
ele.2737.nea
|
aru.27.123a4
|
aru.27.123a4
|
aru.27.123a4
|
alf-comb
|
alf-comb
|
alf-comb
|
usk.27.3a45b6a7-912b
|
usk.27.3a45b6a7-912b
|
usk.27.3a45b6a7-912b
|
whe.26E8.27E8GNB
|
whe.26E8.27E8GNB
|
whe.26E8.27E8GNB
|
guq-nea
|
guq-nea
|
guq-nea
|
cyo-nea
|
cyo-nea
|
cyo-nea
|
gur-comb
|
gur-comb
|
gur-comb
|
her.27.3a47d
|
her.27.3a47d
|
her.27.3a47d
|
rng.27.5b6712b
|
rng.27.5b6712b
|
rng.27.5b6712b
|
sck-nea
|
sck-nea
|
sck-nea
|
bss.27.4bc7ad-h
|
bss.27.4bc7ad-h
|
bss.27.4bc7ad-h
|
rjb.27.3a4
|
rjb.27.3a4
|
rjb.27.3a4
|
gug.27.3a47d
|
gug.27.3a47d
|
gug.27.3a47d
|
cod.27.47d20
|
cod.27.47d20
|
cod.27.47d20
|
cod.27.7e-k
|
cod.27.7e-k
|
cod.27.7e-k
|
gag-nea
|
gag-nea
|
gag-nea
|
sho.27.67
|
sho.27.67
|
sho.27.67
|
wit.27.3a47d
|
wit.27.3a47d
|
wit.27.3a47d
|
ory-comb
|
ory-comb
|
ory-comb
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
rjf.27.67
|
rjf.27.67
|
rjf.27.67
|
rjn.27.678abd
|
rjn.27.678abd
|
rjn.27.678abd
|
dab.27.3a4
|
dab.27.3a4
|
dab.27.3a4
|
sqz.27.7de
|
sqz.27.7de
|
sqz.27.7de
|
sqz.27.7de
|
sqz.27.7de
|
sqz.27.7de
|
rhg-nea
|
rhg-nea
|
rhg-nea
|
had.27.46a20
|
had.27.46a20
|
had.27.46a20
|
had.27.7b-k
|
had.27.7b-k
|
had.27.7b-k
|
whg.27.47d
|
whg.27.47d
|
whg.27.47d
|
whg.27.7b-ce-k
|
whg.27.7b-ce-k
|
whg.27.7b-ce-k
|
hke.27.3a46-8abd
|
hke.27.3a46-8abd
|
hke.27.3a46-8abd
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
whb.27.1-91214
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
lem.27.3a47d
|
bli.27.5b67
|
bli.27.5b67
|
bli.27.5b67
|
lin.27.3a4a6-91214
|
lin.27.3a4a6-91214
|
lin.27.3a4a6-91214
|
mur.27.3a47d
|
mur.27.3a47d
|
mur.27.3a47d
|
sdv.27.nea
|
sdv.27.nea
|
sdv.27.nea
|
oct.27.7
|
oct.27.7
|
oct.27.7
|
omz.27.7a-e
|
omz.27.7a-e
|
omz.27.7a-e
|
sbr.27.6-8
|
sbr.27.6-8
|
sbr.27.6-8
|
sce.27E9.28E9BS
|
sce.27E9.28E9BS
|
sce.27E9.28E9BS
|
gfb-comb
|
gfb-comb
|
gfb-comb
|
fle.27.3a4
|
fle.27.3a4
|
fle.27.3a4
|
ple.27.7d
|
ple.27.7d
|
ple.27.7d
|
pol.27.3a4
|
pol.27.3a4
|
pol.27.3a4
|
pok.27.3a46
|
pok.27.3a46
|
pok.27.3a46
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
BIL94B
|
rjh.27.7e
|
rjh.27.7e
|
rjh.27.7e
|
rji.27.67
|
rji.27.67
|
rji.27.67
|
rjc.27.7e
|
rjc.27.7e
|
rjc.27.7e
|
rje.27.7de
|
rje.27.7de
|
rje.27.7de
|
rjm.27.3a47d
|
rjm.27.3a47d
|
rjm.27.3a47d
|
rju.27.7de
|
rju.27.7de
|
rju.27.7de
|
rja-nea
|
rja-nea
|
rja-nea
|
pil.27.78abd
|
pil.27.78abd
|
pil.27.78abd
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
mac.27.nea
|
tur.27.4
|
tur.27.4
|
tur.27.4
|
bll.27.3a47de
|
bll.27.3a47de
|
bll.27.3a47de
|
syc.27.67a-ce-j
|
syc.27.67a-ce-j
|
syc.27.67a-ce-j
|
syt.27.67
|
syt.27.67
|
syt.27.67
|
ctl.27.7de
|
ctl.27.7de
|
ctl.27.7de
|
sol.27.7d
|
sol.27.7d
|
sol.27.7d
|
sol.27.4
|
sol.27.4
|
sol.27.4
|
dgs-nea
|
dgs-nea
|
dgs-nea
|
agn-nea
|
agn-nea
|
agn-nea
|
ALB-N
|
ALB-N
|
ALB-N
|
BFT-E
|
BFT-E
|
BFT-E
|
hom.27.2a4a5b6a7a-ce-k8
|
hom.27.2a4a5b6a7a-ce-k8
|
hom.27.2a4a5b6a7a-ce-k8
|
hom.27.3a4bc7d
|
hom.27.3a4bc7d
|
hom.27.3a4bc7d
|
SWO-N
|
SWO-N
|
SWO-N
|
Element 2 code source |
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
ICES
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
Parameter |
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
BIOM-SSB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
100000.0 |
0.33 |
1500000.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
12673.0 |
0.33 |
165000.0 |
0.35 |
10300.0 |
0.19 |
132000.0 |
0.4 |
10000.0 |
0.15 |
242000.0 |
0.52 |
35000.0 |
0.28 |
45000.0 |
0.32 |
2250000.0 |
0.12 |
75000.0 |
0.25 |
25826.0 |
0.36 |
150000.0 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
3000000.0 |
0.3 |
8000.0 |
0.2 |
37000.0 |
0.03 |
964563.0 |
0.1486 |
81110.0 |
0.07 |
556600.0 |
0.13 |
634577.0 |
0.21 |
65060.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
Common Fisheries Policy
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
76000.0 |
0.242 |
2008169.0 |
0.25 |
0.63 |
7320.0 |
0.371 |
168552.0 |
0.527 |
8035.0 |
0.407 |
107505.0 |
0.519 |
26082.0 |
0.227 |
266998.0 |
0.382 |
63908.0 |
0.22 |
329685.0 |
0.386 |
5031888.0 |
0.034 |
95678.0 |
0.122 |
63535.0 |
0.266 |
276772.0 |
0.15 |
0.289 |
4587535.0 |
0.52 |
7083.0 |
0.201 |
64312.0 |
0.012 |
302376.0 |
0.106992 |
76243.4 |
0.0252 |
617826.0 |
0.126 |
489616.0 |
0.1722 |
74168.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit other |
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
AR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Improving |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description parameter |
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Sea sandeel stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North Sea and Eastern Channel herring stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been met.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Sea and Eastern Channel herring stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the stock of roundnose grenadier in the Channel, Celtic Sea, West Scotland and Féringian waters is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the roundnose grenadier stock in the Channel, Celtic Sea, West Scotland and Féringian waters is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the North Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea sea bass stock is in a critical situation with a spawning biomass far below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of the F parameter show that the North Sea cod stock is being exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Sea cod stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Celtic Sea cod stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Celtic cod stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North Sea and West Scotland haddock stock is being exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning stock biomass of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Celtic haddock stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Celtic haddock stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of the F parameter show that the North Sea and Eastern Channel stock of whiting is being exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Sea and Eastern Channel whiting stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Celtic Sea Whiting stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Celtic Sea Whiting stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Northern hake stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the northern hake stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2016 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North-East Atlantic blue whiting stock is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered as not being reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2017. