Art8-2024

Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D6 / Ireland / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art8
Report due	2024-10-15
GES Descriptor	D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State	Ireland
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
Report date	2026-04-09 13:40:20

ACS-IE-MS-016

Simplified table

Regional assessment area	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea		physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea
Component MRUs
GES component	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6
Feature	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Element	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD
Criterion	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5		D6C2	D6C1
Parameter	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition		Extent of physical disturbance	Extent of physical loss
Threshold value upper	25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=
Threshold qualitative	L+M=46.03%; U+Z=53.90%; H=.05% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=26.66%; U+Z=72.90%; H=.33% - Status=Unknown ; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=80.45%; U+Z=17.85%; H=1.14% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=80.01%; U+Z=9.65%; H=9.71% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=79.80%; U+Z=19.43%; H=.27% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=47.21%; U+Z=40.24%; H=.26% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=33.34%; U+Z=33.08%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=23.49%; U+Z=52.16%; H=.49% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=39.49%; U+Z=19.77%; H=1.29% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=76.22%; U+Z=14.24%; H=.00% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=82.86%; U+Z=.41%; H=16.73% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=94.11%; U+Z=.00%; H=5.89% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=26.17%; U+Z=.06%; H=73.78% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=53.79%; U+Z=38.65%; H=7.56% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=80.18%; U+Z=1.96%; H=17.86% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=4.15%; U+Z=.01%; H=95.84% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=4.60%; U+Z=3.88%; H=91.52% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit		percentage						percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value		2.0						2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0
Proportion value achieved		1.0411						1.4681			1.9268			0.7284			0.4148			0.1789			0.7193			0.9974			0.1281			0.7487			0.0012			0.1206			1.2595			0.1132						0.0002
Proportion threshold value unit		% area of habitat adversely affected						% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Stable
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown		Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes		No	Yes
Description parameter	H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.
Related indicator	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024		ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good		ContributeToOtherAssessment	ContributeToOtherAssessment
Description criteria
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	Not applicable	OSPAR	National
Reporting method feature	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Not applicable	Type B1	Type D
Trend feature	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Stable
Integration rule type parameter																																																					SPATIAL	THRES
Integration rule description parameter																																																					The integration used is as per the OSPAR Indicator (BH3) for the Extent of Physical Disturbance to Benthic Habitats from Fisheries with mobile bottom-contacting gears to assess disturbance to the seafloor.	Sealed loss is less than 2%.
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold																																																					75.00	98.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not relevant	GES achieved by 2012
Description overall status	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Inner may have 78% of its area in GES and 16% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures other habitats are adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level.
Assessments period
Related pressures	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-2-MRU016 IE-D6T2-3-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	D6T4-MRU016 D6T5-MRU016 IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-1-MRU016 IE-D6T2-4-MRU016 IE-D6T2-5-MRU016 IE-D6T2-6-MRU016 IE-D6T2-MRU016	IE-D6T1-MRU016	IE-D6T1-1-MRU016 IE-D6T1-MRU016
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False

ACS-IE-MS-019

Simplified table

Regional assessment area	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea		physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea
Component MRUs
GES component	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6
Feature	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Element	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral coarse sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mixed sediment	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral mud	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Circalittoral sand	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral coarse sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mixed sediment	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral mud	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Infralittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD
Criterion	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5		D6C2	D6C1
Parameter	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition		Extent of physical disturbance	Extent of physical loss
Threshold value upper	25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=
Threshold qualitative	L+M=82.35%; U+Z=15.55%; H=1.04% - Status=Yes; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=18.44%; U+Z=80.48%; H=.93% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=83.47%; U+Z=16.07%; H=.42% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=35.95%; U+Z=61.38%; H=2.52% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=59.06%; U+Z=40.76%; H=.05% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=33.49%; U+Z=60.19%; H=.05% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=7.89%; U+Z=81.64%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=44.06%; U+Z=47.78%; H=.04% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=13.36%; U+Z=66.99%; H=.24% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=35.22%; U+Z=45.07%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=45.66%; U+Z=54.22%; H=.12% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=61.20%; U+Z=38.79%; H=.01% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=55.81%; U+Z=.45%; H=43.75% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=49.94%; U+Z=49.22%; H=.84% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=80.25%; U+Z=17.58%; H=2.17% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=4.48%; U+Z=.00%; H=95.52% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=18.46%; U+Z=.48%; H=81.06% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit		percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value		2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0			2.0
Proportion value achieved		0.238			1.266			0.588			0.124			0.871			1.029			2.426			4.553			0.432			1.753			0.201			0.002			0.083			0.003			1.542
Proportion threshold value unit		% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown		Unknown	Stable
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	No	Yes	Unknown	No	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	No		Yes		No	Yes
Description parameter	H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.
Related indicator	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024		ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good		ContributeToOtherAssessment	ContributeToOtherAssessment
Description criteria
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good
Description element
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	Not applicable	OSPAR	National
Reporting method feature	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Not applicable	Type B1	Type D
Trend feature	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Stable
Integration rule type parameter																																																					SPATIAL	SPATIAL
Integration rule description parameter																																																					The integration used is as per the OSPAR Indicator (BH3) for the Extent of Physical Disturbance to Benthic Habitats from Fisheries with mobile bottom-contacting gears to assess disturbance to the seafloor. Ireland has achieved Good Environmental Status when the extent of habitat disturbance due to anthropogenic pressures is less than 25% of the spatial extent of each Benthic Broad Habitat Type. Benthic Broad Habitats are integrated together and GES is achieved when the total loss of all BBHT is less then 25% of the entire MRU.	Sealed loss is less than 2%. Ireland has achieved Good Environmental Status when the amount of (sealed) loss from anthropogenic pressures does not exceed 2% of each Benthic Broad Habitat Type. Benthic Broad Habitats are integrated together and GES is achieved when the total loss of all BBHT is less then 2% of the entire MRU.
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold																																																					75.00	98.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	Not relevant	GES achieved by 2012
Description overall status	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Inner may have 53% of its area in GES, 11% not in GES. While concurrently 32.5 % is unknown and 3% is not assessed.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures other habitats are adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level.
Assessments period
Related pressures	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-2-MRU019 IE-D6T2-3-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	D6T4-MRU019 D6T5-MRU019 IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019 IE-D6T2-4-MRU016 IE-D6T2-5-MRU019 IE-D6T2-6-MRU019 IE-D6T2-MRU019	IE-D6T1-MRU019	IE-D6T1-1-MRU019 IE-D6T1-MRU019
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False

ACS-IE-MS-020

Simplified table

Regional assessment area	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea		physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Northern Celtic Sea
Component MRUs
GES component	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6
Feature	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Element	Abyssal	Abyssal	Abyssal	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment	Lower bathyal sediment	Lower bathyal sediment	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD
Criterion	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5		D6C2	D6C1
Parameter	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition		Extent of physical disturbance	Extent of physical loss
Threshold value upper	25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=
Threshold qualitative	L+M=2.47%; U+Z=97.42%; H=.13% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=.00%; U+Z=100.00%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=7.00%; U+Z=92.95%; H=.05% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=.00%; U+Z=96.63%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=68.36%; U+Z=26.99%; H=4.65% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=51.35%; U+Z=47.78%; H=.87% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=67.36%; U+Z=27.87%; H=4.77% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=47.74%; U+Z=17.75%; H=34.51% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=28.43%; U+Z=68.82%; H=2.75% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=21.87%; U+Z=25.92%; H=52.21% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=34.23%; U+Z=41.25%; H=24.52% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.
Threshold value source				OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit		percentage						percentage						percentage						percentage									percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value		2.0						2.0						2.0						2.0									2.0			2.0
Proportion value achieved		0.0001						0.0006						0.0026						0.001									0.0054			0.0021
Proportion threshold value unit		% area of habitat adversely affected						% area of habitat adversely affected						% area of habitat adversely affected						% area of habitat adversely affected									% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Stable
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown		Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No		Yes	Unknown		Yes	No	Yes	No	Unknown	Yes	Yes		No	Yes
Description parameter	H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.
Related indicator	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024		ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good		ContributeToOtherAssessment	ContributeToOtherAssessment
Description criteria
Element status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good
Description element
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	Not applicable	OSPAR	National
Reporting method feature	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Not applicable	Type B1	Type D
Trend feature	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Stable
Integration rule type parameter																																			SPATIAL	THRES
Integration rule description parameter																																			The integration used is as per the OSPAR Indicator (BH3) for the Extent of Physical Disturbance to Benthic Habitats from Fisheries with mobile bottom-contacting gears to assess disturbance to the seafloor.	Sealed loss is less than 2%.
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold																																			75.00	98.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not relevant	GES achieved by 2012
Description overall status	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea North Outer may have 84% of its area in GES and 15% not in GES.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures other habitats are adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level.
Assessments period
Related pressures	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-2-MRU020 IE-D6T2-3-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	D6T4-MRU020 D6T5-MRU020 IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-1-MRU020 IE-D6T2-4-MRU020 IE-D6T2-5-MRU020 IE-D6T2-6-MRU020 IE-D6T2-MRU020	IE-D6T1-MRU020	IE-D6T1-1-MRU020 IE-D6T1-MRU020
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False

