Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D4 / Croatia / Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
| Member State | Croatia |
| Region/subregion | Mediterranean: Adriatic Sea |
| Reported by | Institute for Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia |
| Report date | 2014-09-04; 2020-10-15 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name |
|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme |
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
| Q4e - Programme ID | |
| Q4f - Programme description | |
| Q5e - Natural variability | |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | |
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | |
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity |
| Q6c - Target updating | |
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | |
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | |
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |
| Q7a - Relevant activities | |
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | |
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures |
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | |
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes | |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | |
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
| Q9a - Elements | |
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
| Q41 Spatial scope | |
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | |
| Marine Unit IDs | |
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | |
| Q9c - Monitoring method | |
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |
| Q9e - Quality assurance | |
| Q9f - Quality control | |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples |
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | |
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency |
| Q10d - Description of data access | |
Descriptor |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
D4/D1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Descriptor 4 address structural and functional changes in the food web according to main pressures including climatic variations and changes and anthropogenic impacts (eutrophication, pollution, alien species, fisheries). Primary (D4C1; D4C2) and secondary (D4C3; D4C4) criteria are applied to different trophic guilds using two indicators: (1) values are within natural range (NatRang) and (2) existence of trend (Trend). |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Important difficulty is the lack of understanding the ecosystem consequences of the structural and functional changes in the food web, or the value that society should attribute to it. Indicators require further elaboration to become operational (definition of thresholds or limit reference points). In this moment two indicators (NatRang and Trend) are subject to an expert assessment. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related measures |
|||||||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
|||||||||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D01-05 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
MADHR-D03-02 |
Programme name |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Pelagic habitats - community characteristics |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, maerl, seaweed) |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Programme description |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Plankton (microscopic plants and animals) play a fundamental role in the marine food web. Planktonic species generally have short life cycles and respond quickly to environmental changes and thus require spatially and temporally denser monitoring than species with longer life span and slower reproduction. Apart from the variations dependent on prevailing natural conditions and climate change, plankton communities are also impacted by human pressures, such as eutrophication, introduction of non-indigenous species and fisheries. The proposed indicators (biodiversity-based and stock-based) aim to discriminate changes in the plankton communities of the Croatian Adriatic due to human pressure from those caused by natural spatial-temporal variability. Sampling sites along the eastern Adriatic coast encompass open and coastal waters, with coastal sites reflecting areas under anthropogenic pressures. The samples collected will provide information on community composition and species abundances. Monitoring of plankton communities contributes to demonstrating the achievement of GES in the pelagic habitat, reflecting not only on the plankton but also on other species and habitats. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring of commercially exploited species of pelagic fish - sardines and anchovies, will be sampled on a monthly basis throughout the year. Samples will be collected from commercial fishing vessels, which fish with the purse seine nets in the fishing zones A, B, E and G. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
|||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Frequency:
Phytoplankton: Profiles of middle and northern Adriatic minimal 10 times a year. Lim, Bakar, ZOI 7 times a year.
The rest 4 times a year
Zooplankton:
minimum 2 x per year |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Estimation of the population biomass of both sardines and anchovies inhabiting the entire Adriatic Sea (GSA17, GSA18) is done once a year within the competent scientific institutions such as GFCM and / or STECF together with all participants in Adriatic. |
Features |
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
|
Other pelagic habitats
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Eutrophication
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
Coastal ecosystems
|
Shelf ecosystems
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C6 |
D4C1 |
D4C1 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D4C4 |
D4C4 |
D5C3 |
D3C1 |
D3C2 |
D3C3 |
D4C2 |
D4C2 |
D4C3 |
D4C3 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
Abundance/Biomass, species composition |
Species composition |
Species composition |
||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
Monitoring frequency |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Roger Harris, Peter Wiebe, Jürgen Lenz, Hein Rune Skjoldal and Mark Huntley. 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual
Utermöhl, von H. 1931. Neue Wege in der quantitativen Erfassung des Planktons. (Mit besondere Beriicksichtigung des Ultraplanktons). Verh. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 5, 567–595.
Marie, D., Partensky, F., Jacquet, S., Vaulot, D., (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural
populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl. Environ. Microb., 63, 186-193.
Marie, D., Brussaard, C., Partensky, F., Vaulot, D. 1999. Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton,
bacteria and viruses. In Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 11.11.1- 11.11.15.
Fuhrman, J.A., Azam, F. (1982) Thymidine incorporation as a measure of heterotrophic bacterioplankton production in marine surface waters: evaluation and field results. Mar. Biol., 66, 109-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00397184
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar,.G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013. https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Sampling procedure has been described in Marasovic I., Krstulovic, N., Leder, N., Loncar, G., Precali, R., Šolic, M., Loncar, G., Beg- Paklar, G., Bojanic, N., Cvitkovic, I., Dadic, V., Despalatovic, M., Dulcic, J., Grbec, B., Kušpilic, G., Nincevic-Gladan, Ž., P. Tutman, Ujevic, I., Vrgoc, N., Vukadin, P., Žuljevic, A. Coastal cities water pollution control project, Part C1: Monitoring and Observation System for Ongoing Assessment of the Adriatic sea under the Adriatic sea Monitoring Programme, Phase II. Interim report (IR), December, 2013.
https://jadran.izor.hr/jadranski_projekt_2/MJERNE-METODE-I-OPREMA.pdf |
Quality control |
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
As used in the reported monitoring method.
|
Data management |
|||||||||||||||
Data access |
|||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Contact |
|||||||||||||||
References |