Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D10 / France / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | France |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea |
| Report date | 2026-01-19 09:44:27 |
SRM MO (MWE-FR-MS-MO)
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
D10
|
Feature |
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Micro-litter in the environment
|
Litter and micro-litter in species
|
Species
|
Element |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Chemicals |
Chemicals |
Chemicals |
Cloth/textile |
Cloth/textile |
Cloth/textile |
Food waste |
Food waste |
Food waste |
Glass/ceramics |
Glass/ceramics |
Glass/ceramics |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Macrolitter (all) |
Metal |
Metal |
Metal |
Paper/cardboard |
Paper/cardboard |
Paper/cardboard |
Processed/worked wood |
Processed/worked wood |
Processed/worked wood |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Rubber |
Undefined |
Undefined |
Undefined |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Artificial polymer materials |
Microlitter |
Microlitter |
Microlitter |
Artificial polymer materials |
|
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Element 2 |
Fishing gear
|
Fishing gear
|
Fishing gear
|
Single-use plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
Single-use plastics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
|
Criterion |
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C2
|
D10C3
|
|
Parameter |
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Amount on coastline
|
Amount on seabed
|
Amount on water surface
|
Unknown
|
|
Threshold value upper |
20.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
Trend in total waste densities over the assessment period
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
MSFD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
688.0 |
433.54 |
38.42 |
12.0 |
24.61 |
0.01 |
243.0 |
324.69 |
1.59 |
13.5 |
18.19 |
49.75 |
36.61 |
672.0 |
510.21 |
39.33 |
20.25 |
7.3 |
0.03 |
4.75 |
4.95 |
0.26 |
5.0 |
2.84 |
0.22 |
7.5 |
3.59 |
0.03 |
3.18 |
0.38 |
88164.14 |
88164.14 |
|||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
items/100m
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
number of items per square kilometre
|
||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Parameter achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
No |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description parameter |
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 688 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 87.2% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité sur les fonds marins"" est calculé à partir des opérations de chalutage réalisées à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de déchets pour la catégorie de déchets considérée. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. Cependant, en l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue. Par ailleurs, une tendance non significative à la baisse de la densité moyenne de déchets sur la période d'évaluation a été identifiée.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a non-significant upward trend in average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 12 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 1.5% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité sur les fonds marins"" est calculé à partir des opérations de chalutage réalisées à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de déchets pour la catégorie de déchets considérée. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. Cependant, en l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue. Par ailleurs, une tendance significative à la baisse de la densité moyenne de déchets sur la période d'évaluation a été identifiée.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a non-significant upward trend in average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 243 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 30.5% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité sur les fonds marins"" est calculé à partir des opérations de chalutage réalisées à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de déchets pour la catégorie de déchets considérée. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. Cependant, en l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue. Par ailleurs, une tendance significative à la baisse de la densité moyenne de déchets sur la période d'évaluation a été identifiée.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown. Furthermore, a significant upward trend in the average waste density over the assessment period has been identified.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. Aucun déchet de cette catégorie n'a été retrouvé sur les plages. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 13.5 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 1.7% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. Aucun déchet de cette catégorie n'a été retrouvé sur les plages. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 49.75 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 6.3% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, toutes catégories confondues, par 100 mètre de plage, en réunissant tous les suivis à l'échelle de la SRM sur la période de 2018 à 2020. Cette abondance médiane de déchets est de 672 unités/100m. Un fort niveau de pollution est observé avec cependant une distribution hétérogène de cette pollution. Les abondances médianes des déchets à l'échelle des sites sont comprises entre 132 unités/100 m et 2285 unités/100 m, et l'abondance médiane des sites est de 797 unités/100 m.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité sur les fonds marins"" est calculé à partir des opérations de chalutage réalisées à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de déchets, toutes catégories de déchets confondues. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. De plus, une tendance non significative à la baisse de la densité moyenne de déchets totaux sur la période d'évaluation a été identifiée. Par conséquent, d'après le seuil qualitatif, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité à la surface"" est calculé à partir de l'observation des déchets flottants réalisée à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de déchets, toutes catégories de déchets confondues. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des legs réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. De plus, une tendance non significative à la hausse de la densité moyenne de déchets totaux sur la période d'évaluation a été identifiée. Par conséquent, d'après le seuil qualitatif, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 20.25 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 2.6% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 4.75 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 0.6% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 5 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 0.6% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. L'abondance médiane des déchets de cette catégorie à l'échelle des sites est de 7.5 unités/100 m, ce qui représente 1% de la pollution totale. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
A l'échelle de la SRM MO, 69 suivis répartis sur 6 sites de surveillance ont été réalisés. Le paramètre ""Quantité sur le littoral"" représente une abondance médiane de déchets, pour la catégorie considérée, par 100 mètre de plage, intégrée à l'échelle de la SRM. La valeur rapportée est donc l'abondance médiane des abondances médianes de chaque site de surveillance sur la période de 2018 à 2020. Aucun déchet de cette catégorie n'a été retrouvé sur les plages. En l'absence de seuil, l'atteinte du paramètre est inconnue.