ACS-IE-MS-021

Simplified table

Regional assessment area	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea	physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea		physical-disturb-fisheries-bottom-contact-qsr23-ospar-Southern Celtic Sea
Component MRUs
GES component	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6	D6
Feature	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Element	Abyssal	Abyssal	Abyssal	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Lower bathyal sediment or lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral mud	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Offshore circalittoral sand	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef	Upper bathyal sediment or upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Element extent
Trend element
Element 2
Element source	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD	HD; National; OSPAR; WaterFD
Criterion	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5	D6C3	D6C4	D6C5		D6C2	D6C1
Parameter	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent		Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition	Extent	Extent of physical loss	Habitat condition		Extent of physical disturbance	Extent of physical loss
Threshold value upper	25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0			25.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold value operator	<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=			<=
Threshold qualitative	L+M=.81%; U+Z=50.52%; H=.00% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=15.81%; U+Z=84.14%; H=.05% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=98.10%; U+Z=.00%; H=2.06% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=1.94%; U+Z=17.71%; H=80.35% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=39.85%; U+Z=41.43%; H=18.72% - Status=Unknown; Confidence=Low		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=66.65%; U+Z=33.35%; H=.00% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=12.12%; U+Z=8.13%; H=79.75% - Status=NO; Confidence=High Confidence		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.	L+M=53.28%; U+Z=30.76%; H=15.96% - Status=YES; Confidence=Moderate		Good Status (ParameterAchieved=Yes) is achieved when the extent of adverse effects in any particular Benthic Broad Habitat type is less than 25% of the habitat extent, of which no more than 2% is habitat loss. The quality indicator for adverse effects is not yet agreed upon at EU level, so the HD and WFD state based assessments, and the pressure indicators (BH3) developed through OSPAR for benthic habitats are used.
Threshold value source	OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention			OSPAR Convention
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit		percentage			percentage									percentage						percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value		2.0			2.0									2.0						2.0			2.0
Proportion value achieved		0.0001			0.0004									0.0003									0.0005
Proportion threshold value unit		% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected									% area of habitat adversely affected						% area of habitat adversely affected			% area of habitat adversely affected
Trend parameter	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown		Unknown	Stable
Parameter achieved	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes		Yes	No		No	Unknown	Yes	Yes	Yes		Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes		No	Yes
Description parameter	H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.			H=high disturbance; M=medium disturbance; L=Low disturbance; U=Unassessed; Z=No VMS data. If H > 25% then the BBHT is not in GES with HIGH confidence. If % of M+L >= U+Z, and H<25%, then Parameter is Achieved with MODERATE confidence. If U+Z >= M+L, and H<25%, then it is unknown with LOW confidence.
Related indicator	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024		ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024	ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-BenthHabCondition2024		ASC-IE-PhysDist2024	ASC-IE-PhysLoss2024
Criteria status	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Good	Not good	Good	Good	Good		ContributeToOtherAssessment	ContributeToOtherAssessment
Description criteria
Element status	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Good
Description element
Source assessment feature	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	Not applicable	OSPAR	National
Reporting method feature	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Type B1	Not applicable	Type B1	Type D
Trend feature	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Stable
Integration rule type parameter																										SPATIAL	THRES
Integration rule description parameter																										The integration used is as per the OSPAR Indicator (BH3) for the Extent of Physical Disturbance to Benthic Habitats from Fisheries with mobile bottom-contacting gears to assess disturbance to the seafloor.	Sealed loss is less than 2%.
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold																										75.00	98.00
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of habitats in good status	Proportion of area in good status	Proportion of area in good status
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Not assessed	Not relevant	GES achieved by 2012
Description overall status	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures a habitat is adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level. A qualitative assessment of habitat state based on pressure data and habitat type is described in the text report. The pressure data indicates that the Celtic Sea South Outer may have 70% of its area in GES and 5% not in GES. Concurrently the remainder of the area is considered unknown.	The quality indicator necessary to define at what level or as a result of what combination of pressures other habitats are adversely affected is not yet agreed at an EU level.
Assessments period
Related pressures	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-2-MRU021 IE-D6T2-3-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	D6T4-MRU021 D6T5-MRU021 IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-1-MRU021 IE-D6T2-4-MRU021 IE-D6T2-5-MRU021 IE-D6T2-6-MRU021 IE-D6T2-MRU021	IE-D6T1-MRU021	IE-D6T1-1-MRU021 IE-D6T1-MRU021
Test TV	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Test results	Correct	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	Correct	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False	False