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Northeast Atlantic blue whiting stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the blue ling stock is exploited in a sustainable way (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this evaluation is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the blue ling stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Eastern Channel plaice stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Eastern Channel plaice stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the saithe stock is being exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been met.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the saithe stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2013 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Northeast Atlantic blue shark stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the mackerel stock (Norwegian Sea to Bay of Biscay) is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the mackerel stock (Norwegian Sea to Bay of Biscay) is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Eastern Channel sole stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Eastern Channel sole stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North Sea sole stock is being fished sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Sea sole stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Northeast Atlantic spurdog stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been met.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Northeast Atlantic spurdog stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2013 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North Atlantic albacore tuna stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2013. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Atlantic albacore stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2013 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean) is being exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2013. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean) is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in an age class caught by fishing in a year (2015 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the western stock of horse mackerel is exploited in a sustainable manner (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2016. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the western stock of horse mackerel is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to be not reached.
|
Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2011 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the North Atlantic swordfish stock is exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been met.
|
The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2011. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the North Atlantic swordfish stock is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger).The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Description criteria |
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the sandeel stock in the North Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the herring stock in the North Sea and Eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the herring stock in the North Sea and Eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the stock of roundnose grenadier in the Channel, Celtic Sea, West Scotland and Féringian waters.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the stock of roundnose grenadier in the Channel, Celtic Sea, West Scotland and Féringian waters.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the sea bass stock in the North Sea, English Channel and Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the cod stock in the North Sea and Eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the cod stock in the North Sea and eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with respect to the cod stock in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with respect to the cod stock in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the stock of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the stock of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the stock of haddock in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the stock of haddock in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the stock of whiting in the North Sea and eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the stock of whiting in the North Sea and eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the stock of whiting in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the stock of whiting in the Celtic Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the Northern hake stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the Northern hake stock.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the North-East Atlantic blue whiting stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the West of Scotland to Celtic Sea blue ling stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the West of Scotland to Celtic Sea blue ling stock.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the stock of plaice in the Eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to plaice stock in the Eastern Channel.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the saithe stock in the North Sea and West Scotland.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the saithe stock in the North Sea and West Scotland.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with respect to the blue shark stock in the north-east Atlantic.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the mackerel stock from the Norwegian Sea to the Bay of Biscay.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the mackerel stock from the Norwegian Sea to the Bay of Biscay.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the Eastern Channel sole stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the Eastern Channel sole stock.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the sole stock in the North Sea.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the sole stock in the North Sea.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the spurdog stock in the north-east Atlantic.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition in relation to the spurdog stock in the north-east Atlantic.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the North Atlantic albacore tuna stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the North Atlantic albacore tuna stock.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with respect to the western horse mackerel stock.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with respect to the western horse mackerel stock.
