Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D1-M / Ireland / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas |
| Reported by | Member State |
| Report date | 2013-04-30; 2021-12-08 |
| Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
| Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name |
|---|---|
| Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme |
| Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
| Q4e - Programme ID | |
| Q4f - Programme description | |
| Q5e - Natural variability | |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity |
| Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | |
| Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | |
| Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target |
| Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods |
| Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity |
| Q6c - Target updating | |
| Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | |
| Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | |
| Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |
| Q7a - Relevant activities | |
| Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | |
| Q7c - Relevant measures | |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures |
| Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures |
| Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |
| Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | |
| Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes | |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID |
| Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID |
| Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name |
| Q4k - Monitoring purpose | |
| Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
| Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
| Q9a - Elements | |
| Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
| Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
| Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
| Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
| Q41 Spatial scope | |
| Q4j - Description of spatial scope | |
| Marine Unit IDs | |
| Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date |
| Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | |
| Q9c - Monitoring method | |
| Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |
| Q9e - Quality assurance | |
| Q9f - Quality control | |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % |
| Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples |
| Q9i - Description of sample representivity | |
| Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available |
| Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency |
| Q10d - Description of data access | |
Descriptor |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
Programme name |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme description |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Monitoring details |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
Features |
Species affected by incidental by-catch
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Species affected by incidental by-catch
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
|
Species affected by incidental by-catch
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
|
Species affected by incidental by-catch
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
Benthic-feeding birds
|
Grazing birds
|
Pelagic-feeding birds
|
Surface-feeding birds
|
Wading birds
|
Coastal fish
|
Pelagic shelf fish
|
Baleen whales
|
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans
|
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Turtles
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D1C1 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C2 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C4 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
D1C5 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Quality control |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
Data management |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
Data access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
References |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |