MS/Art8/2018/D3/France/Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D3 / France / Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D3 Commercial fish and shellfish
Member State	France
Region/subregion	Mediterranean: Western Mediterranean Sea
Reported by	Ministère de la transition Ecologique et Solidaire
Report date	2020-02-19
Report access	ART8_GES_FR_2020-02-17.xml

SRM MO (MWE-FR-MS-MO)

Simplified table

GES component	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3	D3
Feature	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
Element	Anguilla anguilla	Anguilla anguilla	Anguilla anguilla	Engraulis encrasicolus	Engraulis encrasicolus	Engraulis encrasicolus	Merluccius merluccius	Merluccius merluccius	Merluccius merluccius	Mullus barbatus	Mullus barbatus	Mullus barbatus	Sardina pilchardus	Sardina pilchardus	Sardina pilchardus	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius
Element code	126281	126281	126281	126426	126426	126426	126484	126484	126484	293632	293632	293632	126421	126421	126421	127026	127026	127026	127029	127029	127029	127094	127094	127094
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element 2	European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range	European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range	European eel (Anguilla anguilla) throughout its natural range	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Gulf of Lion	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus alalunga	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Thunnus thynnus	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius	Xiphias gladius
Element 2 code	ele.2737.nea	ele.2737.nea	ele.2737.nea	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	GSA07	ALB-M	ALB-M	ALB-M	BFT-E	BFT-E	BFT-E	SWO-M	SWO-M	SWO-M
Element 2 code source	ICES	ICES	ICES	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element source	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National	National
Criterion	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3	D3C1	D3C2	D3C3
Parameter					BIOM-SSB		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)			Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)									Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB		Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)	BIOM-SSB
Parameter other
Threshold value upper					22889.0		0.15			0.35									0.07	556600.0		0.24	47600.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source					General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean		General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean			General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean									International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas		International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas	International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper					22740.0		1.92			1.13									0.0252	617826.0		0.4368	12852.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit					tonne		Other			Other									Other	tonne		Other	tonne
Value unit other							AR			AR									AR			AR
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend					Stable		Improving			Deteriorating									Deteriorating	Improving		Deteriorating	Stable
Parameter achieved					No		No			No									Yes	Yes		No	No
Description parameter					The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2015. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Gulf of Lion anchovy stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.		Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2014 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Gulf of Lion hake stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.			Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2014 for this assessment). The results of the F parameter show that the Gulf of Lion red mullet stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to be not met.									Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2013 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean) is being exploited sustainably (F ≤ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.	The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2013. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock (Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean) is above the reference value (SSB ≥ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered to have been reached.		Fishing mortality (F) is a measure of fishing pressure and corresponds to the proportion of the number of fish in a year class caught by fishing in a year (2013 for this assessment). The results of parameter F show that the Mediterranean swordfish stock is exploited beyond the maximum sustainable yield (F ≥ FMSY). The parameter is therefore considered as not reached for this stock.	The annual Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) is calculated from global quantitative or analytical models. The SSB used for this assessment is that obtained for the year 2013. The results of the SSB parameter show that the spawning biomass of the Mediterranean swordfish stock is in poor condition, below the reference value (SSB ≤ MSY-Btrigger). The parameter is therefore considered not to have been reached.
Related indicator					Biomasse du stock reproducteur		Taux de mortalité par pêche			Taux de mortalité par pêche									Taux de mortalité par pêche	Biomasse du stock reproducteur		Taux de mortalité par pêche	Biomasse du stock reproducteur
Criteria status	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Not assessed	Not good	Not good	Not assessed
Description criteria					Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the anchovy stock in the Gulf of Lion.		Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with respect to the Gulf of Lion hake stock.			Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with respect to the red mullet stock in the Gulf of Lion.									Criterion D3C1 is in good condition with regard to the Atlantic and Mediterranean bluefin tuna stock.	Criterion D3C2 is in good condition with regard to the Atlantic and Mediterranean bluefin tuna stock.		Criterion D3C1 is in poor condition with regard to the Mediterranean swordfish stock.	Criterion D3C2 is in poor condition with regard to the Mediterranean swordfish stock.
Element status	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element				The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the Gulf of Lion anchovy stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the Gulf of Lion anchovy stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C2 shows that the spawning biomass status of the Gulf of Lion anchovy stock is poor (D3C2). Criteria D3C1 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the state of the Gulf of Lion hake stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the state of the Gulf of Lion hake stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the state of the Gulf of Lion hake stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is taken from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the status of the Gulf of Lion red mullet stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the status of the Gulf of Lion red mullet stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	The assessment of criterion D3C1 shows that the status of the Gulf of Lion red mullet stock is being exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield. Criteria D3C2 and D3C3 were not assessed. It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).	It should be noted that the code for the additional element comes from the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (http://www.fao.org/gfcm).				The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). It should be noted that the code for the element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).	The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). It should be noted that the code for the element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).	The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Atlantic bluefin tuna stock is exploited sustainably (D3C1) and has a spawning biomass above the reference value (D3C2). It should be noted that the code for the element comes from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).	The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Mediterranean swordfish stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).	The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Mediterranean swordfish stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).	The assessment of criteria D3C1 and D3C2 shows that the Mediterranean swordfish stock is exploited beyond maximum sustainable yield (D3C1) and that the state of its spawning biomass is poor (D3C2). Criterion D3C3 has not been assessed. Note that the code for the additional element is from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT: https://www.iccat.int/fr/index.asp).
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.	The evaluation obtained by calculating the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, for a given stock, without an integration rule.
Integration rule type criteria	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO	OOAO
Integration rule description criteria	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.	The condition of the stock is evaluated by integrating the evaluations of criterion D3C1 and/or criterion D3C2 obtained for this stock. The integration method used is the "One Out All Out" (OOAO) method. This means that all criteria assessed must be within values describing maximum sustainable yield.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00	13.00
GES extent unit	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status	Proportion of populations in good status
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks	The assessment of descriptor 3 is carried out at the level of individual stocks of commercial species without aggregating the results at the scale of the marine sub-region. In accordance with ICES recommendation, this assessment considers for each stock the fishing mortality (D3C1) and the spawning stock biomass (D3C2), on the sole condition that reference points can be calculated. However, the age and size distribution criterion (D3C3) is not assessed. Achieving good status is based on the objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, which is to achieve maximum sustainable yield for each stock. Of the 8 stocks considered in the Western Mediterranean Marine Sub-Region (i.e. for which scientific expertise has been provided), 5 stocks (63%) have been assessed quantitatively: 1 stock is assessed to be in good status and 4 stocks are assessed to be in poor status. The other 3 stoks could not be assessed in this cycle. Compared to IA 2012, the number of fish stocks quantitatively assessed in this marine subregion has changed little for this assessment, from 4 to 5 assessed stocks. In addition, the results obtained over the past 10 years show that conditions are improving for several of the assessed stocks
Assessments period	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016
Related pressures
Related targets