Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D3 / France / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
Member State | France |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire |
Report date | 2020-02-19 |
Report access | ART9_GES_FR_2019-12-12.xml |
GES component |
D3
|
D3C1
|
D3C2
|
D3C3
|
3.3.2
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
||
Features |
|
|
|
||
GES description |
The populations of all commercially exploited fish and crustaceans are within safe biological limits, with a population distribution by age and size that reflects the good health of the stock (Directive 2008/56/EC).
|
The fishing mortality rate on populations of commercially exploited species shall be equal to or less than the level that would produce the maximum sustainable yield. Appropriate scientific bodies shall be consulted in accordance with Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 (Decision 2017/848/EU).
|
The spawning stock biomass of commercially exploited populations of species is above the level that would allow the maximum sustainable yield to be achieved. Appropriate scientific bodies shall be consulted in accordance with Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 (Decision 2017/848/EU).
|
||
Determination date |
201910 |
201910 |
201910 |
||
Update type |
New determination |
New determination |
New determination |
||
Justification for non-use of criterion |
|||||
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |
According to ICES, the GES assessment of fisheries resources is based only on stocks for which maximum sustainable yield (MSY) can be calculated (ICES. 2016). In the case of the stocks of sea bass and sandeel, there is no reference point for the fishing mortality rate, so criterion D3C1 could not be filled in for these stocks. For the blue shark stock, there is no reference point for the spawning stock biomass, so the D3C2 criterion could not be filled in for this stock. Criterion D3C3 could not be filled for any stocks during this evaluation. The methodological standards for the D3C1 and D3C2 criteria for these stocks, as well as the D3C3 criterion for all stocks of commercial species, will be specified following further studies, as provided for in Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
|
According to ICES recommendations, the assessment of good environmental status of fisheries resources should be based only on stocks that have primary indicators, i.e. stocks for which reference points (maximum sustainable yield) can be calculated (ICES. 2016). In the case of the stocks of sea bass and sandeel, there is no reference point for the fishing mortality rate allowing the maximum sustainable yield. Therefore, criterion D3C1 could not be provided for these stocks for this assessment. The methodological standards relating to the D3C1 criterion for sea bass and sandeel stocks will therefore be specified following additional studies, as provided for in Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
|
According to ICES recommendations, the assessment of good environmental status of fisheries resources should be based only on stocks that have primary indicators, i.e. stocks for which reference points (maximum sustainable yield) can be calculated (ICES. 2016). In the case of the blue shark stock, there is no reference point for the spawning stock biomass allowing maximum sustainable yield. Therefore, criterion D3C2 could not be reported for the blue shark stock for this assessment. The methodological standards relating to criterion D3C2 for the blue shark stock will therefore be specified following further studies, as provided for in Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
|
Criterion D3C3 could not be filled in for any commercial species stocks in this assessment. Indeed, ICES was mandated to evaluate the indicators proposed for criterion D3C3 and concluded that they were not operational for the GES 2018 evaluation. It advises not to use them until the reference points are developed (ICES, 2016). For example, ICES recommended that the GES assessment of commercial species be based solely on the indicators of criteria D3C1 and D3C2. However, D3C3 can be considered as a monitoring criterion in case the indicators would detect any deterioration of the status of the stock. The methodological standards for the D3C3 criterion for stocks of commercial species will be further developed following further studies, as foreseen in the Ministerial Order 2019 on the definition of good environmental status of marine waters.
|