MS/Art10/2018/D1-B/France/Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Member State report / Art10 / 2018 / D1-B / France / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D1 Birds
Member State	France
Region/subregion	Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Reported by	Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date	2020-02-19
Report access	ART10_TARGETS_FR_2019-12-12.xml

Simplified table

Target code	D01-OM-OE01	D01-OM-OE02	D01-OM-OE03	D01-OM-OE04	D01-OM-OE04	D01-OM-OE05	D01-OM-OE06	D01-OM-OE06	D01-OM-OE06	OE_MO_gen_A	OE_MO_gen_C	OE_MO_gen_E	OE_MO_gen_G
Target description	Reduce incidental catches of seabirds* (off shore and near colonies), and in particular reduce the incidental catches of the most vulnerable species such as Balearic Shearwaters, Yelkouan Shearwaters and Ash Shearwaters by longlines, set nets and small pelagic seines * cf. seabird species listed in the GES Decision	Prevent collisions of seabirds with offshore infrastructure, including wind farms (application of the avoid, reduce, compensate sequence)	Avoid loss of functional habitats for seabirds, in particular in marine areas where the density is maximum Cf seabird species listed in the GES Decision	Reduce the pressure exerted by certain introduced and domestic species on seabird breeding sites* * Cf seabird species listed in the GES Decision	Reduce the pressure exerted by certain introduced and domestic species on seabird breeding sites* * Cf seabird species listed in the GES Decision	Maintain or restore functional seabird habitats* in coastal wetlands The map of functional seabird habitats will be drawn up as part of the Facade Strategic Document (Document Strategique de Facade) action plan * cf. seabird species listed in the GES Decision.	Limit the physical, noise and light disturbance of seabirds* at the level of their functional habitat areas * Cf. seabird species listed in the GES Decision.	Limit the physical, noise and light disturbance of seabirds* at the level of their functional habitat areas * Cf. seabird species listed in the GES Decision.	Limit the physical, noise and light disturbance of seabirds* at the level of their functional habitat areas * Cf. seabird species listed in the GES Decision.	Maintaining or restoring biodiversity and the functioning of coastal fund ecosystems (medio, infra and circalittoral)	Maintaining the fishery resources of the Gulf of Lion and coastal areas	Ensuring the hosting potentials of the marine environment for birds: Power supply, rest, reproduction, deplacements	Reducing the input and presence of waste in marine waters (coastal, macro-waste, micro particles)
Feature(s)	Benthic-feeding birds Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Pelagic-feeding birds Surface-feeding birds	All birds Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)	All birds All physical pressures Ecosystems, including food webs Pelagic habitats	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Pelagic-feeding birds Surface-feeding birds	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Pelagic-feeding birds Surface-feeding birds	All physical pressures Benthic-feeding birds Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Grazing birds Other benthic habitats Wading birds	All birds Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat)	All birds Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat)	All birds Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat)	Benthic habitats Circalittoral coarse sediment Circalittoral mixed sediment Circalittoral mud Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef Circalittoral sand Coastal fish Demersal shelf fish Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mixed sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand Littoral rock and biogenic reef Littoral sediment Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment Offshore circalittoral mud Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic reef Offshore circalittoral sand Other benthic habitats Pelagic habitats Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	All fish Coastal fish Demersal shelf fish Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Other benthic habitats Pelagic shelf fish	All birds Benthic-feeding birds Grazing birds Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat) Pelagic-feeding birds Surface-feeding birds Wading birds	All birds All mammals Benthic habitats Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Pelagic habitats Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed Turtles
GES components	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1-B	D1 D3 D4 D6 D7	D1 D3 D4	D1 D11 D4 D6	D1 D10 D4 D6
Timescale	202612	202612	202612	202612	202612	202612	202612	202612	202612	202012	202012	202012	202012
Update date	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909	201909
Update type	New target	New target	New target	New target	New target	New target	New target	New target	New target	Target no longer needed	Target no longer needed	Target no longer needed	Target no longer needed