|
The parameter ‘Quantity on the seabed’ shall be calculated from trawling operations carried out on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all the traits over the evaluation period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The parameter ‘Area quantity’ is calculated from the observation of floating waste on board vessels during fishing trips. The reported value is the average waste density for the category of waste considered. This takes into account all legacies made during the assessment period, i.e. from 2015 to 2020. However, in the absence of a threshold, the attainment of the parameter is unknown.
|
The indicator ‘micro-litter buried in coastal sediments’ does not appear to be relevant because the levels of pollution detected are very low and do not reflect the levels of pollution generally observed on the coast. It therefore appears necessary to develop the protocol in order to better quantify and characterise the pollution of the coastline by microplastics.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing microplastics in the seabed, the achievement of the parameter was not assessed for this cycle.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité à la surface"" est calculé à partir de l'observation des micro-plastiques flottants via des filets Manta réalisée à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de micro-plastiques. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. Sur cette période, le calcul de la tendance n'est pas pertinent, l'atteinte du paramètre est donc inconnue.
|
The indicator ‘micro-litter buried in coastal sediments’ does not appear to be relevant because the levels of pollution detected are very low and do not reflect the levels of pollution generally observed on the coast. It therefore appears necessary to develop the protocol in order to better quantify and characterise pollution of the coastline by micro-litter.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing micro-litter in the seabed, the achievement of the parameter was not assessed for this cycle.
|
Le paramètre ""Quantité à la surface"" est calculé à partir de l'observation des micro-déchets flottants via des filets Manta réalisée à bord des navires lors des campagnes halieutiques. La valeur rapportée est la densité moyenne de micro-déchets. Celle-ci prend en compte l'ensemble des traits réalisés sur la période d'évaluation, soit de 2015 à 2020. Sur cette période, le calcul de la tendance n'est pas pertinent, l'atteinte du paramètre est donc inconnue.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing biota waste, no parameters were assessed for this cycle.
|
|
Related indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Criteria status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description criteria |
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The status of criterion D10C1, relating to litter (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C1, relating to waste (excluding micro-litter) in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coast and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The status of criterion D10C2, relating to micro-litter in the environment, is indicated by 3 indicators which assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method, the status of criterion D10C3, relating to ingested waste and micro-waste, was not assessed in cycle 3.
|
|
Element status |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Description element |
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of plastic (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of fishing gear (subcategory of artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of single-use plastic (subcategory artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess this category of waste respectively on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of chemicals in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of textiles and natural fibres in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of food waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of glass and ceramics in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of waste. The ecological status of macro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess macro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of metal in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of paper and cardboard in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of processed or processed wood in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of rubber in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste not defined in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of microplastics (artificial polymeric materials) in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess this category of waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
This item covers all categories of micro-waste. The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. Pending the definition of rules for the integration of these indicators, each indicator shall be assessed independently.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing marine animal ingested litter and micro-litter, this element was not assessed in Round 3.
|
In the absence of a consensual and operational method for assessing the adverse effects of litter and micro-litter on marine species and habitats, no evidence was assessed in the 3 cycle.
|
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Integration rule type parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The environmental status of waste in the environment is defined by 3 indicators which assess waste on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
The ecological status of micro-litter in the environment is defined by 3 indicators that assess micro-litter on the surface, on the coastline and on the seabed respectively. In the absence of a parameter/criterion integration method, each indicator is assessed independently.
|
||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
Proportion of litter categories in good status |
||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Not assessed |
Description overall status |
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of an element/attribute integration method, the achievement of the EEB is unknown at the attribute scale.
|
In the absence of a consensual assessment method, the macro- and micro-litter ingested by marine animals could not be assessed for this cycle.
|
In the absence of a consensual assessment method, the adverse effects of waste on species could not be assessed for this cycle. Furthermore, the assessment of the achievement of good environmental status is not required at the level of this attribute (Decision (EU) 2017/848). Thus, no integration is carried out.
|
Assessments period |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
2015-2020 |
||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |