Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D8 / Ireland / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D8 Contaminants |
Member State | Ireland |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas |
Reported by | Member State |
Report date | 2013-04-30; 2021-12-08 |
Report access |
2014 data
2020 data
Monitoring programme | Monitoring programme name |
---|---|
Monitoring programme | Reference existing programme |
Monitoring programme | Marine Unit ID |
Q4e - Programme ID | |
Q4f - Programme description | |
Q5e - Natural variability | |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate data |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Established methods |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES |
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES | Q5d - Adequate capacity |
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment | |
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment | |
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment | |
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Environmental target |
Q6a -Relevant targets | Q6a - Associated indicator |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_SuitableData |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6b_EstablishedMethods |
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets | Q6d_AdequateCapacity |
Q6c - Target updating | |
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment | |
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment | |
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment | |
Q7a - Relevant activities | |
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities | |
Q7c - Relevant measures | |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate data |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Established methods |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Adequate capacity |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures |
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures | Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures |
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures | |
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures | |
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes | |
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme ID |
Reference sub-programme | Sub-programme name |
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme ID |
Q4g - Sub-programmes | Sub-programme name |
Q4k - Monitoring purpose | |
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions | |
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Habitats |
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Species list |
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Physical/Chemical features |
Q5c - Features | Q5c - Pressures |
Q9a - Elements | |
Q5a - GES criteria | Relevant GES criteria |
Q5b - GES indicators | Relevant GES indicators |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species distribution |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population size |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species population characteristics |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Species impacts |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat distribution |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat extent |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (physical-chemical) |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat condition (biological) |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) | Habitat impacts |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure input |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) | Pressure output |
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) | Activity |
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) | Other |
Q41 Spatial scope | |
Q4j - Description of spatial scope | |
Marine Unit IDs | |
Q4h - Temporal scope | Start date- End date |
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling | |
Q9c - Monitoring method | |
Q9d - Description of alteration to method | |
Q9e - Quality assurance | |
Q9f - Quality control | |
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - Proportion of area covered % |
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling | Q9g - No. of samples |
Q9i - Description of sample representivity | |
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data | |
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data | |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data type |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access mechanism |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data access rights |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - INSPIRE standard |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c Date data are available |
Q10c - Access to monitoring data | Q10c - Data update frequency |
Q10d - Description of data access | |
Descriptor |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitoring strategy description |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Ireland has five monitoring programmes aimed at monitoring pollution status, trends and
pollution effects in the marine environment. These programmes monitor the amount of
contaminants in the water column, in the sediment, and in shellfish (mussels and oysters), the
impact of tributyltin (TBT) on dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus) populations, the inputs of
contaminants into the marine area from rivers and from the atmosphere and acute pollution
events.
Monitoring of contaminants in water, sediment and biota is undertaken using a risk-based
approach in terms of substance selection and spatial cover. As the main sources of hazardous
substance to the marine environment are land-based (through direct, riverine and airborne
inputs), and most sea-based activities of relevance are more concentrated in inshore areas (e.g.
shipping convergence around ports), monitoring is focused in transitional and coastal waters.
Ireland assesses the status of the marine environment against the two primary criteria and one
of the secondary criterion set out in the Commission Decision: concentration of contaminants,
acute pollution events and biological effects respectively. Monitoring of substance
concentrations in the marine environment is undertaken by the Irish Marine Institute through
a combined approach, in accordance with the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the
OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP). These programmes
follow internationally agreed monitoring and assessment protocols and cover a range of target
substances in biota (shellfish), sediments and water, and specifically those EC priority
substances deemed most relevant to the Irish Marine Environment. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
D8C1 Metals in Shellfish - Assessment criteria are only available for a limited set of metals
in shellfish. The derivation of EACs would enhance assessments. Food safety thresholds for some metals are utilised as upper thresholds by OSPAR but continued collaborative efforts is required to establish common threshold values for contaminants. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for mercury in fish and OSPAR assessment criteria. The potential
impact of cumulative effects of combinations of contaminants is unknown.
