Member State report / Art8-2024 / 2024 / D9 / Ireland / NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art8 |
| Report due | 2024-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
| Member State | Ireland |
| Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Celtic Seas |
| Report date | 2026-04-09 13:40:20 |
ACS-IE-SD-022
Regional assessment area |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) |
Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) |
Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Bivalvia
|
Bivalvia
|
Crustacea; Bivalvia
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Ostrea edulis
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Bivalvia
|
Bivalvia
|
Mytilus spp
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Ostrea edulis
|
Mytilus spp
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Bivalvia
|
Osteichthyes, Bivalvia
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Ostrea edulis
|
Bivalvia
|
Bivalvia
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Crustacea; Bivalvia
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Osteichthyes
|
|||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
|||||||||||||||
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
1.0 |
6.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
5.0 |
3.5 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
3.573 |
0.001 |
0.36 |
3.571 |
0.049 |
0.25 |
0.59 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.09 |
4.447 |
2.678 |
0.939 |
17.49 |
0.177 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
0.034 |
0.001 |
0.02 |
0.31 |
0.031 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.009 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.197 |
0.377 |
0.189 |
0.372 |
0.162 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
89.47368421 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||||||||||||||||||
Description parameter |
Parameter status is met for Benzo(a)pyrene in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Cockle, Crassostrea gigas, Ensis siliqua, Mytilus spp and Ostrea edulis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Lophius piscatorius, Pollachius pollachius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Cockle, Ensis siliqua, and Mytilus Spp met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 89.4736842105263% of upperbound assessments in Ostrea edulis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mytilus spp met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Bivalvia, Cockle and Ensis siliqua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mytilus spp met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Ostrea edulis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mytilus speciesmet the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Cockle and Ensis siliqua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Ostrea edulis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Bivalvia met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mytilus spp met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Cockle Ensis siliqua and Ostrea edulis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in cuustacea and bivalves as > 90% of upperbound assessments in Cockle met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-022 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mytilus spp met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description criteria |
The status of Benzo(a)pyrene in Bivalvia in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Lead and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Mercury and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) in Bivalvia in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
||||||||||||||||||
Description element |
The status of Benzo(a)pyrene is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting PAH specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds in MRU ACS-IE-MS-022 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of PAHs (Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting PAH specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
Integration rule type criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
Description overall status |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
No |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
No |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Test results |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
False |
ACS-IE-SD-023
Regional assessment area |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component MRUs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES component |
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
D9
|
Feature |
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Contaminants - in seafood
|
Element |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) |
Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Lead and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Mercury and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) |
Element extent |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trend element |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 |
Bivalvia
|
Bivalvia
|
Clupea harengus
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mullus barbatus
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Raja clavata
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scyliorhinus canicula
|
Solea solea
|
Thunnus spp.
|
Clupea harengus
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Bivalvia
|
Clupea harengus
|
Gadus morhua
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mullus barbatus
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Raja clavata
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Scyliorhinus canicula
|
Solea solea
|
Clupea harengus
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis
|
Loligo vulgaris
|
Lophius piscatorius
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Micromesistius poutassou
|
Mullus barbatus
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Raja clavata
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Solea solea
|
Trachurus trachurus
|
Zeus faber
|
Bivalvia
|
Clupea harengus
|
Gadus morhua
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Nephrops norvegicus
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Clupea harengus
|
Dicentrarchus labrax
|
Gadus morhua
|
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
|
Merlangius merlangus
|
Merluccius merluccius
|
Mytilus edulis
|
Osteichthyes
|
Osteichthyes
|
Pleuronectes platessa
|
Scomber scombrus
|
Solea solea
|
||||||
Element source |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
EU |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
Foodstuffs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criterion |
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
||||||||||||||
Parameter |
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
CONC-B-Muscle
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
5.0 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value operator |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
<= |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
EU
|
EU
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
Regulation on contaminants in foodstuffs (EC 1881/2006)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
17.49 |
0.004 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.06 |
0.005 |
0.001 |
0.01 |
0.266 |
0.227 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.007 |
0.09 |
0.005 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
0.22 |
0.19 |
0.04 |
0.189 |
0.216 |
0.18 |
0.33 |
0.047 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
0.074 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.06 |
0.19 |
0.146 |
0.111 |
13.91 |
0.541 |
0.31 |
0.484 |
0.528 |
2.193 |
0.31 |
0.369 |
4.434 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.281 |
0.173 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.16 |
0.171 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
2.963 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.02 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
0.001 |
0.004 |
0.266 |
0.009 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.005 |
0.007 |
0.027 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.023 |
0.081 |
0.09 |
0.091 |
0.08 |
0.047 |
0.12 |
0.07 |
0.074 |
0.04 |
0.12 |
0.01 |
0.049 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.31 |
0.315 |
0.31 |
0.336 |
0.528 |
0.54 |
0.31 |
0.369 |
2.676 |
0.281 |
0.173 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.16 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
pg TEQ/g ww
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
90.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
% of samples achieving threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trend parameter |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
|||||||||||||||||||
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|||||||||||||||||||
Description parameter |
