Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-F / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia |
| Report date | 2014-09-04; 2020-10-15 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name |
|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme |
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
| Q4e - Programme ID | |
| Q4f - Programme description | |
| Q5e - Natural variability | |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | |
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | |
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity |
| Q6c - Target updating | |
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | |
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | |
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |
| Q7a - Relevant activities | |
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | |
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures |
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | |
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes | |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | |
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
| Q9a - Elements | |
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
| Q41 Spatial scope | |
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | |
| Marine Unit IDs | |
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | |
| Q9c - Monitoring method | |
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |
| Q9e - Quality assurance | |
| Q9f - Quality control | |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples |
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | |
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency |
| Q10d - Description of data access | |
Descriptor |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) approach considers human activities as an integral part of the ecosystem. Main drivers for changes in costal fish biodiversity are human pressures via eutrophication (mainly contribution from agriculture and rivers), aquaculture escapes, fishery and infrastructure interventions in the coastal zone (mainly for tourism purposes). As a pressure of these activities, specific fish indicator species were identified, while their abundance and biomass were used for assessment of impact. Responses include measures against habitat modifications and sustainable fisheries management. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Gaps and plans |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
During implementation phase, some issues are recognised as weak points: namely missing relevant data for determination of criteria D1C1 and D1C5. Established sampling plan with defined stations and frequencies probably won’t be sufficient to complete these issues. Thus, additional effort must be invested to find the most appropriate way to obtain relevant data and / or new methods to determine these criteria. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Related measures |
|||||||||
Coverage of measures |
|||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
MADHR-D01-04 |
Programme name |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme description |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Fish community: Fish biodiversity is assessed through the state of fish communities, since fish as top predators are crucial for supporting the structure of the community, the food-web and the marine ecosystem as a whole. Changes in the fish community are driven by climate but are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fishing. The proposed indicators aim to discriminate change in the fish community in Croatian waters due to human pressure from those caused by natural variability (in time and space). Survey sites are present along the eastern Adriatic coast encompassing the open and coastal waters. Selected sites at coastal waters reflect areas under various anthropogenic pressures. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|||||||||
Monitoring details |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
For pelagic fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: twice a year (in summer and winter period)
For coastal fish: twice a year (in summer and autumn period)
For pelagic fish: Kvarner and Kvarneric Area, middle adriatic islands with transect toward open sea
For demersal and cartilaginous fish: open central Adriatic- Jabuka Pit Area
For coastal fish: Mali Lošinj, Senj, Pag Island, Dugi Otok, Šibenik, Split, Island Vis, Dubrovnik Areas |
Features |
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Coastal fish
|
Demersal shelf fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C3 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
|||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
Monitoring frequency |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
2-yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Quality control |
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
Data management |
|||||||||
Data access |
|||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|||||||||
Contact |
|||||||||
References |