D8C1 PAH in Shellfish - Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) are available for a
limited set of parent PAHs only. Therefore, continued collaborative efforts at OSPAR to
establish common threshold values for contaminants and their effects. The derivation of
EACs for alkylated PAHs in shellfish would enhance assessments. Monitoring under this
indicator is for shellfish in coastal waters only where primary risk occurs. Other approaches are needed for offshore monitoring. The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 PBDE in Shellfish - Where there is no OSPAR EAC, a Canadian FEQG is utilised in lieu of this. There is an inconsistency with the WFD EQSbiota for PBDEs in fish, which
needs to be resolved. The WFD EQSbiota is very conservative and presents analytical
challenges. This is not currently applied in OSPAR assessments. The potential impact of
cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown. D8C1 WFD - The potential impact of cumulative effects of contaminants is unknown and not considered as part of individual EQS assessments. For some substances, the available analytical capability is not sufficiently sensitive to enable
assessment of compliance. Revised EQS and additional EQS, including new EQSbiota,
will be applied for assessment of 2016-2021 cycle (Directive 2013/39). Some of these EQS
are lower than those in Directive 2008/105/EC. D8C2 - There is potential concern about the potential for environmental harm associated with the substitute chemicals, such as copper based paints used to replace tributyltin (TBT) in antifouling paints. TBT present in historically contaminated sediments could be remobilised and enter the water column. D8C3 - The extent and volume of detected spills is not calculated.The Coast Guard has recently developed a new Standard Operating Procedure for recording pollution events. This will allow for the collection of data on the volume and extent of future spills. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D05-08 |
ACS-IE-D08-01 |
ACS-IE-D08-01 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-02 |
ACS-IE-D08-03 |
ACS-IE-D08-04 |
Programme name |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
OSPAR CEMP for Eutrophication, CAMP and RID |
Water Framework Directive Priority substances and other relevant pollutants in transitional and coastal waters |
Water Framework Directive Priority substances and other relevant pollutants in transitional and coastal waters |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP for Concentrations of hazardous substances in biota, sediment and water |
OSPAR CEMP - Biological effects of organotins |
Acute Pollution Events |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Programme description |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
The OSPAR CEMP provides a basis for all contracting parties to OSPAR to assess and determine eutrophication of their marine areas . The programme incorporates guidance on monitoring, quality assurance and assessment tools. It brings together data from a number of different national and regional sources to assess nutrient inputs to the marine environment and eutrophication over the common OSPAR area. This guidance is regularly reviewed to ensure the inclusion of new developments in terms of monitoring parameters and tools, such as modelling. The OSPAR CEMP encompasses three surveys that are combined into an assessment of eutrophication status. |
Concentrations of Priority Substance and other relevant pollutants are sampled and analysed
by the Marine Institute. Sampling is undertaken in transitional and coastal water including
protected shellfish waters in line with a risk based approach. Assessments are undertaken over
a six year period. |
Concentrations of Priority Substance and other relevant pollutants are sampled and analysed
by the Marine Institute. Sampling is undertaken in transitional and coastal water including
protected shellfish waters in line with a risk based approach. Assessments are undertaken over
a six year period. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
Hazardous substance concentrations monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's Coordinated
Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP monitoring
work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the sources and
pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine environment.
Through the OSPAR programme, the trends and status of contaminants at monitoring stations
around Ireland are assessed. |
The level of imposex related to TBT, has been monitored
Article 17 Update of Ireland’s Marine Strategy Part 2: Monitoring Programme
117 | P a g e
for over 30 years in Ireland; and is currently monitored every 6 years. The use of TBT in marine
paints has been phased out in Ireland and internationally through the 2001 International
Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships (AFS Convention), which
banned the application of TBT-based antifouling paints for use on ship hulls. The results of
this monitoring programme are also used as a seabed habitat indicator. TBT is additionally
monitored in sediments. |
Acute pollution events are monitored by the Irish Coast Guard (IRCG). The IRCG are also
responsible for the counter pollution activities at sea arising from spillages or loss of oil and
Hazardous Noxious Substances (HNS) which endanger the marine environment. A National
Maritime Oil and HNS Spill Contingency Plan (NMOSCP) was recently developed to
coordinate marine pollution preparedness and response. This includes a Standard Operating
Procedure for the Assessment and notification of a pollution incident and details the procedure
for recording marine pollution events. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Monitoring details |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Marine Institute – sampling and analytical methods
Annual winter nutrient sampling is carried out in January/February on board the RV Celtic Voyager for coastal surveys and on the RV Celtic Explorer for surveys across the shelf and the Rockall Trough. Over the last two decades, the sampling programme has evolved with coverage initially focusing on the Western Irish Sea but subsequently extending into the Celtic Sea. The current winter environmental programme includes sampling for dissolved inorganic nutrients around the entire Irish coast (coastal water focus) biennially, along with a number of offshore transects completed. Nutrients samples are also collected during Celtic Voyager hydrographic surveys along 53 Degrees N (shelf) and across the Rockall Trough. Actual winter sampling is highly weather dependent. Given the weather dependence and evolution of sampling approaches, caution must be exercised in comparing summary results from year to year for given areas.
Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
The OSPAR Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) consists of coastal atmospheric monitoring stations where monitoring data are estimated to represent marine atmospheric deposition conditions. Ireland has one atmospheric monitoring station reporting data under the OSPAR CAMP situated in Valentia (51º56' N 10º15' W). The monitoring protocol followed is in line with OSPAR CAMP principles. These data contribute to regional and sub-regional assessments as carried out via OSPAR. The data complement additional modelling-based estimates to give depositions for the North East Atlantic area.
Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID)
Riverine samples for physico-chemical parameters are taken monthly to align with the national Water Framework Directive monitoring programme. Samples are returned directly to the laboratory on the day of sampling or the following morning by courier and analysed within 24 hours of collection. Samples are analysed for nutrient concentrations (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) and metals (Cadmium, Mercury, lead Copper, Zinc) and PAH which are reported under Descriptor 8 (contaminants). Continuous monitoring data from hydrometric stations enables the determination of discharge flows from 19 of the largest Irish catchments. The loads of the different substances are calculated as the product of the flow-weighted annual mean concentration and the annual flow, in accordance with the RID principles (OSPAR 1998). |
Monitoring of contaminants is carried out in transitional and coastal waters, and also shellfish
waters, through the Water Framework Directive. Seawater collection and subsequent
laboratory analysis for target substances, is undertaken by the Marine Institute utilising a
combination of outsourced and in-house validated analytical methods in line with best practice. Chemical status is assessed for approximately 12 coastal and 30
transitional water bodies. WFD compliance is considered with Environmental Quality
Standards for priority substances and priority hazardous substances, the Environmental
Quality Standards (EQS) Directive (2013/39/EC) and national standards, where available. |
Monitoring of contaminants is carried out in transitional and coastal waters, and also shellfish
waters, through the Water Framework Directive. Seawater collection and subsequent
laboratory analysis for target substances, is undertaken by the Marine Institute utilising a
combination of outsourced and in-house validated analytical methods in line with best practice. Chemical status is assessed for approximately 12 coastal and 30
transitional water bodies. WFD compliance is considered with Environmental Quality
Standards for priority substances and priority hazardous substances, the Environmental
Quality Standards (EQS) Directive (2013/39/EC) and national standards, where available. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The Marine Institute monitors the concentrations of hazardous substances in biota (bivalve
molluscs) and sediment as part of the OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring
Programme of concentrations of hazardous substances. These include metals (cadmium, lead,
copper and zinc), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Polybrominated Diphenylethers
(PBDEs) and for assessment purposes other substances developed through the OSPAR
common indicator approaches (e.g Tributyltin TBT (see imposex below), plus Perfluorinated
compounds).Samples are collected in accordance with methodologies set out in relevant WFD and/or
OSAPR technical guidance documentation. |
The organotin concentrations and biological effects monitoring is carried out within OSPAR's
Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme (CEMP) (Agreement 2016-01). CEMP
monitoring work on hazardous substances comprises monitoring and assessment of the
sources and pathways of contaminants and their concentrations and effects in the marine
environment. CEMP component H-4 sets out monitoring of tributyl tin (TBT)-specific
biological effects and TBT in sediment or biota (Appendix H4). |
Monitoring for pollution events in Ireland’s maritime area is undertaken by the Irish Coast
Guard. This is carried out through an Aerial Surveillance Programme using specially equipped
aircraft and specialised personnel to detect spills of oil and other harmful substances. This
monitoring has been ongoing since 2014. The data recorded is reported to the Bonn Agreement
annually. |
Features |
Eutrophication
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Eutrophication
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Acute pollution events
|
Eutrophication
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Eutrophication
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Acute pollution events
|
|
Eutrophication
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Eutrophication
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Acute pollution events
|
|
Eutrophication
|
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition
|
Eutrophication
|
Eutrophication
|
Hydrographical changes
|
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events
|
Eutrophication
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Adverse effects on species or habitats