Parameter status is met for Benzo(a)pyrene in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as >90% of upperbound assessments in Bivalves met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Dicentrarchus labrax met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Melanogrammus aeglefinus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merlangius merlangus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merluccius merluccius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mullus barbatus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Nephrops norvegicus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 50% of upperbound assessments in Boarfish (Capros aper), fail to meet the 90% species specific threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 50% of upperbound assessments in Boarfish (Capros aper), Eutrigla gurnardus , Glyptocephalus cynoglossus, Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis, Limaa limaa , Littorina littorea, Loligo vulgaris, Lophius budegassa , Micromesistius poutassou ,Microstomus kitt , Molva molva , Pollachius virens, Psetta maxima, Raja montagui , Scophthalmus rhombus, Squalus acanthias , Trachurus trachurus , Trisopterus luscus and Zeus faber met the 90% species specific threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Pleuronectes platessa met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Raja clavata met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scomber scombrus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scyliorhinus canicula met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Solea solea met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Cadmium and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Thunnus alalunga met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Dicentrarchus labrax, Gadus morhua, Loligo vulgaris, Lophius budegassa, Lophius budegassa,Melanogrammus aeglefinus, Merluccius merluccius, Molva molva,Pleuronectes platessa, Pollachius pollachius, Scomber scombrus, Solea solea met the 90% threshold compliance critereon for species specific threholds. |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Melanogrammus aeglefinus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merlangius merlangus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merluccius merluccius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mullus barbatus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Nephrops norvegicus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Boarfish (Capros aper), Cockle, Dicentrarchus labrax, Eutrigla gurnardus , Glyptocephalus cynoglossus , Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis, Limaa limaa , Littorina littorea , Loligo vulgaris, Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius , Micromesistius poutassou , Microstomus kitt , Molva molva , Pollachius pollachius , Pollachius virens , Psetta maxima, Scophthalmus rhombus, Squalus acanthias, Thunnus alalunga, Trachurus trachurus , Trisopterus luscus and Zeus faber met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Pleuronectes platessa met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Raja clavata met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scomber scombrus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scyliorhinus canicula met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Lead and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Solea solea met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Dicentrarchus labrax met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Loligo vulgaris met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Lophius piscatorius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Melanogrammus aeglefinus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merlangius merlangus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merluccius merluccius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Micromesistius poutassou met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Mullus barbatus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Nephrops norvegicus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Boarfish, Eutrigla gurnardus, Limaa limaa , Lophius budegassa , Microstomus kitt , Molva molva , Pecten maximus, Phycis Phycis , Pollachius pollachius, Psetta maxima, Scophthalmus rhombus , Squalus acanthias, Thunnus alalunga, Trisopterus luscus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon for species specific thresholds. |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Pleuronectes platessa met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Raja clavata met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scomber scombrus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Solea solea met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Trachurus trachurus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Mercury and its compounds in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Zeus faber met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Melanogrammus aeglefinus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merlangius merlangus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merluccius merluccius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Nephrops norvegicus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Lophius piscatorius, Microstomus kitt and Thunnus alalunga met the 90% threshold compliance critereon. |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Pleuronectes platessa met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scomber scombrus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua, Merlangius merlangus, Melanogrammus aeglefinus , Merluccius merluccius, Lophius piscatorius, Pollachius pollachius, Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis and Thunnus alalunga met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Clupea harengus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Dicentrarchus labrax met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Gadus morhua met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Melanogrammus aeglefinus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merlangius merlangus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Merluccius merluccius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Loligo vulgaris, Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius, Molva molva,Pollachius pollachius met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Pleuronectes platessa met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Scomber scombrus met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
Parameter status is met for Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in MRU ASC-IE-SD-023 in seafood as 100% of upperbound assessments in Solea solea met the 90% threshold compliance critereon |
|||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description criteria |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Lead and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Mercury and its compounds in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
The status of Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives in Osteichthyes in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU thresholds. Trend status is Unknown. |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) in Osteichthyes, Crustacea, Bivalvia, Cephalopoda in MRU ACS-IE-MS-023 is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Trend status is Stable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description element |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Cadmium and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (12 PCB-DLs: 77,81,105,114,118,123,126,156,157,167,169,189) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Lead and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Mercury and its compounds is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives in Osteichthyes is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting PAH specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Not assessed |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds for cephalopods and crustacea as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
The status of Sum of dioxins (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is Good based on greater than 90% of assessments meeting species specific thresholds as per EU Reg. 1881/2006/EC. Element trend is Stable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source assessment feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting method feature |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Type D |
Trend feature |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Integration rule type parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Integration rule description parameter |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
At each sampling station substance concentrations in each matrix (water, biota and sediment) are compared against thresholds. If one matrix fails then the station fails for that specific substances (OOAO). A total of 90% or more stations must pass with no increasing trend in contaminants in shellfish for an MRU to be in GES for a substance. Integration rules for combining substance results have not been agreed at EU level and so feature results for each MRU are qualitative at this time. |
Integration rule type criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
90.00 |
GES extent achieved |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
99.80 |
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
GES achieved |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
GES achieved by 2012 |
Description overall status |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
The level of contaminants as measured in edible tissue to seafood caught or harvested in the wild in Irish waters (excluding fin-fish from aquaculture) are below the relevant regulatory limits in Commission Regulation 2023/915. |
Assessments period |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
2016-2021 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test TV |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Test results |
False |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
False |
False |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |
Correct |