Marine reporting unit	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO	MWE-FR-MS-MO
Element	Species (range)	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats	Habitats		Commercial stocks	Habitat types	Marine litter
Element 2
Parameter	Other	Other	Extent	Other	Other	Extent	Extent	Other	Other	Other	BIOM-SSB	Other	Mass
Parameter - other	Ratio	Ratio		Ratio	Ratio			Ratio	Ratio	Structure and functioning of ecosystems		Potential for reception
Target value		100.0
Value achieved - upper
Value achieved - lower
Value unit		percentage							percentage
Value unit - other
Target status	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved	Target not yet achieved
Assessment period	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2015-2021	2012-2018	2012-2018	2012-2018	2012-2018
Target assessment description	target: Defined, concerted and adopted on the façade simultaneously with the action plan of the Facade Strategic Document (Document Stratégique de Façade) and the mapping of functional habitats.	target: 100% of projects authorised as of the adoption of the seafront strategy	Target: No increase in the artificial surface following the application of the "avoid-reduce-compensate" sequence" * from the adoption of the seafront strategy. * In application of article L163-1 of the Environmental Code provides for an absence of net loss of biodiversity, after application of the "avoid-reduce-compensate" sequence	target: Defined, concerted and adopted at the same time as the Maritime Basin Strategic Document (Document Stratégique de Façade) action plan.	target: Significant decrease	target: Defined, concerted and adopted on the façade simultaneously with the action plan of the Facade Strategic Document (Document Stratégique de Façade) and the mapping of functional habitats.	target: Defined and concerted on the façade as part of measure M003, and adopted at the same time as the Facade Strategic Document (Document Stategique de Facade) action plan.	Target: Decrease with respect to the values that will be calculated starting in 2018 on sites applying the protocol developed by the association Natural Reserves of France.	target: No high-stake or major colony	The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.	The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.	The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.	The environmental objective is abandoned as it does not correspond to the definition of an environmental target for the second cycle. It is too general, it is not intended to reduce a clearly identified pressure and does not have an indicator enabling it to be assessed.
Related indicator	Proportion des surfaces de zone de densité maximale à risque pour lesquelles des mesures d'évitement ou de réduction des captures accidentelles sont prévues	Taux de parcs éoliens autorisés présentant un dispositif d'évaluation et, le cas échéant, de réduction du niveau de pression de collision sur les populations d’espèces fréquentant le parc éolien. Taux de projets autorisés dont l'étude d'impact, après application de la séquence ERC, évalue l'impact résiduel sur les oiseaux marins comme compatible avec l’atteinte du bon état écologique de chaque espèce fréquentant la zone du projet évalué, au niveau de la (les) façade(s) marine(s) concernée(s) par chacune de ces espèces	Pourcentage de surface d'estran artificialisé et pourcentage de linéaire artificialisé par site fonctionnel à enjeu fort* *Les sites à enjeux forts sont définis comme ceux remplissant les critères RAMSAR d'importance internationale ou accueillant plus de 15% de l'effectif national	Proportion de colonies insulaires d'oiseaux marins nicheurs à enjeu fort* pour lesquelles les espèces introduites et domestiques représentent une pression avérée. *Les sites à enjeux forts sont définis comme ceux remplissant les critères RAMSAR d'importance internationale ou accueillant plus de 15% de l'effectif national	Proportion de colonies continentales d'oiseaux marins nicheurs à enjeu fort* pour lesquelles les espèces introduites et domestiques représentent une pression avérée *Les sites à enjeux forts sont définis comme ceux remplissant les critères RAMSAR d'importance internationale ou accueillant plus de 15% de l'effectif national	Nombre et surface de sites fonctionnels restaurés sur la façade Surface d'habitat fonctionnel des oiseaux marins dans les zones humides des communes littorales	Surface de zones fonctionnelles des oiseaux de l'estran situées dans des zones de protection forte	Pourcentage de recouvrement des activités anthropiques de toute nature sur les zones (et les périodes) fonctionnelles des limicoles côtiers	Proportion de colonies à enjeu fort ou majeur* selon le travail de classification de l’AFB de priorisation des enjeux pour lesquels les dérangements physiques, sonores et lumineux constituent un risque pour le maintien à terme
Related measures