|
Acute pollution events
|
|
Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES criteria |
D5C1 |
D5C1 |
D5C2 |
D5C5 |
D7C1 |
D8C1 |
NotRelevan |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C1 |
D8C2 |
D8C3 |
Parameters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Other |
Deposition, Freshwater Input rates |
Deposition, freshwater input |
amount in biota |
||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2006-9999 |
2012-9999 |
2012-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1987-9999 |
2006-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
6-yearly |
As needed |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
McGovern et al., 2002: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/222
2016 WES Cruise Report: https://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/1154
EPA Status of Ireland’s Climate, 2012 Report: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/climate-change/ccrp-report-26.php
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP)
JAMP Guideline on methods and criteria for harmonised sampling and analysis of PAHs in air and precipitation
JAMP Guidelines for the sampling and analysis of mercury in air and precipitation
Guidance for the Comprehensive Atmospheric Monitoring Programme (CAMP) (Agreement 2015-04). |
Commission Directive 2009/90/EC |
Commission Directive 2009/90/EC |
||||||||
Quality control |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025, Quasimeme PT scheme, validated methods, SOPs, analytical quality control samples, e.g. CRMs
For the CAMP quality assurance the recommendation is to refer to the procedures within the QA/QC programme of EMEP. Information regarding the procedures for quality assurance of EMEP for precipitation, for air and for aerosol can be found at http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.htm |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all
laboratories used Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and
Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality
Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental
Monitoring in Europe for metals in seawater) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all
laboratories used Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and
Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality
Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental
Monitoring in Europe for metals in seawater) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
ISO 17025 Accreditation for laboratory testing for all laboratories used
Certified Reference Materials (CRMs), and Proficiency testing (including QUASIMEME- Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe) |
QUASIMEME - Quality Assurance of Information for Marine Environmental Monitoring in Europe |
NA
|
Data management |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
ICES database
OSPAR Database
EBAS Database
Data also held nationally in the Marine Institute Database |
Data is managed in the national Marine Institute SQL database - contaminants in water |
Data is managed in the national Marine Institute SQL database - contaminants in water |
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database
|
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database |
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database
|
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database |
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database |
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database |
Marine Institute SQL databases, Data reported to ICES DOME database |
Held in the Department of Transport Database
|
Data access |
|||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Garvan O’Donnell
garvan.odonnell@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Brendan McHugh
brendan.mchugh@marine.ie |
Sorcha Ni Longphuirt
sorcha.nilongphuirt@housing.gov.ie |
References |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
Marine Institute winter sampling: McGrath, T., Kivimäe, C., McGovern, E., Cave, R. R. and Joyce, E. (2013). Winter measurements of oceanic biogeochemical parameters in the Rockall Trough (2009–2012). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5(2): 375-383. 10.5194/essd-5-375-2013
RID: O'Boyle et al., 2016 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.23?refreqid=excelsior%3A20bf35d911276e7fc177949c7321ed61#metadata_info_tab_contents OSPAR, 1998 Principles of the Comprehensive Study on Riverine Inputs and Direct Discharges (RID).19985, OSPAR Commission, London. 18 pp
CAMP: https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/hazardous-substances/camp
OSPAR Common procedure for the assessment of Eutrophication : https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure
McGovern, E., Monaghan, E., Bloxham, M., Rowe, A., Duffy, C., Quinn, Á., McHugh, B., McMahon, T., Smyth, M., Naughton, M., McManus, M. and Nixon, E. (2002) Winter nutrient monitoring of the western Irish Sea – 1990–2000, Marine Environment and Health Series No. 4, 2002, Marine Institute: Dublin. |
N/A |
N/A |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H8 H9
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |
OSPAR CEMP Appendices Hazardous Substances H4
OSPAR annual CEMP assessments |