|
Criterion D3C1 is in good condition vis-à-vis the swordfish stock in the North Atlantic.
|
Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the North Atlantic swordfish stock.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the North Sea sandeel stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 have not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the North Sea sandeel stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 have not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the North Sea sandeel stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 have not been assessed.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the stock of sea bass in the North Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea is in a critical situation with a spawning biomass far below the reference value (D3C2) and a fishing mortality which is certainly too high (no reference point). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the stock of sea bass in the North Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea is in a critical situation with a spawning biomass far below the reference value (D3C2) and a fishing mortality which is certainly too high (no reference point). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the stock of sea bass in the North Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea is in a critical situation with a spawning biomass far below the reference value (D3C2) and a fishing mortality which is certainly too high (no reference point). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea cod stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea cod stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea cod stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic Sea cod stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that its spawning biomass is in poor condition (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic Sea cod stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that its spawning biomass is in poor condition (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic Sea cod stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that its spawning biomass is in poor condition (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the stock of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the stock of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the stock of haddock in the North Sea and West Scotland is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic haddock stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic haddock stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Celtic haddock stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea whiting stock is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea whiting stock is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Sea whiting stock is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Northeast Atlantic blue whiting stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Northeast Atlantic blue whiting stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Northeast Atlantic blue whiting stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
Note that the code of the additional element is a national code due to the absence of an official repository.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the blue shark stock is exploited in a sustainable manner. However, criterion D3C2 could not be assessed, which makes it impossible to conclude on the overall state of the stock. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the blue shark stock is exploited in a sustainable manner. However, criterion D3C2 could not be assessed, which makes it impossible to conclude on the overall state of the stock. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the blue shark stock is exploited in a sustainable manner. However, criterion D3C2 could not be assessed, which makes it impossible to conclude on the overall state of the stock. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the mackerel stock (Norwegian Sea to Bay of Biscay) is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the mackerel stock (Norwegian Sea to Bay of Biscay) is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the mackerel stock (Norwegian Sea to Bay of Biscay) is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) but that the spawning biomass is above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Eastern Channel sole stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Eastern Channel sole stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Eastern Channel sole stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 was not assessed.
|
The only species of elasmobranchs that has been quantitatively assessed is the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, from the north-east Atlantic. This species does not achieve good ecological status because, despite fishing mortality below the reference value (D3C1), the biomass remains insufficient (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The only species of elasmobranchs that has been quantitatively assessed is the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, from the north-east Atlantic. This species does not achieve good ecological status because, despite fishing mortality below the reference value (D3C1), the biomass remains insufficient (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The only species of elasmobranchs that has been quantitatively assessed is the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias, from the north-east Atlantic. This species does not achieve good ecological status because, despite fishing mortality below the reference value (D3C1), the biomass remains insufficient (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Atlantic albacore stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Atlantic albacore stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the North Atlantic albacore stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). The D3C3 criterion has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed; note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed; note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is sustainably exploited (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed; note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the western stock of horse mackerel is exploited in a sustainable manner (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the western stock of horse mackerel is exploited in a sustainable manner (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the western stock of horse mackerel is exploited in a sustainable manner (D3C1) but the biomass remains below the reference values (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed.
|
The evaluation of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is exploited in a sustainable way (D3C1) and presents a fertile biomass higher than the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been evaluated. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The evaluation of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is exploited in a sustainable way (D3C1) and presents a fertile biomass higher than the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been evaluated. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
The evaluation of this stock is based on the evaluation of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 and shows that it is exploited in a sustainable way (D3C1) and presents a fertile biomass higher than the reference value (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been evaluated. Note that the code for the additional element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
|
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
|
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
Proportion of populations in good status |
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 85 stocks considered in the Channel-North Sea marine sub-region, 26 stocks (30%) have been assessed quantitatively: 13 stocks are assessed to be in good condition and 13 stocks are assessed to be in poor condition. The remaining 59 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Of the 85 stocks considered, only 15% of stocks were assessed as being in good condition. Compared to the EI 2012, the number of fish stocks assessed quantitatively has increased for this assessment from 9 to 26 stocks in the case of the ChannelNorth Sea marine sub-region. Furthermore, the results obtained over the last 10 years show that conditions are improving for many of the stocks assessed.
|
Assessments period |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
2011-2017 |
Related pressures |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |